Jump to content
The Education Forum

John Kowalski

Members
  • Posts

    605
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by John Kowalski

  1. On 9/9/2019 at 2:15 PM, Rich Pope said:

    Let me start by saying, I don't believe Oswald shot President Kennedy.  However, I have some concerns about his behavior AFTER the president was shot.  His return to his boarding house, getting his .38 revolver, changing his clothes, leaving the boarding house, heading in the general direction of Jack Ruby's apartment and then winding-up in the TT bobbing from person to person in an apparent effort to make contact with someone.  All of this leaves a bad taste in my mouth.  Is anyone else in the same predicament I'm in?

    Hi Rich:

    If you view Oswald as a patsy, and this is how he describes himself, then leaving the TBSD and getting his gun makes sense. He told the press that he was a patsy i.e he was set up to take the blame for Kennedy's death. His statement to the press indicates that others must have been involved in JFK's murder, and that these other people want him to be blamed for it. After Kennedy was killed he must have realized that what ever reason he was given to be in the TBSD on November 22 was a lie and that and that his own life could be in danger, and that is why he went back to his rooming house to get his gun.

     

     

  2. On 8/2/2019 at 12:36 PM, Cory Santos said:

    Once you get to Canada, since Mexico, central and S. America are apparently not to your liking, let us know how freedom of speech is working out up there in Canada.  I have heard things that might surprise you but I don't want to interrupt your packing.  

    What have you heard about free speech in Canada?

  3. On 6/2/2019 at 3:43 PM, Douglas Caddy said:

    I was introduced to Banister in 1954 by Kent Courtney, one of his close friends.  Courtney had invited met to accompany him to a meeting at the Roosevelt Hotel of the Aaron Cohn Crime Commission that was investigating the extent of organized crime in the Big Easy..

     

     

    Doug:

    Do you know of any connection between Aaron Cohn and Colonel Provosty A. Dayries? He represented New Orleans at a meeting of the International Relations Committee of the International Association of Police Chiefs in Quebec city in 1960. Bloomfield was also at this meeting.

    https://ia801408.us.archive.org/13/items/bloomfield_201907/Bloomfield Pictures - 3.JPG

  4. Thanks Paul for your response but Jim is correct, this is a different person.

    Am interested in Marguerite's (Armstrong's short and fat one) early life and her east coast connections. Armstrong found a HUAC document that mentioned a M.Oswald in 1941 connected to Nazis in New Jersey. What role she was playing is not known but this early connection and Thompson's Nazi sympathies is interesting. Oswald too had the names of some Nazis in his phone book.

     

  5. Paul an Michael:

    I copied and pasted the link into the URL bar and it worked. Have posted a link on DPF. Posters at EF and DPF have been able to access the files using the link. You can try DPF and see if it works.

    You can also access the files by going to internet archive and entering Louis M Bloomfield searching metadata. You will find some files uploaded by me. The top row 3rd file from the left has 339 JPEG files. This is the one to look at. The top row 2nd one from the left has 285 files JPEG files but they are the same as the one with 339JPEG files.

     

     

     

  6. Have uploaded Permindex and CMC documents that I copied from the Bloomfield collection at Library and Archives Canada, and from other sources. These documents includes letters written by Bloomfield to Seligman, Mantello and others regarding the operation of these 2 companies. The files were uploaded to internet archive.

    https://archive.org/details/bloomfield_201907

     

     

     

  7. On 7/4/2019 at 2:15 PM, Lawrence Schnapf said:

    we will be making a plea at the CAPA conference for researchers with significant files to digitalize them so they are available to all researchers. there are too many silos of paper files that are inaccessible to researchers. these paper silos have no economic value (they arent like baseball memorialia) but need to be made available to researchers.  will be a panel about how to do this.  

    Lawrence:

    Good idea, I would like to see what documents other researchers have, and have files to upload as well. Where would they uploaded to?

    John

     

     

  8. Library and Archives Canada have digitized 6 letter books from the Bloomfield collection. The link below will has the letter books.

