Nancy Eldreth

Now Colson was on a program last week. Finally we have one more to remark about Felt's doings and how he did it. Colson's statements was rather surprising to me. He feels that Felt did wrong and not noble at all, that there is something more behind it on why he choose the route that he went and that route was a wrong way to go to report this in. I never picture Colson to make these statements. Somehow, I thought he would go along with how it was done to Nixon. Seems more come to light on the fact that there is something more behind this not so much on what Nixon did as wrong but Felt and group did wrongful acts.

It must be in the air. You know if you go back in time and look at each thing that Bush Jr. did since the first time he was about to enter the White House as our supposed Prez. (this is a slurr in my spelling of PREZZZZZZZZZ). One can't help but wonder why and how they put blinders on almost all of us. Some vote just because of party rather than who would be the best into office. Count the votes, he cut it short. Going into the WH sooner than the votes counted to start office had to leave than cry the blues because he says HE WON. Get all of Senate into office and go by court vote rather than our vote. Now, here is a tricky part that no to many know or even cared to hear about it Bush Jr. brings in all of senate and wants a whole new Jud. Comm. of who he wanted into the offices. Not just a one replacement but the whole darn works. Good thing the entire senate said forget it and walked out on him leaving only a handful of people in the room. NO ONE VOTED THEN AND NO ONE STAYED TO FINISH HEARING WHAT THIS NEW PREZ. was saying. It should have been bye bye Bush then and there. Yeah I wish he would be impeached and it started for me than and there on the very first act before he ever walked into the WH to be the Prez. Now, there is one thing that is super big that Bush Jr. also did way back in the beginning. He changed laws and rules in the Dept. of Immigration just to get some from overseas into the good ol' USA and drove the Head of the Dept. up a wall. Even screaming out HE IS CHANGING ALL THE LAWS TO SUIT HIMSELF --- does not any good. Well, that Bush Jr. sure as heck did do that. He brought into the US people that the CIA and FBI would object too. You know when I found this info out it was only a few days prior to Sept.11th. I was asked not to say anything. Who in the heck can I say this too? Told you can't say this it can bring down a person in that office head of Dept. just for me to find this info out. WELL, I am sure now is as good as a time as any to say this. You know the list goes on as well. On the largest of letters I submitted to Sen. Leahy in the wee hours of the morning around three o'clock and in one of those letters was about the murder surrounding Roselli and info from Files. Well, Sen. Leahy I doubt ever held one of those letters because by 9 o'clock his office door was closed due to bio chem found. Good thing I faxed them that very morning far earlier. Oh I know Files is a no body (so they hope that it comes to that feelings about him). That is what they would love for everyone to think. Did you know Files is one that is NOT ON THE LIKE OF THE BUSH TEAM. Yes, people of the US we have a dynasty into our own government and a not good one and this is a for sure. When Bush Jr. was Gov. of Texas he had the highest rate of executions ever done by any state ever in history. One was found to be innocent after the death sentance was carried out. So, it was wanted a larger search into his own records of this. The Bush's stopped it before he was finished his first running into office. These are documented facts and all part of our own history. Is is possible that Bush's were behind Sept. 11th? Hate to say this but it certainly looks this way. I wish it could be proven, but facts do add up. What more harms way must anyone suffer at the hands of the Bush's. In one of Files letters to me. He asked me was Bush Sr. behind the killing of Barry Seal? I said by the looks of it yes Jimmy he was. Why? Well that is another of our biggest cover up's drug smuggling into the good ol" USA and done by our own government leaders. Now, with Shame as the leaders of this supposed great Nation know and keep silent because of murders and of fear of what really would happen to them if they ever tell the truth behind the reality of Bush's and the reality of real facts so far back as into JFK murder it would come that Texas was nothing to be proud of......... EVER.

How many people on this forum think Mary Farrell was OK and that she was all that she should be as a good person to help let the truth come out? I for one do not think she was. Just curious. Yeah, she ran Lancer but I have heard so many say she was a bad apple. Any comments on this.

Perhaps this way in Elem. and High School but in Colleges at least the one closest to me I also checked with them. They have two teachers one to teach Lone nut and the other teacher teaches conspiracy theory. So yes, in some schools mostly to your college level have it only one way. At least they don't do this to more advanced level of student giving them a chance to voice their own opinions. Also they use many books to work on these theories, not so much a textbook from what I am told. So it is open to any form of discussions. Most Colleges allow speakers to come in and give conferances on this topic as well.

