Jump to content
The Education Forum

"The Same Man"


Recommended Posts

On 8/4/2024 at 12:38 PM, Gil Jesus said:

Mr. Von Pein's "basic fact" isn't a fact at all, but instead is a link to another one of his usual sarcastic tirades on how "somebody else used Oswald's gun". What's "staggering" is how he can refer to the pistol as Oswald's when he can't produce documentation from REA Express that Oswald even received the weapon.

Before you can call it Oswald's, you have to prove that it wasn't a, "throw down" that McDonald tried to place into Oswald's waistband. You do that by producing documentation from REA Express that Oswald, in fact, received the weapon.

Mr. Von Pein also ignores the FACT that the bullets removed from Tippit's body did not match the revolver in evidence. Was this handgun the only .38 in the world that had been rechambered for .38 Special ammunition ?

He also ignores the FACT that no witness put the time of the Tippit shooting at or after 1:15.

He also ignores the FACT that the bullets removed from Tippit's body did not match the shell casings found at the scene.

He ignores the FACT that the persons who found the shells could not identify the shells in evidence as the shells they found. This includes the police officer who marked the shells. This severely damages the chain of custody which should begin AT THE POINT OF DISCOVERY, not in some police lab.

He ignores the FACT that three of the four spent shells found at the crime scene had initials on them of persons not known to be in the chain of custody of those shells. ( DPD Box 7, pg. 478 )

He ignores the FACT that witnesses to the shooting did not identify the coat in evidence as the coat the killer wore.

He ignores the FACT that Helen Markham testified that she had never seen Oswald prior to the police lineup.

He ignores the FACT that TWO witnesses saw Oswald INSIDE the Texas Theater prior to 1:15.

The only one here ignoring the FACTS is Mr. Von Pein.

Yeah, like I say, makes a BIT of sense, the pistol handover part is defo iffy. 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 49
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

8 hours ago, Gil Jesus said:

She never said anything about a 1:22 bus either, so what's your point ?

 

My point is obvious.

Since Markham never mentioned a 1:12 bus or a 1:22 bus, then no one has the right to claim which bus it was that Markham was trying to catch.

Get it now?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Gil Jesus said:

Earlene Roberts, Oswald's housekeeper, says in this video that Oswald entered the rooming house after 1 o'clock and that she saw him out at the bus stop after he left.

https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/roberts-at-bus-stop.mp4

She testified that he was in his room "about 3 or 4 minutes". ( 6 H 438 ) In her affidavit of Dec. 5, 1963, she said that Oswald was "standing on the curb at the bus stop, just to the right and on the same side of the street as our house."  ( 7 H 439 )

THIS IS AT THE SAME TIME HELEN MARKHAM IS LEAVING HER APARTMENT FOR THE 2 1/2 MINUTE WALK TO THE CORNER OF PATTON AVE AND 10TH STREET.

There is no way in hell that Oswald could have walked from that bus stop to the corner of 10th and Patton in the 2 1/2 minutes the FBI said it took Markham to get there.

Oswald was witnessed STANDING at the bus stop at 1:03-1:04. He wasn't walking and he wasn't headed towards the Tippit murder scene. In fact, that bus stop was for a northbound bus that would have taken him AWAY from the murder scene.

Even if he had immediately left the bus stop after Roberts turned away, ( according to the FBI ) it would have taken him 14 minutes to arrive at the crime scene, or 1-2 minutes AFTER Bowley had made his call on the police radio ( according to the dictabelt and transcripts ).

Oswald didn't kill Tippit.

 

 

Oswald arrives at the rooming house at 12:58 and is back in his room "just long enough to grab a jacket", per Earlene Roberts' testimony.  Therefore, he's out the door by 12:59 to 1:00.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Bill Brown said:

Oswald arrives at the rooming house at 12:58 and is back in his room "just long enough to grab a jacket", per Earlene Roberts' testimony.  Therefore, he's out the door by 12:59 to 1:00.

👍

https://jfk-archives.blogspot.com / In Lee Harvey Oswald's Room

 

Edited by David Von Pein
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Gil Jesus said:

Earlene Roberts, Oswald's housekeeper, says in this video that Oswald entered the rooming house after 1 o'clock and that she saw him out at the bus stop after he left.

https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/roberts-at-bus-stop.mp4

She testified that he was in his room "about 3 or 4 minutes". ( 6 H 438 ) In her affidavit of Dec. 5, 1963, she said that Oswald was "standing on the curb at the bus stop, just to the right and on the same side of the street as our house."  ( 7 H 439 )

THIS IS AT THE SAME TIME HELEN MARKHAM IS LEAVING HER APARTMENT FOR THE 2 1/2 MINUTE WALK TO THE CORNER OF PATTON AVE AND 10TH STREET.

There is no way in hell that Oswald could have walked from that bus stop to the corner of 10th and Patton in the 2 1/2 minutes the FBI said it took Markham to get there.

Oswald was witnessed STANDING at the bus stop at 1:03-1:04. He wasn't walking and he wasn't headed towards the Tippit murder scene. In fact, that bus stop was for a northbound bus that would have taken him AWAY from the murder scene.

Even if he had immediately left the bus stop after Roberts turned away, ( according to the FBI ) it would have taken him 14 minutes to arrive at the crime scene, or 1-2 minutes AFTER Bowley had made his call on the police radio ( according to the dictabelt and transcripts ).

Oswald didn't kill Tippit.

 

Preach brother!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...