Paul Rigby

New Video Appears to Show DC Police Units Planting a J6 Pipe Bomb August 16, 2024 | Sundance | 506 Comments One of the great mysteries about the January 6, 2021, events is the lack of curiosity by the FBI about who planted the pipe bombs at the DNC and RNC headquarters. Amid all of the available CCTV video and surveillance technology exploited by the justice department, their transparent unwillingness to identify the pipe bomber has always been a dog that did not bark. The Occam’s Razor explanation for why DC and federal law enforcement have been incurious, points to law enforcement actually planting the bombs. New CCTV video seems to show exactly that. Shortly after 12:51pm a DC police SUV appears next to the park bench where the pipe bomb was discovered. [Video Below] A man with a bag exits the SUV, points to the bench, pulls up his right coat collar to obscure his face from the camera located across the street, then walks to the bench with the bag. The “pipe bomb” device allegedly was found at 1:05 p.m. by a plainclothes officer from the Capitol Police. . Darren Beattie Reporting HERE – Julie Kelly Reporting HERE I am not going to repeat the reporting above, the timelines therein, or the granular details painstakingly outlined. The research is solid, informative and accurate. Instead, my focus is about “why” the pipe bombs were planted. Nancy Pelosi, Kevin McCarthy (House) along with Chuck Schumer, Mitch McConnell and Mike Pence (Senate) did not want the January 6th certification of electors challenged. If you suspect the 85 million votes for Joe Biden might have been manufactured (mail-in ballots), then you understand the DC motive to avoid any electoral challenge that might have resulted in state level legislative inquiry and/or vote counting review. To avoid the challenge to the electoral certification process, a lengthy and very formal process where the Senate must separate from the House as each state is formally questioned/challenged and a debate/vote on each state’s set of electors takes place (minimum 2 hours each state), an EMERGENCY process triggered by the House Speaker (Pelosi) was needed. That’s where the pipe bombs come into play. ♦ We have previously detailed the motives HERE. The J6 pipe bombs were the insurance policy, in the event the feds (Ray Epps et al) couldn’t get the crowd to comply with the FBI provocations. In essence, if no one stormed the Capitol, the finding of the two pipe bombs would have then been the emergency needed to stop the electoral process, evacuate congress and trigger the emergency session. Which explains why the FBI had/has no interest in the DC pipe bomb suspects. As it turned out, the DC crew (Pelosi et al) didn’t need the “pipe bomb emergency” because the manufactured riot (opening the doors to the Capitol building etc.) worked. The J6 emergency need was fulfilled by the “riot” within the Capitol building; the bomb narrative was not needed. Julie Kelly – […] Just as the first wave of protesters breached the building shortly after 2 p.m., congressional Republicans were poised to present evidence of rampant voting fraud in the 2020 presidential election. Ten incumbent and four newly-elected Republican senators planned to work with their House colleagues to demand the formation of an audit commission to investigate election “irregularities” in the 2020 election. Absent an audit, the group of senators, including Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) pledged to reject the Electoral College results from the disputed states. The Hail Mary effort was doomed to fail; yet the American people would have heard hours of debate related to provable election fraud over the course of the day. And no one opposed the effort more than ex-Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.). During a conference call on December 31, 2020, McConnell urged his Republican Senate colleagues to abandon plans to object to the certification, insisting his vote to certify the 2020 election results would be “the most consequential I have ever cast” in his 36-year Senate career. From the Senate floor on the afternoon of January 6, McConnell gave a dramatic speech warning of the dire consequences to the country should Republicans succeed in delaying the vote. He downplayed examples of voting fraud and even mocked the fact that Trump-appointed judges rejected election lawsuits. “The voters, the courts, and the States have all spoken,” McConnell insisted. “If we overrule them, it would damage our Republic forever. If this election were overturned by mere allegations from the losing side, our democracy would enter a death spiral.” Roughly six hours later, McConnell got his way. Cowed by the crowd of largely peaceful Americans allowed into the building by Capitol police, most Republican senators backed off the audit proposal. McConnell, echoing hyperbolic talking points about an “insurrection” seeded earlier in the day by Democratic lawmakers and the news media, gloated. “They tried to disrupt our democracy,” he declared on the Senate floor after Congress reconvened around 8 p.m. “This failed attempt to obstruct Congress, this failed insurrection, only underscores how crucial the task before us is for our Republic.” Congress officially certified the Electoral College results early the next day. (read more) That’s how the whole process happened. Everything around the J6 events was set up by a small group of Marxists within government who are intensely ideological and supported by systems of Law and Order they created, purposefully to control the outcomes of their manipulation. The group then used the J6 Committee to further the false narrative, manufacture additional false claims, control the information flow and present themselves as victims within an insurrection effort they manufactured out of whole cloth. The J6 Committee was to the J6 story, as Robert Mueller was to the Trump/Russia collusion story. The system controls the outcomes, hides the activity, and engineers false narratives (lies).

