Cory Santos
-
Posts
1,572 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Posts posted by Cory Santos
-
-
It was very well done. Next up is John Barbour’s film next week.
-
3 hours ago, David Von Pein said:
And we know for a FACT---based on this and this (in tandem)---that both Clint Hill and Paul Landis were 100% dead wrong when they stated that the back of President Kennedy's head was "missing".
They aren't l-i-a-r-s, they're just wrong (like all the other "BOH" witnesses).
And, very likely, one of the reasons for why most of the BOH witnesses had a mistaken impression of where the large exit wound on President Kennedy's head was located---possibly the #1 primary reason---clearly rests in the lap (literally) of First Lady Jackie Kennedy. Because Mrs. Kennedy, without doubt, manipulated and CHANGED the configuration of JFK's head wound while the limousine was speeding to Parkland Hospital. We know that for a fact because Jackie told us so in her Warren Commission testimony. She said that during the drive to the hospital, she tried to "hold his hair on, and his skull on".
So, Jacqueline Kennedy, in effect, closed up the huge gaping hole in the right-front of JFK's head. And she must have done a pretty good job of "closing" it up too, so that the witnesses in Trauma Room No. 1 weren't even aware there was a huge gaping wound in the upper-right part of the President's head. Which left those witnesses staring at a head that was essentially intact (from their point of view).
So what they mostly saw was the massive amount of blood that was pooling, via gravity, toward the RIGHT-REAR portion of JFK's head, with much of that blood no doubt clinging to the right-rear (occipital) area of the head, giving the false impression that the one and only wound in the President's head was located in the right-rear (occipital) area of the head.
Incredible, you say?
Impossible for so many witnesses to be fooled by the closing up of one single flap on the President's head?
Many people think such a thing was impossible. But what better explanation is there? (And the "Fake Autopsy Photos & X-rays" explanation doesn't come even close to qualifying as a "better" explanation.)
DVP
http://jfk-archives.blogspot.com/2011/04/index.html#JFK-Head-Wounds
Yes the Parkland doctors were so easily fooled. Come on. That is as ridiculous as saying Marilyn was not murdered.
-
So he “confided in his cousin” but is there any recording or signed document or proof?
-
Congratulations. Next up… Marilyn.
-
38 minutes ago, Sandy Larsen said:
I'm not a forensic document examiner.
There is some good evidence that Kennedy had an affair with Meyer. If it has been been authenticated, then I accept that he had that affair.
All I said was that "I checked them out." Which I did using Wikipedia. I'm pretty sure that I even said that I used Wikipedia.
Anyway... The original claim was that Kennedy was I serial adulterer. I'm waiting for that case to be made.
I never made that claim.
-
1 hour ago, Cliff Varnell said:
If the letter was never sent, what’s the big deal it’s on White House stationary?
Apparently Jim thinks that means Ms. Lincoln or the auction house lied? I have no clue. If he is trying to disqualify the document in that manner, it is rather odd. I will let him explain to you however.
-
38 minutes ago, James DiEugenio said:
John Lear?
No comment.
A smart move. But you still have not answered the question.
-
You have no problems citing Evelyn Lincoln when it fits your views but here when it doesn’t you and Sandy discount it. Odd.
One of my clients who passed away wasJohn Lear. One thing he used to tell me was that even confronted with proof most people can’t accept it. -
Jim everyone is waiting. Are you proclaiming this letter from JFK to Meyer which was auctioned off a fake? Yes or no? I am sure the buyer and auction house are waiting to hear you say it also. Go ahead.
-
5 minutes ago, James DiEugenio said:
Yes, and the whole MM/Kennedy trust fund for her mother was also deemed authentic and that also sold for literally hundreds of thousands over a long period of time. And Sy Hersh used it to get more money out of ABC.
Fakes.
Then the letter from Bobby's sister that was supposed to mean MM and RFK were having an affair and the whole family knew about? Turned out to be a tongue in cheek jest..
Then the "Peter" that MM referred to who you said was Lawford, but it was not.
Oh my aching back.
Jim so everyone listening understands you, are you saying this letter to Meyer which was auctioned off was a fake?
-
7 hours ago, Sandy Larsen said:
Even if it is authentic, one mistress is a far cry from "serial adulterer."
Keep looking Cory...
Lol neither of you will say if it is authentic or not. Ok. Will you admit that your post I cited wherein you cited Wikipedia is therefore incorrect as to Meyer? Are you now admitting he had an affair with her?
How can you claim you researched the Meyer issue when you knew nothing about this letter?
You stated:As I said, I wouldn't trust the word of the mistresses themselves, but for kicks and giggles I checked those four out. Here's what I discovered:
-
1 minute ago, James DiEugenio said:
Cory :
This was JFK writing to her on White House stationary?
