Chris Davidson

33 frames would be the answer.

Chris' previous quote below: "Now convert 1.8 sec of 18.3fps film into total number of frames. Does that result sound familiar?" If you were serious about the above excerpt, you could have answered the question with a number. Period!!! Yet you followed with this drivel. Imo ------------------------------------- Yes, it's very familiar. Chris Davidson just won't let this "the films have been faked" theory die. I mean, really? Watch JFK and Jackie as they glide by Towner, who's filming. Nothing is happening. JFK sits there looking at the audience...the same with Jackie pre- and post- "splice." Rate x Time = Distance We're expected to believe that 7 frames have been removed from Towner during that sequence all to reveal...what? You don’t want to question Dale Myers. Why is that? 7 frames is what Myers pointed out. That's the funniest thing about these film alteration theories - no one on here, not Davidson, not Josephs, not others - can still to this day tell us WHAT was removed. Or better WHY they were removed. No one that early in the motorcade has ever said anything or come forward to corroborate something sinister that has happened at that point. Not a one word. You can even see close to the same sequence from the woman who was filming from the 4th floor of the TSDB - people are just standing there clapping, taking photos, and so on. Frames were removed. I don’t have to explain why. Speculation = B.S. And yet...the film alteration theories never die. Of course they won’t. The previous A-B-C postings in this topic are not theories. Prove them wrong? When did the car average 14.2mph in the span provided? Meanwhile, if you choose to believe the assassination was a conspiracy and if the TSBD was nothing but a stage for the police to find fake evidence so they can pin the blame on the "lone nut" Oswald, do you really think that the plotters would have even suggested that their shooters start firing BEFORE the kill zone? The goal here was to blame Oswald with as few shots as possible from the fake sniper's window. That kill zone was obviously pre-planned to happen right down in the knoll area and that's pretty much what happened because IMO, the first shot did NOT start until Kennedy appears again from the freeway sign. Choose to believe. IMO. Real convincing. Glad you have it all figured out. No need to concern yourself with the information I provide. So why, pray tell, would the plotters have a crazy shooter as part of their team to fire way up as the car was turning the corner, completely destroying the plot? It's ridiculous to think so. You are the one that keeps speculating on what the films should show in relationship to shooters. Talk about ridiculous. Further, Davidson here thinks that the Z film was filmed at 48 FPS and then 67% of the frames removed. Fantastic. But again, when I and others have asked him over and over again WHY 67% of the frames needed to be removed - in other words, what did these removed frames reveal - then crickets chirp. No reply. Nothing. Now you want to rehash your same old response. Here’s the problem you have: I showed you the exact method. Should I re-submit, that, which has already been explained in great detail again. Un-necessary for those that get it. Exactly. Because all of these removed frames and splices and painted in blobs are just another wacky theory that does nothing but confuse both serious researchers and newbies just getting interested in why Kennedy was murdered. It's regrettable that you consider applying a basic mathematic formula to the assassination films a "wacky theory". It’s not difficult to solve a R x T = D equation. Even easier when all elements are provided. Unfortunately, not everyone will understand. Such is life.

Now convert 1.8 sec of 18.3fps film into total number of frames. Does that result sound familiar?

That would be a match. And, since Myer's has the motorcade slowing, moving into the Elm St turn, there is no chance in h_ll that it ever approached 14.2 mph.

Myer's average for the motorcade on Houston St = 9.3mph

The correct equation will now read: 73ft traveled at 3.497 + 1.8 sec = 5.297 seconds = 13.781 ft per sec /1.47(1mph) = 9.375mph

Time difference for Towner's camera using Myer's 22.8fps and true fps of 18.3: 167/22.8 = 7.324 sec 167/18.3 = 9.125 sec Difference = 1.8 seconds

Towner's true camera speed = 18.3fps

Myer's total frame count for Towner = 167 frames. 160 + 7 missing. https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwrExtVD005OQ1BsWDAzNjV1LWM/view?usp=sharing

