Jump to content
The Education Forum

All Activity

This stream auto-updates     

  1. Past hour
  2. While the Lawfare bloggers breathlessly anticipate the collusion narrative will yet tie together via a finding of direct conspiracy and coordination between Trump campaign-Wikileaks-Russian government, which will presumably be exposed during Roger Stone’s trial, I’ll predict with some confidence they will end up disappointed on this, much as the journalists for Salon and New York were disappointed when the anticipation of collusion via shared polling data produced nothing of interest. I will also predict that much of the talk of obstruction will fade to the background once the IG report on the activity of the intelligence community regarding these matters becomes public. The Mueller Report is just half of the story, and the other half - largely ignored by the media outlets most invested in the Russian collusion narrative - will flip the script, so to speak. It is remarkable the intensity of the hysteria sparked by the Intelligence Community Assessment released in January 2017 has ultimately resulted in not much of anything at all, beyond the seeding of negative trends in society at large. For example, the automatic suspicion and accompanying reflex to surveil and investigate any communication between Americans and designated foreign nationals is a bizarre throwback to the most paranoid moments of 1950s Cold War. Accompanying this instinct has been efforts to restrict information and impose various levels of censorship, an effort applauded in an NY Times editorial published Friday, which called for intensified censorship of social media. The Mueller Report’s conclusions that the Russian GRU hacked the DNC and coordinated with Wikileaks remains highly contentious. The Lawfare bloggers assume it is settled fact, but it is at this stage a prosecutors assertion which has not been tested or subject to cross examination, and which all of the accused firmly deny, and which knowledgable persons refute. The idea that $40,000 worth of Facebook ads in a multi-billion dollar election cycle constitute some sort of “attack” on American democracy is, on its face, simply absurd. I can’t see any of this dying down, however, and these matters will likely continue to dominate the public conversation at least through the next election cycle.
  3. Today
  4. What, you thought answering a post also requires the same content as a PM? No need. But it does display your over zealous character a bit. That "badge of honour" style list is great to know for everyone, but it is no dragon glass and you are completely missing the point I made in the previous post,once again. Perhaps you, Jim Hargrove, could pay some closer attention to what I do write. I have seen/read/scanned MB's archive to a large extend in relation to the documentation collected from that period. Have you Jim Hargrove? I do not bother with the spook stuff as the older material suits my interest better and there has been a time limit on gathering/copying his archive. This ends soon. I have also read Armstrong's book. And I can tell you this again as you seem to have missed the point Jim Hargrove, had he bothered to read all the material gathered at that time and used it as such then there would have been a whole different book on the table. A book that would have been awesome instead of dangling in a puddle of mediocre mud. That was my point Jim Hargrove. An evidence based book i/e instead of using the word ''probably'' more than 1,000 times! Should I bring up the Osanic interview from one month ago again Jim Hargrove? If only the man stuck with the facts! The amount of speculative content was unreal. Palmer McBride, I know Malcolm spoke with him. He spoke to me about this last Feb. So what! Now you can sling as much as you try Jim Hargrove, but since you missed the point completely I rest my case. Let's talk smudgy pix instead! Or your evidence for two Oswalds inside the T.S.B.D. for which you have hardly any fans, well you got Brian Doyle for one..... freshly, be it temporarily kicked off, from that other place. All that dross about two Oswald's inside the T.S.B.D. at that time can easily be explained in a larger pic. sense, which somehow eludes you, why? And, as I said already forum life ins't what it used to be, so bark some more as I am sure someone in the far distance will pay some attention to it. I on the other hand am going to enjoy this Easter weekend somewhat and then dig into that archive some more this week. Care to join Jim Hargrove?
