Ramon F. Herrera

There is a very interesting maxim, one that almost reaches the level of truism: "The more excuses the person provides, the higher chances s/he is lying". Count the number of excuses in the Posner book below.... Note: "Dr. Luis Alvarez, a Nobel Prize-winning physicist who worked for the military-industrial complex [...]". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luis_Walter_Alvarez

What I posted above is ALL the shootings to heads of people that I could find in YouTube. In every single one of them, the subjects behave as predicted by elementary physics (conservation of momentum). If anybody can find ONE video that violates that elementary rule, please post it here. We will be patiently waiting. -Ramon

So God has a special rule for Kennedy (perhaps for Catholics?) and the opposite for criminals and Muslims? -RFH

"I wish to re-emphasize that none of our test objects in these experiments with melons and skulls ever jumped or fell off the stand AWAY from the shooter." -- J.K. Lattimer Let's verify this with actual shots to human heads, shall we? ========================= Sniper Shot Barret M107 4:15" ================================ Real Sniper Shot - Better than American Sniper 1:10" ================================ Young Iraqi shot by sniper ISIS - Graphics https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ekzXxjfobAE 0:35" ================================ FSA Rebel Killed By SAA Sniper 1:00" ================================ FSA Soldier takes a clean headshot Bullet penetrate and hits another one 0:20" ================================ Sniper Rifle Ballistic Test! | Zombie Go Boom 0:20"

You are welcome, Paul. These links are related to that one: http://www.economicrefugee.net/new-az-immigration-law-ties-to-white-supremacists/ (2 videos) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FsHi6_l1XzA&bpctr=1445202936 (Great music!) https://www.splcenter.org/20090201/nativist-lobby-three-faces-intolerance https://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/extremist-files/group/federation-american-immigration-reform In order to remain on topic, let's close with this one: http://www.wbur.org/2009/08/27/kennedy-immigration (audio) -RFH

In Internet forums, sometimes folks remind me of Godwin's Rule: "Ramon, if you mention Hitler or the Nazis you lose!" To which I reply: "In some instances, violating Godwin's Rule is proper and fully justified. See below" http://www.theweek.co.uk/world-news/35581/how-america-inspired-third-reich -RFH

Most of the software didn't even have a name. It was done in order to support our invention of what they call today "Social Media", in the days of Usenet and e-mail only, before web. The application that became best known was: "Elector Electro". It was used to vote in presidential elections. Results were not binding but a Constitution was modified thanks to it. -Ramon

The Internet, of course. Along with a cast of thousands. http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=22302&p=315660 I was fortunate enough to be in the right place at the right time. For the whole story: http://www.amazon.com/Where-Wizards-Stay-Up-Late/dp/0684832674 -Ramon

You ain't seen nothing, Glenn. "Either you are born crazy, or you are born boring" -Oliver Stone http://www.oliverstone.com/about

"VERITAS" my ass... https://www.google.com/search?q=Harvard+motto&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8

Allow me to continue the article: It would be about 25 years later that advances in: ( A ) Science: the invention of the Finite Element Method and Computational Fluid Dynamics and ( B ) Technology: Faster, cheaper, raw computing power -plus software applications- available to the masses. would make it feasible to determine with certainty that it is impossible for the fatal shot to have come from behind. The above lag was arguably inevitable. Tragically, however, it would take some 20 years more (and counting) for universities to abandon their long-held position: being complicit with their silence. -Ramon ps: http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=22348

Folks, please take a look at the latest production of my trusted team of animators: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dKC_zBA50HA&feature=youtu.be What you see above is the first step toward obliterating the official version, depicted below: Look closely: the head does not move 1 cm. This has been demonstrated empirically by the other side, of all people. The supreme irony. One strong possibility is that for a tangential shot it is physically impossible to make an adult airborne. The violent move (seen not only in the Z-film) is a mathematical absurdity. The argument I am attempting is known as reductio ad absurdum. This hypothesis needs to be proven beyond a shadow of a doubt, correct?. Thank God, we have science and technology on our side. They are closer to us with every passing month and year. Indeed, we need to go from animation to simulation. What is the difference, you ask? Answer: Several zeros to the right of the dollar sign, not to mention brainpower and the participation of universities. -Ramon

