Cory Santos
-
Posts
1,572 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Posts posted by Cory Santos
-
-
1 hour ago, Sandy Larsen said:
Maybe LBJ wasn't seeking a confession from Oswald so much as he was hoping to influence a doctor into saying that Oswald gave a deathbed confession. Just a thought.
Possibly. But he wanted it. His reason for wanting it is the smoke.
-
1 minute ago, Ron Bulman said:
Cory, I'm, sorry I offended you with the ambulance chaser comment. The Raiders do suck. I like to think I have a sense of common decency. I was recently asked if I would like to become an administrator of this site, after another one needed to leave. Learning the ropes, the guidelines of the forum specifically address the use of terms, using idiot as an example. Using it personally directed at another member is a one day suspension from posting.
Cliff is right. Hole in the suit coat and shirt at T-3 is absolutely the first evidence that the Magic, Pristine bullet is bullshit. Whether anyone here or in the msm acknowledges it or not, he deserves a prime rib, imho.
Water under the bridge then. Thank you. All is good.
-
3 minutes ago, Ron Bulman said:
To pay for the Raiders and the stadium? My wallet's quite small. $800 to see them this year especially, they suck, again, is a ridiculous waste of money. I love Madden, Stabler, Lamonica and more. But I'm not an ambulance chaser with money to waste.
No you’re not a lawyer. You are an idiot with a lack of common sense apparently. That’s too bad.
-
3 hours ago, Ron Bulman said:
Cliff, as this is about a lunch . . . line, you could probably get by with Luby's. I'd pass on the Raiders offer right now, that could be boring.
Could be boring to you? So come out and plop $800 for a ticket like I will when Cliff comes out next. Then you can truly make that determination yourself. If you are still bored I am sure something in Vegas can interest you. Open up the wallet Ron because you can’t take it with you. Nevada needs your tax money.
-
3 hours ago, Cliff Varnell said:
Sorry Cory.
The JFKA False Mystery Industry doesn’t do real physical evidence. They’re obsessed with fakes like CE399 or distracted by the Oswald Assassination.
Just as well. I’d probably have to take out a loan to buy a brew and brat at a Las Vegas Athletics game — they gotta get back all that stadium money the A’s fleeced from the Nevada tax payers.
Ok Cliff. Don’t forget though I can still take you to Raiders or Golden Knights games.
-
56 minutes ago, James DiEugenio said:
One of the very worst I have seen.
Kennedy had already committed ground troops to Vietnam?
Civil rights would have proceeded slower?
There would have been no detente?
Oswald was a good shot?
What is surprising is that he missed one?
No one around to defend the Warren Report? What about Dale Myers? Gus Russo? Ruth Paine?
What a bunch of hogwash. And they let him get away with it.
BTW this guy has written four books about Reagan and worked as his consultant in 1980.
Jim your appearance on Fox was much better. Glad they did a better job today.
-
1 hour ago, David Von Pein said:
The exact OPPOSITE is, of course, the obvious truth with respect to the Z-Film and the SBT, as I discuss in great detail HERE.
Yeah I have to agree with Michael. That was a very weak reply to this topic.
-
1 hour ago, Michael Griffith said:
There is some anecdotal evidence that LBJ had advance knowledge of the assassination. If he did, he may not have known many details about the plot, or he may have been one of the plotters. He was corrupt and evil enough to do that, but I'm unsure about his role in the plot.
If the plotters were radical right-wingers, it seems very odd that they allowed LBJ to pursue a liberal agenda on so many issues, e.g., civil rights, voting rights, immigration, healthcare (Medicare and Medicaid), right-to-work laws, welfare spending, and housing.
If you think about it, on domestic policy it gives him a good cover story and he gets the love JFK received-or so he thought- while pursuing an opposite foreign policy.
-
1 hour ago, Joe Bauer said:
I am in the camp that LBJ was 10X more corrupt than any official biography ever comes close to touching on.
That interview of him by Walter Cronkite where LBJ himself says directly that "I nor anyone else" can be sure others weren't involved with Oswald is one of the most important statements ever made about the JFKA and the Warren Report final finding.
To this day I can't believe that recorded statement by LBJ hasn't been given the historical importance it deserves. That LBJ statement is simply a history changing bomb shell one!
What more does any person who ever wanted to know the truth about the JFKA need to hear ( from LBJ's own lips! ) to know that there was so much more to the Oswald story than simply a lone nut case who just got lucky on 11,22,1963 and with the cheapest rifle available makes bullseye target hits that 90+ % of the most highly trained marksmen in the country could not duplicate even under no stress conditions?
Dr. Crenshaw's late life recounting of the call to him by LBJ while Oswald was being treated for his wound, was corroborated and backed up by the hospital telephone switchboard operator who connected LBJ to the surgery room.
Good Joe and yes, Dr. Crenshaw was verified despite personal attacks on his reputation.
-
1 hour ago, Benjamin Cole said:
Check your headline. Interesting question.
Really interesting. He stated in a much later interview that he did not believe the Warren Commission. So why did he care about a confession? Thanks for heads up. Early court hearing today so I’ve been tired.
-
Why would President Biden not want transparency?