That I know of even the 201 files are released. I wished when I went down to NARA I had the time to ask about them. It is enough to get though one full folder of papers in one day. I don't even know what is in those files that were released last December. Anyone care to tell what they know about them so far and shed some light on this subject. I know those files were not to have existed at one time and now they are all out. I do know I was showed in books of how much materials JFK in the NARA is and was told in realitity there isn't that much. I thought it was a lot so far from what I have seen. Also, from what I have been told there isn't to be any more classified documents? I maybe wrong though. Maybe they don't have the computers up to all that is out is another possability.

I went to past level Six and stopped it got boring. No I didn't get the bush game but two other games that took about a second each and was done. How fast i did six of the games was about 20 min. that is how I guess I got the I won thing on three of the things I did do. FAST but when you get beyond six it gets unbearable. I don't feel like thinking anymore, I guess. These are sort of kids games, mind twisters. Sorry sort of like rubets cubic. You can get the same mazes in a slid game I have done for years. I must be missing where the Bush game is? I didn't see it. I am smart in one way and dumb in another way. Maybe I will try later on and see what happnes after I get to level twelve. SO don't feel out of sorts with it. Once you catch onto the maze and movements it get easier. Ever try the maze of plastic and they slid together and call it your IQ level. This makes a lot of people feel bad. I figured it out. I call it smart to figure it out but dumb to do it. (cracking up now, laughing)

Tim how many times did you win? You must be bored. I won and won't go for it So the winnings are one thousand dollars for gas from several gas service stations. 500 dollars for on Visa account 250 dollars for something else. The reason why I won't go for it is because you have to put down your address and for that order to come to you, also have to put down your phone number. Safe not sorry, is how I play any game. Just did them fast. They were fun though. Thanks.

That is interesting I have never seen this web site before. Also it is fasinating because of admittance's of failure on the Warren commission investigations. Tosh Plumlee is still alive he is not on that list. I know those that are also not on the list that were there to keep the issues silenced as well. There is a listing on the Church Committee investigation and Tosh Plumlee is on that list as is a few others. Has anyone compared these two lists together as of yet?

your country will become ungoverable This is the point. It is a concern that we feel that the system is failing all of us. Maybe it is media viewing in at the wrong times puts pressure on Jury and Judge as well. It gets lost for what the courtroom is about and that is for justice. Somethings do need to be watched, who is running our country and or will run it. Issues that the Senate decline and accepts for our laws and standards. When a person who is so clearly guilty and has shown this prior gets away he or she will do the act again. Sadly we all lose not just the ones who were the victums of the crimes. How can anyone change this? I am not sure. Seems that we can fix a car by finding out what is wrong with it with just an analysis test. We can go to a hospital and get tests to find out what is wrong with our health. We can't go to any form of test to tell who is telling the truth and who is not whether it is a witness or the one accused of the crime. Maybe one day my words won't be science fiction and I do hope for this. A test that is one hundred per cent full proof and a back up maybe to that test to make sure the first one is correct. Who knows just maybe one day we can advance this to a better way of understanding. I don't know. I can only hope one day that the crimes get convictions and the ones accused of crimes that are innocent get set free. I worry about our citizens that perhaps their own minds are going corrupt to even be a good person to stand in on a trail. Two of the jury members on Jackson trial cried. That means two pleaded for him to be found guility. I ask why is this system failing and what we get for an answer is not enough evidence to prove him guility by any reasonable doubt. I have seen what goes on in a courtroom and I have to shack my head on it and felt a big let down on my own experience. Can't even go to the back up of what caused the crime to happen. Can't view or express certain things that can prove a case before any judge. Certain points of evidence withdrawn when it should be shown. At the end of it all they call it justice, I call it corrupt.

Al, First of all great to hear from you again. Missed you. What and how if you could see a change in our system a for better justice to be served how would you say that it could be done? Your opinions here. Myself I stopped watching the Jackson trail after he disgraced himself and the courtroom. That was it for me. OJ I just could not get into it. Felt he would get away with it and he did but didn't watch it. Watergate I tried to watch what little they showed to us because of concealments done at that time. Clinton watched every second of it as much as I could and the retakes. Not because of need to but because I was so hoping that it would go away. Just as much as the count the votes with Bush Jr. going into office. The same. Yes, I do think Media watching things does play a role into this as well. Puts pressure on the judge as well as they jury. Maybe it is harmful but with the Watergate deal at that time of closed courtrooms it does make one wonder more. Most of Senate dealings were also so very closed years ago.

