-
Posts
4,737 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Posts posted by Michael Clark
-
-
6 minutes ago, Cliff Varnell said:
Bebe Rebozo?
No Cliff, thats not who I was thinking of, but is as worthy of a mention in this off topic sojourn. I will find it.
-
Howard Hughes, alive and perhaps dead; and I am misssing the name nother buddy from the Bahama Clique...
-
https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/104-10052-10044.pdf
multiple "LI" crypts and specific information.
It is noted that it is a 1977 HSCA doc without support.
LIMUST 1-4 a set of houses used for processing film and other activities in Mexico City.
-
https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/2018/104-10167-10412.pdf
AMBANG
AMSWIRL
JULY 1963
-
-
https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/2018/104-10100-10273.pdf
52 locations with 2 codes reacts
19-4
17-22
-
https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/2018/104-10100-10266.pdf
45 locations 2 redacted with codes
20-6
17-22
-
-
-
https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/104-10125-10246.pdf
october 8, 1963 description of LHO in Mexico City.
-
McCord is front and center in this Doc.
https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/104-10256-10268.pdf
-
11 minutes ago, James DiEugenio said:
That event was sponsored by Gary Aguilar up near his office in San Francisco about 3-4 months ago.
It was a kind of invitation only of some of the better researchers, primarily on the West Coast.
But John flew in from back east. Some of the people there were Lisa Pease, Pat Speer, TInk Thompson, and myself. There were about 20 people there. Gary even invited Wagner to attend, that guy who wrote the Oswald did it book and was a fan of Bugliosi. He did not speak of course.
John apparently does buy into Bagley, and Nechiporenko, and he underplays the incredible gyrations that went on in the USSR after the fail.
Thanks for the backstory, Jim. I wanted to know who was there. With that kind of gathering that meeting should have gone on for a week. I hope to see more video from that conference.
-
https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/104-10102-10189.pdf
CIA response to questions about Veciana. Says Veciana contacted them in December of 1960.
-
https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/104-10102-10189.pdf
16-23. P.9 Santiago, Chile
---------------------------------
https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/104-10167-10238.pdf
16-23
------------------------------------
https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/104-10167-10239.pdf
21-23 (Santiago, Chile Station?)
----------------------------------------
https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/104-10256-10269.pdf
16-23 Santiago Chile
-
5 minutes ago, B. A. Copeland said:
Couldn't agree more Mike, concerning the fanboy bit. I really try staying the course on the evidence and frankly, that is the element I love about 2 great researcher's works (Simpich and Newman for example) and how Simpich basically (and respectfully) disagree with Newman that Angleton played a big role in setting up LHO, especially in Mexico City (please correct me if I'm wrong someone (or Dr Newman!).
Simpich says Angleton was duped by Harvey/Morales & Co (this implies (possibly?) a rogue group) in more ways than one. Dr Newman doesn't seem to mention Harvey or Morales much in his older work (Oswald & The CIA) which is very interesting when you consider just who Harvey and Morales was in the conext of the Secret War against Cuba. Its really challenging for me NOT to consider those 2 when you get to Mexico City and I believe we're just probably at the tip of the iceberg....there is probably so much more to know but I think some light is certainly being shed into those events.
Mike, from what Newman has presented, it seems compelling that Nosenko was not a bonafide defector. I was just listening to even Malcolm Blunt and Dale's talkes (I never get enough) where Blunt himself has always been skeptical of Nosenko's bonafides as well based on the evidence we do have.
Thanks B. A., I have not read anything of Simpich, it's interesting that you say that Simpich has the same doubts about Angleton that I have. And your surmise, or Simpich' that this is where the rogues play their hand the heaviest is right in line with my thinking. I am quite certain that there were two Oswalds and that Angleton was trying to figure this problem out in the fall of 63?
Your observations about Newman's lack of interest in some of these characters is very interesting.
I wish John were here to discuss these things with us, but it must be very difficult for an author such as Newman to open him or herself up in a forum like this.
-
-
https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/2018/104-10100-10230.pdf
ZRKNICK
https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/docid-32343404.pdf
ZRKNICK
LIEMPTY / 4-14, 19, 24
LIMOUSINE
LIMESA
LICALLA
LIMITED
LILYRIC
LIENTRAP
LIMERICK
AMROD
https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/2018/104-10100-10232.pdf
ZRKNICK
ODTEST Not In MFF
HYSAGE
https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/2018/104-10100-10267.pdf
ZRKNICK Not In MFF
ALACME Not In MFF
ALSPURS Not In MFF
-
-
https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/2018/104-10100-10161.pdf
CATIDE Not in MFF
FUBRIAR
-
https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/2018/104-10100-10151.pdf
MHEPITOME
WSACROBAT
WSCHILD
LCPIPIT
https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/2018/104-10100-10152.pdf
LCPIPIT
-
https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/2018/104-10100-10142.pdf
12-22
13-3
ZRORDER
Multiple loc abrev
-
-
-
https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/2018/104-10100-10135.pdf
Numerous locations with their abbreviations
CIA Cryptonym research
in JFK Research
Posted
https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/104-10308-10188.pdf
INDEVOUT/3