Nancy Eldreth

Bill Try to over lay the ears of the image that Eugene did and the ears of Roscoe White. See if they match?

This is to good of work to ignore and just let this sink into the threads. GREAT WORK. First of all, it looks to me like the man has a crew cut. I think that is how it is spell for it. He has a receding hair line his ear is clear to show it's shape. This is the most I have seen of him clear and also his shirt. Now up close and done more clear it not any longer looks like a badge instead it looks like the shirt he has or the lighting of the light onto the shirt. Not sure of that is the end of a barrel of a gun but perhaps it is. Still his hands NEVER show no matter what anyone does however it is clear that is two arms. Maybe the guy has a hood to the back of his coat why it is like that. However you for sure made it clear enough to know this is a person who is not wearing a badge and who has a crew cut hair style with receding hair line. Also, a high forehead. Wish eye could show up better but that is sort of there too. Maybe someday someone can do something a bit more with it to clear that up and we for the first time have the entire look of this man. GREAT WORK, WELL DONE. Hope you don't mind I sent it off to a few people to see what they think of it. This is exciting!!!!!!

I know that it is a classic film and deep and sometimes hard for me to understand. I will get back to my friend on what you have said. That is also what my friend said about Seigel. What we mostly talked about though was about Godfather III. One true fact in the film is that a pope was new and lived a short life and then died. Also, into reality is the fact that many feel that Pope was killed even by many priests who will not utter it out into the open. The way the film does that is like a connection? That puts one to think is this more than film doings or suggestion of reality behind another major hush? I am not sure to go into the open with that point or not? Maybe not such a good idea. Also just perhaps the attack was shown as a slaughter in New Jerser with some other hidden meanings behind it? I am agian am not sure about any of that. By the set timings of what they seemed to MAKE sure of was that they let a car alarm go off in the background. As if to suggest the certain time. MORE TO TODAY not into the 70's but later on into the mid to upper 80's of timing of that supposed attack onto the Mafia members. Also a hint of one actor to be playing the role of Merv Griffin, if I am correct.

Thanks for clearing that up for me. I will tell my friend he is sort of (off) on it.

The first part of the movie one and two are rather boring. Hard to get into but once interested then it get's good. Now as far as Godfatehr III Well it is the best out of the group. What I am told is that it is based on real story. IF that is the case than why is it that I never heard of the attack in New Jersey and that kind of a killing? Is there something behind that and or another cover up on that story? I do know that in the third part there is some facts for certain real. Anyone know anything they wish to add to what is with it of this movie film into the reality of it?

Ron, Indeed thanks for the laugh. I just thought of 9/11 and Bush reading to the kids while we were under attack and it didn't even seem to faze him one bit. Thank you Chris, That is most informative and thank you for your answer / question. Yeah. It could be that they do have to wait until they do get more information from Cheney friend before they do any actions, you are right. But Sitll, one wonders if this will get reviewed by Senate the way it should. Bush is one to give out a full answer to the media well in advance even if the shoe does not fit.

Correction Chris, Cheney was not slow in reporting in the accident that was right away. That report would have been done by calling for help for the victum, which Cheney had no other choice there. Maybe the report was not as complete as it should have been by game warden, another point. What Cheney was slow at was telling the public (which HE NEVER DID DO) and to be frank about it which most agree I don't think he would have EVER told the public if he could have gotten away with it. Another slide under the rug if possible. Glad the owner of the ranch told the public. This is another neglet that Cheney was wrong on NOT doing.

Going back into histroy. All of the strange accidents to me Dick Cheney doing this is just one more to add to the records. if his victum knew something over heard something and or was either being intimadated to keep silent and or was being planned to be a totalled. Yes, Cheney certainly did brake a lot of laws just to execute a bird which ended up as a hunting accident. Past the list is large, from Senator Tower going down in a plane to many in past like LHO, David Ferrie, Johnny Roselli, Charles Nicolletti, Sam Giaciana and list going on and on. What is it with Jim Marrs pointed out list of 230 or so people on question to make goine for silent purposes to keep the truth from coming out. I know one who found a military paper and to me he is another one on the list to silent and that was only month ago dead after complications from being rammed into a tree. So, no they still need to keep the truth from coming out. Now, why would Dick Cheney have to do such a thing? Well, maybe the certain picked on group told Dick Cheney and Bush to forget it we had it with your slaughter list? Gee, NO MORE murders if that is the case. These guys are now on their own. Senate would be on this fast now because they do watch Bush on even a phone call he gets info on. Certain ones want to impeach Bush because of misuse of a system which he seems to violate laws in it. Several weeks ago the men that were imprisioned because of attack on USS Cole were able to escapte from prison. This all adds up, who let those men out or able to escape. Why a group of them to escape? Has to be upper channels in our own government to do that to help those men to escape? Yes, I do link Bush with many crimes that have happened and he is involved with them in some way and or somehow. I know this is bold but this is what I do believe. Why is it not questioned on all the thnigs that Bush Jr.? HE SHOULD BE and CHENEY AND HIS GROUP IS NO EXCEPTION TO THIS EITHER. The democrates try hard to do this and each time somehow and in someway Bush's get out of it and this is the rule for a long time into our histroy. They just do manage to cover up and turn over and keep from letting the US citizens the real truth.

