Steven Gaal Posted June 25, 2015 Share Posted June 25, 2015 (edited) BTW, what about your earlier post on this thread in which you said (in red-colored font) that a particular WC document about Oswald's alleged April, 1962, dealings with the Texas Employment Commission could be found in "on page 491 Volume 19 (WarrenVolumes)" [sic] ? Where did you get that bad information? Harvey and Lee ? Or was it just carelessness on your part? // GRAVES ========================================================================== QUOTE FROM H & L . The employment document does have 4/22 written on it , as you Mr. Graves note. ,GAAL see http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=21846&p=301404 And NO ONE in the H & L camp checked out whether that date was correct or not. Why? Because that could mean finding something that negated its usefulness to this theory. CAMP ?? I HAD LUNCH WITH HIM AT THE MEXICAN RESTURANT NEAR WERE THE LHO DRIVEN CAR WAS SPOTTED IN DALLAS . ONE LUNCH THATS ALL NEVER HAD LETTERS, EMAILS OR PHONE CONTACTS WITH HIM. GAAL Edited June 25, 2015 by Steven Gaal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Graves Posted June 25, 2015 Share Posted June 25, 2015 (edited) BTW, what about your earlier post on this thread in which you said (in red-colored font) that a particular WC document about Oswald's alleged April, 1962, dealings with the Texas Employment Commission could be found in "on page 491 Volume 19 (WarrenVolumes)" [sic] ? Where did you get that bad information? Harvey and Lee ? Or was it just carelessness on your part? // GRAVES ========================================================================== QUOTE FROM H & L . The employment document does have 4/22 written on it , as you Mr. Graves note. ,GAAL see http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=21846&p=301404 Steve, So that incorrect reference to "page 491 volume 19 (WarrenVolumes) [sic] was from Harvey and Lee ? Too bad you didn't realize it was a bad WC reference before you posted it as though it was Gospel Truth from Harvey and Lee. Makes one wonder how many other mistakes Armstrong made in that book. --Tommy PS Regarding your precious "4/62," Greg Parker has already pointed out to us that a 10/10/62 Texas Employment Commission document about Lee H. Oswald says "Date in Fort Worth -- June, 1962," which jibes with the date Oswald and family are known to have moved to Fort Worth from Minsk. Greg rightly points out that Mrs. Cunningham of the Texas Employment Commission probably made a simple mistake when she wrote "4/62" instead of "6/62" (for June, 1962) on another 10/10/62 Texas Employment Commission document about Oswald. Please note that any other explanation makes no sense at all in the context of Cunningham's WC testimony (in which she says that Oswald first came into the Texas Employment Office "on 10/9/62 or 10/10/62"), as well as in the context of all the other dates listed on that document and all the other documents associated with it. Edited June 26, 2015 by Thomas Graves Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steven Gaal Posted June 25, 2015 Share Posted June 25, 2015 BTW, what about your earlier post on this thread in which you said (in red-colored font) that a particular WC document about Oswald's alleged April, 1962, dealings with the Texas Employment Commission could be found in "on page 491 Volume 19 (WarrenVolumes)" [sic] ? Where did you get that bad information? Harvey and Lee ? Or was it just carelessness on your part? // GRAVES ========================================================================== QUOTE FROM H & L . The employment document does have 4/22 written on it , as you Mr. Graves note. ,GAAL see http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=21846&p=301404 Steve, So that incorrect reference to "page 491 volume 19 (WarrenVolumes) [sic] was from Harvey and Lee ? Too bad you didn't realize it was a bad WC reference before you posted it as though it was Gospel Truth from Harvey and Lee. Makes one wonder how many other mistakes Armstrong made in that book. --Tommy PS Regarding your precious "4/62," Greg Parker has already pointed out to us that a 10/10/62 Texas Employment Commission document about Lee H. Oswald says "Date in Fort Worth -- June, 1962," which jibes with the date Oswald and family are known to have moved to Fort Worth from New Orleans. Greg rightly points out that Mrs. Cunningham of the Texas Employment Commission probably made a simple mistake when she wrote "4/62" instead of "6/62" (for June, 1962) on another 10/10/62 Texas Employment Commission document about Oswald. Please note that any other explanation makes no sense at all in the context of Cunningham's WC testimony (in which she says that Oswald first came into the Texas Employment Office "on 10/9/62 or 10/10/62"), as well as in the context of all the other dates listed on that document and all the