Jon: I have worked with Jeff for a while, in translations, audio, video editing, etc. I was involved in cleaning up the recording from Gaeton Fonzi's cassette recorder for Jeff's interview on CNN (Thanks again, Marie!!!). But I digress... Jeff has held polls to HUMILIATE Shenon. Interviewed him in order to sweep the floor with Shenon's crêpe (*). For a small sample of the Blitzkrieg from JFKFacts to Shenon: http://jfkfacts.org/assassination/experts/phil-shenons-cruel-shocking-misinterpreation/ A JFK Facts debate about the CIA: Shenon v. Morrow Whose argument do you find more credible? Vote in the JFK Facts poll on the next page http://jfkfacts.org/assassination/news/a-jfk-facts-debate-about-the-cia-shenon-v-morrow/ -RFH (*) Pardon my French.

Jim: What we have is a win-win-win situation. That is the really cool thing about being on the side of the truth. The violent back snap is completely real: ... not to mention seen by all visual witnesses. Oliver Stone -who knows more than his share about film- says "it was slightly modified". Per Dino Bruggioni, most likely they erased some spray of white brain matter and added an extra rare steak in the entry hole area. Even decades later (say, in the 80s-90s) it would have been quite a challenge to dramatically alter the Z-film in a short period of time. They could selectively apply some touch up here and there but there is no way they could "cut" Kennedy and "paste" him in another spot. Hence the 12 year lock-up in the TIME-LIFE safe. -Ramon

Jim: A great idea (in the sense of ironic and funny) just occurred to me. This is imaginary. Let's say that I somehow get a couple million dollars or something like that and hire a lot of scientists, engineers, geeks, the works. We get the most expensive supercomputers and we start doing the advanced models and simulations (we are talking almost Project Manhattan here). My goal is to explain to the microsecond and micrometer level, the sequence of movements which included the violent back snap. The main hypothesis is that the fatal shot came from ahead. We are trying to prove it with absolute mathematical certainty. Somebody here wrote: "Ramon, you are assuming that the Z-film is genuine! The back snap is really an artifact of the fake!!". You know what I would do? I would turn around to the team and tell them: "Folks, am I afraid that I have to ask you to pack your bags and go home. The 'Parkland Effect' Project is hereby closed" The brain power get up in arms, disappointed, enraged, mutinous: "What!? Are you serious!? How come!?? You better have some good explanation, former boss, or you are walking the plank!" [Me:] "Well, since the real objective was to prove a conspiracy, beyond a shadow of a doubt ... and the feeble argument of the LN side is "Z-film was falsified by NPIC". I REST MY CASE !!! To the poster: Kindly provide your physical address to my secretary so we can send you some sort of gift. A basket of fruits and jams, ok? You just saved me a couple of freakin' million dollars!!" :-) :-) -Ramon

It seems that -as usual!- there are conflicting theories. The government claims that all bullet fragments found in the limo and the brain (minus CE-399) came from the same bullet. Meanwhile: "There has never been any evidence to link the intact bullet, CE-399 with Connally's wounds, or Kennedy's wounds, or the limousine. The travails of CE-399 will be the subject of a subsequent chapter. Because the evidence indicates that the bullet which caused Kennedy's head wound exited rearward, the bullet in the limousine, CE-567, is much more likely to be the one that came from Connally's wounds." (*) -Ramon (*) Thomas, Donald Byron (2013-09-01). Hear No Evil: Politics, Science, and the Forensic Evidence in the Kennedy Assassination (Kindle Locations 6991-6994). Skyhorse Publishing. Kindle Edition.

