Michaleen Kilroy

Didn’t know that. Guess he never wanted to question his conclusions based in limited information from the govt - not a journalistic thing to do.

I don’t think there was a major event covered like this in modern US history. The MSM acted more like accomplices. And still do. My mantra these days is the JFKA is still a crime in progress.

Yeah this one’s a knee-slapper, too: ...the commission analyzed every issued in exhaustive, almost archeological detail....-Witnesses here and abroad testified to the most obscure points. Except they neglected to interview the closest civilians to the shooting - the Newmans - who thought the final shot whizzed near their heads from the grassy knoll. And they never deposed Dr. George Burkley, JFK’s personal physician and the only medically trained person at both Parkland and the autopsy. How could that ovsrsight have happened in such an unassailable investigation? He didn’t agree with the single bullet theory of course: http://22november1963.org.uk/richard-sprague-memo-dr-george-burkley

Yeah it’s amazing to me how breathlessly the writer accepts every conclusion with nary a note of journalistic skepticism. I think much of the media thought that their blind acceptance of the WR was in the best interests of the country. It wasn’t.

Just happened to come across this NY Times article on the day the Warren Report was released: https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/learning/general/onthisday/big/0927.html#article Thought it might be interesting to see how much it got wrong. I’ll start: ”The commission also rejected, after complete access to the files of the F.B.I. and the Central Intelligence Agency, the claim that Oswald may have been some kind of American undercover agent.

The most frustrating part of following developments in JFKA research through the years is the lack of any real focus, consensus or at least narrowing down of suspects. But to my mind, surely the rage of groups like Alpha 66 had to be a key reason for the JFKA. Ironically, as an Irish ‘Troubles’ buff, I can relate to the feeling of being told you won’t be allowed to fight for your homeland from as a trusted and immense a partner as the US. I could also see someone like Phillips encouraging and abetting this rage into something that would benefit the goals of the CIA. Veciana was a CIA agent and US Army Intel asset. He identifies his CIA handler as meeting with LHO weeks before the JFKA. Surely that is the nexus of the conspiracy.

Again someone this involved and this trusted by high-level US Army personnel in essentially a state of war with an adversary should not and cannot be dismissed with his sighting of JFK’s alleged assassin with a top intel officer. It should in fact be big news.

The Army’s documented faith in Veciana in the months prior to the assassination bolsters his claim of seeing Oswald in the company of Phillips for me. This was not some low-level asset. And the list of his Alpha 66 compatriots looks like a who’s who of Cuban and US operatives who wanted JFK dead and could pull it off. Perhaps Veciana still knows more than what he’s saying? Like WHY was he meeting Phillips in Dallas? And isn’t strange how RFK’s first suspicions fell upon the Cubans and CIA in the minutes following the assassination before Oswald had even been picked up? And LHO with connections to both.

I’ll always remember seeing the newly minted editor of The NY Times being interviewed and somehow the Kennedy assassination came up. He said: ”I always thought there was something fishy about that assassination.” Did the interviewer follow up with more questions? Did the Times ever do an investigative piece or even look at any new evidence that challenged the WR? Of course not.

Releasing the source that told authorities about a reporter calling Oswald in Russia would effect the ‘internal’ security of the US - WTH does that mean?

I think that’s a meeting ‘on’ Cuba Michael.

And Alpha 66. And directing the CIA.

And Bill Harvey, fhe insubordinate head of fhe ZR Rifle program, is also in the loop.

When you think about it, how b@llsy is it to declare your suspicions about the CIA and that your family ‘had a problem’ with the agency on national TV? When your dad and uncle were major political figures that you think the CIA had a stealthy hand in their murders? I’ve heard the Irish say ‘God hates a coward.’ Then the Almighty must be very pleased with RFk Jr right now.

Excerpt from review: “...the book is imbued with the spirit of the eloquent, romantic Irish-Catholic rebels whose fighting spirit and jaunty demeanor the Kennedy family has exemplified. RFK, Jr. tells his tales in words that honor that literary and spiritual tradition.” Bingo!