-
Why was LBJ so interested in obtaining a confession from Oswald? Certainly, it is reasonable to conclude that LBJ was concerned about the idea that Oswald say something to the contrary. When you consider his phone conversations during the forming of the Warren Commission along with the Katzenbach memo and his concern for a confession, does this seem suspicious to a reasonable person? If you are a juror how would you accept these facts?
-
18 minutes ago, James DiEugenio said:
I agree with you and Cory.
For what that is worth. Maybe a cup of coffee?
Thank you. It should matter.
-
2 hours ago, Roger Odisio said:
to the attention of the mods and In response to Cory Santos' assertion the thread should not have been moved. It was......
Because RFK's murder, including Junior's discussion of Cesar and his ties to the CIA (an obvious suspect in the JFKA), has nothing to do with the JFKA. Killing Bobby right after he won the California primary on his way to the the Democratic nomination in '68, where, if he became president he was determined to reopen his brother's murder case, again, had nothing to do with that murder.
The murders of the two brothers were entirely separate and unrelated incidents, which is why there are separate forums for each. If a thread appears in one forum it should not be posted in the other.
As usual, this thread was moved by the mods without explanation. Also as usual most members are silent. I would be delighted to hear the mods' explanation for removing this thread because everything I wrote above is obviously utter nonsense (I'm sure they can do better). And also from other members who have sat silently by as to whether the murders of the brothers were unrelated to the extent that posts about some aspect of one should not be allowed in the other .
Thank you. I’m like how you put that.
-
I understand the reason why some topics are moved but this one seems relevant to the forum. It should not have been moved.
-
3 hours ago, Paul Brancato said:
And Noguchi was fired not long after and I believe went to court to fight it, eventually winning. Someone may know more about this. Of course he was ostensibly fired for other reasons, but I’ve assumed it was some kind of payback.
John Barbour is the expert on this. He was very close to Noguchi.
-
22 minutes ago, Nick Bartetzko said:
Cory, I thought I was the Lone Ranger out here…. Nice to know a couple of guys are close by
Cliff Varnell sometimes when he is writing takes over my casita and refrigerator.
-
Just curious if anyone on here has read this book or listened to any of her lectures? I happened upon one the other day by chance.
Interesting viewpoint by someone actually in academia.
https://katiecouric.com/entertainment/book-guide/john-f-kennedy-incomparable-grace-book-infidelity/ -
18 hours ago, Nick Bartetzko said:
Huh…some guys are in the Vegas area? I thought everyone was back east. I’m an hour outside of Vegas. None of the Vegas folks I know like having the F1 race there
18 hours ago, Nick Bartetzko said:Huh…some guys are in the Vegas area? I thought everyone was back east. I’m an hour outside of Vegas. None of the Vegas folks I know like having the F1 race there
Nick, John Barbour is here. John Lear used to be her but unfortunately passed. A few others.
-
I find it amazing that anyone believes the circular maze that is her story.
-
Lol I’m heading to F1 party even though Piastri was not top 3, but willing to do an A’s game Cliff.
-
1 hour ago, David Von Pein said:
That is unquestionably what did happen.*
No other explanation comes close.*
* IMHO.
David, if you ever come to Vegas, feel free to meet me for lunch. Serious. We can at least discuss Marilyn.
-
13 minutes ago, Pat Speer said:
Please name these "20 doctors". And please present their quotes where they say the autopsy photos must be fakes because they got a very good look and they are absolutely certain blah blah blah.
Most of the primary doctors deferred to the authenticity of the autopsy photos. And most deferred to the expertise of men like Lattimer. Very few bought into the back of the head blow-out pushed by Lifton, Livingstone, Groden, Mantik, etc. The one exception among the primary doctors was McClelland. And he claimed the wound was of the left temple in his earliest report, and later said he thought the autopsy photos were legit, but deceptive. And no, he wasn't describing a small entrance wound in that first report. Read a textbook. Doctors DO NOT mention wounds they did not see in their reports while leaving out wounds they would later insist they'd studied. That's not supposed to happen.
So where does that leave us? If you wanna crawl in bed with the Liftons and Fetzers of the world, you can claim the earliest statements of some of the witnesses, and the subsequent statements of some of the other witnesses (after prodding by a wide-eyed "researcher") are a slam dunk, and that the multitude of times these doctors said they deferred to the autopsy report or the authenticity of the autopsy photos, and encouraged the likes of Lattimer, are an aberration, as a result of their being scared or some such.
But then you're not a supporter of the Parkland witnesses, are you? You are a zealot who thinks you can peer into their souls and discern what they really saw and who they really are. Not men who know they could be mistaken, and know autopsies are conducted for a reason. But scared little rabbits.
Pat, in the documentary these medical professionals look at the diagnostic results and clearly say that what the films show are not what they witnessed. I think Sandy has a point here. Have you watched the latest documentary?
-
2 minutes ago, Sandy Larsen said:
Yes, yes, we know. You believe the 20 Parkland doctors and nurses mass hallucinated. We get it!
Don’t forget, according to David Jackie kept the head in place so well that surgeons were fooled.
Why did LBJ want a confession from LHO?
in JFK Assassination Debate
Posted
FYI, I don’t believe this conversation was taped and saved. At that time not all White House calls were recorded. Although the phone log does seem to verify it happened. I think if the LBJ library has it then it should release it. Anyone know the answer to this? Not my area.