Martin Hinrichs

Thank you Bill for bring up this Topic again. Your concerns are more than valid and the evidence concerning the geometry + testimonies of Truly & Baker leading to Oswald's enter of the vestibule (from the south) shall not and cannot be underestimated. Gimmie some time (maybe weekend) and i add more about it. Your are right on the money, Bill. best to you Martin Edit: File attachement

Thanks John. I see you've analyzed it carefully and your critic is well deserved. Please be picky. It helps to get things better. My next Gif will be without interlaced issues. And thank you for your kind words. best to you Martin

Thank you Bill. This blotch is a damage of this frame and appeared in every Nix film i'am aware of. I obtained this frames from Groden's "Case of conspiracy". Some of this frames are interlaced. I recognized it first as the Gif was stabilzed. Thats the reason why this Gif shivers in some frames. But i thought for this purpose (Chaney) it's good enough, John Dolva. Duncan, flooded is maybe not the best word. Sorry. But it is in comparison to other forums the one with most LN'er, which is not bad at all. It cause motivation and traffic. Let's see what the future will tell us. best to you Martin

Yes, yes i know you believe Oswald did it. No problem. Duncan's forum is flooded with LN'er. I think it will become the first LN'er forum ever. I've talked daily based with LN'er over there and thats OK. Some of them are even comrades. Talked to them in chattings. What i recommend you is to get a bit more personal. Talk to people. Get a bit off topic. Call them by their names. No need to be emotional. Just talk to them. Martin

Sure, i know what you mean Todd. Keep in mind he possibly turned to his right to make sure what his mate (Jackson) was doing. Or he reacted to a shot from the rear. (thats what you mean) 1 out of four so far. Martin

Even with the risk to get blamed but i don't know what the problem is. Officer Chaney was riding the right flank of the presidential limousine. He was the one next to Kennedy during the motorcade until Dealey Plaza, always slightely behind him. On his right side was Officer Douglas Jackson riding. Chaney had one thing in common with Officer Hargis...both wearing dark sunglasses. Police Officer Martin riding on the left to Hargis did one thing that every Officer flanking the presidential limousine did....he slowed down after the headshot.. But instead of stopping, he accelerated to follow the SS-100-X. Not so Officer Hargis. As we all know Hargis stopped his motorcycle to get onto the grassy knoll, examine this area briefly and went off. Officer Martin pursuing the SS-100-X is obviously seen here in Bell: In this McIntire photo he is again visible riding on the south side of Elm. He is also recognizable in the Daniel film. Whether it is Chaney or Jackson in this McIntire photo on the left is unknown to me. The aftermath film and photos wont give an answer as far as i know. All what i can say is that Chaney braked down a bit more after the fatal headshot than Jackson. Who accelerated first to follow the president is speculative. I would say Chaney because of his testimony. Martin

Hi Barb. Here is the relevant sequence of Jackies arm/hand movement. Frames 327-339. Unfortunately it's almost impossible to stable the entire sequence smooth because there is some horrible Camera motion blur in some frames. Her hand lasted for 9 frames on his back. So, half of a second. It appears to me that most parts of her hand (expect the thumb) moved on the upper part of his shoulder/neck area. At the end of the sequence her hand glitched/moved slightely forward and then back. BTW, fine descreption about the Parkland witnesses. best to you Martin EDIT: Thank you Jack.

