Vince Palamara

1) JFK autopsy doctor J. Thornton Boswell debunks Gerald Posner 2) JFK autopsy doctor James J. Humes confession 3) Only known video of JFK mortician Thomas Robinson 4) Robert Groden on Dr. Perry's Reaction to JFK Autopsy Photo 5) The Missing JFK Autopsy Photos 6) Witnesses Debunk JFK Autopsy Photos 7) JFK Autopsy Photos (full set)

I don't know why the screen capture isn't showing but the video is fine.

Thanks for the info!

True. The looks on their faces do seem "concerned" haha!

Yes!

The looks on Hill's and Landis' faces are priceless - you know they are thinking "Win! You are &^%&ing this up!! Retake!! Retake!!" @James DiEugenio

Thanks!

Thanks! Please see my latest post about Russ Baker - it related directly to your interest. As for deleted texts, there are ways to retrieve them and it appears someone may still have them.

Too Secret? The Secret Service’s Long, Troubling History of Omerta (substack.com)

And even more in depth (every known medical-related witness)- every time they said anything about the wounds in chronological order:

What all this proves is what I have been stating for years (in my books, articles, conference appearances, etc.): people need to stop viewing the Secret Service as beyond reproach while having no problem feeling comfortable with casting aspersions [rightfully, I might add] at the FBI and CIA. While the vast majority of the agents (1865-2022) were/are men and women of impeccable character and heroic background, there are bad apples throughout history that have spoiled the bunch, so to speak. I have often encountered a sort of mental barrier by some (especially non-researchers) when it comes to the Secret Service: "C'mon, Vince- these are the 'good guys', are they not?" My response is: yes, they are, in most cases; same with the men and women of the FBI and CIA. Again, all it takes are a few bad seeds. Heck, look at the NINE agents who drank the morning of 11/22/63 and the NINE agents who drank and partied in 2011 when President Obama was scheduled to visit Cartegna, Columbia. One of the 11/22/63 drinkers was Clint Hill. Three others were follow-up car agents: Jack Ready, Paul Landis and Glen Bennett. They also stayed out very late, so sleep deprivation is an issue, as well. Not only weren't these men fired or indicted, they were able to carry on as if not happened AND, in Hill's case, receive an award and a promotion! With regard to the current/modern Trump/Biden situation, you are seeing conflicts of interest and divided loyalties. Murray "leaving" could be tantamount to JFK's first Secret Service Chief U.E. Baughman being "retired" [a.k.a. fired, the way they did it for Dulles/Bissell/Cabell during the same time period], as Baughman sided with Hoover in shockingly stating to the press that there was no Mafia and there hadn't been one for many years, a statement directly opposed to RFK and JFK both. Often times in government, one is not "fired" to retain dignity and a pension. This is still an active/fluid situation, so more to come in the following days/weeks/months. That said, the Secret Service deleting text messages, siding with Trump, NOT siding with Biden, believing the election of 2020 was a hoax and cheering on the insurrection are causes for grave concern. I cannot wait when Tony Ornato (and others) testify to the 1/6 committee. Here are my responses to a recent media inquiry: -Any insight into the current scandal? Yes- history repeats itself: in 1995, after the ARRB asked for them, the Secret Service destroyed critical JFK motorcade records. Here we are in 2022 and the Secret Service deleted important texts after they were asked for them. In 1963-1969, a Secret Service agent named Emory Roberts became a tad too close to LBJ (while also voicing concerns about JFK’s private life and failing miserably on 11/22/63, having also paralyzed the agents under him to act), becoming his appointment secretary, an unprecedented move for a still-active agent. In 2020, a Secret Service agent named Tony Ornato became a tad too close to President Trump and became Deputy chief of Staff. Ornato and several of his fellow agents reportedly cheered on the 1/6/21 insurrection at the Capital, an action that went against President-Elect Biden (the false notion that the election was a fraud). -How does this fit into larger problems with the institution? The agency has a history of becoming too close to a protectee and also having low regard for other protectees. -What do you make of the agents behavior on Jan 6and the agency’s behavior in the aftermath? I think it was atrocious and alarming. The agents should be professional and apolitical. They should also refrain from becoming too chummy and compromising their own integrity. -What is agency’s track record on disclosure and on retention or destruction/hiding of records? Bad. As the ARRB’s John Tunheim and Thomas Samoluk have duly noted on the documentary JFK Revisited, the Secret Service is the only federal agency to destroy records after they were asked for them and were more difficult to work with than any other agency- even the FBI sand CIA. -What is the level of competency and skill on the part of average agents, and what do we need to know about the kind of person who works there? I know everyone likes to praise the bravery and dedication of ss, cops, military, etc – but what is the cold, hard reality? The vast majority of the agents through history have been good and loyal men with good training and backgrounds (often in law enforcement and/or in the military). However, during the JFK, LBJ, Nixon and Trump eras, perhaps others, several agents harbored either too close emotions to the protectee or they held ill will toward them. Neither is acceptable, especially the latter. The agency needs to better screen potential agents for these kinds of feelings and beliefs. JFK agents who harbored anger at President Kennedy for his private life (the agents who spoke to Seymour Hersh and others) and political views (Elmer Moore, Forrest Sorrels) cast a dark shadow on the success of the assassination. Likewise, the agents who were too close to Trump and cheered on the insurrection—-and deleted valuable text messages—-need to be held accountable.

Well said.

The looks on Hill's and Landis' faces are priceless: "Ummm-cut! Win, redo that: there's no way Oswald could have fired the rifle THAT fast!!!"

Greer's 2/28/78 HSCA interview. Kellerman's 3/9/64 Warren Commission testimony Kellerman's 8/24/77 HSCA interview Greer's 3/9/64 Warren Commission testimony:

Unfortunately, although Landis does not believe the single bullet theory, he apparently has waffled on his initial impression of one of the shots coming from the front, as he conveyed to Blaine in THE KENNEDY DETAIL that he was "mistaken" From page 606 of the HSCA Final Report...I WONDER IF LANDIS WAS STILL "TRAUMITIZED", BLAINE? Landis 11/27/63 report.

Clint Hill's March 9, 1964 Warren Commission testimony- "IT WAS RIGHT, BUT I CANNOT SAY FOR SURE THAT IT WAS REAR"--?!?!?!?!?

From Hill's book Five Days In November (2013) From Hill's book Mrs. Kennedy and Me (2012) From The Kennedy Detail (2010): Hill wrote the Foreword, contributed to the actual book itself, and did the media and book tours. The co-author, Lisa McCubbin, co-wrote his three books and became his wife: Clint Hill's March 9, 1964 Warren Commission testimony

Even Secret Service agents Clint Hill and Paul Landis are against the SBT [From Hill's last book Five Presiden (2016); Landis, also in 2016: Shaker Heights man guarding Kennedys witnessed JFK assassination (photos) - cleveland.com ]

Outstanding, Pat!