Folks: This is the essence of the so-called "Herrera Effect" (aka "Parkland Effect", aka "Suction Cup Effect") : (1) Minimalist, from above:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5oMYjHEQkEQ (2) With CFD: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k-G11nq5Pa4 (3) Lateral view with more realism: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tB6eB2lXBk8 Frankly, I am trying to decide what to do about the fate of the bullet. I wonder whether there is enough heat to vaporize it in such short trip through cranial matter. What is the official version? All one reads is "Magic Bullet this, Magic Bullet that". Can't find much about the Fatal Bullet. TIA -Ramon

Number of People Shot in the Head Who Move in the Same Direction as the Bullet: 100% Number of People Shot in the Head Who Move Against the Direction of the Bullet: 0% Your Jet Effect (and the neuromuscular spams) are DEAD, David. -Ramon

Hi David: Where did you get that image (HoleinOccipital_zps82b5a764.jpg)? What is its source? I am looking for material like that for the Isometric-to-3D Model Project. TIA -Ramon

Actually, two users have reported their rather small attachment quotas. For all we know, many users have such shortcoming, but they are not affected because all they post is text. One possibility is that the original web master/sysadmin left an ample quota for the person who hired him (Greg), and small for everybody else. All the rich graphics that we see are hosted elsewhere. That would mean that Greg is paying for a lot of disk space which is not being used. -Ramon

The friction is color coded. A current unknown of my model is whether such friction can completely vaporize the copper in such short distance, or to what extent. For a more discriminating use of color to depict different fields, see here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D6iuVr9V6os -Ramon

By design! Do you know the cost (in computer resources and actual dollars) of those simulations? The challenge of the researchers is to capture the essence. -RFH

Ramon, As you get deeper into this subject I believe you will discover that it is even more complex than it appears. Alvarez, who SURELY knows better, deliberately avoids a number of factors in his "jet effect" theory. Looking forward to hearing your response, and hoping you have uncovered some info that is new to me. Tom Hi Tom: If you have not done so, please read my 2 related threads: "2D Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation of a bullet inside a fluid" "How can a bullet so narrow knock out such a large piece of bone?" And the brief of my Contest: https://www.freelancer.com/contest/contest.php?project_id=281621 [Click on "View Brief"] Notice that we are testing my hypothesis first, but my only interest is the truth. If it becomes clear that the "Herrera Effect" is impossible, I am not married to it. We will move on and test/simulate other scenarios. In short, the Herrera Effect says the following: If a person is run by a bus which going from East to West, chances are that the body will NOT go West to East. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9MLc0udf_74 -Ramon

Ramon,I have read all the posts, watched the videos, etc. Your hypothesis here is spread out over multiple posts, and you have not responded directly to questions from several members. Thus it is still unclear how your "Sucking Cup Effect" functions. Please state the forces at work here, and how they are created, step-by-step, beginning with a small entrance wound in the skull. A 'verbal' explanation will suffice. i.e. a video is not required... Tom Tom: You are absolutely correct. I am going step by step, waiting, implicitly asking the audience: "Are you boys and girls with me so far?" Did you read the copy of my original Usenet post? The one in the Physics Newsgroup in 2013? It is in this thread, #42. That is about 80% of the explanation. I still owe you the last 20%. Thanks for keeping me honest!! -Ramon

The only shots which can actually move the subject are the two shots shown in the upper half of the diagram. - The sese shot is known as "Alvarez Affect" or "Jet Effect". - The seLE shot is known as the "Herrera Effect" (or "Parkland Effect"). Note: The uppercase denotes an EXPLOSION, which requires a large hole AND has the accumulated energy to make an adult airborne (without the use of his gluteal muscles). The Grassy Knoll shooter was to be enabled only if, after a certain point Kennedy still had the head attached to the rest of his body. The assassin's orders were to perform the lower-left shot (which could have been neatly falsified during the autopsy). However, if there is a God, he intervened and nudged the elbow of the shooter about 5 degrees to the right. As a result the shot became seLE, and therefore the crime can be solved mathematically. The lower-right shot is a lie, ordered by professor Blakey. -Ramon