Martin Hinrichs

Dear Jack, we have to keep in mind that Abraham Zapruder kept on shooting roughly 9,5 seconds after the fatal head shot. Wiegman show activity within seconds after the fatal shot. It's high likely both Zapruder and Sitzman don't left the pedestal that early. My best to you Martin

Hi Lee. I can't find any indicator in the Muchmore film that the brake lights of the SS-100-X went on. Can you recall in what frames this should happend? http://jfk.fotopic.net/c1178741_1.html Thank you Martin

I think so Robin. And it won't make me wonder if the dark shape on the left is Zapruder. Martin

Here one Wiegman frame (thanks Robin) enhanced, rotated, several Photoshop filters added and cropped. What do we see?

Thank you for all this informations Doug. I should consider to buy the book. And yes, Conspiracy is a crime, not a theory. Jim and Bernice, thank you very much for your kind words. Jerry, i used a 3D windshield template rotating it in my 3D application. Feel free to post your study. We can examine it together. best to you all Martin

Here is the last colored version of Altgens6 i made. Very little parts of Altgens6 are unknown to me. Here the thread: http://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index...pic,964.60.html Martin

Thank you very much Doug. I've watched the entire Youtube Video presentation posted here by Jack White, uploaded by Rich DellaRosa the very same day as it was up. To make it simple, i was very impressed by your presentation. It's certainly easier for me to understand english in written form but most of what you told did i understand. It was 1999 as far as i know when you were made that speech. Long time has passed by. A minor glitch attracted my attention during that presentation. You said a shot from the south side atop of the Triple underpass (close to Commerce street) was 225 yards away from the moving target. Well, it depends were you believe that shot have to occur (maybe 217?) but the distance is closer. Let's say a shot trough the windshield was fired at Z#217 then the distance from the triple underpass to Kennedy was approx. 125 yards. So to say...easier. But i don't know if this particular interpretation is meanwhile updated. Again this is just a minor thing. I made a while ago a 3D examination of a possible throat shot location on Duncan's forum. There is an alternative to that Windshield through and through shot. From behind the picket fence at the grassy knoll was at Z#200 - Z#222 a clean and unobscured trajectory to Kennedy's throat. No Stemmon's freeway sign, no crowds in the way. Clean view. From what direction the throat shot happend is unfortunately unkown to me. But we have two alternatives. By the way, the so called spiral nebula in Altgens7 is exactly in the same place as in Altgens6. That makes me wonder. But it have to be further examined. I've started already. I have my doubts that Tony Marsh is correct here. Anyway......one thing is for certain, we both standing of the same side of the fence! My best to you Martin

Game......Set.......Match. You got it right and McAdams wrong. Never expect a neutral and objective disscussion with McAdams. I wonder if he realize how worse and damaging to the LN'er community he is. Congrats Pat. best Martin

Thanks for the response Jerry. I see you seeking in the dust as me as well. We shall ask John Hunt to join here too and yes...it would be very nice if would share the additional, more detailed scans from the 1978 HSCA windshield cracks. I think we can find a solution to find out if these windshield cracks are the same. Thats not impossible. And i believe you agree with me on that because you consider to spend a couple of bucks to analyze it from your two trusted professionals. The good think is they are trying to work it out in CAD. Thats my homeland since 1992. So, i can cross check, contact this persons if you don't mind. A comprehensive and conclusive analysis might deserve a seperate Topic i think. And it will need a very careful examination to come to a common accepted denominator for all parties. But i think we can achieve it. A comparison of this two windshield cracks is nevertheless dominated by the following undeniable principal: The windshield was kicked out at 11/26/63 by the feet of the Arlington Glass men. And that dominant cross crack should be visible in every photo post to 11/26/63. (Look at the attachement) I miss that in the HSCA 1978 photo. I know you know it Jerry. You should consider to save your money because of the known facts. The only question which remains unanswered to me is: why is this photo existant in the archives and related to the 1978 HSCA files? For what purpose? Did they used a template to re-create a similar windshield crack? In the end it's pretty clear to me. We are dealing with two different windshields. I was never in Washington and i hope to be there at some point. I think in spring i will do a journey over the ocean. But Dallas is the major task on my list. But who knows, the archives might be worth to visit. My best to you Martin

Hi Jerry. I like to ask you a couple of questions before i went into detail regarding my improved windshield crack study. It has been said in your/Barb and Josiah's article that: Can you, or anyone else guide me to the original article from John Hunt's windshield study? I can't find it here nor on Lancer or Google. Is it hidden in alt.assassination groups? What i like to see is the whole expert's report from John Hunt about this ingenious but simple proof . Another question i have is.......what is the source of this photograph taken ca. 1978 for the HSCA: Ok, i can't find it in my files nor on any other online source (Mary Ferrell). Who made it and for what purpose? Thank you forward. As i said, every help is much appreciated. Martin

Thank you Doug. Feel free to contact me anytime. You are welcome. Hi Jack, you are quoting a conversation between Doug and me. So, i don't know if your judgement belongs to me. Just in case you may missed it.....it appears to me that Doug and me are in sync regarding the windshield crack issue. best Martin

It was Bernice Moore who kindly posted the link over here, Doug. At that time i wasn't a member of this forum here. http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.ph...14532&st=75 Posting#77 I will state something about my study soon but i wait for something which will have to be arrived here at my home the next days. Meanwhile i thank you both Doug and Jerry for your very kind words. Take care Sincerely Martin

