John Cotter

This is more of your diversionary gibberish.

You’re confusing science with dogma. Speaking of which, you’ve ignored the video I posted of RFK Jr debunking the official covid dogma spouted by a doctor and a town hall moderator.

I’ve previously posted the video below of RFK Jr debating both a doctor and a town hall moderator on his vaccine stance. Nobody has been able to identify any flaw in his position: https://twitter.com/DireReport/status/1674248850180288518 Also, vaccine scientist and RFK Jr critic Professor Peter Hotez has been offered 2.6 million dollars to debate RFK Jr on the Joe Rogan show, but he has declined the offer. One of the excuses Hotez made is that “in science we do not do debates”. So much for vaccine “science”. https://rumble.com/v2vcqo6-2.6-million-isnt-enough-for-hotez-v-rfk-jr-ep.2.html

The dodging continues, starting with your strawman argument implying that I commented on your “metaphorical intentions”. I never referred to your metaphorical intentions: I referred to the metaphor itself, not to the intentions behind it. Since the metaphor speaks for itself in term of its racist and ad hominem import, there’s no need to speculate on the intentions behind it. What you’re doing is the equivalent of trying to obfuscate the racist import of Kipling’s phrase “white man’s burden” by raising the issue of what Kipling’s intentions were in using the phrase. You’re using a similar dodge in relation to Biden’s security stripping of RFK Jr. You’re trying to obfuscate the murderous iniquity of Biden’s action by raising the question of what lies behind it. As I’ve said already, this persistent dodging by you is an admission of your inability to defend the indefensible, namely, the aforementioned murderous iniquity of Biden. Please stop cluttering the thread with your diversionary gibberish.

Willam, Since you’re the one who conjured up the “little green men”, they’re figments of your imagination not mine. In other words, you’re the one who’s delusional. And since your “humorous metaphor” explanation simply doesn’t wash, you’ve confirmed the racist and ad hominem import of your “little green men” projection. As for your second paragraph, your whataboutery is yet more diversionary gibberish, the only possible purpose of which is the attempted obfuscation of your inability to defend the indefensible – your condoning Biden’s despicable security stripping of RFK Jr and, by extension, the security stripping of JFK and RFK which enabled their assassinations.

William, The only sense I can make of your repeated “little green friends” reference is that it’s both a racist and ad hominem jibe. However, I won’t go “whining” (to use your term) to the moderators about it – as you went whining to them about something innocuous that I said – just as I could have complained about Kirk’s hare’s piss raiméis. I don’t take that childish gibberish seriously. Notwithstanding such diversionary gibberish, what’s clear is that you’ve again dodged the essential point, which is that you’re condoning Biden’s security stripping of RFK Jr. You’re thus likewise condoning the security stripping of JFK and RFK which facilitated their assassinations. These are the dirty US politics that you espouse, and I understand them all too well.

The results of the dirty deal would have been very generous for Hunter but the judge didn't fall for the trick: The court scene, with more drama, as described by the NY Times: The deal the prosecutors had agreed to was very unusual and smelled of influence from above: The prosecutors should be fired for offering an unprecedented sweetheart deal to the son of the sitting president and for trying to trick the court into agreeing with it. Clark, Hunter's lawyer, is also under fire. Days before some Republican Members of Congress had filed an amicus brief with the court's clerk. It included testimony from two IRS whistle blowers who allege that Hunter Biden's tax case had also received 'special' treatment. A person from Clark's office then called the clerk, claimed to be with the office of Theodore Kittila, the lawyer who handled the case for Congress, and asked to remove the whistle blower evidence from the file. The clerk did so but Kittila got notice of it: The New York Post has the full take of the story. The judge was miffed as Clark called this dirty trick a 'misunderstanding' but has not yet decided what to do about it: Under Joe Biden the IRS and the Department of Justice are bending the laws and precedents to make the doings of his son Hunter Biden look less crooked than they are. The lawyer of Biden's son plays dirty tricks to remove evidence from the court's case against him. Luckily the judge seems to have no sympathy for either. Should the Republicans decide to impeach Biden over all the issues related to this son's 'businesses' they will hear a lot of applause for making their case. This malodorous quagmire is somewhat at odds with the Manichean cartoon strip version of US politics with which we're constantly bombarded by most of the MSM.