  5. To Bart Kamp: I contacted John A. and asked him if he knew Malcolm Blunt. Following is John's response. John said that he met Malcolm in the mid-1990s in Dallas. They spent a lot of time together reviewing documents and meeting people in Dallas. Malcolm traveled with John to his home in Tulsa, OK., where they spent a few days looking over John's collection of documents. During the next several years (1995-1999) John traveled to Adelphi, MD, where he and Malcolm met daily and visited the National Archives during working hours. At night they would return to an apartment they shared and review, and often copy, each other's documents. ** John and Malcolm were at the National Archives when John handled and inspected each and every item belonging to LHO that was listed on the joint FBI/DPD inventory (the National Archives no longer allows personal inspection of these items--only photographs). ** John and Malcolm were at the National Archives when John discovered that the DPD had sent 225 items to the FBI during the evening of 11/22/63, but 3 days later the FBI returned 455 items to the DPD. ** John and Malcolm were at the National Archives when John inspected the Minox camera and 1) could not open the camera to view the serial number; 2) found the camera to be unusually "heavy"; 3) had the camera weighted; 4) learned the weight of this camera was far in excess of manufacturer's specifications; 5) concluded this camera had been intentionally filled with a material that prevented the camera from opening and exposing the serial number of the camera ** John and Malcolm were at the National Archives when John asked to see the roll of Klein's microfilm that was obtained by the FBI. The archives advised the microfilm had disappeared, and they had only a box in which the microfilm had been stored ** John and Malcolm were at the National Archives when John copied an HSCA tape recording of Robert McKeown, during which he discussed meeting with LEE Oswald on Labor Day weekend in 1963. John realized this was the same day during which HARVEY Oswald and his wife and child were at Lake Pontchartrain with the Murrets. McKeown also discussed his close, long time personal relationship with Castro. ** John and Malcolm were at the National Archives when John located a document (WC testimony of James Cadigan) wherein Allen Dulles had altered testimony. ** John and Malcolm were at the National Archives when John discovered that the US Postal money order, allegedly used to pay for the Mannlicher Carcano rifle, had disappeared--there were only photographs of the money order. ** John and Malcolm were at the National Archives when John found a document wherein the WC agreed to accept FBI photographs of evidence in lieu of the physical evidence. This, of course, provides the opportunity to alter or manufacture any and all evidence. Have you, Bart Kamp, ever visited the National Archives? On one occasion, Malcolm and John drove to Rhode Island where they met and had a lobster dinner with former Marine Richard Cyr, who knew and spent a lot of time with LEE Oswald in Japan. Malcolm and John then drove to Leeds, MA., where they met and videotape recorded an interview with Dr. Milton Kurian, a NYC psychiatrist who interviewed HARVEY Oswald in April, 1953 (see U-Tube video). On another occasion, when John and Malcolm were together in Dallas, John brought Dr. Kurian and his wife to Dallas, TX for a JFK Lancer conference. John also brought Palmer McBride to this conference, a man who had worked with HARVEY Oswald at the Pfisterer Dental Laboratory in New Orleans in 1957-58 while LEE Oswald and Richard Cyr were together in the Marine Corps in Japan. Malcolm spent several days with Palmer, who had recently retired from a 40 year career working for NASA. Malcolm also spoke with Harry Vance (Palmer's long-time friend from N.O) who also met and remembered HARVEY Oswald at the Pfisterer Dental Lab in 1957-58. Then there was William Wulf, President of the N.O. Amateur Astronomy Association (1957-58), who met HARVEY Oswald on numerous occasions in early 1958. When HARVEY Oswald visited Wulf's home, and began discussing communism, Wulf's father told young Oswald to "get out of his house." Please ask Malcolm for his impression and opinion of Palmer McBride and Harry Vance's credibility. Please record Malcolm's response for the benefit of forum members. Have you, Bart Kamp, ever personally interviewed a witness who personally knew or worked with LHO during the 1950s. Malcolm accompanied John during one of his (John's) many visits to the home of Marina Oswald Porter. It was during this visit that Marina gave John all of the original color slides from Dr. Norton's examination of HARVEY Oswald when exhumed in 1981. John copied the slides, returned the original slides to Marina, and posted some of the slides on line. Did you, Bart Kamp, ever meet Marina or June or Rachel ? I look forward to posting your replies to the above questions for the benefit of forum members. Since you seem to be too busy and too important to hang out with us mere mortals here on the Ed Forum, I am also going to PM you this message to make sure you don't miss it. Forum software should email it to you also. As for evidence for two Oswalds at the TSBD, I have posted it in this very thread, posted it in many other threads on this forum, and have posted it all over HarveyandLee.net. You just pretend it doesn't exist. That doesn't make it go away.