George Webb fleshes out Cheattle's "Continuity of Government" gaff: https://georgewebb.substack.com/p/the-cheney-sanction-how-trump-was

Kirk, You have my solemn promise that the moment I came across a worthwhile piece of work on the subject by anyone - be it a pink-haired, ethnic transgender amputee, an opioid-dependent deplorable in a string vest and denim, or, that rarest of things these days, a Deep State Dem with a scruple - I'll post it. Pip pip!

I think Trump's private security team - I'm assuming he possesses one, an assumption that well be unwarranted - need to have a look at its own advance party preparation people. There is much here that, at best, reeks of complacency, at worst, of complicity:

Too early to be sure beyond the obvious broad outlines. For example, the dramatis personae, the real players, are by no means clear:

So now we know – you haven’t viewed CBS-TV’s coverage on Monday evening, 25 November, and thus haven’t a clue what it contains. But you are prepared, nevertheless, to insist it did not contain any Zapruder film footage, however truncated on the grounds of taste. This is dismally typical of adherents of the Department of Zapruderland Security, where ignorance is knowledge and the recitation of establishment orthodoxy is preferred to critical examination of evidence. We have a further example of both. You cite Wrone, who, in his brief history of Z-fake dissemination post-Shaw trial, offers us a classic limited hang-out, conceding that there were, at bare minimum, hundreds of small public gatherings, most obviously and typically at colleges across the US, where the revised version was shown in the period 1969 to 1975. By this assessment alone, viewers of the film, pre-ABC’s broadcast, ran, even allowing for repeat viewers and Wrone’s low-side figures for such gatherings, into the hundreds of thousands. What Wrone withholds from his readers is even more significant - the television showings, from the first, on Los Angeles’ KTLA-TV 5pm news in mid-February 1969, through those on a late night Chicago show, which subsequently syndicated it to stations in Philadelphia, Detroit, Kansas City & St Louis (1970-71), to its broadcast on small TV stations such as WITF (Harrisburg, Pennsylvania), which ran the film in late September 1973. The reach of these TV broadcasts has never been fully catalogued and explored, yet you again “know,” presumably via a hidden super-power, that which you cannot. The available evidence is clear, even from the limited sample I’ve run across, much of it inadvertently, that Wrone’s pseudo-survey ignores the numbers of Americans who saw the revised version of the fake on local television prior to the film’s TV “debut” on a network in early March 1975. None of this should come as a surprise, for as Wayne Philips, Direct of Public-Affairs for Time-Life Inc., conceded as early as July 1971, “Life no longer has control over the film. It has been shown repeatedly throughout the country.” “Largely out of public view”? Phooey: it was all over the place.

There is a terrific podcast series called Ghost Stories at the End of the World. There's plenty on Gladio, not least as it manifested in Belgium. Check it out: https://player.fm/series/series-2643096

Opening 28 minutes or so provide an excellent overview of the bodycam evidence so far:

So a number of sources insist. It should therefore be a very straightforward matter for you to post a link to where you viewed CBS-TV's output from, let me be generous, say 8pm until close on the evening of Monday, 25 November 1963. You did check this claim before posting it, didn't you? After all, it's not unkown in this case for widely accepted "truths" to be nothing of the sort. As a fair-minded chap, I extend my request to anyone to post such a link. And I do so from a concern that readers may harbour the entirely unfounded suspicion that you're once again winging it, and making claims you haven't checked. And as for Life keeping the film "largely" hidden, I do like that adverb. I assume it means something akin to "a bit pregnant." That is, it means the opposite, certainly after the second version of the Z fake was shown on LA's KTLA-TV 5pm news on 14 February 1969, and thereafter popped up on local TV stations across the country, was displayed in lecture halls, and so on and so forth, until it "debuted" on ABC in March 1975. And that's to ignore Life's occasional flashes of Zapruder's ankles prior to February 1969.

