Jump to content
The Education Forum

Paz Marverde

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    791

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by Paz Marverde

    A Question for the JFK Experts Here

    in JFK Assassination Debate

    Posted

    On 7/8/2018 at 10:49 PM, Paul Brancato said:

    Of course, but you misunderstand the theory I’m exploring. The plot didn’t originate with non citizens. If QJWIN hired the assassins it was at the behest of Harvey. What should I call an extra legal entity that includes members of CIA and Army and DPD and Dallas right that outsources a hit team?

    Better way to express the idea. Said this way, I agree

     

    A Question for the JFK Experts Here

    in JFK Assassination Debate

    Posted

    10 minutes ago, W. Niederhut said:

        The COBAD Syndrome is an acronym that I coined in my 2005 clinical monograph of that title.  "COBAD" stands for "Childhood-Onset Bipolar Attention Deficit" syndrome.

         At the time,  there were only three peer-reviewed papers in the world psychiatric literature about this subject, but we now know that it has a population prevalence of about 1 percent in adults-- which is what I had estimated in 2005, extrapolating from the peer-reviewed child psychiatric research at the Massachusetts General Hospital.

    Thank you very much for answering 

    A Question for the JFK Experts Here

    in JFK Assassination Debate

    Posted

    21 minutes ago, Paul Brancato said:

    I would not assume that it was CIA, even if arrows point at Angleton, or Mafia because they were in the hitman business. I think it’s an extra legal entity of some kind with diverse members and international connections. 

    Yes and no. I mean: yes, but the CIA was part of this entity

    Resounding revelations on the assassination of John Kennedy. A conversation with Stephen Jaffe, member of the Garrison’s team that reopened the investigation in 1967

    in JFK Assassination Debate

    Posted

    Steve Jaffe asked me to publish here this for him. I do it with pleasure:

    Quote
    First of all, I worked for Garrison, a courageous District Attorney and author, and with Mark Lane a great trial lawyer and author about the JFK case. I didn't want to write a book in those early days as I was very young. I had asked Garrison not to mention my name in the press and he always kept his promise. It would have had a negative effect on my family (my father was a distinguished Oncologist and my brothers were editors and journalists). Garrison talked about me to the media in several places which will become evident.
     
    Many authors including Garrison and Lane wrote eloquently and informatively about the assassination of President Kennedy. I'm old now and can tell my story without worrying about my family. I have kept active in terms of filmmaking, with "Executive Action," and assisting John Barbour. And Lane and I have produced a documentary which I hope will come out by next year.
     
    As for what I have to tell, I didn't realize the importance of it until more recently after reading many books on the case. There are great works written by scholars. I would like to correct the record in terms of what I did. I have also been moved to do it as a result of a friendship that developed years later with a member of the Kennedy family. I admire the scholars about the case of JFK and of RFK. I'm particularly pleased to see the revelations about the two cases by another profile in courage, Robert Kennedy, Jr., at such an important time.

     

    3 POTUS and the Israeli nuclear arsenal

    in JFK Assassination Debate

    Posted

    58 minutes ago, W. Niederhut said:

    His view of the JFK assassination seems to be drawn partly from Michael Collins Piper--with a CIA false flag/attempted assassination (blamed on Castro, etc.) hijacked by Menachem Begin (Micky Cohen, etc.) and the Mossad at the behest of David Ben Gurion. 

    You should read this too:

    https://medium.com/@pazmarverde/clay-shaws-centro-mondiale-commerciale-and-its-israeli-connections-e461175e404

     

    3 POTUS and the Israeli nuclear arsenal

    in JFK Assassination Debate

    Posted

    2 hours ago, W. Niederhut said:

      There is a highly detailed review of the radical shift in U.S. policies toward Israel's nuclear program at Dimona after 11/22/63 in French historian Laurent Guyenot's recently published book, From Yahweh to Zion.