  6. 90% of all Americans are not aware of Barr's true career and extremely politically slanted activity background ( such as Kirk describes above ) except in the most superficial way and most of them don't even care to know more. That is why things are the way they are. Still, you wonder how guys like Barr get confirmed so easily when Congress should know these things.
  7. Doug, E. Howard Hunt and his wife Dorothy were your "best friends in Washington?" Doug that is a very thought provoking claim in the following way. What do you make of your former best friend's close to death tape recorded confessional via his son St. John Hunt where he outlines his involvement ( and that of his fellow team members ) in the JFK "Big Event" and who he believed was behind it's planning and implementation on the highest level ... including Cord Meyer and LBJ? Generally I think we know our "best friends" better than most others in our lives. So, I ask you, in your opinion, was your best friend creating a false story in this end of life taped confessional effort and if so, what would be his motivation to do so? Or, do you believe E. Howard Hunt's taped confessional story was true? And if so, why? You knew Hunt well enough it seems you would at least have some inclination as to the integrity and validity of his confessional either way.
  8. Robert from whatever vague gleanings I can get from your actual leanings other than being obsessed with a permanent government Deep State, and the scandalous genealogy and associations of the upper crust, and their fishing and golfing habits and all, I think I've picked up that you're into open government. Did you read Doug's link that Barr under Bush, was for stopping the CIA's moratorium on destroying their records? I think I've picked up that you're against the U.S. over extension of power and the war state, a point of view I think I share with you. Where we differ is you thought Trump would be your savior in this regard, but you weren't alone. Does it strike you at all that the person carrying your water right now in your battle against the Deep State, was a Conservative preacher against the Anti Viet Nam War Resistance, (which I don't know you might be in favor of), but whose career was propelled forward by no less than George Herbert Walker Bush as head of the CIA in 1976. Then after Bush left his post, Bush backed him for a clerkship post with the U.S. Court of Appeals. Then later he made him his Attorney General and his first opinion,” recognized the president’s right to dispatch FBI agents abroad to arrest for­eigners even in violation of international treaties, and that through him, the attorney general have an “inherent constitutional power” to au­thorize certain overseas operations, includ­ing abductions, to fend off “serious threats” to U.S. domestic “security” from “international terrorist groups and narcot­ics traffickers.”.And sure enough 6 months later, we invaded Panama.Later, he successfully got pardons for Weinberger, Eliot Abrams, Mac Farlane, among others in the Iran Contra scandal. That's about as Gung Ho American imperialist as it gets. How did you guys always fall in with these despicable suckers? How do you reconcile the inconsistencies?
  9. Hahaha whatever that means! Somebody really went searching for that one. Somehow I doubt they ever use it in polite conversation.
  10. Thanks for the link! I look forward to reading more of your writing.
  11. Is the unspoken correlative here that one JFK's body was substituted for the other after both were dead? Does not compute.
  12. Just read Jim Hougan's article in the Garrison magazine you recommended "Hougan, Lidddy, the Post and Watergate. Any knowledge about the escort service ran out of the Columbia Plaza apartments a block from the Watergate?
  13. Yesterday
  14. It is proof, your personal opinion doesn't carry any weight on this. There is zero evidence for two Oswald's in the TSBD, if so start listing it. No doubt it can be refuted w the back of a hand....as it is worthless and can be easily explained by looking at the larger picture at play here, something I really miss seeing from a lot of people here. You got some nerve introducing an even smudgier pic with the 6th floor hooey, than the Darnell stills. I thought it was already decided a decade or so ago that it was utter indiscernible rubbish. Why are you trying to flog this dead horse again? Sixth floor smudge indeed. I am going to tell you something else, and you will not like this. Had Armstrong paid better attention to Malcolm Blunt's research then he would have noticed the real stuff instead of speculating his rear off with Hansel and Gretal type innuendo. In the coming months I will release the stuff that puts the real story out, the one we at ROKC have been propagating for a few years already. No amount of dragon glass will even make a dent into it. And that's it from me, I am way too occupied w the above mentioned material (scanning/archiving etc.) and forum life isn't as appealing as it used to be.
  15. I failed to proof read my post before placing it on the forum. Heres the corrected copy: Hi. I'm Joel Peralez from Houston, Texas via the South Padre Island area where I was born and raised until the age of 21, whereupon I attended and graduated from The University of Texas School of Law in Austin, Texas. I've considered all the theories over the years, including the late Sherry Fiester's blood splatter analysis and the direction of the fatal shot from the area of the southern most area of the triple underpass, but I couldn't square the credible conclusions regarding the blood splatter analysis with the fact that a witness was located in the triple underpass area at the time of the assassination, cut in the face by a piece of concrete struck by a stray bullet, but evidently failed to hear a rifle shot nearby! Why, I asked myself. Then, last night, the thought occurred to me that if a silencer was on the rifle used by the shooter in the triple underpass area, that would explain why the nearby witness failed to hear a nearby rifle shot. I then googled "silencer 1963", and discovered that silencers were available that year, but ONLY TO THE US MILITARY. I came across an article on silencers and the jfk murder i'd like to share with the forum. I will update and post the article shortly. In the meantime, Google the info as indicated above and the article should appear. None of the commentators that I have heard or read about, including the house select committee on assassination considered the use of a silencer. It would explain so much. I.e., rifle shots made from the grassy knoll and the school book depository were distanctions, while the real killer made the fatal head shot from the triple underpass -as sherry fiester concluded in her fine analysis- employing a SILENCER as part of the murder weapon. 
  16. Hi. I'm Joel Peralez from Houston, Texas via the South Padre Island area where I was bon and raised u til the age of 21, whereupon I attended and graduated from The University of Texas School of Law in Austin, Texas. I've considered all the theories over the years, including the late Sherry Fiester's blood splatter analysis and the direction of the fatal shot from the area of the southern most area of the triple underpass. I couldn't square the credible blood splatter analysis with the fact that a witness was located in the triple underpass area at the time of the assassination and struck in the face by a piece of concrete that was struck by the stray bullet - and evidently failed to hear a rifle shot nearby. Why, I asked myself. Then, last night, the thought occurred to me that if a silencer was on the rifle used by the shooter in the triple underpass area. That would account for the witness not hearing the rifle shot nearby. I then googled "silencer 1963", and discovered that silencers were available that year. but ONLY TO THE US MILITARY. I came across am article on silencers and the jfk murder i'd like to share with the forum. I will update and post shortly. In the meantime, Google the info as indicated above and the article should appear. None of the commentators that I have heard or read about, including the hoiae selwct committee on assassination of jfk considered the use of a silencer. It would explain so much. I.e., rifle shots made from the grassy knoll and the school book depository were distanctions, while the real killer made the fatal head shot from the triple underpass as sherry fiester concluded, employing a SILENCER as part of the murder weapon.
  17. Seems like an excellent analysis: https://www.lawfareblog.com/what-mueller-found-russia-and-obstruction-first-analysis?utm_source=pocket-newtab
  18. I've located the text of that 1996 interview with Johnny Brewer. It can be found here. On the second page of the interview—here—Brewer does, indeed, say that the radio station he was listening to on 11/22/63 could have been KLIF. But he then adds, "but I honestly don't know". ____________________________________________________________________________________
  19. Paul, Regarding your post on the previous page.... No doubt certain Warren Commission apologists will just call that one of those amazing coordinated typos... you know, the kind of thing that happens all the time... like Magic Bullets, Magic Postal Money Orders, disappearing wallets, etc. As you probably know, John A. has written extensively on how the FBI altered the Dictabelt time stamps by transferring them tp audio to tape, editing the tape, and then re-cutting new Dictabelts. Here is a link directly to the altered Dictabelt discussion: https://harveyandlee.net/Tippit/Tippit.html#Dictabelt
  20. I know nothing of the kind. The two "Davis" bullet shells have a perfect, unbroken, 1-man chain of possession (Doughty & Dhority). Each officer marked the shell they got from the Davis girls. Check Dale Myers' book for up-close photos showing those markings. And those 2 shells were fired in Revolver V510210. CTers have no way out re: those two shells.
  21. Stephanie: No, I have never been afraid at what I know but maybe I should have been in past times. Right now I am being harassed frequently, including two entries into my residence when I have been away, by thugs stemming from my giving information to Special Counsel Mueller in 2017 about Roger Stone that Mueller undoubtedly explored during his investigation and which may or may not be in the redacted version of the Mueller Report released by AG Barr. The information may also be used by the prosecution when Stone faces his criminal trial in November. Also those who hired the thugs are upset about what I know about the history leading up to the two FISC (court) FISA warrants issued in 2017 that Barr is claiming are part of the "spying" on the Trump campaign. I plan to write about this in the EF in the near future. Mueller Report Likely to Renew Scrutiny of Steele Dossier https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/19/us/politics/steele-dossier-mueller-report.html
  22. Dave, Not even the Warren Commission could link any bullets from that gun to Tippit's body. What they tried to link were the shells (cartridge cases) that were allegedly found at the scene with the above gun, but the problems with the cartridges are infamous: the bullets recovered from Tippit's body don't exactly match the shells. Some of the tested shells do match the above gun, but nobody can say for sure that the tested shells were, in fact, the same ones recovered at the Tippit scene. Not even the officers who marked the shells can say for sure. We just don't know, and the possibility of a later switch is real. Firm conclusions (based solely on the ballistics evidence) are impossible here, thanks to the apparent "mis-handling" of the evidence. You know this.
  23. Prior to Watergate, almost any conversation that I had with Howard Hunt included his talking about the Bay of Pigs military debacle, which he is on record for blaming on JFK. Howard was consumed with bitterness at what had occurred as were his Cuban-American friends in Miami. MPD Carl Shoffler knew that Howard and Dorothy were my closest friends in Washington and he feared at some point in time they would have told me too much. As I have recounted elsewhere, in April 1972 Howard introduced me to Lawrence Houston, the CIA General Counsel, at a meeting during which they tried to recruit me as a CIA agent. I demurred in giving them an answer. Watergate broke two months later and that changed everything.
  24. Jim, I will see your 1:15 death certificate and raise you one better : As you undoubtedly know, the Warren Commission "investigation" was hampered by the apparent incompetence of the Dallas PD in their own inability to make and provide a transcript of all Dallas Police radio traffic for 11/22/63. The Warren Commission published their Exhibit 705 which were the transcripts from the first and second Dallas PD submissions, plus the March 23, 1964 FBI verified submission of the "complete" logs for channels one and two. The DPD dispatch log as published by the Warren Commission was typed up by the DPD and verified by the FBI after listening to the entire DPD tape collection. On page 408, after being alerted that Tippit was shot, the following appears: "Disp: 10-4 603 and 602, 1:10 p .m" 1:10 pm . . . Lest anyone think this is a typo, check out the time stamp notation at the bottom of page 408. This is only a total of 63 words later than the previous time stamp. There is a second time stamp of 1:10, but this time the "0" has been partially whited out and typed over with a "9", but the original "0" is still plainly visible. So, on the logs according to the Dallas Police themselves, and verified by the FBI , the two earliest Dallas dispatch time stamps after the shooting of Tippit read "1:10", one of which was subsequently re-typed to read "1:19" And the Warren Commission published it! How did it happen? My guess is that the DPD and FBI were desperate to push the Tippit shooting back by roughly 7 or 8 minutes, so they phonied up the transcripts by '"adjusting" the times from the originals. Notice that many of the time stamps are (parenthetically noted), but the "1:10 pm" stamp is not. I bet someone went through and determined which time stamps needed "adjusting", put a parenthesis around those, and somehow overlooked the 1:10 time stamps. The second one was caught (and typed over), but the first one on page 408 was not. And there it sits to this day. The first two Dallas Police Time Stamps after the Tippit shooting were "1:10 pm" http://www.aarclibrary.org/publib/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/pdf/WH17_CE_705.pdf
  25. Speculation. Where is the Willis girl in the Bronson frame?
  26. Says the man who thinks the Warren Commission got it right!
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...