Exactily on the SS letting him do it and also with not any updated tags to do hunting legal. He sure did make a good list of things to throw into the punch didn't he? Now there is a common sense law that Dick broke as well. Chaney said that he was blinded by the sun, well no one shots when they get blinded ever. He is the only person I ever heard of doing that. The heck witht he bird should be the thought when you are blinded. CHANEY HAS NO COMMON SENSE EITHER. Yes he broke a lot of laws to do this IF he is telling the truth on accounts of the sun, drinking only one drink is still breaking the law when it comes to shotting a gun, no updated tags, stupid with no dogs with] them. Yeah, he was really prepared to go hunting all right. Now, what was he really after? Yes, I do think this does look rather off the cuff here. I do hope thsi goes before some Senate meetings into question.

Anyone watch Nightline? It is like they are threatening us back now? What was said is this. Anyone that makes anything more to the Cheney accident is WRONG. It is like how dare you say anything about this. Let's be honest with Chaney answer to us now. He said that he saw him get up. Yet the man was supped to be down to begin with. SO WHICH ONE IS IT. He didn't see him prior. It doesn't add up. NO I pray on this one that it is not dropped. Nice they tell what his friend THEY STRESS THIS FRIND part. But nice they tell his words in the hospital without any show of him. His supposed response was "what is all the fuss about." That was on Nightline. OK Let me get this straight now Clinton does the silence role he only does a lie to cover up someting emgarrassing. Cheney gets a gun shoots his friend, drinks prior, doesn't say the story straight still on a man who is down he sees him fall down but yet he never saw him when he was down to pick up a bird. He thinks it was a bird that he shot. OK we got three zagged versions on what he says is now the straight story so we won't get it messed up. Yet, if anyone caught it he smiles a half smerk at the end of his stantment. To me Clinton did far less wrong EVEN IN HIS WRONGFUL DOINGS than what Cheney does to cover his crimes. I still hope that he does face some legal trail and it does come out and his friend whom they are putting words in the mans mouth before he even comes out of the hospital. YES, I am upset over Chaney story. Upset to see this go on again in this country. I also detest what was said on Nightline if anyone thinks that there is more to this story is Wrong. WHAT IS SPOONFEED TO US IS WRONG IN MY OPINION.

Tim, Curious how did you know Cheney drank? You are right, he did. Now to his amount of what he claims well who knows? Again he broke a law. They do seem to add up. Any American Citizen that even got caught by a game warden would be fined on just the drinking and game hunting combined. Guess he thinks and or is above the law because of who he is.

***************************************************************** "(If the victim dies, there will be an attempted cover-up at the local level that will ultimately fail because news travels too fast these days via the Internet in contrast to the 1960's.)" But, rest assured the neocons have their proverbial asses covered on this one, regardless of how fast news travels via the internet, today. After all, they can always counter that Attorney Whittington, was a colleague, and possibly a little doddering at his age of 78 years. Apparently the news services here on the Left Coast have already begun accusations that Whittington, "unwittingly" placed himself in the line of fire by walking diametrically ahead of Cheney, instead of diagonally, or however hunters are supposed to disperse themselves into the field. Operation Mockingbird in its finest form, at work! Oh, and it's a good thing they hadn't taken any dogs with them. They'd have to answer to PETA had Cheney shot one of the pointers, as well. Hunting laws are sort of like like driving a car laws. Anyone that is behind anyone regardless of what direction they come from are responsible for someone in front of where the gun is pointed, aimed and fired. So therefore Cheney is in the wrong no matter how anyone cuts any dice. Just like a car accident. Back one can not in any way stiick anyone in front of them they are responsible. The other fact if it was only 60 feet in distance from them an a man face is turned looking at you, one should be able to notice who the person is from that distance I WOULD THINK SO. IF that is the case and can be proven then Cheney should be faced with criminal charges.

