Dean Hagerman Posted November 29, 2009 Posted November 29, 2009 Ok so this is for Craig and Duncan In TGZFH one of Jacks studies was on "The Other Camera Man" in the Betzner picture I found out that Duncan made this discovery (Good work Duncan) now Duncan claims he made a mistake because TOCM would have to be wearing a jet pack to be at the height that he is Well what Duncan has forgot is that TOCM is standing on an extension of the same wall that Zappy is on If you look real close you will see that I checked out Zappys height while standing on the retaining wall Then I drew a line next to TOCM at a point that you can see the retaining wall coming out of the side of the Pyracantha tree As you can clearly see the line is shorter then Zappys, as it should be because TOCM is standing back behind Zappy After carful study by myself, I found that TOCM could have been standing on the retaining wall with no help from a jet pack His height is on par with that of Zapruder and he is just as clear as Zappy and Sitzy So Craig for you this is my first study of one of Jacks studies in TGZFH And for Duncan, I would like to know why you reversed yourself on this great discovery? I await comments and detailed replies from both of you And Duncan, thanks for all the work you have done, I truly hope you can set aside your unwarrented prejudice against me and my theories and have a nice calm discussion on this very important topic Thanks guys Dean
Dean Hagerman Posted November 29, 2009 Author Posted November 29, 2009 And here is the other part of my study that proves its possible for TOCM to be in the position shown in Betzner with out needing a jet pack I did not show close ups because I want the whole picture to be shown for easy viewing and comparing In this Bond picture you can see the retaining wall that TOCM stood on as well as the Pyracantha tree he was filming over the top of I drew a line of a woman standing inside of the pergola, further back then TOCMs position on the retaining wall behind the Pyracantha tree As you can clearly see, the two lines are the same height, and again the woman is not only further back but is also most likley shorter then TOCM (as most men are taller then woman) So again my question to Duncan is why does TOCM need a jet pack when clearly he could have shot the other film (as seen by Rich Dellarose, Milicent Cranor and others) standing on the retaining wall and filming over the pyracantha tree
Dean Hagerman Posted November 29, 2009 Author Posted November 29, 2009 Here is Jack's work on the TOCM in Betzner for those who have not read TGZFH
Craig Lamson Posted November 29, 2009 Posted November 29, 2009 Ok so this is for Craig and Duncan In TGZFH one of Jacks studies was on "The Other Camera Man" in the Betzner picture I found out that Duncan made this discovery (Good work Duncan) now Duncan claims he made a mistake because TOCM would have to be wearing a jet pack to be at the height that he is Well what Duncan has forgot is that TOCM is standing on an extension of the same wall that Zappy is on If you look real close you will see that I checked out Zappys height while standing on the retaining wall Then I drew a line next to TOCM at a point that you can see the retaining wall coming out of the side of the Pyracantha tree As you can clearly see the line is shorter then Zappys, as it should be because TOCM is standing back behind Zappy After carful study by myself, I found that TOCM could have been standing on the retaining wall with no help from a jet pack His height is on par with that of Zapruder and he is just as clear as Zappy and Sitzy So Craig for you this is my first study of one of Jacks studies in TGZFH And for Duncan, I would like to know why you reversed yourself on this great discovery? I await comments and detailed replies from both of you And Duncan, thanks for all the work you have done, I truly hope you can set aside your unwarrented prejudice against me and my theories and have a nice calm discussion on this very important topic Thanks guys Dean Strike one for deano....this is "bunnies in the clouds". Please try again next time, or do you need the rules restated?
Dean Hagerman Posted November 29, 2009 Author Posted November 29, 2009 Ok so this is for Craig and Duncan In TGZFH one of Jacks studies was on "The Other Camera Man" in the Betzner picture I found out that Duncan made this discovery (Good work Duncan) now Duncan claims he made a mistake because TOCM would have to be wearing a jet pack to be at the height that he is Well what Duncan has forgot is that TOCM is standing on an extension of the same wall that Zappy is on If you look real close you will see that I checked out Zappys height while standing on the retaining wall Then I drew a line next to TOCM at a point that you can see the retaining wall coming out of the side of the Pyracantha tree As you can clearly see the line is shorter then Zappys, as it should be because TOCM is standing back behind Zappy After carful study by myself, I found that TOCM could have been standing on the retaining wall with no help from a jet pack His height is on par with that of Zapruder and he is just as clear as Zappy and Sitzy So Craig for you this is my first study of one of Jacks studies in TGZFH And for Duncan, I would like to know why you reversed yourself on this great discovery? I await comments and detailed replies from both of you And Duncan, thanks for all the work you have done, I truly hope you can set aside your unwarrented prejudice against me and my theories and have a nice calm discussion on this very important topic Thanks guys Dean Strike one for deano....this is "bunnies in the clouds". Please try again next time, or do you need the rules restated? Your trained photographic eye can not see a man holding a camera to his face? If you cant see that I dont know what else to tell you
Chris Davidson Posted November 29, 2009 Posted November 29, 2009 Dean, It appears that the FBI recreation team agrees with Jack too. Why else would they film from the location you have referred to in his study. Obviously, the recreation was not filmed from the Z position, but from behind the Pyracantha shrub. chris
Chris Davidson Posted November 29, 2009 Posted November 29, 2009 Dean, I would hope others might ask themselves why the FBI wouldn't recreate their movie with the same camera and from the same location as Z. What don't they want us to know. Here's a little help for you. Location of the Pyracantha shrub if you were really filming from Z's position. chris
Robin Unger Posted November 29, 2009 Posted November 29, 2009 (edited) Dean,I would hope others might ask themselves why the FBI wouldn't recreate their movie with the same camera and from the same location as Z. What don't they want us to know. Here's a little help for you. Location of the Pyracantha shrub if you were really filming from Z's position. chris Another SS image. Edited November 29, 2009 by Robin Unger
Bernice Moore Posted November 29, 2009 Posted November 29, 2009 a few more the one is chris research from some time ago...chris i saved it... \B..