A paragraph of surpassingly cynical disingenuousness. Remind us - when did mass ownership of affordable portable film cameras occur? In America, the wealthiest country on earth, the 1950s. So the period between the creation of the Z-fakes and the plausible utilization of mass film camera ownership as cover, was, at most generous, a decade. Within that decade, name me any other target for CIA assassination that merited remotely comparable efforts to obscure and mislead through film? There aren’t any. Prior to that decade, newsreel cameramen were the only likely source of such film coverage, and hereby hangs a tale. The 1934 assassination of King Alexander I of Yugoslavia was the first caught on film. The cameraman was one George Mejat (1). The camera he used was cumbersome, required hand-cranking, and frequent change of reels. It was, in short, a technology best suited to “handling carefully staged public events, and so the footage of Alexander’s arrival and conversation” with the French foreign minister was “of far higher quality than the blurred, jerky images of the assassination itself.” (2) Yet capture them Mejat did, with interesting consequences. Before too many questions could be asked about Mejat’s admirable “luck” in positioning himself to capture the assassination – he was dead, allegedly of natural causes. Meanwhile his assassination sequence was used to “prove” that Alexander was assassinated by fringe domestic extremists, and not, as very good evidence suggested, by state apparatuses (most obviously Mussolini’s). He had served his purpose and was duly terminated. 010405 K Brown, The King is Dead, Long Live the Balkans! Watching the Marseilles Murders of 1934 1- History Catcher: George Mejat (French documentary): 2 - 010405 K Brown, The King is Dead, Long Live the Balkans! Watching the Marseilles Murders of 1934: https://watson.brown.edu/files/watson/imce/research/projects/terrorist_transformations/The_King_is_Dead.pdf Highly recommended: K S Morawski, The assassination of King Alexander I of Yugoslavia in the light of archival press articles: https://rcin.org.pl/ihpan/Content/62823/PDF/WA303_82385_SDR-51-1-SI_Morawski.pdf Which leaves us with the question of lack of repetition by the CIA. First, have all assassination film sequences since 1963 been released and analysed? If so, by whom and when? Perhaps you would care to share the source of your confidence. Otherwise one might conclude your winging it and have no firm evidentary base for such a claim. Second, why would the CIA dedicate resources to lesser targets and run the risk of unwelcome scrutiny of the technique? It worked like a charm once, and that was likely enough.

Karl, I agree! Have you ever seen a more half-hearted attempt by LEO to thwart a crime?

"I F**king Told Them!": Enraged Butler Cop On Bodycam Says He Told Secret Service To Cover Warehouse Used By Shooter, And They Agreed by Tyler Durden Thursday, Aug 08, 2024 - 09:20 PM https://www.zerohedge.com/political/i-fking-told-them-enraged-butler-cop-bodycam-says-he-told-secret-service-cover-warehouse Bodycam footage from local Pennsylvania police reveal that in the moments after last month's attempted assassination of Donald Trump, an officer says he told the Secret Service to cover the warehouse used by shooter Thomas Matthew Crooks. The new bodycamera footage was released by the Butler County Police Department, showing the officer who confronted the shooter. (Butler County Police Department) "I f—ing told them that they needed to post guys f—ing over here…I told them that f—ing Tuesday," said a Butler Township officer in audio captured by his body-worn camera and obtained by the Wall Street Journal. "I talked to the Secret Service guys. They’re like, ‘Yeah, no problem. We’re going to post guys over here,'" the officer continues. The footage paints a more complete picture of the anger and frustration moments after Thomas Matthew Crooks was able to fire eight shots at the former president from an AR-style assault rifle. A spectator was killed, two others were injured, and Trump suffered a bullet wound to the ear. The Journal obtained the videos under a public-records request Thursday. A police officer in one of the videos at one point refers to a suspicious individual who had been lost by authorities. The unidentified officer referred to “a gentleman with a flat face that we were looking for earlier. He was creeping people out.” The officer's account, which was broadcast over radio channels, was captured by one of the body cameras. "He was watching people out in the woods by the water tower. I’m not sure he is the gentleman down or not," the officer says. Around 10 minutes after the shooting, another officer says to a fellow officer "I thought you guys were on the roof. I thought it was you. I thought it was you." To which "No" can be heard in response. "What the xxxx! Why were we not on the roof? Why weren't we?" the officer replies. https://www.wsj.com/us-news/videos-show-police-at-trump-rally-airing-frustration-with-secret-service-47c62e12?mod=e2tw

Not exactly verbatim, as the source of the interview reveals: In fairness to Marrs, Yarborough references "the stop" earlier in the interview, prior to the quoted section.