Myer's frame rate for Towner's camera = 22.8fps for his multi-sync hypothesis to work. Excerpt from Gary Mack on Towner's film: "The Towner film's true speed is likely closer to 18fps or slightly faster for most of the reel than to any other speed; it certainly was not operating at 16fps on November 22, 1963. Gary Mack" https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwrExtVD005ONzVvdm1iOWlXUDg/view?usp=sharing

Connecting the dots. Showing the Myer's deception. Tina Towner used a 8mm movie camera. https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwrExtVD005OVmxWN1dXMkVCY1U/view?usp=sharing

Excerpt is from Myers multi-sync film document. https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwrExtVD005OQkkzcjNaOG9HX1E/view?usp=sharing

64 frames/18.3 fps = 3.497 sec 73ft/3.497sec = 20.874ft per sec = 14.2 mph

The distance traveled by the common object from z193-z257 = 73ft. Z camera at 18.3 frames per sec. At 1.47ft per sec (1mph) the math awaits.

z193-z257 = 64 frames

The necessary plotting. https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwrExtVD005OX0NRckNoUFZ2ZXM/view?usp=sharing

The common object between the z video and Myers (Wiegman15/z257) frame. https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwrExtVD005OTG5udE1haW1XT2c/view?usp=sharing

I left a few clues for you in the "Splice In Tina Towner Film" topic.

Why don't we give Andrej a chance to respond. The importance of the previous Z clip along with this, might ring a bell for Andrej and/or others. https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwrExtVD005OcTJIMFBsQlpEUDA/view?usp=sharing P.S. #1 on the list states that Myers multi-film sync is a bunch of cr__p.

Andrej, do you care to put two and two together and explain why this video clip destroys Dale Myer's time sync. At least it should start you thinking. If not, I'll eventually fill in the details for you. https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwrExtVD005OS2VGODVhbzYxVms/view?usp=sharing

Andrej, Myers didn't assume anything. You are wise to doubt his timeline. No opinion necessary, just a matter of excised frames.

David, Just to compliment your previous post, so others (I know you are already familiar with it) might understand the MO of the powers that be. Don't want to sidetrack your topic, so carry on. Quote Tom Purvis: The reduction in size and resolution problems are an apparant means of the WC to, as stated, "Hide in plain Sight" much of that information which they could not risk keeping completely hid. And although you are most probably not up to date on the altered survey data in the WC Data block, this too was one of their "slight" sleight-of-hand tricks. CE882 is purportedly* a copy of the survey plat which Mr. West prepared for the WC after their May 1964 re-enactment of the assassination. CE883 is reported to be a EXACT "cardboard reproduction" of CE882. Dates on these are May 31, 1964 In order to understand much of the WC, one must also understand their "slight" sleight-of-hand tricks. The actual survey plat(CE882) was introduced into evidence in a sealed envelope which was never opened. Thereafter, CE883 (reproduction on cardboard) was introduced as representing what was inside the envelope and never opened for view. Now! You may find that I often tend to, if you will, see if anyone is paying attention---------to detail.

Thanks for correcting that.

Sandy, Your quote "I used physics to determine how far over the catcher's head the thrower needs to throw the baseball in order for it to come down in the catcher's vicinity." The distance was approx 320ft in 3.2 sec. The top blue line is the top of the baseball arc. (Red arrow points to baseball). If you replay the video and time the travel of the ball, in relationship to the runner getting ready to slide, (straight line distance between 3rd base and home plate = 90ft), the runner has approx 7 strides, is in an arc outside the straight base line distance and slides, all from when the ball in flight reaches it's top height which is 1/3 of the remaining time of 3.2 sec = 1.07sec. 7 strides @ 3.5ft per stride = 24.5ft extra baseline running arc = 5ft approx slide before ball hits glove = 3.5ft Total approx 33ft Fastest runner in the world Usain Bolt at 27MPH Olympic Record 100meters Base runner 33ft in 1.07 sec = 21mph Ball in flight, caught by catcher approx 5ft before runner slides. At 1.07 seconds (travel time from top height of ball arc to catcher's mit), how fast/far does the ball have to travel to beat the runner by approx 5ft? chris

A simple pressing down of the fps button on the B/H 414 moves you from 16/18 to 48fps.