Douglas, Your last sentence I hope you are correct on it abou news travels to fast these days. It does but when it comes to what suits Bush's it is with a lot of limits. They tried to brainwash the press even to make it sport for the jokes on certain TV shows. Yeah, they sort of did do that but when it comes to something serious they put it down fast NO JOKING. Good it at least has got some credit now by the actions that goes onto TV. When Bush's didn't get the jokes as they hoped now they take what little they can from the NO JOKES on TV triing to live it up on what little they got for the jokes and make it their own backwall crutches for their own lame story version. Also Cheney said that he talked to his victum. Said he is OK with it. God, I hope this man lives to tell another version on how fine he is and or is not intimadated by the Bush's. Thank you for some leading backgrouund on Whittington. That maybe a must needed looking into part of what he knew about (something) in his own life that Bush would not wish to have out to the public. Sad, they will do this the same and IS there anyway to MAKE things go another direction COURT, LAW, LEGAL SYSTEM? Tim, Also thank you but how does one know if Cheney was drunk at that time? His backlog may not be a present condition that he would choose that day. Personally, I don't and can't see how Cheney could manage a football team if he were to be had of one to make orders for them, let alone a country.

What laws did Cheney break in the hunting sport that he was into? First of all can't say he could not see the man in front of him? Also with his face spattered that means his face was showing toward Cheney. I am sure that proper colors were worn by Whittington hat and coat, to help people know he is not a bird he is very human? Also if these so called rich guys do this sport where in the world is their hunting dogs with them? If a dog were used then there would be no accident? I bet more break into laws are done than that that Cheney who is so skilled at this sport has done? I know the dogs are extra and not a law but I am sure that shooting low in hunting is also a break into law if it is a thicket they are firing into? I do hope that this does go to court and for once is not hidden. Because what my real question here is this, "what is it that Cheney does not want Whittington to release?"

Now Miller I am still back at the steps on Daily Plaza......and on the why's Even saw the darn films side by side and still on those steps because they are the same seconds. Maybe it is two sets of steps? I don't know but you know I never can get past that part of it. Saw it over and over and over again and during the last documentary they bunched it all together and why in the world can 't someone else come up with this is the bets the hell out of me. ONE Guy walking up the steps. OK Guys and guy not on the steps. OK THree guys on the steps GEE,s and put them into the gropus of jammed all together it never made any sense to me. SAME SECONDS TOO and it shows that. But everyone has a good explaining I still love to hear it. Even thought Bill Miller you tried and gave it your good almightly best shot with me THE DARN THING NEVER MADE SENSE.

So tip the glass and say congradulations to a lot of blackmail and Merry Christmas and have a Happy New Year, is what they say to each other while they still wish for the disinformations crews to keep it that way.... AMEN,,,,,,,,,, that is correct. Well I do wish for all to have the best Christmas ever and a Good New Year and lets change that past disinformatons crews and drown them in their own whatever.

JKF wanted the highway opened from Maine to Flordia keys. THEY DIDN'T WANT IT AND YES THEY GAVE JFK A HARD TIME OVER IT. What did I say Richard? You miss the whole points of both stories of what Mary opens up a section of her words to be the most to get ones attention at the beginning of her talk. To what I have said. But what the heck, you are a know it all. So go to it again Richard and show what you know or don't know or put down or pick up. Richard if you also saw I said I have the chart of his schedule and it was posted up on Lancer some time back. SO YES I DO HAVE IT AND I SAID THE LISTINGS OF IT. DE AND MD BOURDER FL> THEN DALLAS ON THE LISTINGS> THE SIGNING OF THE PAPERS TO JFK HIGHWAY WHICH WAS DONE WAS JUST BEFORE HE WENT TO DALLAS IT WAS JFK'S LAST ACT. THEY GAVE HIM WHERE HE WAS TO SAND A WAY OUT OF THE WAY AREA. You know the most important thing I could say to this is this. (IT IS A SHAME OF WHAT YOU WOULD SEE IF YOU GO DOWN THE HIGHWAY AND SEE AND KNOW WHERE JFK STOOD AND THERE IS NOT MUCH TO SHOW OF THAT LAST ACT AND OR EVEN THAT JFK STOOD THERE) A stone one can barely see nothing much that anyone even knows it is there and or what it is about. SAD RICHARD VERY SAD Now DO YOU GET MY POINTS? The Newark Exit, then the Elkton Exit, then The Perryville exit off of I-95 up further is the JFK RESEARCH EXIT and that is what it is called up close to the Susquehanna River. What a name for an exit? That is just it. The buiding you are reference to is just a conforance hall and restuarant that is it. Not a park not any mouments at all to JFK and what that was about. If in the middle of the road is a written part detailing the moment it is SMALL letters and so much there is not one thing that anyone passing could read even ONE word of it. NOTHING JUST A RUN A MUCK and nothing more. TRY MORE LIKE A SICK JOKE ON JFK OK. Now if you don't understand that how much more can I make it clearer to you. What Mary did there is something for a change I actually clap my hands to her on that action of what she just did and said. SHE MADE ONE HELL OF A GOOD POINT TO KOCK SOMEONE OFF THEIR FEET AND FOR ONCE I DO SAY SHE IS IN THE RIGHT TO DO SO. TO ME SHE IS MAKING ONE MAJOR AND GOOD POINT TAKE IT OR LEAVE IT I DON"T CARE THAT IS UP TO YOU. BUT LEARN MORE ON IT WOULD BE BETTER. Oh one more thing from our area NO ONE CALLS IT JFK HIGHWAY HERE AT ALL IT IS JUST I 95. I did however find out by word of mouth but even they always call it I95. Just a highway and who cares how it got done. The opening of the highway to that area and just being that area was not what was said by JFK the day he stood there RIchard. It was to be more an opening of the Florida Keys to Maine. Now if anyone has any photos of JFK standing there I would LOVE TO SEE THE RARE PHOTO"S That would be worth looking for, don't you think?