Nice dodge there, William. I refer your false dichotomy in suggesting that the security stripping from RFK Jr is exclusively a systems problem rather than both that and an egregious instance of Joe Biden’s murderous turpitude. Is there any crime committed by the mainstream Democratic Party to which you slavishly adhere that you will not condone?

It is indeed disgusting - especially in view of what happened to RFK Jr's father.

Good man, Kirk. When it comes to highly entertaining gibberish, you're the gift that keeps on giving.

It was the then Taoiseach, Charlie Haughey, some time back in the 1980s.

So now you're saying it’s not about RFK Jr being a racist. It’s about how I might interpret (through my “lens”) an unspecified interpretation by you through your (politically-biased) lens of a black woman’s unspecified interpretation through her (politically-biased) lens of something RFK Jr said concerning black people’s safety vis-à-vis covid. In other words, it’s about what an Irish politician once described as “nods, winks, hints and innuendos”. Thanks for confirming that your purported custard pie is really just a nothing burger.

Are you suggesting that Seamus could be jiving me too?

Thank you, Kirk, for yet another helping of first class gibberish.

Thanks for confirming the fact that you haven’t been engaging rationally with my posts.

Thank you for belatedly posting “citations”. The problem with them is that they don’t provide anything remotely like solid evidence that RFK Jr is a racist, notwithstanding the mish mash of purported guilt by association and tenuous interpretation which is supposed to be suggestive in that regard. It’s just tendentious flim flam cobbled together for the political purpose of nobbling RFK Jr’s presidential campaign. Obviously faux left authoritarians are going to parrot the claim that this vacuous confection is some kind of smoking gun. That’s because pies are needed to be thrown in the idiotic game of political slapstick. Accusing someone of racism is a serious matter. The burden of proof always lies with the accuser (Semper necessitas probandi incumbi ei qui agit). You have provided no proof whatsoever.

For starters, you should read my posts.

Your belated request for this citation is a deflection from my prior request for a citation from you, which you have persistently failed to provide. This is further evidence that you’re not debating in good faith and that what you’re engaged in is a demented political hit job on RFK Jr. Hence, your request is disingenuous. Only nine days ago I posted the following proof of the covid scam: https://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/29366-this-is-the-presidential-candidate-you-intend-to-support/?do=findComment&comment=507796 Previously, I had posted about the corruption of the drug companies and regulatory agencies as documented in Ben Goldacre’s 2012 book, Bad Pharma: How Drug Companies Mislead Doctors and Harm Patients. The link to my post is here: https://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/29366-this-is-the-presidential-candidate-you-intend-to-support/?do=findComment&comment=507796 As for the criminality of drug companies, numerous such companies have had to pay billions of dollars in fines, as described in the Wikipedia article, “List of largest pharmaceutical settlements”: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_pharmaceutical_settlements Of course, none of these inconvenient facts matter to you and your fellow faux left authoritarians, and you’ll continue posting your one-eyed rabid gibberish, no matter what citations, evidence or arguments are presented to refute it.

@Leslie Sharp can’t provide the citation I repeatedly requested which might back up her claims and accusations. @W. Niederhut strawmans me as a MAGA person because his worldview is determined by a childishly simplistic Manicheanism divorced from reality. I can’t help thinking of this clip from Cheers: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lbS2KSRUVHo

You have failed to cite the evidence requested of what RFK Jr actually said. Your continued misuse of the word “infer/ring” renders your posts nonsensical. The purported “preventive vaccine” was an experimental concoction peddled by profiteering pharma with criminal records who had corrupted the relevant regulatory authorities. On this spurious basis you accuse people of being racist. You’re just spouting partisan political poison on behalf of an utterly corrupt plutocratic regime as part of a campaign to politically assassinate a candidate who presents a threat to that regime. The only people who might agree with your vile nonsense are your political fellow travellers.

Your continued misuse of the word “infers” illustrates your persistent perversity. Please cite evidence of what RFK Jr said which would support the allegations of racism against him.

You’re grasping at a lot of straws there, and on the basis of all that utter nonsense, you’re effectively accusing me of racism. I’m not going to waste my time explaining why your post is a pile of nonsense, other than to say your incorrect use of the word “infers” in the final paragraph exposes the topsy turviness of your “logic”.

How is a factual claim that black people have a different physical characteristic from white people racist?

Who needs the endorsement of cowardly apologists for the murderers of members of their own extended family?

Another highly informative post by the omniscient Mr Cohen.