    How to download:

    The first file on the page is letter book 25. The letter book 25 link, not the PDF icon, will take you to another page.  On the next page you will see a warning that the files may not be ready, ignore it.

    You will see another link Online Mikan Number 4068837 (1item).That link will take you to another page where there is a PDF icon from which you can download the file. Files are large so the download will take a while.
     
    The archives are going to digitize all files in the Bloomfield collection that have files that are subject to solicitor-client privilege. Project will be complete sometime in 2020. If you return to their website at a later date you may find more of Bloomfield's files will be available for download.

     

    http://collectionscanada.gc.ca/lac-bac/results/arch.php?FormName=MIKAN+Items+Display&PageNum=1&SortSpec=score+desc&Language=eng&QueryParser=lac_mikan&Sources=mikan&Archives=&SearchIn_1=partof&SearchInText_1=192534&Operator_1=AND&SearchIn_2=&SearchInText_2=&Operator_2=AND&SearchIn_3=&SearchInText_3=&Media=&Level=&MaterialDateOperator=after&MaterialDate=&DigitalImages=&Source=&ResultCount=10&cainInd

  9. J

    On 5/14/2019 at 12:12 PM, Jim Phelps said:

    Most do not know the full JFK issues without entering into the New Orleans cancer Vaccine Project under the Alton Oschner, Mary Sherman, Harold Urey and various Manhattan Project Deuterium scientists:

     

    We all know all about PERMINDEX.
     
    All JFK folks know that PERMINDEX was a pet project of Louis Bloomfield's connections with DISC and FBI Div V.
     
    Bloomfield was raging Zionist connected with LBJ, Ruby, Larner, and others.
     
    Bloomfield pulled PERMINDEX into DISC and into the Rockefeller AMA and Big Pharma network to cover up the issues of deuterium making problems with viral and bacteria infections in humans and its problems in the US food chain.
     
    We all know that PERMINDEX's Ferenc Nagy was in Dallas for the JFK hit and they were under Bloomfield and Masonic George Mandello. He is Polish and trying to protect Polish Polio screw ups by Hilary Koprowski
     
    That effort to cover up, conceal, and collisions with AMA and Big Pharma made trillions from that cover up on a predominate health causal issue and killed tens of millions of Americans.
     
    They sold the diseases and they made expensive treatments that left out the low cost treatments using low deuterium. Such is called Racketeering. And TREASON !
     
    The New Orleans Cancer project came from using Green Monkeys for Polio vaccines with known problems of SV-40 or SIV, that set off the cancer pandemic in the US from contaminated Salk and Sabin vaccines, but also set off the SIV to HIV jump in Gabon in 1959 from live green monkey vaccines used on the Black Communities in that area. Here that screw up was by Polish Hilary Koprowsk.
     
    Everyone knows all these people were warned not to allow contaminated Green Monkey SIV/SV-40 vaccines loose on the public, but they did it any way and caused the cancer and HIV Pandemics.
     
    And the whole reason for the LHO and JFK cover up is due to these crooked Louis Bloomfield types working with CIA New Orleans to kill Castro with SV-40 and Urey's deuterium techniques for cancer causality.
     
    They sold the diseases and they made expensive treatments that left out the low cost treatments using low deuterium. Such is called Racketeering.
     

    Your profile mentions that you are from Knoxville. Albert Osborne lived there during the 1930s and 1940s. Have you ever done any research on him and his alleged connection to Bloomfield?

  10. 10 minutes ago, Rob Couteau said:

    Great question. Hopefully someone on the admin side can get an answer. BTW, regarding images taking up space, a while ago when I ran out of my quota for attachments, Kathy Beckett advised me that as an alternative we can post photos on google docs: "Just open up a Google account, go to google docs to set up, copy your photo and paste it to Docs. Then you could post the link in your Forum post." If this were our standard operating procedure it might help. 

    To save space I upload documents to Internet Archive then post a link from them to this forum.