Tim you are right. It is like a cartoon. Not what I meant to say though. Witnesses would state what they would know but would not have to go through the courtroom sceen. Sorry for my not to intelligant way of wording that. Of course Witnesses would be needed but all they would need to do is outside of the courtroom statements. When a witness gets crossed examined they go though hell. This brings me back into focus on one who testified in a courtroom and changed their testimony so much it shocked the defendant's attorney when they were to speak on the case for the defendant and went against him rather than for him. Lies even go on with witnesses so often. Am I wrong on this? Even to the other side of it going against the plantiff as well sometimes when an atty. thinks they will go with what they stated to a police officer and then alter their own statements later on in a courtroom?

But what are the ways to reform it? Good question and one I am sure all of ask a thousand times even in our own experiences of life, when a crime is done around us. What is needed is a full proof lie decortive device, one that is one hundred per cent. Would not need witnesses only to state what they know. Would not need jury ones that can get swayed or paid off. The system we have now is terrible for sure. Some witnesses have been killed before they can make statements. Some get so discredited by their own aflections or past wrong deeds. Victims even go though worse. Also discredited so often and have to go through the whole crime scene in front of so many. Take for instances Jackson and wearing PJ's in front of a child that was abused. This had to have been a trauma to that child. Also so unfitting to the courtroom. Yes, he was put down for it. But frankly I think charges should have been made to him that day for inproper dress in a courtroom setting. He could have had one of his staff go home and get cloths and changed and made address to the fact the issues and circumstances. No it was like he was doing this on purpose. We need a new device that is full proof and made by force to take when a crime is committed. No more of this courtroom nonsenses done. Pay off's by atty. deals done by atty. over to atty. Yes, a lot of atty. out of work not really it would be only defense atty. in front of a judge. I know I am dreaming but who knows maybe one day we could have this kind of justice that is justice. I bet a lot in governments would not like this because of their own crimes? Than again maybe we all ready have it and they don't want it to be used just because of this. All a person would have to do is make statements and that would be it.

Hi Nancy MONEY? Well, maybe. Surely, Bob Woodward is rich from his earlier books without having to make more money, although a bit more wouldn't hurt I suppose. My point though is that he does not have to publish the book -- I don't believe he is hurting financially. Sure he will make money, but what truly is the intent of the book? Woodward either wants to 1) make a clean breast of Deep Throat, if DT was Felt, i.e., a way of clearing the record, 2) present his "authorized" version of Deep Throat, if DT was not just Felt but was more than one person. . . or if there really was no DT. Take your pick. Best regards Chris <{POST_SNAPBACK}> 1) make a clean breast of Deep Throat, if DT was Felt, i.e., a way of clearing the record, 2) present his "authorized" version of Deep Throat, if DT was not just Felt but was more than one person. . . or if there really was no DT. Woodward has a long way to go. Yes, it is interesting. What I find is the ones to write books so fast is for other reasons as well. Some hold it over the story. Can't tell because of the book and signed rights. Some into money from the start is if it is a way of knowing there could be a lawsuite somewhere and in from some direction. To make known facts. NO I don't think that Woodward will do all of that, not all of it not even in his books. Woodward lied about the clues and hints he gave to help anyone ever come to any real answer onto whom was Deep Throat. Yes, to throw us all off. He did more than that. Would you care to see what I did write to Woodward once? No one ever checked into what went on right afterwards. Or to why he would state on one of his Washington posts tapes on the web. He said there was no Watergate crimes in which to be libel for. He is wrong. There was. I find that most that have prepped books ready to go in case of emergancies is doing it to try to protect themselves. So, as far as the truth goes at this point he has a long way to go. I once called a wrong person Deep Throat because of the reactions of Woodward, Bradlee and Bernstein. They reacted and it was on TV news, later then I called the person that to his face and he also reacted. This I will never let down nor change my mind on just what happened. NEVER it did take place. Now, I know it was to discredit me in a terrible way. So, I am a bit angry. Funny thing is the person that I called this never minded. After the show that is. It was all an act. He won't talk no more, won't go onto any web site to answer and sometimes does not answer his emails either. Also, strange is we got to become more friends afterwards. I talked to him on the phone with a lump in my throat as I asked him if he was taking me to court for what I said. He said, NO and I am not angry with that. But I never met Woodward ever and I was not in DC at that time. Took Bob Vernon a long time to tell me he was not DT, one full year and a day. He shut down his own forum fast. Took him one more year before he stated to me the real reasons why he reacted the two times. SO I stated back OK fine that is your reasons for the shut downs twice and not answering my question so why then did Woodward react? No Response from Bob Vernon. Yes, it discredited me terrible back in my own face. SO why in the world would Woodward and his two co-workers act the way they did after I sent the email to Woodward? Reactions to the possible lawsuit, perhaps? There exact words were from Woodward to Bradlee, "We are the only ones to know who Deep Thoat is" (began to laugh all three of them while saying the next group of words) "and we never told anyone." Still laughing all the way through the last words. Then our local news stated these words, "Nixon and a small group of people always knew who Deep Throat is." Now this was before I even addressed to Bob Vernon. Discredit me vs. tell a part of facts? So what was all of that and why did they put me though it. I look at each one on each of their reactions now, Woodward his worry look, Carl and his laugh it off, Bradlee just trying to be sincere. Truth is the whole thing can come down in a second and I do think each of them know it too, with doing a book or no book.

