Chris Davidson

Simmons testimony stated this: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwrExtVD005OaGNId0g3UWRsakk/view?usp=sharing

Dr.Shaw stated this: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwrExtVD005OV2ZLREV5OWNUN3c/view?usp=sharing

The Warren Report states this: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwrExtVD005OM21CSkZyUTV3TUU/view?usp=sharing

Lets explore that location for a bit. Credit to Gary Murr. Thank you Gary https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwrExtVD005OZzRfNDM5cUxLaEk/view?usp=sharing

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwrExtVD005OS0RxREpjXzRCSmc/view?usp=sharing Why did Greer take his foot off the accelerator and look back? He was reacting to Connally being shot circa 24.6ft (Station# 4+40.7) previous to the extant 313 shot. Very close to where Cutler labels "JFK within the limo" at extant z285. https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwrExtVD005Oc19wcXJBUTBHRVU/view?usp=sharing

Kinney didn't lie. If you do the math for the limo speed between z313 and z348 = 24.6ft the vehicle averaged 8.75mph. It's just that Greer "hit the gas" after the "second shot". The one right in front of Altgens. Or in Kinney's words, "the fatal head shot".

Thanks David, Let me add this back again, as it becomes ever more clear about the "second/last shot" circa Altgens and the speed of the limo at the "first shot". This will also integrate very nicely with frame removal using Kinney's limo speed at the "first shot". https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwrExtVD005OS0RxREpjXzRCSmc/view?usp=sharing

Clint climbing on the back of the limo does not occur until after the extant 313 shot. https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwrExtVD005Oazl2MUZZWkpZcDg/view?usp=sharing

Mark, If you have read through the rest of this topic, Robert West's testimony in the Clay Shaw Trial of 1969 will answer the question you posed and back up what I have presented. Objecting to the surveyor's answer when it directly implicates the FBI (told West to plot the points) is pretty much the icing on the cake. They did not want it known that a new path had been created for the limo even in the 1969 trial. Robert West used '+" marks on the original plat/s, as can be seen on the previous path document supplied. https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwrExtVD005OdXpHbUhhc1dPZzg/view?usp=sharing

Translation from the previous notes = The WC creates a separate paths for JFK within the limo. Since they had to take into account Zapruders filming position in terms of LOS, it would look like this: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwrExtVD005ON280RWJ1X0NEdDQ/view?usp=sharing If you look at the red arrows, they will show you the 2 different locations (on the same Zapruder LOS), an object (JFK within the limo) would align with. This is what happens when you move the limo in a "slight" southerly direction.

How would one go about creating an adjustment in this assassination scenario? First read the notes obtained by Tom Purvis via Robert West. https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwrExtVD005OemZRYmVxQ2FhMGM/view?usp=sharing

The extant zfilm shows the limo traveling 1.08ft per frame between z156-z166. 5frames x 1.08ft per frame = 5.4ft The distance between 24.6 and 30ft = 5.4ft. Adjustment accounted for.

Using the previous link, can someone do the simple math and tell us how far the limo would have traveled in 5 frames from z161-z166?

CE884 z161-z166 lists a limo speed of 2.24mph. If one compares that to the extant film, it's quite obvious the limo is not traveling 2.24mph from z161-z166. What shouldn't be forgotten is the truer distance traveled in that span. I suggest using this post (over a year old) as a reference, in regards to the limo speed from z156-z166. http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?/topic/22692-swan-song-math-rules/&do=findComment&comment=328146

How do we vice-versa between 24.6ft and 30ft in terms of an adjustment? Look no further than CE884.

It should then come as no surprise that JFK aligned with Altgens (using Cutler's positioning) via Zapruders LOS at z348 = the 24.6ft that was retarded. https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwrExtVD005OdXN5bGdwLVoyMXc/view?usp=sharing

The above equation (camera fps conversion of 22.8 to 18.3) using 9.3mph (Myers average speed for the motorcade on Houston St) is converted to distance. This is an adjustment distance that would have to be dealt with somewhere else in the assassination scenario. In other words, if you advance an object forward by 24.6ft arbitrarily, at some point, you would have to retard it also. This distance shows up on the shared original SS Dec5,1963 and Feb 1964 FBI plat.The FBI was trying to retard the extant 313 shot by 24.5ft. The problem they had was the yellow curb markers on film. (Thank you Tom Purvis.) https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwrExtVD005OYjJCNmxnbDY4TGM/view?usp=sharing

Mr. BELIN. He came too far to the north before he made his curve, and as he curved--as he made his left turn from Houston onto the street leading to the expressway, he almost hit this north curb? Mr. TRULY. That is right. Just before he got to it, he had to almost stop, to pull over to the left. If he had maintained his speed, he would probably have hit this little section here. Does time and distance increase, if the arc increases and vice-versa? Think at least 1.8seconds and 30ft to begin with. Previously provided for those that are interested. https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwrExtVD005OajhibnRwazljem8/view?usp=sharing Cryptic, I would say not. Common sense in the context of changing frame rates and cutting out film footage around the corner to accommodate the official story. I would say yes.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gzdWPwVTWsI

And, where Altgen's says he was. Remove Liebeler's commentary meant to confuse and get to the question/answer. https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwrExtVD005OVnVTRW43anI0Sjg/view?usp=sharing

Governor CONNALLY. As we looked at them this morning, and as you related the numbers to me, it appeared to me that I was hit in the range between 130 or 131, I don't remember precisely, up to 134, in that bracket. Mr. SPECTER. May I suggest to you that it was 231? Governor CONNALLY. Well, 231 and 234, then. Mr. SPECTER. The series under our numbering system starts with a higher number when the car comes around the turn, so when you come out of the sign, which was---- Governor CONNALLY. It was just after we came out of the sign, for whatever that sequence of numbers was, and if it was 200, I correct my testimony. It was 231 to about 234. It was within that range. What do you think? The 100frame slip up!!!!!

Once again, https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwrExtVD005ORmVWOFpRNm9nd2c/view?usp=sharing

Wiegman describing the 3rd shot. https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwrExtVD005OS0QxMjN6ZTd2cnc/view?usp=sharing

And that puts the reaction by Wiegman to a shot on Elm St at approx z347. Which coincidentally, is exactly where shot #3 on the SS/FBI plat of Dec5,1963 says it occurred. https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwrExtVD005ORnhnOUhtTVhRWHM/view?usp=sharing

If you watch the Wiegman film, there is a point where he starts panning back towards the TSBD opening, which has always been considered the reaction to a shot. In this case, the shot at z313. That point is Wiegman89. Wiegman's camera was 16mm/24fps. The difference between Wiegman15 and Wiegman89 = 74 Wiegman frames converted to zframes = 74 x (18.3/24)=.7625 = 56.4 zframes 56.4 zframes added to z290 = z346.4/z347 https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwrExtVD005OT1FfVGpJZTlyR2c/view?usp=sharing