How little you both know from this area.......... Sorry this time I know where JFK stood the area and also how few were there the day that JFK said a few words to open the highway. Also how sad because just like the lack of what you know on that day it still is to this day so it is not your faults but the ones that would like little known on it. LIke it was hardley in the news and I did have the gifted insight to meed someone who was there to see the event. From that person and others I did learn more. So, NO TERRY AND SMITH YOU ARE NOT TO BLAME ON HOW LITTLE YOU KNOW ON ONE OF THE PRESIDENTS LAST EVENTS IN LIFE TO DO THAT WAS SO SAD IN MANY WAYS> IT IS A LITTLE OUT OF THE WAY SPOT AND NOT MUCH FORMED AFTER THE EVENT AS IT SHOULD HAVE. I think I have this one right.

I 95 is JFK highway YES Terry. It is also on his schedule as to being JFK last act of doing and YES it is on some remote and you and or anyone else can not undo what is in black and while already written down. It is thought and told somewhere that JFK was in fact threatened if he does do the highway it was NOT wanted to be done. Now Terry there is not anything wrong in that of what I wrote it is historical facts. If you don't know about it then I suggest you look it up and yes any student can do so as well. I have the listing of JFK schedule got it from NARA and long time ago posted it up on Lancer. It is also considered to be and in fact is a remote area of which area he for some reason choose to stand to open the highway. I think if I do remember what I was told that was the ONLY PLACE they would let JFK stand to do it. Not any Landmark around it even just a river front not far away. No, I don't take that remark at all coming from Mary as to be just a comment with no meanting behind it at all. She meant what she said.

Interesting that Mary would state this up on top. What they hoped would pinpoint what JFK did to agravate people in his decision of opening the highway. Yet, not talked about into any debate on JFK for reasons why JFK got shot. Just is not named. Yet, it is on records. Sort of that is. As to how Mary knew it was REMOTE now that is really shocking since she probably never went there never saw it on the news or barely and since not many people were even there to view this act being done. Rare that they didn't openly announce this ahead of time so a large crowd would draw near JFK to be near the president. Just a handful of people were there. Odd that it is so kept so silent to this day and YET MARY KNEW THIS FACT. Open up what is behind that point and you got a handful of information. DUPONT OH YEAH BUSH JOHNSON TEXAS BUSINESS'S How much was Mary's hands tied? Maybe she was on many rights tracks but her hands were so very tied and someone needs to tell it about that on her. OPEN UP