other documents associated with it. Anna Lewis says Feb 1962 is when see meets Lee Oswald... with ample opportunity to cut, retake, and get it right... she repeats, Jan-Apr 1962.... / JOSEPHS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Parker Posted June 25, 2015 Share Posted June 25, 2015 BTW, what about your earlier post on this thread in which you said (in red-colored font) that a particular WC document about Oswald's alleged April, 1962, dealings with the Texas Employment Commission could be found in "on page 491 Volume 19 (WarrenVolumes)" [sic] ? Where did you get that bad information? Harvey and Lee ? Or was it just carelessness on your part? // GRAVES ========================================================================== QUOTE FROM H & L . The employment document does have 4/22 written on it , as you Mr. Graves note. ,GAAL see http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=21846&p=301404 Steve, So that incorrect reference to "page 491 volume 19 (WarrenVolumes) [sic] was from Harvey and Lee ? Too bad you didn't realize it was a bad WC reference before you posted it as though it was Gospel Truth from Harvey and Lee. Makes one wonder how many other mistakes Armstrong made in that book. --Tommy PS Regarding your precious "4/62," Greg Parker has already pointed out to us that a 10/10/62 Texas Employment Commission document about Lee H. Oswald says "Date in Fort Worth -- June, 1962," which jibes with the date Oswald and family are known to have moved to Fort Worth from New Orleans Minsk. Greg rightly points out that Mrs. Cunningham of the Texas Employment Commission probably made a simple mistake when she wrote "4/62" instead of "6/62" (for June, 1962) on another 10/10/62 Texas Employment Commission document about Oswald. Please note that any other explanation makes no sense at all in the context of Cunningham's WC testimony (in which she says that Oswald first came into the Texas Employment Office "on 10/9/62 or 10/10/62"), as well as in the context of all the other dates listed on that document and all the other documents associated with it. "first came in" is in reference only to the Dallas Tec. He did register at FW TEC in June and did have testing done there as well. Can't recall off the top if Dallas did the same tests already done by FW, or if they did different ones, but either way wouldn't surprise. Cunningham was apparently not immediately aware at the time she tested Oswald that he already had tests done at a different office. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Parker Posted June 25, 2015 Share Posted June 25, 2015 BTW, what about your earlier post on this thread in which you said (in red-colored font) that a particular WC document about Oswald's alleged April, 1962, dealings with the Texas Employment Commission could be found in "on page 491 Volume 19 (WarrenVolumes)" [sic] ? Where did you get that bad information? Harvey and Lee ? Or was it just carelessness on your part? // GRAVES ========================================================================== QUOTE FROM H & L . The employment document does have 4/22 written on it , as you Mr. Graves note. ,GAAL see http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=21846&p=301404 Steve, So that incorrect reference to "page 491 volume 19 (WarrenVolumes) [sic] was from Harvey and Lee ? Too bad you didn't realize it was a bad WC reference before you posted it as though it was Gospel Truth from Harvey and Lee. Makes one wonder how many other mistakes Armstrong made in that book. --Tommy PS Regarding your precious "4/62," Greg Parker has already pointed out to us that a 10/10/62 Texas Employment Commission document about Lee H. Oswald says "Date in Fort Worth -- June, 1962," which jibes with the date Oswald and family are known to have moved to Fort Worth from New Orleans. Greg rightly points out that Mrs. Cunningham of the Texas Employment Commission probably made a simple mistake when she wrote "4/62" instead of "6/62" (for June, 1962) on another 10/10/62 Texas Employment Commission document about Oswald. Please note that any other explanation makes no sense at all in the context of Cunningham's WC testimony (in which she says that Oswald first came into the Texas Employment Office "on 10/9/62 or 10/10/62"), as well as in the context of all the other dates listed on that document and all the other documents associated with it. Anna Lewis says Feb 1962 is when see meets Lee Oswald... with ample opportunity to cut, retake, and get it right... she repeats, Jan-Apr 1962.... / JOSEPHS And what encouragement did she receive off anyone "to get it right"? Anna Lewis is about the furthest thing any honest investigator would try and use to negate all the other evidence. That you guys use her says it all about your agenda. Absolutely disgusting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Graves Posted June 25, 2015 Share