Jump to content


Spartacus

Greg Parker

Member Since 28 May 2004
Offline Last Active Today, 12:12 PM
*****

Posts I've Made

In Topic: Harvey and Lee: John Armstrong

Today, 04:20 AM

Thanks Greg...  but I don't need any lectures from you on the meanings of words.  We are talking about arguments in logic, not that simplistic page of elementary phrases you linked us to...

 

In rhetoric, a tautology (from Greek ταὐτός, "the same" and λόγος, "word/idea") is a logical argument constructed in such a way, generally by repeating the same concept or assertion using different phrasing or terminology, that the proposition as stated is logically irrefutable, while obscuring the lack of evidence or valid reasoning supporting the stated conclusion.

 

pl.tau·tol·o·gies (from your link if you click on Tautology)

  1. a. Needless repetition of the same sense in different words; redundancy.
    b. An instance of such repetition.
  2. Logic An empty or vacuous statement composed of simpler statements in a fashion that makes it logically true whether the simpler statements are factually true or false; for example, the statement Either it will rain tomorrow or it will not rain tomorrow

When you include the conclusion in the question  "the fake Marge's job was to tell a story...." whether yours or Steve's, the conclusion cannot be part of the question as an assumption of the answer...

 

Try, "Why did Marge produce the photo for the WC?"  and then maybe we can have a discussion. 

Whether that photo accomplishes this or that is part of the analysis, not part of the question.

 

but hey, nice try...   :up

 

 

You still have no idea. What you refer to is begging the question. You do it constantly.

 

Now you tell me I should ask a question... which is exactly what I did, Here it is from the other thread: Why did (presumably the fake) Marguerite provide it to the WC, when it might give the game away? That is not a logically fallacious question or in any way tautological.

 

But even stranger, after telling me to ask a question here (that I've already asked), you then tell me in the other thread that questions are useless ("WHY questions do not help any of us Greg...  how would we know why anyone does anything related to these events other than to guess?" You really are a very confusing - and confused individual.   


In Topic: Bronx Zoo photo questions

Today, 04:10 AM

(EDIT - I did not respond to the Myra Mardi Gras question...  it says that John showed the photo to Myra, so I am asking John where he acquired it and will get back to you)

 

Thank you. I look forward to the answer.


In Topic: Bronx Zoo photo questions

Today, 04:09 AM

 

Greg Parker,

 

Have you ever thought Robert Oswald's post-assassination behavior was odd?

 

The fact he produced the Imperial Reflex in early 1964 is odd to me.  If it was owned by Lee, and Robert had it, why wouldn't he have served it up sooner?

 

Another question:  Why, do you think, did Robert not stand up more strongly for his blood brother Lee?  Did they dislike one another?  I have a brother with whom I'm quite close, despite 10 year's age difference.  I've supported him at every opportunity.

Robert doesn't support the man killed by Ruby.  This man was not his brother.  Over the years Robert has never visited his 2 "nieces" because they aren't his nieces.  The best research would be for someone to obtain Robert's DNA and compare it to the one of the nieces.  Only that.

 

Kathy C 

 

Kathy, I would support DNA testing, but I fear certain people would only scream that the results have been faked.

 

I would ask how you know that ( a ) Robert has never visited his nieces and ( b ) if you have solid evidence he hasn't, then what evidence is there to support the reason for it? 


In Topic: Harvey and Lee: John Armstrong

Yesterday, 11:46 PM

 

 

So the fake Marguerite's job was to tell a story which included producing a photo of the fake Lee which might blow the whole scheme, but the risk was worth it because they wanted to show Lee was a normal child with sever psychiatric problems per Hartogs which would eventually manifest in killing Kennedy. Intriguing!

 

And completely idiotic.

 

 

 

Greg... these are your speculations - not anyone's conclusions.  "might blow the whole scheme" is YOUR attempt at creating a tautology again.  You set up the circumstance with a preconceived WRONG assumption and then build an argument around it...

 

Let's start this way Greg...  Have you ever in your life encountered documentation illustrating the details of a long-term, intelligence-agency-run covert action?

 

Can you explain what the plan was in 1952 (before and beyond) related to the creation of duplicates for the purposes of intelligence?

 

I know I can't.  So if we don't know the plan... how can we judge what would blow it up or not or what is related to JFK or not?

------------

 

Hartogs will be another discussion... 

 

Not my speculations. Gaal said her job was to tell a story. Gaal's speculations, if anyone's.

 

I think it is about time I referred you to a dictionary on the meaning of "tautology".

 

Here are some examples of real tautology:

http://examples.your...-tautology.html 

 

Have you ever in your life encountered documentation illustrating the details of a long-term, intelligence-agency-run covert action?

 

Yes I have.

 

Myra's photo? Anything?


In Topic: Harvey and Lee: John Armstrong

Yesterday, 11:09 PM

 

 

Who said she was channeling Allen Dulles ?? Marguerite has a story to tell and  that's her job. The photo wasn't deep sixed because nobody reads/looks and the photos of that LHO time frame are scarce and an intell tale of H & L is being told. If someone did look they would see a child experiencing a normal time and that's the tale the CIA wants to tell. //,gaal

 

So the fake Marguerite's job was to tell a story which included producing a photo of the fake Lee which might blow the whole scheme, but the risk was worth it because they wanted to show Lee was a normal child  with sever psychiatric problems per Hartogs which would eventually manifest in killing Kennedy. Intriguing!

 

And completely idiotic. 

 

Never said that LHO was presented as normal. Marguerite gave a story that she  gave him normal things as a child and yet he turned 'COMMUNIST'. GOVERNMENT  Monitor your children closely for you don't know if they could turn out  commie traitor. Monitor monitor ...you don't want your child to be a POTUS murderer !!! monitor for any sign and put them on the right path to love the wonderful system we have !! .gaal.

++++++++++++++++++++++
lobotomy Parker

channeling Parker

Completely idiotic Parker  ))))) >>>>> ITS possible you are not self aware of how many insults you throw out. ,gaal

 

More self-aware than you of the insults to intelligent life everywhere that your posts are.