  11. Rob:

    It was a very difficult task. Poorly edited meant that the narrative was difficult to understand. Having no index made this job extremely difficult. Had to re-read whole sections of the book to locate information about people or events that I was looking for. His over reliance on connections also made the book difficult to follow because in his effort to overwhelm the reader with  connections, he would go off on a tangent describing some people or events, that the original point being made would be lost.

  12. Gene:

    You raise an interesting point about Disney's connection to Helliwell and his use of front companies to buy land. Helliwell was connected to the CIA and anti-Castro operations, makes me wonder if Disney worked with Helliwell on any of his anti-Castro operations. Maybe some of Mongoose's front companies were owned by Disney.

    Another land scam is buying land and then selling it below market value to a politician. The sale of the land is a way of concealing a bribe. Metta's book CMC mentions this. Bribing would be an that the CIA would do and maybe Disney helped them with this.

     

  13. Paul:

    While I share your suspicions about Permindex/CMC, given the fascists and CIA operators connected to them, I believe that much more work needs to be done in regard to Bloomfield. The accusations against him are rooted in Garrison's investigation of Clay Shaw, and his suspicion about Bloomfield and Permindex are sourced from an article in Le Devoir and Italian media. The Le Devoir article that mentions Bloomfield does not even get his name right, he spells his name L.H. Blumfield, not L.M. Bloomfield. The article states that he was with the OSS, but I would like to know what his source is for that information. The article, written in French, is attached. I did not translate it but it would be interesting to find out if the author provides a source for his information about Bloomfield being with the OSS.

    https://ia601508.us.archive.org/28/items/BloomfieldLeDevoirMar1667/Le Devoir Mar 16 67.pdf

  14. 15 hours ago, Paul Brancato said:

    Not offhand John, but it came from a Bud Fensterwald FOIA request decades ago, if memory serves. Garrison’s team dug up the story. Steven Jaffe, who used to post here, was on that team and went to France to verify with SDECE. Sorry if I have some detail wrong.

    I read Dope Inc a long time ago and still have my copy. I’m on the fence about the info therein. Basically what I think is that the Bloomfield Papers don’t prove or disprove the conspiracy theories about Bloomfield. Remind me - aren’t they still withholding correspondence from key years in the early 1960’s? 

    i am interested in the Bronfman family too. Colonel Frank M Brandstetter worked for them in Mexico after he left Havana. Does Brandstetter come up at all?

    Paul:

    They are withholding documents but basis upon which they hold back documents is based on solicitor-client privilege. I have reviewed the list of people they held back when they gave me the documents in 2018 and none of them were connected to Permindex or CMC. I also did not see any letters to Bandsetter.

  15. 5 hours ago, Jim Harwood said:

    Please make note John of another of your errors. You wrongly claim that I believe Bloomfield ran Permindex. It's my contention that that issue is secondary , almost worthless. And it's that fact that makes you and Maurice's mission suspect, really pointless with regards to the Kennedy murder. But that is my point. What you're doing is pointless and meaning less. And you keep saying LaRouche is some kind of fraud and this after you post a 1979 letter from Louis Mortimer Bloomfield to Isadore G. Alk  and he is claiming just the opposite! Bloomfield has them being surveilled   by the RCMP while asking the former Chief Counsel of the Foreign Funds with Treasury to help him with this LaRouche problem. 

    You implored "show me documents" and do not quote LaRouche or Torbitt"?  First of all I never quoted either book instead I pointed out that your Black op statement that the false background of Bloomfield came from LaRouche spouting anti semitic rantings was really a 600 page book on the international drug trade titled Dope Inc. And further the documents you shared here corroborated claims from the book.  You seemed to have missed that point.  And by the way anyone that regurgitates ADL material is not too bright a fellow. The ADL is the private protection arm of Dope Inc.  

    Who wrote Dope Inc.? Lyndon Larouche's organization. Go to their website, they published it in 1978. https://store.larouchepub.com/product-p/eirbk-2010-1-0-0-std.htm

    What you believe about whether or not Bloomfield ran Permindex is of no interest to me. My point is that Larouche's organization was responsible for telling the lies about Bloomfield that persist to this day. Whether or not they started with Dope Inc. or the Executive Intelligence Review article (not a book) is not important. What is important is that Larouche was the source of the lies.

