Chris Davidson Posted April 20, 2017 Posted April 20, 2017 Why don't we give Andrej a chance to respond. The importance of the previous Z clip along with this, might ring a bell for Andrej and/or others. https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwrExtVD005OcTJIMFBsQlpEUDA/view?usp=sharing P.S. #1 on the list states that Myers multi-film sync is a bunch of cr__p.
Chris Davidson Posted April 20, 2017 Posted April 20, 2017 The common object between the z video and Myers (Wiegman15/z257) frame. https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwrExtVD005OTG5udE1haW1XT2c/view?usp=sharing
Chris Davidson Posted April 20, 2017 Posted April 20, 2017 The necessary plotting. https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwrExtVD005OX0NRckNoUFZ2ZXM/view?usp=sharing
Chris Davidson Posted April 20, 2017 Posted April 20, 2017 The distance traveled by the common object from z193-z257 = 73ft. Z camera at 18.3 frames per sec. At 1.47ft per sec (1mph) the math awaits.
Chris Davidson Posted April 21, 2017 Posted April 21, 2017 64 frames/18.3 fps = 3.497 sec 73ft/3.497sec = 20.874ft per sec = 14.2 mph
Chris Davidson Posted April 21, 2017 Posted April 21, 2017 Excerpt is from Myers multi-sync film document. https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwrExtVD005OQkkzcjNaOG9HX1E/view?usp=sharing
Chris Davidson Posted April 21, 2017 Posted April 21, 2017 Connecting the dots. Showing the Myer's deception. Tina Towner used a 8mm movie camera. https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwrExtVD005OVmxWN1dXMkVCY1U/view?usp=sharing
Chris Davidson Posted April 21, 2017 Posted April 21, 2017 Myer's frame rate for Towner's camera = 22.8fps for his multi-sync hypothesis to work. Excerpt from Gary Mack on Towner's film: "The Towner film's true speed is likely closer to 18fps or slightly faster for most of the reel than to any other speed; it certainly was not operating at 16fps on November 22, 1963. Gary Mack" https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwrExtVD005ONzVvdm1iOWlXUDg/view?usp=sharing
Chris Davidson Posted April 21, 2017 Posted April 21, 2017 Myer's total frame count for Towner = 167 frames. 160 + 7 missing. https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwrExtVD005OQ1BsWDAzNjV1LWM/view?usp=sharing
Chris Davidson Posted April 21, 2017 Posted April 21, 2017 11 minutes ago, Chris Davidson said: Myer's frame rate for Towner's camera = 22.8fps for his multi-sync hypothesis to work. Excerpt from Gary Mack on Towner's film: "The Towner film's true speed is likely closer to 18fps or slightly faster for most of the reel than to any other speed; it certainly was not operating at 16fps on November 22, 1963. Gary Mack" https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwrExtVD005ONzVvdm1iOWlXUDg/view?usp=sharing Towner's true camera speed = 18.3fps
Chris Davidson Posted April 21, 2017 Posted April 21, 2017 Time difference for Towner's camera using Myer's 22.8fps and true fps of 18.3: 167/22.8 = 7.324 sec 167/18.3 = 9.125 sec Difference = 1.8 seconds
Chris Davidson Posted April 21, 2017 Posted April 21, 2017 4 hours ago, Chris Davidson said: 64 frames/18.3 fps = 3.497 sec 73ft/3.497sec = 20.874ft per sec = 14.2 mph The correct equation will now read: 73ft traveled at 3.497 + 1.8 sec = 5.297 seconds = 13.781 ft per sec /1.47(1mph) = 9.375mph
Chris Davidson Posted April 21, 2017 Posted April 21, 2017 59 minutes ago, Chris Davidson said: Excerpt is from Myers multi-sync film document. https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwrExtVD005OQkkzcjNaOG9HX1E/view?usp=sharing Myer's average for the motorcade on Houston St = 9.3mph
Chris Davidson Posted April 21, 2017 Posted April 21, 2017 That would be a match. And, since Myer's has the motorcade slowing, moving into the Elm St turn, there is no chance in h_ll that it ever approached 14.2 mph.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now