And thats the problem C.Lamson. Your shape has almost nothing to do with reality. Well if my shape has nothing to do with reality , then yours is wrong as well since they are the same except for the area of the top of the head which YOU skip...M.H. FAIL Here in this Gif below we can see the shape of JFK's head at Zapruder frame 337. Let us compare this Gif with that what you have done to the image (ouch) Lets see, exactly as mine except you missed the top of his head. OUCH indeed M.H. FAIL In my outline is a part of Kennedy's forehead intentionelly not included. This portions can be seen in particular in frames 326-330. Whether this is actually hair or brain tissue hanging out of the cranium has to be further examined. I tend to say the latter. Lets see, exactly as yours except you missed the top of his head. OUCH indeed M.H. FAIL In this Zapruder frames below we can clearly see a damage at the top of Kennedy's head. Portions of his cranium at this location was simply gone. You included this area to his head. C.L. Error Sorry to burst your bubble there Martin, but the section of JFK's head you declined to outline in your lax drawing is actuallly there, regardless of the content (complete head or not) Its still PART of the shape of his head. Thats what you asked for, and I provided. Again Epic fail M.H. It's pretty clear by now this is no longer about trying you trying to prove your point that the area in question is hair or a blowout, but rather your attempt (and epic fail) to disect my rough outline of JFK's head. Fine, you draw better outlines than I do. OH wait, you screwed yours up too. Sheesh you FAIL at that too! We don't have to discuss the face of JFK in your work. Your lax outline is nowhere near to reality. C.L Error Well good since the face had ZERO to do with the subject at hand. M.H EPIC FAIL You guessed the lower back of JFK's head overpainting Jackies white glove. This part is not visible to the camera and therefore hidden. Well you can guess. Let me use your words: Believe/feeling is no proof. No I do not "guess at all. I simply did as you told and viewed the surrounding frames. Those frames show quite clearly the section of JFK's head under the gloved hand. You asked for the shape of JFK's head. I gave you the shape of the top and back of JFK's head..(the area under discussion if you recall). That shape INCLUDES the area under her glove. I don't have to guess his head is there, I can SEE it in the previous frames. M.H. MAJOR EPIC FAIL at his own directions. OUCH! You want to dictate the tempo of my research and when i have to post???? Guess what the answer is..... I don't know what you do the whole time. I have a company with serious work to do. You apparently not. I can say what I please and you can respond as you please. However your "response" is a major failure. Well, when in China a rice sack topple or you made statements like this....has the same effect to me. Nice analogy. You work here is worth about a sack of rice or less. Now you want to attempt to actually prove it's not hair..... Now Martin, How can you discount the fact that the area in question slowly, with the passage of time and the forward movement of the head becomes more exposed to the direct rays of the sun? Oh Craig my charming dear, i made my standpoint clear, providing relevant evidence why i analyized the image as i did. Conclusive and rational. Your answer appears to be rather an emotional reaction (i've seen your unedited version) than a constructive response. Repeating special wordings is a good indicator for that. I don't know whether you are unwilling to examine my work logical, you are limited to understand the photographic evidence, you have problems with your glasses or can't admit mistakes. I don't know. We all have our strengths and weaknesses. From what i read on this forum, i don't think i exaggerate to say you have a good knowledge about the technique aspects of cameras. This is a standard routine of a professional photographer. On the other hand (you as a professional photographer) it's sad to see how limited your understanding of the photographic evidence in the JFK assassination sometimes is. If you don't got it yet (or unwilling to get it), i can't help you. As i said, i made my standpoint clear (Post #93) and you have stated your point of view. I'll let judge the forum members and all the frequent anonymous visitors who is right and who is wrong. I'am not just for you here Craig and have zero interests in endless boring races (which have seen so often in the past on various forums). ************************************** I'am open for any constructive discussion/study with all the other forum members for sure. Martin

And thats the problem C.Lamson. Your shape has almost nothing to do with reality. Here in this Gif below we can see the shape of JFK's head at Zapruder frame 337. Let us compare this Gif with that what you have done to the image (ouch) In my outline is a part of Kennedy's forehead intentionelly not included. This portions can be seen in particular in frames 326-330. Whether this is actually hair or brain tissue hanging out of the cranium has to be further examined. I tend to say the latter. In this Zapruder frames below we can clearly see a damage at the top of Kennedy's head. Portions of his cranium at this location was simply gone. You included this area to his head. C.L. Error We don't have to discuss the face of JFK in your work. Your lax outline is nowhere near to reality. C.L Error You guessed the lower back of JFK's head overpainting Jackies white glove. This part is not visible to the camera and therefore hidden. Well you can guess. Let me use your words: Believe/feeling is no proof. You want to dictate the tempo of my research and when i have to post???? Guess what the answer is..... I don't know what you do the whole time. I have a company with serious work to do. You apparently not. Well, when in China a rice sack topple or you made statements like this....has the same effect to me.

Hi Raymond Thank you. To be honest Ray, i never really understood why people believe that this damaged part of JFK's head had to be red. It appears to me while studying particular frames that even in frame 314 (where we should see minimum portions of the brain) no sign of red blood is visible. It's looks rather brownish than redish even in frame 314. Please compare below the top of the head with the red roses we can see in Z#320. I gathered some WC testimonies from witnesses at Parkland for you. I've included Clint Hill. Mr. SPECTER - Before proceeding to describe what you did in connection with the tracheostomy, will you more fully describe your observation with respect to the head wound? Dr. McCLELLAND - As I took the position at the head of the table that I have already described, to help out with the tracheotomy, I was in such a position that I could very closely examine the head wound, and I noted that the right posterior portion of the skull had been extremely blasted. It had been shattered, apparently, by the force of the shot so that the parietal bone was protruded up through the scalp and seemed to be fractured almost along its right posterior half, as well as some of the occipital bone being fractured in its lateral haft, and this sprung open the bones that I mentioned in such a way that you could actually look down into the skull cavity itself and see that probably a third or so, at least, of the brain tissue, posterior cerebral tissue and some of the cerebellar tissue had been blasted out. There was a large amount of bleeding which was occurring mainly from the large venous channels in the skull which had been blasted open. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. SPECTER - What did you observe as to the nature of the President's wound? Dr. PETERS - Well, as I mentioned, the neck wound had already been interfered with by the tracheotomy at the time I got there, but I noticed the head wound, and as I remember--I noticed that there was a large defect in the occiput. Mr. SPECTER - What did you notice in the occiput? Dr. PETERS - It seemed to me that in the right occipitalparietal area that there was a large defect. There appeared to be bone loss and brain loss in the area. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. SPECTER. Will you describe as precisely as you can the nature of the head wound ? Dr. JONES. There was large defect in the back side of the head as the President lay on the cart with what appeared to be some brain hanging out of this wound with multiple pieces of skull noted next with the brain and with a tremendous amount of clot and blood. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. SPECTER - Would you describe as precisely for me as possible the nature of the head wound which you observed on the President? Dr. CARRICO - The wound that I saw was a large gaping wound, located in the right occipitoparietal area. I would estimate to be about 5 to 7 cm. in size, more or less circular, with avulsions of the calvarium and scalp tissue. As I stated before, I believe there was shredded macerated cerebral and cerebellar tissues both in the wounds and on the fragments of the skull attached to the dura. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. SPECTER. And what, in a general way, did you observe with respect to President Kennedy's condition? Miss BOWRON. He was very pale, he was lying across Mrs. Kennedy's knee and there seemed to be blood everywhere. When I went around to the other side of the car I saw the condition of his head. Mr. Specter. You saw the condition of his what? Miss BOWRON. The back of his head. Mr. Specter. And what was that condition? Miss BOWRON. Well, it was very bad---you know. Mr. Specter. How many holes did you see? Miss BOWRON. I just saw one large hole. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mr. SPECTER. What did you observe as to President Kennedy's condition on arrival at the hospital? Mr. HILL. The right rear portion of his head was missing. It was lying in the rear seat of the car. His brain was exposed. There was blood and bits of brain all over the entire rear portion of the car. Mrs. Kennedy was completely covered with blood. There was so much blood you could not tell if there had been any other wound or not, except for the one large gaping wound in the right rear portion of the head. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I assume Arlen Specter getting blister while hearing this. What all of them describe is the damage we can also see in this autopsie photographs. Parts of JFK's face are visible and also the top (from front to back) of his head are visible. Some parts are a mix of brain and hair. What we see in the later Zapruder frames is this damage. The quality of this the Zapruder film in general is unfortunately too bad to see all that details. best to you Martin