    Your personnel comments about me are also not welcome, and it is because of these comments that I will not be responding to any more of your posts.

  16. 52 minutes ago, Paul Brancato said:

    Yes - thanks - I am aware of this report. I wondered whether John has seen any supporting evidence in the Bloomfield Papers. 

    Paul:

    Did not see anything about that in the Bloomfield collection.

    Do you have a copy of this report?

     

  17. 3 hours ago, Paul Brancato said:

    John  -  are you able to verify any connections to OAS? 

    Paul:

    Could not find any connections to the OAS in Bloomfield files. The only name that I found of interest was a man named Jacques Mondoloni. He was connected to Credit Suisse Canada, a   company that Bloomfield was president of. Credit Suisse was a subsidiary of Credit Suisse in Switzerland. There may have been a man with the last name of Mondoloni that had some alleged connection to intelligence or crime but am not sure.

  18. 5 hours ago, Robert Wheeler said:

    John:

    I listened to the Podcast and found it interesting and may have some questions. In the meantime, here is my 2 cents.

    I did not get the impression from the podcast and your other writings that you thought Bloomfield was an owner in Bloomfield. That may have been me reading between the lines with a general idea of what Bloomfield's role should be, or any other lawyer for that matter.

    I've been under the impression Bloomfield was a proxy for other interests that wanted to remain anonymous. This would be a typical role for a lawyer in most jurisdictions. The ability to remain an anonymous owner of a corporation (LLC) varies by place and in time. Each US state has its own incorporation rules and the laws change over the years. For example, if I incorporate in NJ, you can do a free public look-up of my corporation and see my name. If I incorporated in New York, and you looked up my company's name you are not going to see my name.

    There are other rules that preserve anonymity or show the true owners that vary state to state and country to country. Sometimes tax considerations come in to play, or the necessity to have an annual meeting, or minority shareholder rights, voting rights, financial disclosures, etc. Delaware's incorporation rules kind of check all of the right boxes for the formation of a corporation, it is relatively cheap, and the courts are efficient, so you see most companies incorporated there.

    Assuming Bloomfield was a proxy for other owners, any of the above could come in to play. There are plenty of legitimate commercial reasons why the true owners of a company like Permindex would want to remain anonymous.

    Just as an example, assume David Rockefeller wanted to develop what is now the NY World Trade Center. If he did not use a proxy, it would have been impossible for him to buy up all the land needed, which probably had over 100 different owners in the early 1960s.

    This is because as soon as some small building owner hears a Rockefeller is buying up small parcels in lower Manhattan, he is going to demand top dollar, way higher than the actual market value. My parcel worth $100,000 to any old buyer is going to be worth $1 million to a Rockefeller is the thinking.

    There can certainly be nefarious reasons why an owner might want to remain anonymous, I'm just saying there are plenty of legitimate reasons as well. 

      

     

     

    Robert:

    I can say for sure that Bloomfield was not a shareholder in either Permindex or CMC. In one of his letters he states that he is acting on someone else's behalf. Unfortunately, he does not say who he is acting for. Michele Metta has CMC company documents, one of which provides the names of shareholders in CMC. The document states that Bloomfield is acting as a proxy. Bloomfield's correspondence and Metta's CMC document corroborate that Bloomfield was acting on someone else's behalf and that he was not a shareholder. Metta's document is posted on this forum in a thread about his book.

    You make an interesting point about a shareholder trying to hide his connection to a company. I saw  documentary a few years ago where a wealthy person, it may have been Rockefeller, was buying land that he would donate to the government so that it could be preserved as a national park. He had someone else buy it for him because he knew that if he bought it himself the price would go up.

