-
Posts
489 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Posts posted by Ian Kingsbury
-
-
James
Would the characteristics of the wound be consistent with a hit on
Connally alone after the head shot say z340 when Connaly was laying
To his left leaving his torso exposed between the seats ?.
Ian
-
Tommy
Don't you think if Kostikov was indeed in Mexico that he would have been shadowed
Therefore all eyes and cameras on who tries to contact who that's what they were there for
After all .
The CIA would have loved a picture of Oswald in Mexico but alas.
I thought Harry Dean said Oswald went to Mexico to be tricked by Gabaldon
In a fake "CIA" office.
Ian
P.s.
if Kostikov was in Mexico then Atlee-Phillips would have known!.
-
Tom
I followed on from Daniels lead and found this
http://ilovetypography.com/2008/04/25/extreme-type-terminology-part-4/.
Also I found this interesting
ASCII developed from telegraphic codes. Its first commercial use was as a seven-bit teleprinter code promoted by Bell data services. Work on the ASCII standard began on October 6, 1960, with the first meeting of the American Standards Association's (ASA) X3.2
In case of an odd or extra symbol rather than number or letter.
Ian
-
It's good to have a thread to let off a bit of steam would you agree?.
-
He has to define the evidence first ...surely?.
-
Yeah, right. Anybody who has the gall to think Oswald was guilty (or "no conspiracy") is automatically labeled "CIA".Makes me sick.Looks like another professor on the cia payroll....my tax dollars at work ....makes me sick.
You wish!.
-
-
Perhaps Mockingbird is losing its grip
-
Tom
I would certainly like to try and help I will send you an email address to your pm.
Can you run classic on your mac? . If you can find a copy of NIH image for macs you may find it helpful it was developed
To distinguish the colour variances in brain cancer cells its shareware and quite a powerful tool .
I will try graphic converter as well as these have been successful in restoring some Victorian family photos .
All the best
Ian
-
Tom
I will try and find the posts of Christophe he was using software
To develop images taken in Dealey some pictures appears to
Clarify areas and enhance the view.
His was purely software on an image and they looked similar.
I guess it's like the 3D pictograms some can see while others look !.
Ian
-
Tommy
.
Can you see what it is yet?.
Ian
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microdot
Scoff then read wrong
Read then scoff correct
It's your avatar!. Hahaha
-
Tommy
Do you remember Christophe at Duncan's forum ?.
Who ran some algorithms over some of the pictures from Dealey?.
Ian
How do you think they make integrated circuits ?.
-
-
Tommy
Did you look?.
Ian
-
Tom
Measure me for a strait jacket too I see at least four faces
The large one on the lower right is the largest and it appears symmetrical.
I will try iPhoto on my mac!.
Ian
P.s. inside the a ...Dulles?.
-
Tom
I tried using photo software but it gets too pixelated but I did notice
That just in front of the first line appears to be block spelling out "Joe"
I can see the additions to the letters but the faces Are beyond the software
I am using.
Ian
-
It was more balanced than expected, and included the news that Anthony Summers is planning to release an update to his book Conspiracy/Not in Your lifetime.
Possible title "never again"!.
-
The last truths told about The body were at Parkland hospital
By the doctors attempting to save the life of thier president.
Then the body got stolen anything after that was designed to
Confuse and disseminate. Are any of the photos real?.
The body at Bethesda does not look the same as it left Parkland
Especially the throat wound(argument).the photographer does not recognise
The photos ,the developer does not recognise the film.
I am just inserting this post as there are very many readers who do not
Understand the finite medical implications me included .
The medical reports start to stink after parkland they are supposed to.
There was a 1/4" hole in the right forehead yes or no?.
There was a big hole in the back of the head yes or no?.
Why do the photos not show this?.
Answer they are not meant to.perhaps the originals did.
If you want to get the 75 % who believe in the conspiracy
To understand it you have to simplify the explanations.
-
Tom
This gets more compelling with every post ,finding the picture must have been
A shock?
Ian
-
"Holy Fetzerooni batman".
-
Don
I have some reservations about Oswalds role but I agree with the statement.
If the "Oswald involved somehow" researchers/readers do not support the statement
It at least will make those unaware question the statement anyway!.
IOW
The statement begs the question "Well what did he do" by then you are into the conversation
Or able to drop in a real fact or two.
Last year I fitted some stone lintols and Jambs at a History teachers home
He was unaware of many aspects of the case and woefully unaware of the
American foreign policies ( Kennedys not Dulles)at the time.
I recommended " JFK and the unspeakable " and when he finished to give it to the school library.
Ian
-
-
Martin
http://www.marksobel.com/COMMISSION/menu.htm
There are clips at
YouTube looks interesting!.
Ian
-
Paul
Maybe a deal was struck "you get the film I disappear"
What are the odds of filming the 2 events randomly?.
This makes him (Martin) part of the plot would you stick your head out
For a looksee's?.
There must be many for whom the penny has dropped , those facilitators
With an ignorant part to play the small details that have leaked that cannot be
Proved because the participants part whosever small has become self evident
Only those on the outside of the planning would want to be "involved".
Ian
The Connally Thorax Wound and the Missing Bullet
in JFK Assassination Debate
Posted
James
Thank you
Ian