Roger DeLaria

bump

Nice website Gary. I plan on ordering your book and look forward to reading it.

Kathy,

Where have you seen the frontal head shot? I would like to see these missing frames as well. I'm ready to see it, as I think we all are.

Merry Christmas to everyone, and may you find what you're looking for.

I don't think that looks like Oswald at all. It could be the same as the guy in the inset picture, though. Hard to tell definitively.

I haven't read it yet, but it's on my list. To me, the crash has always seemed a suspicious event among many suspicious events surrounding people related to the assassination/Watergate.

http://ora.us4.list-manage.com/track/click?u=bf4ff8383c96cca30f53b212c&id=328300b246&e=f9bba50d36

http://ora.us4.list-manage.com/track/click?u=bf4ff8383c96cca30f53b212c&id=f3e657724f&e=f9bba50d36

http://ora.us4.list-manage1.com/track/click?u=bf4ff8383c96cca30f53b212c&id=e1d7e57416&e=f9bba50d36

http://ora.us4.list-manage.com/track/click?u=bf4ff8383c96cca30f53b212c&id=93c3f9b999&e=f9bba50d36

I bought my copy a couple of weeks ago, and am looking forward to getting to it. Another one on my long list to read.

I would tend to agree that the files released in 2017 are going to render us zilch. I believe anything incriminating was disposed of long ago. Possibly some interesting tidbits, but no smoking guns.

Tom,

Certainly could be, who knows?

I would say his response is a little disappointing, but typical, and I'm not surprised. He's asked a question regarding the JFK Assassination files, and he answers talking about Roswell, UFOs, and Aliens. Nice deflection and non-answer. The implication seeming to be that anyone questioning the assassination is not to be taken seriously.

I came across this and found it pretty incredible. Holy cow.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4v92yDr_Aeo

I would agree that it's the same man as well. It looks like he's wearing a blue apron, too. It's interesting how the man is walking east toward the depository while most others are going westward in the opposite direction. Hmmm.

Good article that shows the fingerprints of intelligence that were all over the operation.

Gee, he had more protection there than he did in Dallas.

Working for Dulles, and with his background, I've always felt Ed Lansdale was a prime candidate for organizing/managing DP. This picture I've thought is very telling.

For myself, I've come to the conclusion that it was LBJ. It wasn't just LBJ alone by himself, but LBJ was the lynchpin at the epicenter of other conspirators(Texas Oil, CIA, industrialists/war profiteers) whom he had deep ties to, and whom had a vested interest in JFK being eliminated. LBJ was going to be personally and politically ruined and go to prison. LBJ had Big Oil and MIC money behind him, as well as the Texas political machine. He had deep relations and contacts throughout congress, the state of Texas, industry and commerce, as well as law enforcement to ensure he got off scot-free. I see the who and the why right there. LBJ had a clear motive and wouldn't have any problems finding willing co-conspirators.

I feel that much of the continuing cover-up may have to do with protecting the legacy and integrity of institutions, and in people's confidence in those institutions.

Story about the Pentagon using a charity to spy in North Korea. Some people involved with the charity knew, some didn't. Interesting about covert machinations.

http://edition.cnn.com/videos/us/2015/10/26/report-pentagon-spying-on-north-korea-through-charity-intv-lead.cnn

LBJ had motive, opportunity, and connections in spades.

The assassination and surrounding activity must have the highest rate of multiple coincidences of any event in modern history.

Well, a lot of things can be done with digital wizardry. To me, the 3d model is not in the same leaning stance as the photo. I consider myself to have excellent balance and core strength, and there's no way I could lean like that. It just looks so bad, it's embarrassing. And, the lines of the stair support and garage are way off kilter. Me thinks that those should be straight., too.

deleted

Reading through these recent posts about control and influence of Hollywood and what we are supposed to think and be told, as well as the massive money spent on such as Glenn mentioned, I can't help but think back to Eisenhower's farewell speech regarding the military industrial complex massive $ being spent.

"A vital element in keeping the peace is our military establishment. Our arms must be mighty, ready for instant action, so that no potential aggressor may be tempted to risk his own destruction.

Our military organization today bears little relation to that known by any of my predecessors in peacetime, or indeed by the fighting men of World War II or Korea.

Until the latest of our world conflicts, the United States had no armaments industry. American makers of plowshares could, with time and as required, make swords as well. But now we can no longer risk emergency improvisation of national defense; we have been compelled to create a permanent armaments industry of vast proportions. Added to this, three and a half million men and women are directly engaged in the defense establishment. We annually spend on military security more than the net income of all United States corporations.

This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence -- economic, political, even spiritual -- is felt in every city, every State house, every office of the Federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this development. Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources and livelihood are all involved; so is the very structure of our society.

In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the militaryindustrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist."

I haven't read Talbot's new book yet, but it's certainly on my list.

The Dulles brothers through Sullivan and Cromwell certainly represented some some very powerful interests around the world, and had their hands in quite a few cookie jars.

http://www.mohammadmossadegh.com/news/dulles-brothers/

http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/US_ThirdWorld/US_Guat.html

https://theoligarchkings.wordpress.com/2010/05/27/united-fruit-company/

Something just doesn't look right about the shoulder line to me. The upper part of the white shirt is cutting off the bottom left of Lovelady's jaw. It looks clearly pasted over, in my opinion.

The area behind "doorwayman" containing the partially blacked out suit and tie guy(that looks like it was monkeyed with) whose shirt is simultaneously in front of and behind doorwayman, cutting off his shoulder, and also appearing further down, obscured by the too large floating baby; could oswald have been photographed in that area behind doorwayman, necessitating his being obscured by suit and tie guy? Forgive me if this has been already discussed and I'm off base here, I haven't really looked into Altgens 6 all that much.

I recently finished Legacy of Secrecy, where this was talked about.