Maybe we are finally entering an era where the assassinations will receive honest analysis by the MSM rather than their lockstep agreement with the government first begun with their unquestioning support of the WR. Maybe.

Just looking at the photo of LHO passing out flyers above and considering this ‘lone nut’ was: - promoting a group heavily infiltrated by CIA and FBI with a founder that wanted to turn CIA in ‘62 and officially did in ‘64 - which we just found out about in 2018 - promoting a group that would be targeted by the CIA for a propaganda operation outside the US a few weeks later (with LHO heading for Mexico two days after the CIA alerts the FBI) - only receiving publicity because he somehow found and provoked a response from the NO chapter of the DRE, a group that its founders had told Helms would not exist without continuing assistance from the CIA - messing with an anti-Castro group that Helms, second in command of the CIA but ostensibly in bureaucratic control, had re-committed the agency’s support of and hired a direct report - George Joannides - to manage it in Dec ‘62 - interfacing with a group that Helms, Joannides and others in the CIA would conspire to obstruct several federal investigations from learning about the agency’s sponsorship and control of the group. Later the agency would lie on paper to the records release board about having any knowledge of Joannides. - not only interfacing with CIA assets but requested and received a one-on-one meeting with an FBI official - all in a single day But the US intel community maintains to this day they had nothing to do with LHO but also didn’t see him as a threat, even though their DRE propaganda assets in NO stated that exact sentiment in a PRESS RELEASE shortly following their interactions with LHO. Please. Just please. How much horseshyte do they expect us to swallow?

Maybe America is waking from a dream... Not even a scintilla of all the mayhem the CIA did has been revealed yet, IMO. The true history of the Cold War and the use of communism to reach these bastards’ imperial goals, and their control over American society and govt. remains to be written. Now if the Post could investigate all the potential CIA suspects in the JFK case that RFK Jr. points to in his new book, that’d move the ball forward. They can start with why Helms PROVABLY lied and obstructed justice with WC and HSCA.

Ditto again, Steve. This is what makes the most sense to me as well.

Agree with this as well. I always felt whoever was behind the assassination wanted a war.

That’s the cleanest and clearest version of an assassination conspiracy I’ve seen. Makes so much sense considering who the conspirators likely were, the available evidence and who they wanted to blame it on. It’s interesting to note that if you look at all of what we know LHO said in custody, the one thing he offered freely and repeatedly was his membership in the FPCC. It could be he felt if he stayed with the mission, he’d be OK.

It was mind-blowing for me to see RFK Jr point to all of my usual suspects - Helms, Harvey, Phillips, Morales - but really only report what they did and said, and how the CIA behaved overall before and after the assassination. RFK Jr. never directly accuses anyone but they are in the book as blinking red warning lights to what looks much closer to the real story of the assassination than what the WC with all its blinders (self-imposed and otherwise) would ever know or relate to the American people.

Of course the media focuses on the more sensational news of RFK Jr.’s meeting with his father’s convicted assassin. What they ignore is what RFK Jr. makes clear in his new book - that the Kennedy family now agrees with longtime JFK assassination researchers on who the prime suspects are in the case - high-ranking CIA officials like Helms, DAP and Bill Harvey.

Though objectively it should be big news, I ain’t holding my breath!

RFk Jr has an interesting new book out that cites many in the JFK assassination research community, giving credence and validation to a conspiracy. Jim, Larry, Lisa Pease, John Newman and others’ insights are included. He disparages Helms, Harvey and Phillips pointedly and even references a personal conversation with Veciana regarding his identification of LHO with DAE in Dallas. Also includes some heartbreaking and intimate details from the Kennedy’s family POV in the aftermath of the assassination and much more about his dad, mom and his own struggles. The book is called ‘American Values: Lessons I Learned from My Family.’ i haven’t read it all yet but you can check it out here: https://www.amazon.com/American-Values-Lessons-Learned-Family/dp/0062845918