Please.
Jim, go ahead and call it a fraud if you think that. Otherwise admit it’s authentic as the auction house said it was.
-
On 10/30/2023 at 2:07 PM, Sandy Larsen said:
Okay. And likewise, you should google something like "wtc controlled demolition" to learn what really happened on 9/11.
You said that family members have revealed that JFK was a serial adulterer. To which I replied that I would take their words seriously.
So what happened to them? Don't exist, eh?
As I said, I wouldn't trust the word of the mistresses themselves, but for kicks and giggles I checked those four out. Here's what I discovered:
Mary Pinchot Meyer: According to the Wikipedia article on her, "More than ten years after Pinchot Meyer's death, rumors of her affair with Kennedy began to circulate." Gee, it took a decade for that rumor to begin. Regardless, National Enquirer and Washington Post "confirmed" the affair (whatever that is supposed to mean) to the satisfaction of the Wikipedia editors. So I guess maybe that affair really took place. (Or maybe not. I'd like to see how the affair was confirmed.)
Ellen Rometsch: According to the Wikipedia article on her, Rometsch was allegedly an East German spy who "was widely thought in some Washington journalism circles to have been a mistress of President John F. Kennedy. However, the FBI never turned up 'any solid evidence' that Rometsch was a spy or that she had relations with President Kennedy." No evidence.
Mimi Alford: According to the Wikipedia article on her, "Mimi Alford is an American woman who allegedly had an affair with President John F. Kennedy while she served as an intern in the White House press office between 1962 and 1963." Allegedly.
Judith Exner: According to the Wikipedia article on her, "[David] Powers ... stated that Kennedy never had an affair with Exner. Never.
Here you go regarding Meyer.
https://abcnews.go.com/amp/US/jfks-love-letter-alleged-mistress-auction/story?id=39585248You can also read this
https://spartacus-educational.com/JFKmeyerM.htm
All fake or forged right?
-
1 hour ago, Cliff Varnell said:
John Roselli, not Hunt.
Tosh: “We took-off before day break on November 21, 1963 expecting to arrive in Tampa about sunup. We were to pick up other personal at Tampa. One of these people was John Roselli, whom I knew.”
Did he say a third person was on the plane? At some point I thought he did.
I did not hear this being discussed on the first episode-which anyone can listen to. You don’t even need to know the secret hand shake. Then again Cliff, as you know, I had a very busy work week so I might have been dozing a little. My wife was so tired from her attorney work that she was asleep by 8.
-
9 hours ago, James DiEugenio said:
A trusted source heard the first installment.
Tosh Plumlee says that he flew Howard Hunt into Dallas.
Can anyone confirm this?
What do you mean by trusted source? I am listening to it right now. So far interviews with Jefferson Morley and Dick Russell. Nothing secretive.
-
12 minutes ago, Jonathan Cohen said:
Right. So it would appear this entire argument is based on Sandy Larsen using a horrible copy of Altgens 6 as his source material.
Thank you.
-
4 minutes ago, Sandy Larsen said:
Beats me why nobody else noticed that Carl's face is missing from the Cronkite (very early) copy of Altgens 6. But it's missing, for everybody to verify:
(Ignore the flashing red.)
What are you talking about? Nothing is missing!
-
20 minutes ago, Jonathan Cohen said:
Why not .. I'll play along. Please enlighten us by what actual means Carl Jones' face "was added to the original Altgens 6 photo" so that it evaded detection by every JFK researcher until you happened to come along. I'd really love to know.
I tend to agree. This every photo is faked argument really is odd at best. If conspirators were sitting around that day playing on pictures then why did they not simply put Oswald in a picture of the sixth floor?
-
According to the description of this new book by an associate of David Lifton, the assassination had nothing to do with JFK’s presidency and was in the planning prior to him being elected.
Anyone know more about this? -
Apparently he worked with David Lifton for a time.
-
Pretty big claims Anyone know if they are backed up with any actual evidence or is it speculation and second hand accounts?
-
6 hours ago, Cliff Varnell said:
You’re a bit short of an event.
So you’re suggesting focus on the magic bullet lol?
-
I would like to see the clothing evidence then cliff so you can take me to lunch.
-
14 minutes ago, Cliff Varnell said:
I’ll donate $100 to the Ed Forum if this book cites the clothing evidence as proof of conspiracy.
Take me to lunch.
Clint Hill 's views in the new edition of his book, Five Days in November.
in JFK Assassination Debate
Posted
David you are speculating. Clearly Jackie did not “close up the head” as you claim. Look at her dress and the limo. What do you think was all over the place? As for Marilyn, it is refreshing to see you and Jim agree.