So far so good. Ah, i see that you realize the problems. I don't have a problem, i see only errors in your sketch. I do. Step by step. I can ensure you, i'am not afraid. Please stay on Topic. There is another Topic where your last point belongs to. Ask over there. So Craig, next step. Pay attention to the red arrow. What do we see in the area, where you see parts of JFK's head? Raymond, i will come back to your questions. The reason i did not yet, is Craig Lamson's divertion tactics (as we can see all over here). I hope you understand. Thanks for your patience. Martin

Craig, it's really hard to begin and i don't know how to start. /o\ Look what you have done to the image...../o\ /o\ I don't know whether you are joking or not. I see you wear glasses in your avatar. How long is it ago you've visited your optician? Your eyes may suffered over the time watching often on the screen. This is no joke. I mean this serious. Sorry, it's hard to take you serious anymore (just in case you are not joking) I'am posting your image a bit larger again for everybody (incl. you) to see. Martin

Thank you Jim.

Thank you Bernice. Bill has a good eye. Martin

Craig: You say all what we see inside your orange outline represents the head shape of John F. Kennedy's head after the final bullet impact?? I got a bitter sense, i'am going to waste my time.....again.

Show you study Craig. Please draw an outline of JFK's head.

Really. Follow the shapes of JFK's head and you will realize it. I'll give you a hint: Study the frames before and after and pay attention to Jackies black collar. Martin

What we see in Z#frame 337 is cleary a damage of the rear of JFK's head. This is what Clint Hill described. I outlined and tinted that shape. What you see is postwork made by me. Martin

Thank you Bernice for all that Pictures. I found a good enlargement of frame 374 in the PDF file you have uploaded. I copied it and attached it below. I hope thats OK with you and Jim Fetzer. At last a crop from frame 359. Credit: Robin Unger Martin

Thank you for your kind words, Jack. Thats for sure. It's very obvious. True, there was a gusty wind in DP that day. I noticed a while ago in Altgens 5 and other movies that the wind was coming from the opposite direction. Take a look at the black flag on the SS-100-X please. The only rational explanation i have is....the wind whirled between the tall buildings. Martin

Thanks Chris. We do almost the same. But i use Ulead Gif Animator to create a Gif file. There is an option to control the speed called Delay. You can apply it via 1/100th of a second. The Muchmore film runs at 18.5 seconds per frame. So, 1:18.5= 0.054 seconds between each frame. This Gif is in realtime: Unfortunately i used not all frames. I shall do it to show what i mean. Martin

Chris, it slowed down before the headshot. No doubt. Are you sure all frames in your Gif running at same speed and in realtime? Thank you Martin

Thank you Stephen! This is not too far away from the young man seen here. I tweaked that image a bit if you don't mind. Martin

Thank you for that detailed explanation John. I heard from that tool and played with it many months ago. But i've never heard about that 3D Plugin. So, i've downloaded the newest version (1.31?) and the 3D Plugin as well. I tried to follow your instructions but was til now without success. But to be honest i spend not very much time (which is always limited) yet. I will play around with it the other day and see if i can achieve something. If you have some time[anytime] (with your skills on this tool) i would be more than happy if you could do the same with let's say 3-4 subsequent Nix frames. I can do a stable Gif out of it. Absolutely no problem John. best to you Martin

Thank you John. Can you probably describe it how you've done it (software)? And are you able to locate that shape in another frame too? (Your crop looks somehow rotated) best to you Martin