James Richards Posted June 27, 2004 Share Posted June 27, 2004 Do you have anything on Dick Danner, Maheu's former FBIbuddy, who became his right hand man at Hughes? Sorry Jack, I don't have much on that at all. However, if I remember correctly, wasn't Danner George Smathers campaign manager back in I think 1950? James Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted June 27, 2004 Share Posted June 27, 2004 If I remember right, Danner was MAYOR of some city in Florida before moving to Fort Worth. He had a unique method of selling cars. His dealership was on West Seventh just west of downtown across the river. He hired dozens of very young (20s) competitive salesmen. Each night (7-10) they would stand by the curb waving and beckoning to passing cars. They were especially interested in "popular" cars which had a high resale value to young guys. When one of these cars pulled over to the curb, TWO of the salesmen would talk to the driver and get in a "bidding war" to buy the car, offering to pay the driver "cash on the spot" for the car. Eventually one of the "bidders" would "win". In addition to the instant cash, the driver "won a new Ford AT COST", but did not have to buy. The winning salesman would pull out CASH and take possession of the car on the spot (pending title). The dealership made money by selling the popular older models. I presume that in the daytime, they operated like a normal dealership at normal prices. Danner advertised the practice on a local rock-n-roll station, and the traffic was so heavy they had to have police directing traffic. They moved lots of new Fords this way, since the stranded motorists needed transportation. The HIGH VOLUME got Danner bigger discounts from Ford. Suddenly, at the height of his "success", Danner suddenly closed shop and moved to Las Vegas, joining his FBI buddy Maheu at Hughes Corp. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ron Ecker Posted June 28, 2004 Share Posted June 28, 2004 James Bamford has a new book on 9/11 and its use by the Bush regime as a pretext for war against Iraq. Appropriately entitled "A Pretext for War." The book's Amazon.com page (link below) includes a lengthy favorable review from the Washington Post. Bamford's previous book "Body of Secrets" made news for drawing public attention to Operation Northwoods, the U.S. military's proposal in 1962 for terrorist attacks against American citizens to be blamed on Castro. http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/038...0231992-2723255 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted June 28, 2004 Share Posted June 28, 2004 Members of this forum might be interested in Jim Marrs new book on 9/11. You can discuss it here:http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=992 I furnished Jim this illustration for his book. Also I furnished it to Marcel (member of this forum) for his website. These two photos are all that is needed to debunk the official story that a giant 757 jet crashed into the Pentagon. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Kerrigan Posted June 29, 2004 Share Posted June 29, 2004 No missile hit the Pentagon on Sept. 11. All the targets were hit by planes (but that doesn't mean the alleged hijackers were the ones flying the planes). http://www.snopes.com/rumors/pentagon.htm http://urbanlegends.about.com/library/blflight77.htm http://urbanlegends.about.com/gi/dynamic/o....com/2002/03/14 http://www.cs.purdue.edu/homes/cmh/simulation/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted June 29, 2004 Share Posted June 29, 2004 No missile hit the Pentagon on Sept. 11. All the targets were hit by planes (but that doesn't mean the alleged hijackers were the ones flying the planes).http://www.snopes.com/rumors/pentagon.htm http://urbanlegends.about.com/library/blflight77.htm http://urbanlegends.about.com/gi/dynamic/o....com/2002/03/14 http://www.cs.purdue.edu/homes/cmh/simulation/ Mr. Thirdeye...please do your homework before posting such nonsense. Jack White Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Richards Posted June 29, 2004 Share Posted June 29, 2004 Jack, In that top photo you posted, given that the outside wall has yet to collapse, that there is no aircraft wreckage and the damage to the building at this point is superficial, one has to conclude that no large passenger jet smashed into the Pentagon. Nice work. James Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ron Ecker Posted June 29, 2004 Share Posted June 29, 2004 Jack, In the second of the two photos, the collapsed wall (and therefore the hole) looks to be more in front of the firetruck on the right than the one on the left. That should therefore hold true for the first photo, in which the trucks appear to be in the same positions. In any case, why would anyone fake a plane crash into a building and forget to make a hole? Once realizing their mistake ("Damn, we forgot to make a hole"), wouldn't they have to bump off all the firemen who arrived on those trucks and observed that Flight 77, or whatever hit the building, didn't leave any hole? Isn't it much more likely that the top of the wall collapsed because there was a hole underneath it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Kerrigan Posted June 29, 2004 Share Posted June 29, 2004 What about all the witnesses who observed a plane crashing into the Pentagon? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony Frank Posted June 29, 2004 Share Posted June 29, 2004 (edited) What happened to the plane that was hijacked if it didn't crash into the Pentagon? I think there is more than ample evidence of a plane crashing into the Pentagon. Those pictures touting that it was a missile could have easily been faked to give people something to chew on. Edited June 29, 2004 by Tony Frank Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted June 29, 2004 Share Posted June 29, 2004 Jack,In the second of the two photos, the collapsed wall (and therefore the hole) looks to be more in front of the firetruck on the right than the one on the left. That should therefore hold true for the first photo, in which the trucks appear to be in the same positions. In any case, why would anyone fake a plane crash into a building and forget to make a hole? Once realizing their mistake ("Damn, we forgot to make a hole"), wouldn't they have to bump off all the firemen who arrived on those trucks and observed that Flight 77, or whatever hit the building, didn't leave any hole? Isn't it much more likely that the top of the wall collapsed because there was a hole underneath it? Do your homework before making unsupported statements. Jack White Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted June 29, 2004 Share Posted June 29, 2004 What about all the witnesses who observed a plane crashing into the Pentagon? Do your homework before making unsupported statements. You clearly have not read what witnesses said. Jack White Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted June 29, 2004 Share Posted June 29, 2004 What happened to the plane that was hijacked if it didn't crash into the Pentagon?I think there is more than ample evidence of a plane crashing into the Pentagon. Those pictures touting that it was a missile could have easily been faked to give people something to chew on. Do your homework before making unsupported statements. You are clearly uninformed on this subject. Jack White Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ron Ecker Posted June 29, 2004 Share Posted June 29, 2004 Jack,In the second of the two photos, the collapsed wall (and therefore the hole) looks to be more in front of the firetruck on the right than the one on the left. That should therefore hold true for the first photo, in which the trucks appear to be in the same positions. In any case, why would anyone fake a plane crash into a building and forget to make a hole? Once realizing their mistake ("Damn, we forgot to make a hole"), wouldn't they have to bump off all the firemen who arrived on those trucks and observed that Flight 77, or whatever hit the building, didn't leave any hole? Isn't it much more likely that the top of the wall collapsed because there was a hole underneath it? Do your homework before making unsupported statements. Jack White I have a thick file on Flight 77 and the Pentagon hit. I have done my homework. You are the one making unsupported statements. With respect to my quoted post, the statements I made are supported by plain common sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony Frank Posted June 29, 2004 Share Posted June 29, 2004 Jack, I live in Maryland, near DC. People from my church were killed on Flight 77, which departed from Dulles Airport in Virginia. Tell us what happened to that plane and the people who died if it did not crash into the Pentagon. Tony Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now