Cory Santos Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 Very interesting. I had not heard this before. https://whowhatwhy.org/2017/10/06/navy-doctor-bullet-found-jfks-limousine-never-reported/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pamela Brown Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 15 minutes ago, Cory Santos said: Very interesting. I had not heard this before. https://whowhatwhy.org/2017/10/06/navy-doctor-bullet-found-jfks-limousine-never-reported/ There are a number of inaccuracies in this story, so I would treat it with caution... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Walton Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 Some initial comments (re: PDF): The Queen Mary is the back up car, not the limo and Greer never drove the Queen Mary. This guy seems to have a reminder bell in his brain as it seems like he's constantly making sure that the whole world knows that all shots came from the rear. Even when the interviewer thanks him at the end, he's like: ".....there's no question the shots came from the rear..." Funnily, he mentions the back wound and how the throat shot is its exit. He supposedly was at the autopsy but unironically never mentions that the back wound is nowhere near the throat and had no exit point. He simply states there's "no question" it came from the rear. Ford's reply letter includes "helpful" mentions including POSner's book. This, from the guy who scribbled "of neck" in the WR next to back to strengthen the preposterous SBT. Below is an image about the back wound - for comparison only. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 11, 2018 Share Posted January 11, 2018 From the AARC LIbrary Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Walton Posted January 13, 2018 Share Posted January 13, 2018 Bart call me stupid but what is the significance of the documents you posted above? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted May 1, 2018 Share Posted May 1, 2018 https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/2018/docid-32269709.pdf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Clark Posted May 1, 2018 Share Posted May 1, 2018 (edited) 3 hours ago, Bart Kamp said: https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/2018/docid-32269709.pdf 159 page doc concerning the molestation of collection of JFK autopsy photos. Early pages are a request by the HSCA made to the FBI for fingerprints of committee staff which were taken upon employment by the commission. Talk of a possible break-in of a safe containing JFK autopsy photos and evidence. request for Professional finger print identification personnel Many pages of finger prints and much redaction. The meat and potatoes start on page 96. p.100 Regis Blahut, CIA agent, is identified as the person whose fingerprints were found in the safe. p 136 to end, blanks or finger prints, mostly redacted. Edited May 1, 2018 by Michael Clark Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now