Posted June 25, 2015 (edited) BTW, what about your earlier post on this thread in which you said (in red-colored font) that a particular WC document about Oswald's alleged April, 1962, dealings with the Texas Employment Commission could be found in "on page 491 Volume 19 (WarrenVolumes)" [sic] ? Where did you get that bad information? Harvey and Lee ? Or was it just carelessness on your part? // GRAVES ========================================================================== QUOTE FROM H & L . The employment document does have 4/22 written on it , as you Mr. Graves note. ,GAAL see http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=21846&p=301404 Steve, So that incorrect reference to "page 491 volume 19 (WarrenVolumes) [sic] was from Harvey and Lee ? Too bad you didn't realize it was a bad WC reference before you posted it as though it was Gospel Truth from Harvey and Lee. Makes one wonder how many other mistakes Armstrong made in that book. --Tommy PS Regarding your precious "4/62," Greg Parker has already pointed out to us that a 10/10/62 Texas Employment Commission document about Lee H. Oswald says "Date in Fort Worth -- June, 1962," which jibes with the date Oswald and family are known to have moved to Fort Worth from Minsk. Greg rightly points out that Mrs. Cunningham of the Texas Employment Commission probably made a simple mistake when she wrote "4/62" instead of "6/62" (for June, 1962) on another 10/10/62 Texas Employment Commission document about Oswald. Please note that any other explanation makes no sense at all in the context of Cunningham's WC testimony (in which she says that Oswald first came into the Texas Employment Office "on 10/9/62 or 10/10/62"), as well as in the context of all the other dates listed on that document and all the other documents associated with it. Anna Lewis says Feb 1962 is when see meets Lee Oswald... with ample opportunity to cut, retake, and get it right... she repeats, Jan-Apr 1962.... / JOSEPHS And what encouragement did she receive from anyone "to get it right"? Anna Lewis is about the furthest thing any honest investigator would try and use to negate all the other evidence. That you guys use her says it all about your agenda. Absolutely disgusting. Greg, Thanks for pointing out in your previous post that Oswald had already been tested at the Fort Worth TEC office in June, 1962. The important thing is that H&L's precious "4/62" can be explained as a simple mistake made by Mrs. Cunningham when she should have written "6/62" for June, 1962, the date that Oswald and family moved to Fort Worth from Minsk, a date that Cunninham was aware of, as indicated by her "Date in Fort Worth -- June, 1962" notation regarding Lee H. Oswald on another 10/10/62 TEC document. Can you please provide a link to any of Oswald's TEC Fort Worth documents from June, 1962? Thanks, --Tommy Edited June 25, 2015 by Thomas Graves Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Parker Posted June 25, 2015 Share Posted June 25, 2015 BTW, what about your earlier post on this thread in which you said (in red-colored font) that a particular WC document about Oswald's alleged April, 1962, dealings with the Texas Employment Commission could be found in "on page 491 Volume 19 (WarrenVolumes)" [sic] ? Where did you get that bad information? Harvey and Lee ? Or was it just carelessness on your part? // GRAVES ========================================================================== QUOTE FROM H & L . The employment document does have 4/22 written on it , as you Mr. Graves note. ,GAAL see http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=21846&p=301404 Steve, So that incorrect reference to "page 491 volume 19 (WarrenVolumes) [sic] was from Harvey and Lee ? Too bad you didn't realize it was a bad WC reference before you posted it as though it was Gospel Truth from Harvey and Lee. Makes one wonder how many other mistakes Armstrong made in that book. --Tommy PS Regarding your precious "4/62," Greg Parker has already pointed out to us that a 10/10/62 Texas Employment Commission document about Lee H. Oswald says "Date in Fort Worth -- June, 1962," which jibes with the date Oswald and family are known to have moved to Fort Worth from New Orleans. Greg rightly points out that Mrs. Cunningham of the Texas Employment Commission probably made a simple mistake when she wrote "4/62" instead of "6/62" (for June, 1962) on another 10/10/62 Texas Employment Commission document about Oswald. Please note that any other explanation makes no sense at all in the context of Cunningham's WC testimony (in which she says that Oswald first came into the Texas Employment Office "on 10/9/62 or 10/10/62"), as well as in the context of all the other dates listed on that document and all the other documents associated with it. Anna Lewis says Feb 1962 is when see meets Lee Oswald... with ample opportunity to cut, retake, and get it