Mr. Simkins, Question. How much do you think that Dallas Texas had their hands onto Nixon having to leave office? My feelings say A LOT. Don't be surprised if some finaancial support didn't come from Down in Dallas Texas. Who are those Texas Businessmen that don't wish to get the truth out about JFK and their hands were stained with Blood just like the men that did in fact shoot the guns. Let's see \ Now there would be LBJ. I got a nice letter from NARA you might be highly interested in on LBJ. This is just one. Don't be surpised on Bush Sr. and his own father. Others as well. I can think of one on Felts street address,,,,, hint and clue,,,,, Chapman. Now, there is more. This was not an easy game of bringing down a man of power and a lot of people did like Nixon a lot before they stated the fireball game on him. Who are those Texas Businessmen other than what I just named? Why would Hoover himself really wish to see Nixon pushed down and out of power? I like your comments now added to Deep Throat section of this forum. You could be right but there is more than that even. Add Colson and one from White House Treasury dept. Don't remember his name but it was named on Nixon's Library forum. See way back, Bush Jr. pardoned Colson for his Watergate crimes so he could get back into politics and vote for him. Bush JR. just never seeks to amaze me in a wrong way. Politics is dirty and that is for sure. I was huffed when Bush did this, it took all this time for someone to pardon him and I guess they needed his input on some issues like how to destroy this so the truth can't really come out. Just parts of it but not all of it. If I am wrong please point it out to me, but I don't think so.

Ron that was a little humor. My feeling exactly though on OJ and Jackson and I vented the same exact words today. NO JUSTICE in US today maybe we need to get rid of our old system and get a new one. Like no more on the jury stand get rid of them if they can't know right from wrong. Have a persons that no one knows who be on the jury and with a law degree but you know I thought about that as well and somehow doubt if even that would work. I am not sure if it is because of skin color but I stated it seems to be the fame thing and as well as that one that has money. The poor person can't afford to take things to trial and the rich get away with it. There is not any form of justice today. Take a president like one that some Senators wish to bring down HE IS DOWN just because of their wish. Clinton vs. truth about Monica, people wished him out because of other issues silence in the White House on the Nixon visit. Nixon vs. truth about money, power, justice Kennedy vs. didn't wish to get into war, Judy, Bay of Pigs mess up vs. Bobby Kennedy as well and what ever was behind that mess up, Hoover and his gayness. Lincoln vs. Freedom of slaves act, power to the south more behind it all. OK so if we wish to bring down someone has to be someone powerful and wanting him out of office dead or alive. IF we ourselves wish for justice we don't get it unless we ourselves are rich and powerful. If we are against one that is for reasons of child abuse or murder and they are powerful famous people, miles well not have a trail than. Throw it out the window, it goes no where. I hope the families of these children do go civil suit and get Jackson hard or someone rich and powerful pays off one of Jackson guards to get a secret camera in his living areas and make lots of films. GO GET HIM. For once I would love to see somebody who does wrongful acts of injustice get it and not get away with it. I should say spare our president now, but in truth I would love to see him be impeached, too. Airing out more, In truth I do think Bush Sr. and Jr. have more crimes behind them that are far more serious than all of Clinton's Nixon's and also JFK and Robert Kennedy's, Bay of Pigs mess. Can't see any wrong on Lincoln.