Craig Lamson Posted November 29, 2009 Posted November 29, 2009 Ok so this is for Craig and Duncan In TGZFH one of Jacks studies was on "The Other Camera Man" in the Betzner picture I found out that Duncan made this discovery (Good work Duncan) now Duncan claims he made a mistake because TOCM would have to be wearing a jet pack to be at the height that he is Well what Duncan has forgot is that TOCM is standing on an extension of the same wall that Zappy is on If you look real close you will see that I checked out Zappys height while standing on the retaining wall Then I drew a line next to TOCM at a point that you can see the retaining wall coming out of the side of the Pyracantha tree As you can clearly see the line is shorter then Zappys, as it should be because TOCM is standing back behind Zappy After carful study by myself, I found that TOCM could have been standing on the retaining wall with no help from a jet pack His height is on par with that of Zapruder and he is just as clear as Zappy and Sitzy So Craig for you this is my first study of one of Jacks studies in TGZFH And for Duncan, I would like to know why you reversed yourself on this great discovery? I await comments and detailed replies from both of you And Duncan, thanks for all the work you have done, I truly hope you can set aside your unwarrented prejudice against me and my theories and have a nice calm discussion on this very important topic Thanks guys Dean Strike one for deano....this is "bunnies in the clouds". Please try again next time, or do you need the rules restated? Your trained photographic eye can not see a man holding a camera to his face? If you cant see that I dont know what else to tell you I don't play the silly "I see things in trees games". Have you seen Elvis lately? Now back to "proving" your photographic prowess, you have any?
Dean Hagerman Posted November 29, 2009 Author Posted November 29, 2009 Dean,It appears that the FBI recreation team agrees with Jack too. Why else would they film from the location you have referred to in his study. Obviously, the recreation was not filmed from the Z position, but from behind the Pyracantha shrub. chris Very nice! Thank you Chris
Dean Hagerman Posted November 29, 2009 Author Posted November 29, 2009 And Duncan, thanks for all the work you have done, I truly hope you can set aside your unwarrented prejudice against me and my theories and have a nice calm discussion on this very important topicThanks Dean I have no prejudice against you Dean, I just think you are wrong. You have the Camera Man in the wrong location. Here he is. Duncan I told you I have a good sense of humor What you posted was not funny I was hoping to get replies from Craig and Duncan that I could debate Instead when I do what was asked of me from Craig all he can say is "I don't play the silly I see things in trees games" And Duncan posts a silly 20 foot tall Badge Man with a camera on his nose I think that says alot
Craig Lamson Posted November 29, 2009 Posted November 29, 2009 And Duncan, thanks for all the work you have done, I truly hope you can set aside your unwarrented prejudice against me and my theories and have a nice calm discussion on this very important topicThanks Dean I have no prejudice against you Dean, I just think you are wrong. You have the Camera Man in the wrong location. Here he is. Duncan I told you I have a good sense of humor What you posted was not funny I was hoping to get replies from Craig and Duncan that I could debate Instead when I do what was asked of me from Craig all he can say is "I don't play the silly I see things in trees games" And Duncan posts a silly 20 foot tall Badge Man with a camera on his nose I think that says alot No you did exactly what I asked you NOT to do, but you did it anyways and then complain. Shall I take you back to the original request? Yes it does say alot...about you.
Chris Davidson Posted November 29, 2009 Posted November 29, 2009 I wonder how wide the bush at the base of the wall was, back in Shaneyfelt's exam. chris
Dean Hagerman Posted November 30, 2009 Author Posted November 30, 2009 I wonder how wide the bush at the base of the wall was, back in Shaneyfelt's exam.chris Again nice work Chris Im sorry to ask but are you the one who took a film from Zappys position with a Bell and Howell camera and 8mm film? I would love to see more of your work from this position (and anything from the retaining wall in TOCMs position) Thanks Chris Dean
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now