right... she repeats, Jan-Apr 1962.... / JOSEPHS And what encouragement did she receive from anyone "to get it right"? Anna Lewis is about the furthest thing any honest investigator would try and use to negate all the other evidence. That you guys use her says it all about your agenda. Absolutely disgusting. Greg, Thanks for pointing out in your previous post that Oswald had already been tested at the Fort Worth TEC office in June, 1962. The important thing is that H&L's precious "4/62" can be explained as a simple mistake made by Mrs. Cunningham when she should have written "6/62" for June, 1962, the date that Oswald and family moved to Fort Worth from Minsk, a date that Cunninham was aware of, as indicated by her "Date in Fort Worth -- June, 1962" notation regarding Lee H. Oswald on another 10/10/62 TEC document. Can you please provide a link to any of Oswald's TEC Fort Worth documents from June, 1962? Thanks, --Tommy Tommy, as far as I can tell, they didn't publish them - again acting on memory, but this was possibly because Cunningham obtained the results and transcribed them into her file on Oswald. Yet again from memory, it was someone at FW TEC who contacted Peter Gregory for Oswald re his Russian language skills. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Graves Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 (edited) Yes, Greg. I'll look up the name of the gal at the Fort Worth TEC in a minute. EDIT: Greg, The name Annie Laurie Smith comes to mind. As does the name Virginia Hale. http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh22/pdf/wh22_ce_1389.pdf --Tommy Meanwhile, for your enjoyment here's another huge mistake on Jim Hargrove's website. I wonder if he'll thank me for bringing it to his attention? -- About 1/3 down the page, Hargrove writes: "NOTE: In 1963 [sic; it was actually in 1962] Lee HARVEY Oswald was interviewed by TEC counselors Helen Cunningham, Don Brooks, and Laura Kittrell. None of these counselors were interviewed by the Warren Commission and all TEC records of their interviews with Oswald were given to the FBI and disappeared." http://harveyandlee.net/1956/1956.html Well, prickly Mrs. Helen P. Cunningham's testimony starts on page 117 of Warren Commission Hearings Volume X. And anxious Donald L. Brooks' testimony starts on page 143 of the same WC volume. And here's a nice June 11, 1964, affidavit by the very same Mrs. Helen P. Cunningham: http://jfkassassination.net/russ/testimony/cunning1.htm So much for Hargrove's assertion that Cunningham and Brooks weren't interviewed by the Warren Commission. We already know from earlier posts in this thread http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh19/html/WH_Vol19_0210a.htm that it's not true that "all TEC records of their interviews with Oswald were given to the FBI and disappeared." LOL --Tommy Edited June 26, 2015 by Thomas Graves Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Parker Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 Yes, Greg. I'll look up the name of the gal at the Fort Worth TEC in a minute. Meanwhile, for your enjoyment here's another huge mistake on Jim Hargrove's website. I wonder if he'll thank me for bringing it to his attention? -- About 1/3 down the page, Hargrove writes: "NOTE: In 1963 [sic; it was actually in 1962] Lee HARVEY Oswald was interviewed by TEC counselors Helen Cunningham, Don Brooks, and Laura Kittrell. None of these counselors were interviewed by the Warren Commission and all TEC records of their interviews with Oswald were given to the FBI and disappeared." http://harveyandlee.net/1956/1956.html Well, prickly Mrs. Helen P. Cunningham's testimony starts on page 117 of Warren Commission Hearings Volume X: https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=44&search=cunningham#relPageId=125&tab=page And nervous Donald L. Brooks' testimony starts on page 143 of the same WC volume: http://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=44&search=cunningham#relPageId=151&tab=page And here's a nice June 11, 1964, affidavit by the very same Mrs. Helen P. Cunningham: http://jfkassassination.net/russ/testimony/cunning1.htm So much for Hargrove's assertion that Cunningham and Brooks weren't interviewed by the Warren Commission. We already know from earlier posts in this thread that it's not true that "all TEC records of their interviews with Oswald were given to the FBI and disappeared." LOL --Tommy Are you really surprised by any of that? I can see Jim slowly distancing himself from Harvey & Lee and adopting the far more plausible Bernie & Bob theory any day now... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Graves Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 (edited) Yes, Greg. I'll look up the name of the gal at the Fort Worth TEC in a minute. Meanwhile, for your enjoyment here's another huge mistake on Jim Hargrove's website. I wonder if he'll thank me for bringing it to his attention? -- About 1/3 down the page, Hargrove writes: "NOTE: In 1963 [sic; it was actually in 1962] Lee HARVEY Oswald was interviewed by TEC counselors Helen Cunningham, Don Brooks, and Laura Kittrell. None of these counselors were interviewed by the Warren Commission and all TEC records of their interviews with Oswald were given to the FBI and disappeared." http://harveyandlee.net/1956/1956.html Well, prickly Mrs. Helen P. Cunningham's testimony starts on page 117 of Warren Commission Hearings Volume X. And nervous Donald L. Brooks' testimony starts on page 143 of the same WC volume. And here's a nice June 11, 1964, affidavit by the very same Mrs. Helen P. Cunningham: http://jfkassassination.net/russ/testimony/cunning1.htm So much for Hargrove's assertion that Cunningham and Brooks weren't interviewed by the Warren Commission. And of course we already know from earlier posts that it's not true that "all TEC records of their interviews with Oswald were given to the FBI and disappeared." Here are nine pages of them: http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh19/html/WH_Vol19_0208a.htm LOL --Tommy Are you really surprised by any of that? I can see Jim slowly distancing himself from Harvey & Lee and adopting the far more plausible Bernie & Bob theory any day now... Actually I am, Greg. I didn't realize that his website was so inaccurate until now. Of course I hadn't looked at his website until now, either. LOL --Tommy Edited June 26, 2015 by Thomas Graves Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Graves Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 BTW, what about your earlier post on this thread in which you said (in red-colored font) that a particular WC document about Oswald's alleged April, 1962, dealings with the Texas Employment Commission could be found in "on page 491 Volume 19 (WarrenVolumes)" [sic] ? Where did you get that bad information? Harvey and Lee ? Or was it just carelessness on your part? // GRAVES ========================================================================== IT WAS A QUOTE FROM H & L . The employment document does have 4/22 written on it , as you Mr. Graves note. ,GAAL see http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=21846&p=301404 Steve, 4/22 ? Didn't you mean to write 4/62? LOL --Tommy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Graves Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 (edited) Greg, Thanks for pointing out in your previous post that Oswald had already been tested at the Fort Worth TEC office in June, 1962. The important thing is that H&L's precious "4/62" can be explained as a simple mistake made by Mrs. Cunningham when she should have written "6/62" for June, 1962, the date that Oswald and family moved to Fort Worth from Minsk, a date that Cunninham was aware of, as indicated by her "Date in Fort Worth -- June, 1962" notation regarding Lee H. Oswald on another 10/10/62 TEC document. Can you please provide a link to any of Oswald's TEC Fort Worth documents from June, 1962? Thanks, --Tommy Tommy, as far as I can tell, they didn't publish them - again acting on memory, but this was possibly because Cunningham obtained the results and transcribed them into her file on Oswald. Yet again from memory, it was someone at FW TEC who contacted Peter Gregory for Oswald re his Russian language skills. Yes, Greg. I'll look up the name of the gal at the Fort Worth TEC in a minute. [EDIT: Greg, The name Annie Laurie Smith comes to mind. As does the name Virginia Hale. http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh22/pdf/wh22_ce_1389.pdf ] Meanwhile, for your enjoyment here's another huge mistake on Jim Hargrove's website. I wonder if he'll thank me for bringing it to his attention? -- About 1/3 down the page, Hargrove writes: "NOTE: In 1963 [sic; it was actually in 1962] Lee HARVEY Oswald was interviewed by TEC counselors Helen Cunningham, Don Brooks, and Laura Kittrell. None of these counselors were interviewed by the Warren Commission and all TEC records of their interviews with Oswald were given to the FBI and disappeared." http://harveyandlee.net/1956/1956.html Well, prickly Mrs. Helen P. Cunningham's testimony starts on page 117 of Warren Commission Hearings Volume X. And anxious Donald L. Brooks' testimony starts on page 143 of the same WC volume. And here's a nice June 11, 1964, affidavit by the very same Mrs. Helen P. Cunningham: http://jfkassassination.net/russ/testimony/cunning1.htm So much for Hargrove's assertion that Cunningham and Brooks weren't interviewed by the Warren Commission. We already know from earlier posts in this thread http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh19/html/WH_Vol19_0210a.htm that it's not true that "all TEC records of their interviews with Oswald were given to the FBI and disappeared." LOL --Tommy edited and bumped for Greg Parker