      Guyenot also describes the broad history of Leo Strauss and the Neocons in considerable detail.  As Guyenot describes it, the Neocon's active involvement in the U.S. Executive branch began in earnest with Richard Perle and the Ford administration.  Many of the Neocons who later became advocates for increased U.S. military spending (and Star Wars/Team B propaganda in the 1980s) had been "liberals" opposed to the Vietnam War prior to the Six Day War in 1967.

       As for JFK and LBJ, their views on support for Israel's nuclear program were radically opposed.  Dimona became an unmentionable subject in LBJ's White House after 11/22/63, and John McCone became a persona non grata.  McCone complained that LBJ refused to even read his intelligence reports about Israel.

        Most of Guyenot's version of this history is probably old hat to the scholars on this forum, and he will become a persona non grata, himself, but his new book is a fascinating read, and generally well referenced.

    Thank you very much for this 

    Very poor taste by the French.

    in JFK Assassination Debate

    Posted

    26 minutes ago, Robert Harper said:

    I'm afraid to disappoint those who think otherwise, but I agree with those who are not offended. Eventually, ideas that are unsustainable leave themselves open to satire and irony and mockery. I'm thinking of Marx's phrase that history repeats itself, first as tragedy and then as farce.

    Unfortunately, it's not satire. It's a commercial ...

    Resounding revelations on the assassination of John Kennedy. A conversation with Stephen Jaffe, member of the Garrison’s team that reopened the investigation in 1967

    in JFK Assassination Debate

    Posted

    29 minutes ago, Robert Harper said:

    Paz—Thank you for bringing Farewell America to our attention. I retrieved my 1968 HB edition of the book, printed in Belgium. I have it quoted it often,  because some of the references to the “theatricality” of the event reverberated with  me. Like a few other books, I picked up vibrations that it was considered  – somehow – not  reliable because of a bias. What is known as Torbit Document, or Final Judgment by Michael Piper Collins, had this aura sprayed on them. I had picked up somewhere that this book  was the result of the investigation authorized by Daniel Patrick Moynihan. I read somewhere else that a French Intel person

    Herve wrote it. It’s quite satisfying to  read of confirmations in any case. I think all books written in the 10 year period after JFK’s murder are important. It speaks volumes  that there is not one significant “journalist” in the group.

    For the flow of this thread, I offer  three sections  I marked up in from my book, - which has pretty much fallen apart from the binding - but whose content remains vivid:

    At the end of the 18thcentury, a Frenchman, the  Chevalier de Beaujour, wrote on his return from North America :“The American loses no opportunity to acquire wealth. Gain is the subject of all his conversation, and the motive for all his actions. Thus, there is perhaps no civilized nation in the world where there less generosity in the sentiments, less elevation  of soul  and of mind…Here, everything is weighed, calculated and sacrificed to self-interest.”( P.20)

      (On JFK😞He was not friendly to the extent that people felt close to him. His personality was witty and penetrating, and his language was as direct as the finger he so often pointed during his press conferences. Romain Gra y said that never, in seven years in the United States, had he encountered a cerebral  mechanism that functioned so perfectly.(p.41)

    Caracas and then Bogata gave the President of the United States a warm welcome. In Mexico in June, 1962, he paid tribute to the Mexican revolution, and in March, 1963 in Costa Rica he defended the rights of the peasants to land and an education and called for an end to “the ancient institutions that perpetuate privileges.” (p.161)

     

    Thank you very much, Robert. About the “theatricality”, yes: it was a tragical stage, no doubt. You know very well what that means

    Resounding revelations on the assassination of John Kennedy. A conversation with Stephen Jaffe, member of the Garrison’s team that reopened the investigation in 1967

    in JFK Assassination Debate

    Posted

    5 hours ago, Paul Brancato said:

    Steve Jaffe has posted here recently.

    I perfectly remember it, and what you asked, and what he said to you in his answer. In this interview to Michele Metta, he reveals far more than what he said to you. To you, he said wait, in this interview he speaks.

    Let me add that Jaffe is a very special human being, and his forthcoming book will be for sure a must read. I do invite everyone to buy it

×
×
  • Create New...