  19. 1 hour ago, Jim Harwood said:

     

    John--- are you and Maurice Phillips simply trying to neuter  Permindex , Bloomfield et.al as suspects in the 1963 assassination of JFK?  It seems to me that's your intent. Otherwise why waste your time ferreting out documents you don't even seem to understand? To you Bloomfield is simply "very well connected" man who just happens to know the Rothschild family, Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands (a 1933 Brown shirt member of Hitler's Nazi party) as well as co founder with Prince Phillip and World Wild Life Fund for Nature (kill people save animals).  But it strikes me that you and Maurice are engaged in a rather stupid endeavor if your goal is to deflect attention from Bloomfield. 

    In your Black Op interview you claim a lot of the misunderstanding about Bloomfield comes from a right wing anti semite Lyndon LaRouche who was spreading his hatred of Jews. What you're actually referring to is a 600 plus page book that came out in first edition in 1978 titled Dope Inc. It was an expose of the then world drug trade and the financial institutions, governments, intelligence agencies that support the business.  In that book contained three chapters of interest for the "who done it" Kennedy assassination buff -- Part VII "Chapter 1 Bronfman Gang  2. The Kennedy's : Organized Crime in the Government (I dont think the Kennedy's are jewish are they?) 3. Permindex: Britain's Assassination Bureau

    Chapter 3 in Part VII covers Bloomfield and Permindex. 

    Furthermore  some of the documents you've posted here corroborate Dope Inc. You have a 1979 letter from Bloomfield to I.G. Alk asking for help in dealing with the Larouche menace in Montreal. I.G. Alk is actually Isadore G. Alk the former "Chief Counsel" of the Treasury's Foreign Funds Control. That mean Alk grabbed money/assets of persons/corporations that were deemed hostile to the United States under wartime. The Trading with the Enemy Act, that sort of thing.  Alk left the Treasury in 1946 and began to represent the old Swiss bankers in post WWII legal cases against the United States where these Swiss bankers  wanted their confiscated Nazi fortune returned to them.  But more interesting is even though Alk is retired from Treasury it seems Bloomfield would like his help in stopping LaRouche  and the only help Alk might offer is to start a investigation of LaRouche under the guise that he (LaRouche)  is working with a foreign government hostile to the United States. In fact that's exactly what happened under Executive order #12333. And for more irony this colluding with a foreign government charge made under this Executive Order #12333 was also the pretext used to start the witch hunt against President Donald Trump. In fact LaRouche was prosecuted  by Robert Mueller in the Boston legal case in 1987 that ended in a mistrial. The same Robert Mueller that spent two years trying to coup Trump for the same British Empire that wacked JFK . 

    In Dope Inc they call Bloomfield the successor to Special Operations Executive William Stephenson as the Queen's Top agent in North America and sure enough you copy a letter sent to a gentleman in NYC  by Bloomfield in care of Sir William Stephenson.  

    John I don't think the way your'e presenting these Bloomfield documents is in any way helpful in getting at the truth of 11/22/63. It's just a bunch of nothing. 

      

     

    Quote

     

    Jim:

    I can't speak for Maurice Philipps but I can say on my own behalf that my goal is not to neuter Permindex and Bloomfield but to determine what the truth is about them. To do this I reviewed the Bloomfield collection at the archives and found no evidence that he was a shareholder in Permindex. There is also no evidence that he founded Permindex and that he had control over decisions made by that company. The only evidence I have seen is that Ferenc Nagy, Shaw and Mantello, not Bloomfield, were CIA assets.  I also researched Albert Osborne and found no connection between Bloomfield and Osborne as has been alleged by Larouche.

    Here is a suggestion: one of Bloomfield's letters mentions a 200,000,000 lira investment into CMC. Why don't you do some real research and find out who was supplying that money. If CMC  and Permindex were involved in JFK's murder, does it make sense that a lawyer protecting the interests of some shareholders had a motive to kill him or wealthy investors who may have been threatened by Kennedy's policy of providing an opening for left wing parties to play a role in government?

    The problem with your beliefs is that they are founded on classic disinformation and not on fact. If you are so sure that Bloomfield ran Permindex and that he was involved in Kennedy's assassination, where is the proof? By proof I mean show me documents and do not quote Larouche and Torbitt lies.

×
×
  • Create New...