Jump to content
The Education Forum

Stephanie Goldberg

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    250

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by Stephanie Goldberg

    A Lie Too Big To Fail by Lisa Pease

    in JFK Assassination Debate

    Posted · Edited by Stephanie Goldberg

    I just finished reading this book this week.  Wow!   I had previously read the book by Turner & Christian, but this work obviously has access to far more information than what was available to them at that time.

    There was a wealth of information here, so much so that I feel the need to let it digest for a bit.  One thing is very clear, though.  Using just the autopsy evidence and the statements of the people who tackled Sirhan that night, there's no way that he could have done the shooting attributed to him.  Combine that with the remaining original statements of witnesses and the obvious mishandling of the evidence and witnesses in the case, and there's enough information to give any potential juror lots & lots of reasonable doubts.  

    (Oh, and I read somewhere that somebody on the forum wrote the introduction.  It was quite good, too.)

     

    ETA:  I meant to post this earlier, but I forgot.  It's been a long week, but I wanted to say what a good book this is if anyone hasn't read it yet.

    Robert Morrow's Notes on Robert Caro book signing

    in JFK Assassination Debate

    Posted

    Question - I do not know Robert Caro.  I HAVE read a lot of what I consider to be recent books about iffy issues, such as Lisa Pease's A Lie Too Big to Fail: The Real History of the Assassination of Robert F. Kennedy    

    and wonder how this was published in our times.  I do believe that certain authors and their POV's are sanctioned by what was once called the Establishment.  But now?  How do books get published and publicized if such sanctions still exist...unless they also somehow contribute to what was once called the Establishment's POV?  How do you publish this and still get to call out the CIA, for example?  

    (Disclaimer - I believe what she wrote in her book, but given that there are obstacles to the truth - what happened that this was allowed to be published?)  

    The Mysterious Life and Death of James McCord

    in JFK Assassination Debate

    Posted

    14 hours ago, Douglas Caddy said:

    Stephanie:

    No, I have never been afraid at what I know but maybe I should have been in past times. Right now I am being harassed frequently, including two entries into my residence when I have been away, by thugs stemming from my giving information to Special Counsel Mueller in 2017 about Roger Stone that Mueller undoubtedly explored during his investigation and which may or may not be in the redacted version of the Mueller Report released by AG Barr. The information may also be used by the prosecution when Stone faces his criminal trial in November. Also those who hired the thugs are upset about what I know about the history leading up to the two FISC (court) FISA warrants issued in 2017 that Barr is claiming are part of the "spying" on the Trump campaign. I plan to write about this in the EF in the near future.

    Mueller Report Likely to Renew Scrutiny of Steele Dossier

    https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/19/us/politics/steele-dossier-mueller-report.html

    Thanks for the link!  I look forward to reading more of your writing.

    Was there an Oswald Wedding Ring?

    in JFK Assassination Debate

    Posted

    1 hour ago, Ron Bulman said:

    Yes, I think he's talking about the one who interviewed Lee in Moscow, then had Marina handed off to her after the assassination by the CIA to write a book about her.

    Thanks!  I am still learning all the abbreviations here, so I try to ask before guessing on some of them.  Priscilla...Johnson?  (Yes, I could Google it, but sometimes I like to see what I know off the top of my head.)

    Where did Oswald develop the infamous gun photos?

    in JFK Assassination Debate

    Posted

    This is all good information!  Thank you to EVERYONE who has posted here!  🙂

    The address issue is a bit confusing, but I understand what's been said so far.  I have to think on this for a bit, but as far as the publishing companies moving en masse, we know that the TSBD building was taken over in 1963 for the purpose of school books, yes?  Or was it?  Can we fix the date of the move of those companies from their previous address as shown above and into the TSBD building?  How does that correlate to Oswald's move to New Orleans?

    As far as the method of development, that is extremely interesting.  If you believe that Oswald developed them, then they were potentially done while he was at JCS.  He had opportunity there, but did he have the means?  Were there machines at JCS which could develop prints by the drugstore method?   (I wonder how the HSCA determined that the prints were developed by the drugstore method?  Is there any record that the Warren Commission or the HSCA tried to locate the drugstore at which they might have been developed?) 