Edited June 26, 2015 by Thomas Graves Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Parker Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 Greg, Thanks for pointing out in your previous post that Oswald had already been tested at the Fort Worth TEC office in June, 1962. The important thing is that H&L's precious "4/62" can be explained as a simple mistake made by Mrs. Cunningham when she should have written "6/62" for June, 1962, the date that Oswald and family moved to Fort Worth from Minsk, a date that Cunninham was aware of, as indicated by her "Date in Fort Worth -- June, 1962" notation regarding Lee H. Oswald on another 10/10/62 TEC document. Can you please provide a link to any of Oswald's TEC Fort Worth documents from June, 1962? Thanks, --Tommy Tommy, as far as I can tell, they didn't publish them - again acting on memory, but this was possibly because Cunningham obtained the results and transcribed them into her file on Oswald. Yet again from memory, it was someone at FW TEC who contacted Peter Gregory for Oswald re his Russian language skills. Yes, Greg. I'll look up the name of the gal at the Fort Worth TEC in a minute. [EDIT: Greg, The name Annie Laurie Smith comes to mind. As does the name Virginia Hale. http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh22/pdf/wh22_ce_1389.pdf ] Meanwhile, for your enjoyment here's another huge mistake on Jim Hargrove's website. I wonder if he'll thank me for bringing it to his attention? -- About 1/3 down the page, Hargrove writes: "NOTE: In 1963 [sic; it was actually in 1962] Lee HARVEY Oswald was interviewed by TEC counselors Helen Cunningham, Don Brooks, and Laura Kittrell. None of these counselors were interviewed by the Warren Commission and all TEC records of their interviews with Oswald were given to the FBI and disappeared." http://harveyandlee.net/1956/1956.html Well, prickly Mrs. Helen P. Cunningham's testimony starts on page 117 of Warren Commission Hearings Volume X. And anxious Donald L. Brooks' testimony starts on page 143 of the same WC volume. And here's a nice June 11, 1964, affidavit by the very same Mrs. Helen P. Cunningham: http://jfkassassination.net/russ/testimony/cunning1.htm So much for Hargrove's assertion that Cunningham and Brooks weren't interviewed by the Warren Commission. We already know from earlier posts in this thread http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh19/html/WH_Vol19_0210a.htm that it's not true that "all TEC records of their interviews with Oswald were given to the FBI and disappeared." LOL --Tommy edited and bumped for Greg Parker Virginia. It all comes back. As usuual, they miss the real story. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steven Gaal Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 (edited) BTW, what about your earlier post on this thread in which you said (in red-colored font) that a particular WC document about Oswald's alleged April, 1962, dealings with the Texas Employment Commission could be found in "on page 491 Volume 19 (WarrenVolumes)" [sic] ? Where did you get that bad information? Harvey and Lee ? Or was it just carelessness on your part? // GRAVES ========================================================================== IT WAS A QUOTE FROM H & L . The employment document does have 4/22 written on it , as you Mr. Graves note. ,GAAL http://www.history-m...Vol19_0210a.htm So, what does the "4/62" stand for on the page, above? Is it a typo for "4/63"? Unlikely, because it's written twice. In her testimony, Mrs. Cunningham of the Texas Employment Commission said the first time Oswald came in was on 10/9/62 or 10/10/62, so obviously he couldn't have been tested six months before that in April, 1962 (4/62) . This shows his test scores and is dated 10/10/62. http://www.history-m...Vol19_0208a.htm --Tommy Edited June 26, 2015 by Steven Gaal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Graves Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 (edited) BTW, what about your earlier post on this thread in which you said (in red-colored font) that a particular WC document about Oswald's alleged April, 1962, dealings with the Texas Employment Commission could be found in "on page 491 Volume 19 (WarrenVolumes)" [sic] ? Where did you get that bad information? Harvey and Lee ? Or was it just carelessness on your part? // GRAVES ========================================================================== [iT WAS A] QUOTE FROM H & L . The employment document does have 4/22 written on it , as you Mr. Graves note. GAAL Dear Steven, I've highlighted your little mistake, above, in bold red to make it really easy for you to find. You probably meant to write 4/62, instead. Right? Or do you really think that Harvey or Lee went into the Texas Employment Commission in April of 1922? --Tommy Edited June 26, 2015 by Thomas Graves Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts