Ray Mitcham

Then let me ask you this one:

Did Marina move in relation to the subject?

Marina moved in relation to the background....

I assume that both you and Jim mean the camera moved in relation to the background. Don't want you saying later "I didn't say the camera moved..."

If that is the case how come the parallax view of the fixed verticals in the background hasn't changed?

Mr Lamson, if you didn't sigh so much and tried to answer the question properly, maybe we could further the discussion. Perhaps I can make it a bit easier for you.

In respect of CE133A, In CE133B do you think he moved:-

a) to his left (our right)

b. to his right, (our left)

c) backwards

d) forwards

e) all of the above

f) none of the above.

g) a combination of any of the above. (in which case state your choice.)

Sighonara.

Regards,

Sigh...

Maybe you should do a better job of ASKING the questions, and more importantly trying to find the answers YOURSELF first.

Again, he moved in relation to the sun, how much simpler does it get? If YOU want to do the tests to see what movements would be required relative to the light source to create the shadow changes seen, by all means have at it.

I've created photographic lighting sets for 30 years, and I'm confident in my assessment that the shadow angle changes as the natural result of body movement. I've tested this in relation to another crazy "shadow angle claim" years ago.

However the long and short of it is if YOU want to know the answer,then why not actually DO THE WORK yourself. This is not rocket science, all you need is a camera, a pencil, a work light and a piece of clay.

So lets "sigh" again. And see if you actually want to FIND the answer....

Why won't you answer a simple question, Mr Lamson? When you say he moved in relation to the sun which way do YOU think he moved? That's all I'm asking you to tell me. If I don't know what you are mean when you say "He moved in relation to the sun" then your comment means nothing. If you want your photography subjects to "move" to a different position, do you just say "move" or do you tell them which way to move? I don't want you to do any WORK for me, I just want a simple answer. Which way do you think he moved in CE133B, in relation to his position in CE133A?

Regards,

In which respect? His stance? His position in relation to the fence? What do you mean by "his body changes position"?

(By the way, I love the "sigh....")

Exactly as I said, his body is in different positions from one photo to the next.

What do you mean by "different positions"? Different position in relation to the ground? Different position in relation to his body shape? Different position in relation to the back drop?Easy question to answer, I would have thought.

Let me 'sigh' again...

How hard is this...really? He moved. How much simpler does this need to be? His body is in different position from one photo to the next.

One would think it SHOULD be pretty easy to understand since we are taking about shadows...his body is in different positions...in relation to the SUN....

Mr Lamson, if you didn't sigh so much and tried to answer the question properly, maybe we could further the discussion. Perhaps I can make it a bit easier for you.

In respect of CE133A, In CE133B do you think he moved:-

a) to his left (our right)

b. to his right, (our left)

c) backwards

d) forwards

e) all of the above

f) none of the above.

g) a combination of any of the above. (in which case state your choice.)

Sighonara.

Regards,

In which respect? His stance? His position in relation to the fence? What do you mean by "his body changes position"?

(By the way, I love the "sigh....")

Exactly as I said, his body is in different positions from one photo to the next.

What do you mean by "different positions"? Different position in relation to the ground? Different position in relation to his body shape? Different position in relation to the back drop?Easy question to answer, I would have thought.

Perhaps with your experience in photography, Mr Lamson, you could explain how the angles of Oswald's shadow in CE133a and CE133b differ so much, seeing as they were taken within minutes of each other.

Sigh...his body changes position....

In which respect? His stance? His position in relation to the fence? What do you mean by "his body changes position"?

(By the way, I love the "sigh....")

Perhaps with your experience in photography, Mr Lamson, you could explain how the angles of Oswald's shadow in CE133a and CE133b differ so much, seeing as they were taken within minutes of each other.

G'day Ray, and welcome to the Forum. What did you do in the RAF? I'm RAN myself, with the FAA.

Thanks for the welcome, Evan. I was in radar (early detection), controlling fighter interception defending the country, during the start of the Cold war although it was now that long ago, I think the radar we used worked by clockwork.

My name is Ray Mitcham and I served in the Royal Air Force, after which I started my own business from which I have recently retired.

I live in the U.K. And I am happily married with three adult children and five grandchildren.

I was 25 years old when President Kennedy was assassinated, and have been following the investigation since the 1970's. There are so many anomalies with the official evidence that it would seem that there has to have been a conspiracy. I believe that the Internet is the common man's best avenue for solving these anomalies. I am particularly interested in joining the Education Forum as it seems to be one of the few web sites where different points of view are accepted without aggression from people who disagree with them. It will be from sites such as this that the truth about J.F.K. Will eventually out.