On Larry King Live Mr. King asked Woodward when is your book coming out tomorrow? Woodward looked stunned. Response was no not done yet. Have to get with him. By that time he was caught on the remark because Woodward all ready stated that Felt was with dementia. So how can he get with him if he can't talk to make much sense? Then Mr. King asked, "will the book be out next week?" Woodward stated I don't think so. Gee, this is fast still. He must have had enough done to the book to all ready get it moving. MONEY is the only name of the game for this. Doesn't matter what it really and truely represented and behind it all. MONEY and as I said FOLLOW THE MONEY I do think is more on them than it was on Nixon some time back. Just sell the story doesn't matter also that Felt was wrong on points stated to Woodward. Sorry but Woodward's versions now and Felts never made sense to start with and now makes less sense than before. Thank you Mr. Simkins for your response on this.

Pat, There is only one thing that is very unsettling to me about Nixon. This is the fact that he gave Howard Hunt a lot of money to keep silent. What his real role in this in full I have not any idea when he promised to his own children one day the truth will come out. They don't seem to go hand in hand at all. Why not the truth way in advance? Why a later time for this? On it's own with what Hunt said, "if I tell it all the domino's will fall." Well, I wish he wasn't paid and maybe we would have more facts about JFK assassination. I know it was John Dean's idea to pay Hunt but still Nixon could have said well let him tell it than. One thing that Tosh Plumlee stated once is that if the truth came out about JFK it would cause a war. Any thoughts on this? Is the the reason why Nixon would say PAY HIM? As far as Felt, I have not any good feeling about him. He could have done things right, gone another route and not to a new reportor that was on the job for only months. Nixon would have had maybe more support had Felt done it the right way in a proper way. What Felt did was dirty pool and there is not any doubt in my mind about that.

Best of luck with your site. Just viewed it, it is nice but yes it does have a lot of pop up's and side advertisments. Don't know how one can get them off, maybe the ones that supply the web space for you can help you to get ride of them. I even have a pop up deletes on my own computer system and these still come through. More important is to have fun with it and enjoy doing putting it together!!!!

Took some time today to see just what Dr. Kissinger had to say about Deep Throat. None of his statements have been aired that I have heard. So I did find an article short not long on just what Kissinger did repond. I know this doesn't answer what Mark is asking me to give my opinions and knowledge on why Nixon would be considered very set up. There is a list of issues that would come to mind on how to show this. From NOONE names what is in the White House safe that Nixon refused to let known only to Haldeman this is one. To the Watergate key that was hidden for a long time and then when it came out did not show a big open acceptance of what is it's real purpose. To the fact that the watergate door was set to easy open and if they had the key to the desk than why would they need a door sealed so it is easy opening? To the fact that they already wired the room prior and they didn't do any wiring then. To the fact that they were sent to the wrong room to break into in the first place. To the fact that no one knew what was locked in the safe yet they knew it was enough to cause Nixon a great deal of problems. This is a long list of questions that are not answered to Watergate and that Nixon didn't even know at that time to battle over these problems. Then to go now to the full picture of Felt is another issue. Just found out they did tell this now and it was for money for them and that was the only reason. This is rather sick when I come to think of it. Felt didn't do any action to the laws of FBI and it was for revenge kick and his issues rather petty. He didn't get what he hoped for so he cut the president down in any way he could do. Also hidding thoughtout the years if Nixon was alive it would be rather interesting to see if he would have filed charges on Felt for what he did to him. Nixon wanted to take Watergate into legal action himself and never did he stopped and I can't help but wonder why he did. He wished he had fought it himself. Perhaps he felt it to involved because it did stem back to who was the total group that was involved in this. I have a feeling that was more the issue than just Watergate facts to gather alone. ___________________________________________________________________ Kissinger: Throat No Hero While many are lionizing W. Mark Felt as a hero, including former President Bill Clinton who certainly got tripped up with Linda Tripp, Henry Kissinger, President Nixon’s secretary of state got it right when he said, "Hero’ is not the first word that comes to my mind." Kissinger told Fox News, "I view him as a troubled man. I don’t think it’s heroic to act as a spy on your president when you’re in high office. I could fully understand if he resigned ... or if he went to the prosecutor. That would be heroic," Mr Kissinger said. Recent events have put Deep Throat revelations matters in an even different light. Felt’s family has said that one of the factors for Felt to clear his throat regarding the entire issue of dollars. Money played a role in Felt coming out of the deep dark closet. Joan Felt stated that she is a single mom, her son has law schools bills and Deep Throat himself has medical needs.