I understand Robin. It's a pity, this HQ version of this image has been gone. It would show very much detail from inside (particular the backpart) the SS-100-X than no one else. Martin

Robin, it's a great image. I have exactly this one on my disk already. The same name: 10748.jpg. The date i've downloaded it was august 13, 2009. Don't ask me where i have it from. I forgot it. Is your Geocities portfolio erased recently? Did i have maybe more you are missing? Martin

Len, as i implied earlier in this thread, i will create a short video. Let's say a graphic animation which should describe and cover all the about the suncycle in Neely on november 22 and the related shadows. The idea is to upload it onto Youtube then (what i've never done before) This will descibe all what i mean in a very simple but consistent form without misinterpretations/misunderstandings. You appear to me intelligent but nevertheless you didn't understood it at first. Thats the reason why i will do this video. To make sure everybody understand it. Look, i've seen many Topics here and elsewhere with endless discussion over 60-70 pages where almost every uninvolved visitor is getting bored sooner or later. But more worst, most of them did not reveal who is right and who is wrong . Such a endless discussion is certainly the last thing i will. Short, crisp and convincing is what i like. Len, you have no other chance than to wait. Bump it up from time to time to make sure i don't forget. If it makes you feel good, then so be it. best Martin Why do I get the feeling that as they say here in Brazil you will post that the video "on St. Never's Day" or "when the chicken grows teeth" That was unfair and you know it. I'll keep this in mind! Martin

Hi everbody. On November 5, 1960, two individuals were arrested on location during the Chicago torchlight parade which Kennedy attended. The following individuals are of interest. They are: Alejandro Jaime Cruz Israel Dabney Thanks for any information you can provide. This question is attended to me by second hand. Thank you forward. Martin

Thank you Jack and Dean. But that time is absolutely impossible. It would cast a shadow towards in front of Oswald if there were no building behind. Such a photo at 9:12am would look like in deep dark shadow. Martin

Len, as i implied earlier in this thread, i will create a short video. Let's say a graphic animation which should describe and cover all the about the suncycle in Neely on november 22 and the related shadows. The idea is to upload it onto Youtube then (what i've never done before) This will descibe all what i mean in a very simple but consistent form without misinterpretations/misunderstandings. You appear to me intelligent but nevertheless you didn't understood it at first. Thats the reason why i will do this video. To make sure everybody understand it. Look, i've seen many Topics here and elsewhere with endless discussion over 60-70 pages where almost every uninvolved visitor is getting bored sooner or later. But more worst, most of them did not reveal who is right and who is wrong . Such a endless discussion is certainly the last thing i will. Short, crisp and convincing is what i like. Len, you have no other chance than to wait. Bump it up from time to time to make sure i don't forget. If it makes you feel good, then so be it. best Martin

Martin, Your link above is to an article Dale and I collaborated on refuting the wacky theory of LN'er Max Holland. You'll also find several other articles that I wrote on Dales website. I'd be more than willing to discuss anything that I wrote or collaborated on. As far as Dale's SBT work, I don't speak for Dale and you'd have to conmtact him. Todd Ok, i understand. Thanks Todd. Martin

As long as i type Todd W. VAUGHAN in Google i find him in as long with researcher Dale K. Myers. http://jfkfiles.blogspot.com/2007/06/max-h...-in-dallas.html Todd can probably answer some of Dale's (SBT)work issues? Martin

Len, i've posted already. http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.ph...0&start=150 I knew that i couldn't escape your eyes. BTW, i glance daily based here and see what's been posted. I work at home with several computers. To post something fundamental is another story. That needs time. I'am not a supporter of rush judgements. best Martin

Dean, your words support my theory that it is far better to discuss matters civil to convince anybody instead of harsh critic. Jerry did it in a modest way (like some others too) and now you consider to update your thoughts. Thats the way it should be. There is really nothing wrong with the Pyracantha branches and their lenght. Altgens 8, which Robin has posted speaks for itself i think. And Zapruder was simply the closest to this bush and used a zoom lense as some here mentioned as well. Therefore we see much more detail. If you ask me, Richard B. Trask got it right. Who else than Altgens it should have be? The only one close to him with a camera was Bothun. Altgens used a zoom lense and Bothun not and thats the reason why Bothun's FOV (you propably know his famous photo with the alleged James Files walking away in the background) is much wider/covered more enviroment. Both men were south of Elm street as they had taken their photographs. (Altgens has already passed Elm in Bothun's photo which was taken seconds later). best to you Martin

Thanks Len. Yes, unfortunately thats the way it is. I hope i will not suffer by a burnout next cause my clients extracting all my time and energy lately. Craig, our conversation (Hany&me) is yet no finished and i don't want to post half cooked things and i also have to ask for permission to publish our conversation when it's done. I hope you both understand and thanks for your patience! Sincerely Martin

Len, i don't what you do the whole day. But i'am working. And this the some 18 hours each day these weeks. When i have the time (and i take all i need) i show the forum members (not in particular you) that i'am absolutely correct.

Ok, i see my descreption was either not clear enough (my english could be better) or too technical. Please take it not as offense Len. *********************** In case other forum members don't understand it too, please let me know. (Craig Lamson and Hany Farid understand it so far.) I consider to make a graphic animation (movie) which describes simply what the suncycle did on march 31, 1963 in Neely street in case there is interest at all. Thank you Martin