Jump to content
The Education Forum

Why did/do the Kennedys remain silent?


John Dolva
 Share

Recommended Posts

This just an attempt to kick off some brainstorming in the hope of learning things.

With no supporting evidence: (just perhaps hypothetical inferences)

Could it be that the Kennedys have steered clear of the issue when they had the opportumity to not do so because they in their own way have already, behind the scene, dealt with it and a new investigation might uncover THAT??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 229
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

This just an attempt to kick off some brainstorming in the hope of learning things.

With no supporting evidence: (just perhaps hypothetical inferences)

Could it be that the Kennedys have steered clear of the issue when they had the opportumity to not do so because they in their own way have already, behind the scene, dealt with it and a new investigation might uncover THAT??

John,

Who are the Kennedy benefactors? Who promoted them, provided them with their wealth and political power?

There are your killers and that's why the Kennedy family remain silent.

Edited by Terry Mauro
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought they were relatively old money. ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought they were relatively old money. ?

JFK has been dead 47 years. What exactly do you mean?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mean old money as opposed to nuveau riche. You mentioned benefactors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mean old money as opposed to nuveau riche. You mentioned benefactors.

Yes, and that would mean, what?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes.

Perhaps.

Yes, in various ways, starting with JFK ''..going to nut country''. Jackie ''Let them see what they have done.''...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mean old money as opposed to nuveau riche. You mentioned benefactors.

Yes, and that would mean, what?

Old money (people) usually behave differently to the nuveay riche. Maybe Old Money is an oz term for something worded differently in the US?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes.

Perhaps.

Yes, in various ways, starting with JFK ''..going to nut country''. Jackie ''Let them see what they have done.''...

You're assuming the "they" Jackie reportedly mentioned was the so called "nuts" you refer to. There is no proof she was refering to the people/leaders/so called right wing element of Dallas.

No, the better method to get at the truth is to ask yourself, who promoted and groomed the Kennedy family to be a political dynasty. On who's behalf were they supposed to be working?

Who provided them their wealth, and political influence?

When you find out who that is, then you have your killers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes.

Perhaps.

Yes, in various ways, starting with JFK ''..going to nut country''. Jackie ''Let them see what they have done.''...

You're assuming the "they" Jackie reportedly mentioned was the so called "nuts" you refer to. There is no proof she was refering to the people/leaders/so called right wing element of Dallas.

No, the better method to get at the truth is to ask yourself, who promoted and groomed the Kennedy family to be a political dynasty. On who's behalf were they supposed to be working?

Who provided them their wealth, and political influence?

When you find out who that is, then you have your killers.

Yes, who? Hence old money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes.

Perhaps.

Yes, in various ways, starting with JFK ''..going to nut country''. Jackie ''Let them see what they have done.''...

You're assuming the "they" Jackie reportedly mentioned was the so called "nuts" you refer to. There is no proof she was refering to the people/leaders/so called right wing element of Dallas.

No, the better method to get at the truth is to ask yourself, who promoted and groomed the Kennedy family to be a political dynasty. On who's behalf were they supposed to be working?

Who provided them their wealth, and political influence?

When you find out who that is, then you have your killers.

Yes, who? Hence old money.

Could you be more evasive? :D

Yes, who?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not being evasive. I'm displaying ignorance. It seems a q worth asking. Yes : Who? I do not know. You seem to indicate you know, so I'm asking, that's all.

I know they were old irish catholic east, prob victims of assimilation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This just an attempt to kick off some brainstorming in the hope of learning things.

With no supporting evidence: (just perhaps hypothetical inferences)

Could it be that the Kennedys have steered clear of the issue when they had the opportumity to not do so because they in their own way have already, behind the scene, dealt with it and a new investigation might uncover THAT??

If 2 of my brothers, uncles, dads, relations, were publicly shot in the head and I witnessed their assassinations and consequent cover ups, I wouldn't go playing the hero. Especially if I had children of my own. I don't think the Kennedy's can take fault for not making waves. God knows I wouldn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share


×
×
  • Create New...