    It's curious that the only other print matched to that camera (the Walker house) was not developed the same way.  Back then, developing film was something of a luxury for people of limited means.  You'd think that every print on the roll of twelve would show the same type of developing.    So if the Walker house print was developed separately, how/when was it done?  

    The article by Ms. Minor is fascinating.  I wouldn't have stumbled onto that one on my own!  

    I have yet to read Mr. Bugliosi's book or Ms. McMillan's.  (I'm like years behind everyone here in research, so thanks for the quotes!)

    And yes, I know the Seth Kantor note is unsourced.  It's a tantalizing what if at best, but it started me thinking.  So many things seemed to have been unresolved from the early research of many people who were on the scene.  Could be dead ends.  Maybe not.  -shrugs-  

    Where did Oswald develop the infamous gun photos?

    in JFK Assassination Debate

    Posted

    So at that point in time, Oswald was working at (and about to be unemployed by) JCS.  He was living at the Neely Street address.  Are either of those addresses considered near the Dal-Tex building?  The Neely Street address doesn't look close to me on a map, considering that Oswald was probably stuck to the bus, taxi or a friend with a car.

    The Dal-Tex building may have had a photo developing business there or a camera shop, but we have yet to determine that one way or another.  It is awfully conveniently located to his future employment at the TSBD.  Were there any government offices at 501 Elm in 1963?

    I'm not trying to prove that Marina took that photo (or the other gun photos).  I'm not trying to prove that Oswald had the film developed.   I am curious where Seth Kantor acquired that information and why some source told him that they thought that the photos had been developed there. 

    And I am curious where Oswald would have acquired the disposable income to have photographs developed, especially if his employment of record was so poorly paid and so sporadic.  Perhaps it was that secret nest egg that funded his trip to Russia?

     

     

     

     

     

    Where did Oswald develop the infamous gun photos?

    in JFK Assassination Debate

    Posted

    Since I'm pretty new here, I realize this may have already been covered.  I did try to search the forum, but I couldn't find anything exactly like this.

    If Marina took the gun photos of Oswald on March 31, 1963, where did they have the film developed?   And when?  

    If Oswald was still working at Jaggers-Chiles-Stovall then, he could have potentially developed them himself, except I think he lost his job right around then, didn't he? 

    A note from Seth Kantor's notebook in the Warren Commission exhibits says in part - 

    "Ask Fritz --

    1 - Who N.C. preacher who tipped them about the mail-order purchase?

    2 - 501 Elm is place that processed photo.  What are details of photo (showing gun & Daily Worker head: "Be Militant")"

    501 Elm is the Dal-Tex building, isn't it?  Did they have a photo processing facility in March of 1963 among their offices?  I couldn't find that information.  And where did Mr. Kantor obtain this information about where the photo was allegedly processed?  

     

     

    John Barbour posted this on Facebook today

    in JFK Assassination Debate

    Posted

    33 minutes ago, Ron Bulman said:

    I just tried to.  Donated via pay pal.  No notes section to give my address.  

    Then TheGarrisonJournal@gmail  gives me this.

    ..https://www.bing.com/search?q=TheGarrisonJournal%40gmail&form=PRUSEN&mkt=en-us&httpsmsn=1&refig=661dbf593466483695b507b8c561acb3&sp=-1&pq=thegarrisonjournal%40gmail&sc=0-24&qs=n&sk=&cvid=661dbf593466483695b507b8c561acb3

    I had no problem ordering mine through the Donate link via PayPal.   After I entered the amount and hit next, a notes section became available right below the amount field.

    List Of Nefarious Characters Possibly Present In Dallas on 11,22,1963

    in JFK Assassination Debate

    Posted

    9 minutes ago, Ron Bulman said:

    Stephanie, I know Nixon was there for the Pepsi convention the night before but he left from Love Field during the morning before the assassination happened.  Reputedly received the new in a NY city taxi from a passer by.  An interesting crossing of path's with GHWB in the background though.  I've wondered before if it as planned to illustrate the sources of power to those some of it was granted to in turn.

    You're right, of course.  He left Dallas before the assassination.  But Nixon was in Dallas that day, and many people consider him to be a nefarious character.  

    And, yes, it is wild how many presidents (including future ones, of course) were in Dallas that day.

×
×
  • Create New...