One of the last acts that Pres. Kennedy did was on the shoulder of the Highway. He was warned on that so I have heard NOT TO DO THE JFK HIGHWAY. Some didn't want a road to open up from Maine to the Florida Keys. Why manybe it was thought to be the act of taking JFK life in Florida first then dropped it. Some remote part of the hightway. It is so SICK AND SO SAD ON THAT REMOTE PART OF THE HIGHWAY. Barely a stone to show where JFK Stood. A sign to say JFK RESEARCH on one of the cut off's of the highway. Yet barely anyone knows this is where a great man stood to name this highway to be opened that so many use on the Eastern side of USA to make travel faster and easier to get to large cities. A threat on his life interesting that Mary would have named this since not to many use this threat or even know of it. Hardly ever named on the forums even as if to push this one issue aside just like the road when passing it is pushed so much to the side. The location on the highway is between MD and DE in the states. Oh there is a small building off of the highway of a conforance hall and that is about it. Has nothing to do with JFK research though. It is listed on a paper of where JFK was prior and you know what else I heard that when JFK did the opening ceremony to the highway NOT MANY PEOPLE WERE EVEN THERE TO HEAR HIM ON THE HIGHWAY JUST A HANDFUL OF PEOPLE. As if to even push it away in our own local area. You know it gave me a strange feeling and who was it who did own that area in which to give the threat to JFK or the opening and who is it that is big in the area? Why it is Duponts, of course. That whole area is horseman's area and they are with the Duponts. I have wondered on and about the Duponts involvement for a long time. Still do? As far as Mary opening up on something she knows full well will never come out is well well well how could she NOT KNOW THIS? Easy when you rig and fix things so they can't come out. That is how. Get rid of some papers here and there but she is not correct it will come out with or without her non help for it to come out. She can't stop it anymore and she won't have the power to do so is what I hope for and have to say. Dupont's wanted JFK out of sight too and I am not sure why, it was overheard once at a race track. So if anyone has any insight on this love to hear it.

Getting to know your personal ways is a very upbeat thing. COOL and refreshing. Thanks a bunch. OK I went to NARA to look up what Jimmy Files was under. Now, just image I expected to find something at least. Yeah, right, try major cover up of a whole year of nothing of 82nd airbourne div. Just gone. Like they never existed when they did that year. In fact I do have the name of the commander and you know the last time I tired posting it on Lancer when I could that is before they kicked me off that is. Well it was given to me by one who was also in military and now maybe why he told me to keep this to yourself. Yeah, they sure don't like the names out that year of 1959 in that area do they? Back in time they were there. All up to 59 and nothing not even in the books. In 60 there was something at least a very thin folder with a few things good that someone knew they should put down some notes. In NARA they considered this a cover up and you know it sure as heck is. Guess I frightened them down there that day. Took out every single cover up in JFK area and then did that also with a whole year of records that should have been there that were not there. Made it clear on the nose this is all I am looking at today. Can one actually look up cover ups OH YEAH one can. They have pink slips in where materals were supposed to be there and it is not and reasons why it is not there. Most is now to be looked at for reason as HOG WASH. National Secuity is only considered Nat. Sec. reason at the time of issue and now it is NOT THAT ANY MORE WELL one paper went even further to over ride all of that down in NARA and that was this. "REASONS THIS PAPER WILL NEVER BE COMING OUT EVER INTO THE FUTURE. Gee, don't know what it is but it sure must be HOT or someone decided to destroy it so they have nothing there and someone was afraid to not tell on it because of who must have destroyed evidence. That is usually what is the bottom line on that. Now, Files thinks a lot of you Mr. Hemming how I know is he told me. So, somewhere along the lines you two met? have any idea of where that might be? When? Just wondering on it? Tosh Plumlee ran into this too? Since Jimmy won't give out his MO number that makes it harder. Tosh does not know if he ever met him. Files said a couple of times only. Now, as far as Wim forget it. He is odd and you know I started to give him some of Files letters that he wrote to me and he stopped me and said to me never to write to him again. I guess Jimmy and his newer version of what really happened was a bit overwhelming on him. See, there is another side to every coin here, really. Especially when Wim knows these are for real letters and straight from Jimmy to me. I would think if it was his investiment he would wish to get them. At that time Vernon was wanting all of them and give them to me and really wishing to read them to see if I miss anything important. yeah OK well enough said for now. Thanks for answering and hope this might shed a bit of light onto this subject. Peace & Cheers from New England, Nancy I went to Boston once and "Cheers" is not what it looks like on TV never is in person you know.

Good thing this one is poached eggs and toast. Off from the cereal uauals. So, no I don't think that at all. GOOD THING IT CHANGED THOUGH. Thanks for the laugh though.

Jim Marrs sometimes does answer emails. Hemming what is the reasons for breakfast at the closing of each writing you do? Love to ask questions to you but not on any forum? Rather get into conversations but you are wrong on a few points? Not going into them on any forum any more. Not worth the hassels. My say is probably on purpose you are posting some wrong points. Just a guess here?

When I see it happen then I will believe it. Bush keeps covering up all of his wrongful doings. So, when? His fathers has all of his records covered up and that was a long time ago. Sad, they both get away with so much. So, for me, it is don't count your chickens before they hatch. Like to see this one hatched, should have been a long time ago. NEver even to get to the point of 9/11 ever. Should never have happened and yet it did. Smiles on Bush's face are always at the wrong times, everyone in America should have picked up on that also a long time ago.