You are, of course, exaggerating quite a bit. It's true that he once said something like that at the 1993 Chicago Symposium, and published the text in EOC, but you're making it sound like it was a mantra of his. You also didn't answer my main question. You accused him of trying to use NAA to prove Oswald's guilt. Was that also something that you "gleaned" from his newsletters?
I'm not aware of his current thinking (on anything) as I'm not in the loop, but have always thought of him as a critic and a skeptic. He's obviously not a big conspiracy believer, but it may be too simplistic to put him squarely in the LN camp. Didn't you convert to LN-ism yourself for a while?