Ramon F. Herrera

All this time, people have been talking about the Zapruder film, in singular, when the term "Zapruder films" is more accurate in certain contexts. According to this: http://www.jfklancer.com/History-Z.html on day one there were already 3-4 copies. Where are they? Are those copies of the film included in the JFK Collection Database? http://www.nara.gov/cgi-bin/starfinder/0?path=jfkcnew.txt&id=demo&pass=&OK=OK Could it be possible that one of those copies (previous to the alterations claimed by Brugioni and Horne) https://vimeo.com/102327635 will ever be available? TIA

Kathy: Do you have an idea how much of our prosperity comes from overseas?

Thanks so much for that image, David!! Wouldn't it be wonderful if somebody extended that superimposing job, but in 3 dimensions and maximum detail? Now we are at the point I would like to underscore. The plotters were in such a hurry that they screwed up badly. That x-ray, by itself, is a perfect job... except that other photos were released! In all its wisdom, our fatherly government is attempting to make us swallow the following: (1) The x-ray with the huge frontal hole (see [a] and in your image) is genuine. AND (2) The stare of death photos with the pristine frontal region where the bullet was supposed to exit, also genuine. What is their explanation for this blatant inconsistency? Allow me to try: Manly-Carkie Bullet: "Gee, I made it all the way through the 6th. floor, a trajectory which was nicely going down. The little entry hole was not so bad, either, thank my creator for providing me with a pointy head; next, the accumulation of compressed brain mass was harder and harder, but the explosive removal of frontal bone was achieved! However, at that point I was very tired and could not move one atom from the victim's skin". The maxim "the Kennedys are thick skinned" gets a whole new meaning, I guess. Pardon my sarcasm, I tend to do that when anybody treats me like an imbecile. ps: Where can I get that image?

Are you saying that the GOP has 17 candidates and 1 mind? Was Mr. Dole aware that he was some sort of sacrificial lamb, an investment in the future?

The source is this book: http://patriot.net/~ramon/jfk/JFK-Second-Autopsy.pdf Page 6.

The source is this book: http://patriot.net/~ramon/jfk/JFK-Second-Autopsy.pdf Page 6.

The X ray is from this debate. http://www.ctka.net/reviews/mantik_speer.html And that is the point that I am trying to make. Shouldn't we CTs (Dr. Mantik included) believe all these doctors, nurses, etc.? http://jfkmurdersolved.com/doctors.htm If that is the case, not only is the x-ray a fake but inconsistent with the attached fake, which was done very carefuly: That drawing is nothing short of perfection: the hole can be attributed to 6th floor TSBD or to Grassy Knoll. The people who invented it are trying to avoid calling the Parkland folks liars (only that they need new glasses or something).

This is one of those things that infuriate me about the whole JFK case. It is impossible for the photo and the x-ray attached to be both genuine, right? Reasoning: (1) Unless all the Parkland personnel concocted a unanimous lie, the x-ray cannot possibly be real. Not even close. We may split hairs about the gaping hole being baseball-, fist- or grapefruit-size, or perhaps being closer to the right as opposed to the center, but a hole like that cannot possibly heal (or migrate) during the 4-hour flight from Parkland to Bethesda. (2) Let's say that we accept the x-ray. Now we have an even worse problem. Where on earth is the huge hole that should have obliterated the right eye, plus vicinity, of the victim? If there is any consistency in this world: • CTs must say that the X-ray is a fake. • LNs must say that the photo is a fake. TIA, -Ramon

Hi Jim: Speaking of dumpster-level credibility, let us not forget that of Mr. Bill O'Reilly. He and prof. McAdams are in many respects, inseparable. See how the following two wise men arrived at the same conclusion: [Prof. Jay Rosen, from the scholar point of view:] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a1Ux5rdBu1c [Jon Stewart, very succinct, from the humorist point of view:] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iliH-67pvyk&feature=youtu.be -Ramon

Did the Warren Commission watch the Zapruder film? Notice that I am not referring to still images, but motion video. As usual, there seems to be an official version and one contadicting it. TIA, -RFH

I was born in Venezuela, emigrated to the US in the 1980s. I have engineering degrees in Computer Science and Electrical Engineering. The Latin American angle of the 50-70s have always interested me. In my family (Catholic, of course) the Kennedys reached the highest levels of admiration. I like to think of myself as a pioneer of the Internet, since I was fortunate enough to be at MIT when the network was being created. Worked with Bolt, Beranek & Newman (BBN) who were the first Internet Provider and did the analysis of the Dictabelt audio. I have been a participant in the first newsgroup, alt.conspiracy.jfk for almost as long as it exist, but lately I spend my time in JFK Facts, where I have done translations and audio work. I spent many years in Cambridge, Massachusetts and relocated to Houston, Texas, a few years, ago. Have visited Dealey Plaza several times. The book that I have been recommending lately is "The Last Investigation" by Gaeton Fonzi, one of my personal heroes. The day job that I do is software engineer, completely unrelated to any of the above. I am currently working on a web site that will combine 2 of my passions the JFK Assassination and science (Physics of the violent backsnap, audio, etc.)