Barry Krusch

Gary, will you accept this challenge?

thanks, Daniel, I sent the link....any other takers?

Its uploaded.

Thanks, Kathy, I'll convert this to PDF. I find it interesting that in a nation of 375,000,000 people, there are a few hundred doing this work. I wonder why?

super, robert thanks

super, robert thanks

I've got my appointment made . . . have you?

I have not been able to locate this link on any thread in this forum, but if you have any similar links, please post them here.

As you know, the Clay Shaw trial transcripts have long been available on the Internet, but I have never been able to find all of the transcripts in one large file. That being the case, I decided to create one myself. I uploaded the file to my archive at: http://www.krusch.com/jfk You will notice that this is a large file, over 150 megabytes. There is, however, one really big difference between this file and the ones which are accessible on the Internet. This document has an embedded index. As you will see, it is extraordinarily convenient! Here is how you access the index. You will need to have a version of Adobe Acrobat reader version X. if you do not have that, download it and install. Now, open the Clay Shaw file after you have downloaded it to your computer. Type CTRL + SHIFT + F on the PC, and I think CMD on the Macintosh. Now, type some search terms like "Finck". Voila!! You can now go to any page which has the word Finck. Well, almost any page. Because the OCR is unreliable, this will probably only pick up 90-95% of the occurrences. Still, you will agree, it's extremely valuable. That said, I'm still looking for some virtual jurors to read the chapter in my Oswald book. So far, I've not yet received any feedback in terms of someone reading the chapter and giving me a 200-500 word analysis. If you're interested, please let me know.

Daniel, very valuable stuff, tks.

By the way, a fascinating image . . . what is it, and where did you get it?

I don't disagree, David. I think when you see the final book it will make sense.

Sure, thanks....is there a lone assassin theorist in the house?

Still need a couple other volunteers . . .

I am going to buy it and when I review it I am going to say exactly what I think about it. Remember this: for every one person who buys the book, perhaps five, ten, twenty, or thirty will read the reviews and not buy the book. So I welcome this opportunity to clarify any errors in the book, if any exist.

Excellent, Pat, my first taker! Thank you! Any lone assassin theorists out there ready to weigh in? Need one more CTer too ....

As you may or may not know, I am working on an upcoming book on the Kennedy assassination. The basic concept of the book is to divide the case against Oswald into a number of component parts, conglomerating the relevant evidence within each part, and then making the determination as to how the evidence does or does not support that part. Most of the chapters have already been written. What I have recently done is taken one of the chapters of the book, forty pages long, and had a "virtual jury" read the chapter and then tell me what their confidence level was for the fact at issue. I have already received six responses. Quite surprising responses, actually, which is why I am taking the present route. My initial idea was to have only laypeople read the evidence, but based on the responses I have received, I think it would be a good idea to have Kennedy experts have at the material as well so that we can do a good compare and contrast exercise in the interpretation of data. Your mission, should you decide to accept it, is to let me know if you are interested in reading the sample chapter, and then submit to me within a week a 200-500 word analysis of the chapter, with a final report of your ultimate confidence level based exclusively on the evidence that you have read, trying to forget everything else that you have read about the case, just like a regular jury is supposed to do. If you are willing to do this, I promise that I will publish whatever you have written exactly as you have written it, with no changes at all. For the Kennedy expert part of the jury, I want to have both camps represented, one camp which believes that there was a conspiracy to kill President Kennedy, the other which believes that there was no conspiracy. At this stage, whether or not Oswald was involved is not at issue. If you're interested in participating, please reply here in this forum, or you can send me an email at bkrusch@yahoo.com. Let me know in which camp you reside. I will then take a look at all of the candidates, and from the groups, choose two from each. I want to have an equal number of people represent each position, so if you have a strong belief on either side and want to participate, let me know! Thanks..... Barry

Just uploaded ARRB Medical Exhibits. You can now download all the medical exhibits in PDF form with just a couple of mouse clicks.

The publication of this book is fantastic news! I have ordered my copy today!

Oooooh, excellent, thanks Richard!!

"Temporary workers".....that's chilling.

Hmmm, ok....

David, do you have any articles in particular that should be read?

Well, considering as a consequence of this activity that workers stacked boxes shielding the "sniper's nest" FOR Oswald ( he didn't do it), I would say that this would be pretty significant.

Well, one caveat there....to scan the book I have to tear the binding off. The book is thereafter toast. So you have to be willing to make the supreme sacrifice for the common good.