Chris Davidson

Myers has that car synced at z257. The problem is it's actually 100 frames from z190 that the sync should occur. iow, Wiegman15 should be synced with z290. Or, add 33frames (1.8seconds) to z257 https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwrExtVD005OYUJaSVk5Q21NMDQ/view?usp=sharing

David, I'm going to add to what you wrote, but in a way that will tie your post in, with what I've been posting. A little at a time. Myers deliberate deception with the Towner camera FPS rate =1.8 seconds. The car in the background of z190 takes 67 frames to get to where we see it as Wiegman15. 1.8sec + 67 frames(67/18.3 = 3.66sec) = 5.46sec =100 total frames https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwrExtVD005OcFdsUUFfX1BLMk0/view?usp=sharing

All one has to do is plot Bell's end of film frame on Houston St, with his beginning frame onto Elm St. (SELECTIVE SPLICING) is what I refer to it as. Then plot that object (if you even know what it is) from Z193, find where those LOS's intersect, and realize this is exactly the area Myers has that object travel it's miraculous 14.2mph. Even when shown, it takes a little effort (not much) to understand it. But, I'm not holding my breath. BTW, guess what film Myer's doesn't include on Houston St in his multi-sync document? https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwrExtVD005ORVpTdTN2dVZhV1E/view?usp=sharing

Now you're trying to summarize. Tina Towner's film 30ft long!!!! Stop while you're ahead way behind. The denseness is getting very thick.

z133 + 67 = 200 frames + Myers 1.8sec fps switch = 233 frames Governor CONNALLY. As we looked at them this morning, and as you related the numbers to me, it appeared to me that I was hit in the range between 130 or 131, I don't remember precisely, up to 134, in that bracket. Mr. SPECTER. May I suggest to you that it was 231? Governor CONNALLY. Well, 231 and 234, then. Mr. SPECTER. The series under our numbering system starts with a higher number when the car comes around the turn, so when you come out of the sign, which was---- Governor CONNALLY. It was just after we came out of the sign, for whatever that sequence of numbers was, and if it was 200, I correct my testimony. It was 231 to about 234. It was within that range.

67/18.3 = 3.661 3.661 + Myers 1.8 sec fps switch = 5.461 sec 5.461sec x 18.3 fps = 100frames

9.3 x 1.47 = 13.671ft per sec 1.8sec x 13.671 = 24.6ft

Lack of Research.

67/2 = 33.5 /18.3 = 1.83sec 30/1.83 = 16.393ft per sec = 11.151mph 152/18.3 =8.3sec 136.1/8.3 = 16.397 = 11.154mph

My best guess for now is approx 26.5 seconds with what's available.

Thomas, this will not affect the overall time of approx 30sec. It has no affect on what you're trying to prove. Chris

If there is any doubt that 30ft and the 167 frame total of Towner's film is not connected to both WC CE884 documents, let me lay that idea to rest right now. 167 frames = 100 + 67 frames 167frames /18.3fps = 9.125 sec 30ft/9.125 sec = 3.287... ft per sec /1.47 (1mph) = 2.236mph 100 frames/18.3fps = 5.464 sec 30ft/5.464 sec = 5.49ft per sec = 3.735mph https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwrExtVD005OWDB2VUhBRGllcW8/view?usp=sharing The orange version of CE884 will yield a limo speed of: 18.3fps/3frames = 6.1 x .9ft = 5.49ft per sec = 3.735mph The white version of CE884 will yield a limo speed of: 18.3fps/5frames = 3.66 x .9ft = 3.294ft per sec = 2.24mph So once again, how was it the WC arrived at the limo traveling at 2.24 and 3.74 mph? Enquiring minds want to know.

Eventually, someone else will wise up and connect this information with the "Towner" thread. The distance traveled by the common object from z193-z257 = 73ft. 64 frames/18.3 fps = 3.497 sec You can then begin to stop spinning your wheels.

The inability of Michael and Jeremy to directly address/disprove the information being provided speaks volumes. The earth is still flat to these guys because someone keeps telling them it is. Here's an easy question to answer: Yes or No Do you believe Tina Towner's 8mm camera ran at an average 22.8fps as stated by Dale Myers in his multi-sync project? Remember, that is an average, so doing a little simple math could yield (24+21.6 speeds)=45.6/2 =22.8fps I guess they fed the camera some "speed" before filming ensued. So please tell us film experts, when does a 8mm camera become a 16mm/24fps camera. 24fps - 5% (1.2fps) variation = 24 -1.2 = 22.8fps This is why there are industry standards. Excerpt from Gary Mack on Towner's film: "The Towner film's true speed is likely closer to 18fps or slightly faster for most of the reel than to any other speed; it certainly was not operating at 16fps on November 22, 1963. Gary Mack" I didn't agree with GM on many aspects of this case, but his common sense answer to Towner's frame rate is more than appropriate. Slightly faster would include 18.3 which is exactly what I'm using to discredit Myers. So, go back and look at the rest of the A-B-C's and start discovering a world that is round.

Andrej, If Carl Jones was looking eastward in Altgen's 6, what would be an event/sound that would cause him to look westward? Answer this question and you might begin to understand the Myer's frame sync deception.

This is how the (WC) uses manipulation. Let's pretend that we don't have access and have never watched the zfilm. Then, someone supplies us with an official document that states the limo was traveling at 2.24mph at a certain time. Could I make the assumption it was averaging 2.24mph for longer than 5frames =.273 seconds, even though that's what the document entails? How would we know the total frame count during that 2.24mph span?

Of course using .18ft per frame x 5 frames CE884 (z161-z166) = .9ft or the total B.S. distance traveled if you are to believe the WC.

Quite close indeed. If you want an even closer match, just use a number between CE884 z166 and Towner total frames of 167. Something like this: 30ft/.18sec = 166.666... frames

WC884- z161-z166 = .9ft traveled in 5 frames 18.3frames per sec/5frames = 3.66 x .9ft = 3.294ft per sec / 1.47(1mph) = 2.24mph https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwrExtVD005Obk9fNjdySjVGRk0/view?usp=sharing

I don't believe in many coincidences, at least, not in this case. 167 Towner frames /18.3fps = 9.125seconds 30ft/9.125sec = 2.236mph

Isn't it interesting at what total frame# (166) within WC884, the limo's speed is at an all time low (z161-z166) And, coincidentally, the Towner film is comprised of 167 frames.

Myers gives us the time- 1.8 sec Cutler gives us the distance- 30ft The Towner film gives us the total frames (167) or quite close to.

In other words, The WC didn't supply data for extant frames 133-166 or coincidentally 33 frames. Always important to know the answer to simple equations.

The extant film (limo on film) starts at z133. Myers robbed us of 1.8sec = 33 zframes via the change in frame rate for Towner's camera from 18.3 to 22.8. WC CE884 (JFK in limo) at z166 = Station# 3+30.1 From z161-z166, the WC has slowed the limo tremendously. Cutler (when superimposed on West) accurately plots JFK within the limo at extant z133 = Station# 2+99 This points to a 30ft correction. https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwrExtVD005Obk9fNjdySjVGRk0/view?usp=sharing