Just FYI: In the mid-fifties, Felt was the Assistant Special Agent in Charge of the New Orleans FBI office, working under Morton P. Chiles, the SAC who preceded Harry Maynor. This was before most of the NO cast were involved in anything significant, but I'll bet he was acquainted with or aware of former SA W. Guy Banister, who left the FBI to join the NOPD and later started a PI firm in that city. This is something that was posted about Felt on alt.assassination.jfk I found it to be if this is true than it is possible that Felt did in fact wish to COVER UP and use Nixon as a target to set him up. This is what I am getting at. How much Woodward and Bradlee were involved I am not sure. By the looks on their faces at least Woodward he is caught off guard by this sudden development. Carl I am not sure knows anything and tries hard to laugh it off as maybe this is better at least he is still alive. I wonder how much Felt can write now? Because Woodward sort of blew that as well by saying well he will get with him to write the book? Then also says he is incoherent in conversations. This is the whole thing is this thing still a cover up. So mixed up it is messed up in the process? Well, we need to know more about Felt his life, what he did and who he was with? Who crossed his paths in his life? He did set Nixon up, for sure. IN the film he says it was for culvert operations but donesn't go into it at least on the film. I also wonder how much of the conversations were told to Woodward, they say just clues and not much.

Wish it could make the newspapers on another angle. Yes, a lot of things went on down in the White House some years back. Puzzling that things don't happen anymore, I wonder on that as well to this day. They say that if it were today that Felt were to do this he would not be able to do that and no one can anymore. I guess they know the style and watch out for it. I do think things go on far more than we even know. When I seen King tonight and watch Nixon say some of the things he answered and including his response about the convention he was on in Dallas when JFK was shot. He was not alarmed but made me wonder, a lot. He stated the part about conspiracies and also the need for papers to come out that are hidden dealing with JFK's assassination. He doens't feel it to be a conspiracy. This was in 92 this report was done with King and Nixon. Well, I wonder about that NO conspiracy about JFK. Gee, what is that all about then? Made me wonder why I do what I do? Why any of us do what we are doing for that matter; however I do agree on those papers to be released and was glad he said that. To say a conspiracy would have pulled him in because so many think he was involved. So interesting on how Nixon did answer this. Papers to be releases is what he hoped for and not the wait on it. Well Nixon got his wish on that.

On Felt's part if this is that, it is now coming down to money for the family. Sort of sketchy to say the least that it is that factor alone somehow I doubt that is fully the truth on this. Sounds more like Felt's daughter is speaking on this rather than from where it is really the ties that caused Felt to let the truth out. Again, this story just don't add up. There is something more to this than money for the family at this time. Also, what a thing to do? Somehow doesn't seem right and or fair. Why not have let the truth out way sooner when Felt was of mind. Why not to have waited until he passed away like planned? MONEY Well go follow the money is one of his remarks to Woodward now isn't that interesting it is now with them to follow the money on his part. Maybe I am being petty just maybe I mean something more as well. If Nixon were alive to hear this wonder what he would say? I have a feeling the same thing. Go follow the money to the top while you brought down a president to get there. Under it all was not the truth about it all but he got away with it and if the real truth did in fact come out Felt would have been sent to prison for treason and for other crimes up against the laws of the FBI. Still the factor is he did break the law and that is not a hero to do that and this is how I do feel.

Mr. Simkins go back to the 60's with Felt more. His role more to the time of JFK assassination. ONe person did but not much into it and it brings his personhood highly questionable at the time of JFK. Where he lived and issues about him during this period.

Wim Dankbaar from Holland runs JFK Murder Solved.

Boy of Pigs thing to me I think Nixon was talking about JFK assassination each time but it is more of the group that did it he is referring to rather to get into all of the facts surrounding it. He makes it as more of the source of problems that just kept going down the line of events one after the other. Bay of Pigs, JFK and then into his own problems of Watergate. They did fear the possible opening up of the Cold War under it again and didn't wish to cause any more problems in with that to happen again. So, they had their hands tied not to try to get into that area. No doubt about it, Nixon hands was tied from a lot in the past. I know many think that Nixon was involved in JFK murder and for the problems that could swing into Bay of Pigs flub up's. It was Bobbie Kennedy that messed up there or was it more of Hoover's mess up's? Love to see a book that was told to me that existed and that is a book that would explain a lot more than what we know now. It isn't something that you can buy in a store either. Wish we could it is a hidden journal. ONE book alone. It is evidence that would help open a door to all of this. The Bay of Pigs register. Never has been seen to us and someone holds it and no one knows who for sure.