Greg Parker Posted June 8, 2015 Posted June 8, 2015 (edited) http://gregparke4.wix.com/hardlyleedotnut Only one article so far, but will add more as time goes on. Enjoy! Edited June 8, 2015 by Greg Parker
Thomas Graves Posted August 27, 2015 Posted August 27, 2015 Should add a "toothfairy" page Greg. Good one, Ed! --Tommy
David G. Healy Posted August 27, 2015 Posted August 27, 2015 (edited) Should add a "toothfairy" page Greg. I'm sure Greg appreciates there's someone trailing behind him with a dustpan... Dude, it's gonna take a generation, at least one generation to get the 2 Oswald's idea out of assassination researchers heads, by default, and the same time period, if not longer, for the more than casually interested. Interested that there were possibly TWO Oswald's. That's two Oswald's, that idea exists right NOW! Who cares the details, that's the reality of the mountain you're climbing? Expunging that idea, or creating and all new Oswald? Is that your focus? Now that could be interesting! Just curious: Your take on, what's the point of two Oswald's? How does it fit into a conspiracy to murder the president of the United States? If at all? You've garnered attention now. Most of it a negative slant. At least from my take of the few related threads at EF. So don't leave the viewing public here with: perhaps the "toothfairy" created another sophomoric JFK assassination website --or-- just another website driven by wishful thinkin' and a hopin'. Attacking specific researchers, mocking them and their work, in the hopes THAT will reopen the JFK assassination case? Ain't gonna happen. Edited August 27, 2015 by David G. Healy
Greg Parker Posted August 29, 2015 Author Posted August 29, 2015 (edited) Dude, it's gonna take a generation, at least one generation to get the 2 Oswald's idea out of assassination researchers heads, by default, and the same time period, if not longer, for the more than casually interested. Interested that there were possibly TWO Oswald's. That's two Oswald's, that idea exists right NOW! Like wow man that's crazy! An idea exists, In your OPINION, it will take generations to eradicate that idea. You may be right. It took generations to dispel the Flat Earth Theory. No doubt there were some back then playing the same dumb running interference play as you. Here's a thought. Bad ideas shouldn't be allowed to hang around just because, like some graffiti, they're resistant to scrubbing. Who cares the details, that's the reality of the mountain you're climbing? Expunging that idea, or creating and all new Oswald? Is that your focus? Now that could be interesting! Details schmetails, eh? You still don't get it do you? The FOCUS is historical accuracy in my own research. and more generally clearing the table of all the junk. Both facets have the ultimate aim of getting this case reopened and the history books corrected. Just curious: Your take on, what's the point of two Oswald's? How does it fit into a conspiracy to murder the president of the United States? If at all? The point of the theory is ego and ownership of the agenda. Some of the same people jumped on other silly bandwagons as well. The White Fiasco and the fake McCone-Rowley come to mind. Some of the same people also spent 50 years arguing about the zapruder Film. That really advanced the Cause, didn't it? What it did do was boost the profiles of the protagonists and make fools of us all. You've garnered attention now. Most of it a negative slant. At least from my take of the few related threads at EF. I have no desire to seek or hope for positive attention from agenda-driven tin-foil hat wearing idjits. So don't leave the viewing public here with: perhaps the "toothfairy" created another sophomoric JFK assassination website --or-- just another website driven by wishful thinkin' and a hopin'. The website is parody. This is sophomoric. It is a large part of what is being parodied MAGIC Tooth VANISHING SCARS http://harveyandlee.net/Tooth/Tooth.htm Edited August 29, 2015 by Greg Parker
Greg Parker Posted August 29, 2015 Author Posted August 29, 2015 Attacking specific researchers, mocking them and their work, in the hopes THAT will reopen the JFK assassination case? Ain't gonna happen. In order to be taken seriously by the outside world, this "community" has to engage in some some serious housecleaning AND have some serious resaerch to put on the table. It's a two-pronged plan. That you don't get it, is understood.
David G. Healy Posted August 30, 2015 Posted August 30, 2015 Attacking specific researchers, mocking them and their work, in the hopes THAT will reopen the JFK assassination case? Ain't gonna happen. In order to be taken seriously by the outside world, this "community" has to engage in some some serious housecleaning AND have some serious resaerch to put on the table. It's a two-pronged plan. That you don't get it, is understood. You need do but one thing when it comes to dealing with today's "research community." The very same thing Oliver Stone did in 1980's. It's simple, a good script! PERIOD! Cleanse the research community? You've got to be kidding... How do you cleanse free speech and free thought in all forms of media? Then toss the internet into the mix? Oh-my. Impossible. Get that "serious" research into script form. Have support staff get a synopsis together. If a synopsis is any good, good money will find you! Oswald, patsy or a murderer? Do what Stone did, his best creative vision and license put forward. The best story (script) wins hearts and minds! Advance truth or make a point (assassination research cop), which is it? Good luck, champ!
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now