Chris Davidson
-
Posts
4,307 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Posts posted by Chris Davidson
-
-
On 3/1/2023 at 2:41 PM, Chris Davidson said:
It's interesting, how many people have written off the reenactments as "less than perfect" attempts to obtain the truth.
The fact is, the reenactments were far more accurate in hiding the alterations.
Just as with the camera height on the pedestal not being quite the same height as what the extant Z camera was, this was also applied in terms of vehicle speed.
The gif above has the limo starting in the same location in both, when using the traffic signal light post in the background.
Running it from the beginning thru to the extant Z207 splice frame = 41 frames, which is reflected as a distance traveled of 41ft via CE884. 41ft/41frames - One ft. per one frame hmm!!!
The immediate tipoff besides two different CE884 documents, is the listing of frame 166/171 in the same location.
The QueenMary in the reenactment session only takes 32 frames vs the 41 to arrive at the extant z207 location. (They knew the true speed of the limo)
41/32 = QueenMary traveling 1.28x faster in that span.
1ft per one frame = 18.3ft persec/1.47 = 12.44mph
12.44mph x 1.28 = 15.92mph
15.92mph - 12.44 = 3.48mph x 1.47 = 5.11ft in one second = 18.3frames
If this simple math gets too complicated just ask for refinements.
What's nice about modern day technology is the ability to recreate the reenactments.
As mentioned above, the reenactment vehicle was moving at a "calculated" faster speed than the extant limo.
This is easily remedied by modern day programs (FinalCutPro) abilities to create interpolated frames.
In this instance(below) more interpolated frames were created by a 52% reduction in speed.
.48 +.52 = 1
Once that was obtained, and the correct "frame removal" sequence was applied to some of the area in question(below is z186-z207), it would be very difficult to decipher that 60% of the whole(real+interpolated) were removed from below.
This could have been completed with an optical printer using the "sequencer" option I believe, in a brief amount of time.
I left a partial view of the speedier 15.92mph reenactment version for comparison.
-
4 hours ago, Joe Bauer said:
Notice Carlson never dismisses Powell or her claims in this episode. He simply postulates the need for more proof to back up her claims.
In fact, Carlson endorses the need to look into voter machine fraud. And Fox News gives Powell a stage for making her false claims.
Once the subpoenas are issued, the evidence is collected and testimony under oath is given, the truth in this case arrives.
Over 60 court cases lost in pursuit of the Big Lie. Most of them laughed out of the courtrooms.
26 minutes ago, Joe Bauer said:Fox News never reported the reality of Trump's long term L** pushing to the degree it should have.
That it was dividing and damaging our entire society is so many dangerous and irresponsible ways.
So, no thank you TC and friends.
-
17 minutes ago, Paul Brancato said:
Win or lose, does no one follow my point? If Fox wins, which Larry, given his legal background, thinks likely, does that make the anchors less guilty of knowingly spreading falsehoods?
We understand Paul.
The answer is No. They are not less guilty. They actually are more guilty.
Some of us choose not to sell our souls to hypocrites for the sake of a "pie in the sky" JFK news flash.
-
12 hours ago, Chris Davidson said:
If you have a grip on the previous posting, it should be quite easy to understand the following:
Why would the FBI/SS have a zfilm copy that contained a lot of missing frames (I'll use frame 195-222 span, HINT HINT) which would normally equal 27frames.
When viewing this 19 progressive frame gif, imagine excising the SIX double image frames that appear while it's playing.
That would leave 13 frames for that same 27 frame span in the extant zfilm.
13/27 = .481
I hope that ratio rings a bell.
The elimination rounds for the extant zfilm.
And now, as a follow up, it's back to Dino:
-
On 2/6/2023 at 2:15 PM, Chris Davidson said:
The graphic below is an excerpt from what I provided Tony.
The scale is 1" = 10ft so each individual line is 1.25ft.
When I originally sent him the plotting results, I used 1.875ft as the distanced travel, but 1.875 was reflective of the individual measuring lines.
Hence the reason that equation is in red type.
So, 5.3mph(shorter frame span) vs 5.98mph so far.
Fairly close, and it will get tighter.
When you get tired of looking at the gifs above, refer back to the plotted area of extant z195.5-201.5.
The scale is 1"=10ft or each 1/8" mark = 1.25ft
I count approx 7.875 marks at 1.25ft = 9.84 ft total in 6 frames = 1.64ft per frame = 20.41mph
Add that to the next span at 5.3mph and you have an average speed from extant z195.5-207 of:
20.41 + 5.3 = 25.71 / 2 = 12.85mph
Now compare back to the average speed from CE884 z166-z207 = 12.44mph
Take another look at the "camera movement" within the gifs again.
-
Did you really believe this was all camera movement?
I suggest comparing it to the previous gif.
-
If you have a grip on the previous posting, it should be quite easy to understand the following:
Why would the FBI/SS have a zfilm copy that contained a lot of missing frames (I'll use frame 195-222 span, HINT HINT) which would normally equal 27frames.
When viewing this 19 progressive frame gif, imagine excising the SIX double image frames that appear while it's playing.
That would leave 13 frames for that same 27 frame span in the extant zfilm.
13/27 = .481
I hope that ratio rings a bell.
The elimination rounds for the extant zfilm.
-
On 3/1/2023 at 2:41 PM, Chris Davidson said:
Running it from the beginning thru to the extant Z207 splice frame = 41 frames, which is reflected as a distance traveled of 41ft via CE884. 41ft/41frames - One ft. per one frame hmm!!!
The immediate tipoff besides two different CE884 documents, is the listing of frame 166/171 in the same location.
1ft per one frame = 18.3ft persec/1.47 = 12.44mph
For use as a reference:
2.24mph = .18ft per frame
3.74mph = .30ft per frame
5.98mph = .48ft per frame
.481 x 12.44 = 5.98mph
See the connection to the speed, dictated by the tire circumference chalk markings previously supplied? It's the last entry below in my discussions with Tony.
.481 is awfully close to 1/2
Do you know what happens to the vehicle speed on film when you remove over 1/2 the frames in a certain span, depending on what frame removal sequence you utilize.
Especially when the vehicle was slowing down/stopping?
I've previously provided the plotted speed using JFK as the mark from extant z201.5-207 = 5.3mph
Is that close to 5.98mph. It is by .3ft
2.34ft/5.5frames =5.3mph
2.34ft + .3ft =2.64ft/5.5frames = .48ft per frame
And, since they had the limo traveling at .3ft per frame per CE884 extant z168-z171 (3frames/.9ft), I believe my plotting of a 5.3mph limo speed is well within the BS parameters set forth by the WC.
-
On 3/10/2023 at 2:13 PM, Chris Davidson said:
Paul,
Personally, I would never label a "peaceful" protest as a terrorist act.
But, what occurred on Jan 6th was not a peaceful protest.
Terrorism Definitions
International terrorism: Violent, criminal acts committed by individuals and/or groups who are inspired by, or associated with, designated foreign terrorist organizations or nations (state-sponsored).
Domestic terrorism: Violent, criminal acts committed by individuals and/or groups to further ideological goals stemming from domestic influences, such as those of a political, religious, social, racial, or environmental nature.
And, if anyone believes it was peaceful, just watch/listen to 19 seconds of video.
If a person smashed the windows in my house trying to break in, I wouldn't necessarily think they were a terrorist, unless the intent was proven to be of a political, religious, social, racial, or environmental nature.
But, I do have the right to defend my property/safety.
The hypocrisy flowing from the Fox mouthpieces is deafening.
They easily could have put a bullet in Chansley and many others, just like they did to Babbitt.
They chose not to.
Was an all out bloodbath a more desireable outcome?
Carlson is the poster child for hypocrisy.
The Dominion trial hasn't been good to him or his cohorts. That's in an environment where, when you perjure yourself, the consequences are real, as opposed to his bully pulpit on Fox.
"While Carlson said that it was not clear how Chansley got into the Capitol, the plea agreement admitted he entered the building through a broken door around a minute after it was breached, becoming one of the first 30 intruders in the Capitol. Already-public security footage shows his entrance.
“If he was, in fact, committing such a grave crime, why didn’t the officers who are standing right next to him place him under arrest?” Carlson said.
Manger called the “tour guide” characterization “outrageous and false” in an internal message to officers on Tuesday.
“I don’t have to remind you how outnumbered our officers were on January 6. Those officers did their best to use de-escalation tactics to try to talk to rioters into getting each other to leave the building,” Manger said."
-
Paul,
Deciphering the BS supplied by the WC (zfilm, ballistics, math etc).
-
1 hour ago, Paul Brancato said:
- labeling protest as terrorist is something we should all be up in arms about.
Paul,
Personally, I would never label a "peaceful" protest as a terrorist act.
But, what occurred on Jan 6th was not a peaceful protest.
Terrorism Definitions
International terrorism: Violent, criminal acts committed by individuals and/or groups who are inspired by, or associated with, designated foreign terrorist organizations or nations (state-sponsored).
Domestic terrorism: Violent, criminal acts committed by individuals and/or groups to further ideological goals stemming from domestic influences, such as those of a political, religious, social, racial, or environmental nature.
And, if anyone believes it was peaceful, just watch/listen to 19 seconds of video.
If a person smashed the windows in my house trying to break in, I wouldn't necessarily think they were a terrorist, unless the intent was proven to be of a political, religious, social, racial, or environmental nature.
But, I do have the right to defend my property/safety.
The hypocrisy flowing from the Fox mouthpieces is deafening.
-
A refresher and it's on to some ballistic triangles:
-
On 3/7/2023 at 8:28 AM, Chris Davidson said:
Does this motion look like familiar?
Change the ANGLE and you have a solution to the bobbleheads.
But, once you change it, it'll reveal the necessary camera height difference upon the pedestal to accommodate the alterations.
And/Or,
This might make it a little easier on the eyes, while conveying the same message:
Don't forget the angle change on the top sprocket hole, now that the bottom one is aligned.
-
On 2/24/2023 at 12:19 PM, Chris Davidson said:
I re-recommend listening to the short clip of Dino from the above link.
These are extant zframes 215/217, I left out z216 for accentuation purposes. Z216 has the same approx angle change as extant 217.
When viewing this, use bobblehead mentality.
iow, Individual pieces of a moving film.
Does this motion look like familiar?
Change the ANGLE and you have a solution to the bobbleheads.
But, once you change it, it'll reveal the necessary camera height difference upon the pedestal to accommodate the alterations.
-
On 3/5/2023 at 1:12 PM, Michael Davidson said:
So , if hes shot at different points to where the WC states does that automatically point elsewhere for the shots ? Dal Tex ? Front shot (s) ?
Plus if the film has been altered does that only refer to the Stemmons sign ? Frame removal ? Masking of blow out at the back of the head ?
Michael,
I'm not too concerned with shooter locations at this time. I will say, I believe Dr.Shaw has one of the positions correct in regards to Connally. Previously addressed.
More handywork was applied to the film/s than just the StemmonsSign adjustment. imo
More importantly, it's rather obvious that the shot/reaction circa extant z207 had to be excised because of the reactions seen on the extant film at approx z225.
Not enough time for one shooter.
-
On 2/10/2023 at 11:49 PM, Chris Davidson said:
Speaking of that lower sprockethole.
This next gif should help you conceptualize the sleight of hand.
What part of the StemmonsSign is in unison with the Bobbleheads?
Give your eyes a few seconds for adjusting to see its true movement.
Let's throw in the bobbleheads using a non-splice/splice frame.
two non-splice frames.A different zfilm iteration of course.
If you didn't realize, these gifs are comprised of extant z205,206,207.
-
On 3/1/2023 at 1:55 PM, Chris Davidson said:
Actually, the lower sprocket hole is a great answer, which no doubt, was altered.
But, I should have been more specific.
A remnant on the Stemmons Sign is what I'm looking for.
The appropriate song with the appropriate answer:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=szlqFlG4DL8
-
Thanks.
Breaking it down somewhat further keeping the CE884 correlation in mind, the 2.24mph distance difference over those 18.3 frames(1sec) would only yield you 3.292ft which would leave another 1.8ft (5.1ft - 3.292) to resolve.
Since 2.24mph = .18ft per frame and there was 1.8ft to resolve, a total of 10 frames would fit the bill.
Hence the difference in entries between CE884 z161/171 of 10 frames, which would actually be in the same physical spot were it not for the angular/chess/BS directional change by the WC.
Or, just take the 5.1ft/5frames (z161-166) = 1.02ft per frame and multiply by 10 frames = 10.2ft.
z166 - 5.1ft/5frames = z161
z166+5.1ft/5frames = z171
Overall total of 28.3frames x .18ft per frame(2.24mph) = 5.1ft
The same distance(10.2ft) the WC moved Robert West's shot determination circa station# 371.1(extant z207-splice) to the official WC location at station# 381.3
-
On 3/2/2023 at 12:00 AM, Chris Davidson said:
Looking previously at CE884, it's rather obvious the limo was not traveling at the designated speed entries for z161/166 and z168/171 which is 2.24 and 3.74mph respectively.
But, knowing they were trying to retard the limo progress by 5.1ft at the z166/171 entry point, then a simple calculation of 5.11ft over 5 frames would yield a speed of 12.72mph.
Recollecting, I think I plotted this span at 13.44mph , so close enough to give you a more accurate speed in this location.
Take the simple breakdown from above(the path switch) and allow it to help correlate the designations below:
Using 5.1ft/5frames = 12.697mph
Frames Z168-186 = 21.6ft = 14.938mph @ 18.3 frames (1second)
14.938mph - 12.697mph = 2.24mph
Z161-166 = 2.24mph
That’s a match.
-
Distance retarded 5.11ft
Distance advanced 10.2ft (Station# 371.1-381.3)
Total Span = 15.31ft
10" elevation change on a 3.13° slope = 10"/12" x 18.3 = 15.25ft distance traveled.
-
Now you can incorporate that retarded 5.11ft into this previously supplied graphic:
And, by piecing together two different WC distance adjustments, you'll have your answer to the 10" height conundrum.
It's similar to using the distance difference between the limo front end vs JFK in the limo as your measurement markers.
-
Looking previously at CE884, it's rather obvious the limo was not traveling at the designated speed entries for z161/166 and z168/171 which is 2.24 and 3.74mph respectively.
But, knowing they were trying to retard the limo progress by 5.1ft at the z166/171 entry point, then a simple calculation of 5.11ft over 5 frames would yield a speed of 12.72mph.
Recollecting, I think I plotted this span at 13.44mph , so close enough to give you a more accurate speed in this location.
-
The QueenMary reenactment speed difference(z166-z207) was approx 3.48mph = 5.11ft.
Since the WC knew that plotting the limo on its correct path would reveal more of the true events, they had to alter the limo path (using dots) instead of using Robert West's + marks.
When plotted, it looks like this using an LOS from the Z pedestal.
The blue lines are indicative of the distance difference between West's marks and the WC limo path in the extant Zfilm.
That distance(5.1ft) equaling the speed difference of 3.48mph over 41 extant zframes.
-
14 hours ago, Chris Davidson said:
It's interesting, how many people have written off the reenactments as "less than perfect" attempts to obtain the truth.
The fact is, the reenactments were far more accurate in hiding the alterations.
Just as with the camera height on the pedestal not being quite the same height as what the extant Z camera was, this was also applied in terms of vehicle speed.
The gif above has the limo starting in the same location in both, when using the traffic signal light post in the background.
Running it from the beginning thru to the extant Z207 splice frame = 41 frames, which is reflected as a distance traveled of 41ft via CE884. 41ft/41frames - One ft. per one frame hmm!!!
The immediate tipoff besides two different CE884 documents, is the listing of frame 166/171 in the same location.
The QueenMary in the reenactment session only takes 32 frames vs the 41 to arrive at the extant z207 location. (They knew the true speed of the limo)
41/32 = QueenMary traveling 1.28x faster in that span.
1ft per one frame = 18.3ft persec/1.47 = 12.44mph
12.44mph x 1.28 = 15.92mph
15.92mph - 12.44 = 3.48mph x 1.47 = 5.11ft in one second = 18.3frames
If this simple math gets too complicated just ask for refinements.
Unveiling The Limo Stop
in JFK Assassination Debate
Posted
When you excise frames, the frame count is bound to bite you in the ass.
Another example from both versions of CE884 would be the speeds derived from the same physical location.
In this instance below, 9.54mph and 28.63mph starting with extant z207.
It is the same concept from above, where we have two greatly varied speeds of 5.3 and 20.41mph in adjacent frame spans plotted, that cover z195.5-z207.