David Josephs

I guess there really aren't any consequences.

and herein lies the root of the evil we are discussing. Dub'ya and gang did it right to our collective faces knowing full well there aren't any consequences other than book tours, speaking engagements, board positions and more wealth. Welcome to America

A quick and decisive seizure of governmental power by a strong military or political group. In contrast to a revolution, a coup d'état, or coup, does not involve a mass uprising. The sudden overthrow of a government by a usually small group of persons in or previously in positions of authority.

Both the 2000 and 2004 presidential elections can be seen as coup d'etats

9/11 was a coup d'etat

JFK was definitely a coup d'etat

The Fed bailout could even be considered a coup... if one squints a little....

The unbridaled growth of the National Security State and Mil Ind Complex during the 50's MUST be considered a form of coup

Sadly, "Good" must fight "evil" within the law - with the proper proof and process. A Posse can just go out and lynch the bad guys.

Tell me William, you say "and they're all well known" - I've seen a variety of lists as to who people thought ordered it and carried it out and then covered it up and keeps it covered to this day. I have read many of your posts and articles and am very interested in who is at the top of your list of "well knowns" and how to we convict them?

DJ

I solved the Betzner mystery and it wasn't much of one.

Once again, I have to admit that I was WRONG. That IS NOT Betzner in the Martin film

The girl in the blue dress, who leads Rosemary around the wall is the person we see in Martin's film.

Watch the gif, after Rosemary passes her, she heads under the post toward the street. You can barely see the top of her head going in that direction.

Then watch the guy in the suit(on the right) start to lean.

My apologies to all.

I still believe the timing isn't correct, but I can't prove it with this .

Back to tracking Rosemary and counting frames for now.

http://98.155.2.255:8400/5D1C9/Master2.gif

chris

Sounded pretty interesting to me Chris but this slight tweak of frame 323 is enough to convice me something is being hidden.

Love the virtual black square painted over the back of his head and from what I understand it is even more noticeable on the 35mm Hollywood prints that maybe

one day I'll get to see....

My name is David Josephs I have been captivated by history and the reasons behind events for as long as I can remember and have amassed quite a diverse collection of information and images. I enjoy photographic analysis the most.

I would like, at some point, to contribute to the understanding of the JFK assassination by assembling and presenting the data in a more easily accessible manner so it does not overwhelm anyone interested in learning about the history of the event.

I'm 42 and have been interested in the JFK issue since I was a boy but never pursued it as vehemently as in the last 6 months. I've read Presumed Guilty, I've tried to understand NAA and its conclusions. I've waded through many, many web sites. I've tried to give Prouty some benefit of the doubt. I have visited the site and was awed and humbled. I am most surprised by the fact that both sides are so sure that the other explanation of events is impossible. I ultimately feel that 100% of the evidence is not 100% reliable which makes it very difficult to come to any conclusions. Both sides base their conclusions on this ever changing evidence.

What bothered me most was if there was indeed a conspiracy specifically dealing with the assassination it does not seem as if anything was done to insure Oswald was not seen by anyone at the time of the shots. With as much advance planning necessary it seems unlikely that other patsies could have been used. He would have had to be the patsy (or really did it). Yet I get the impression now after Presumed Guilty and other Warren critiques, that even if Oswald was running along side the limo at the time of the shots, the WC would have found a way to convince us that it wasn't really him. But it would have been much harder.

If you're planning this thing, how can you chance that he is seen anywhere else but up on the 6th floor at the right time? You simply plan to kill, ignore or discredit anyone who might have seen him? And if was part of it, (he didn't hear the shots or know what happened?!?!?) all he had to do was walk outside instead of up to the 2nd floor at 12:20 and he protects himself.

I've ramble on long enough. I do not do any first hand investigative work. I gather in all that I can and try to find a single convincing fact or premise that can exist based on the physical evidence. I would just be nice though to have a site that has ALL the photos and films available in the public domain. So many thread refer to pictures and film frames that I do not have or cannot find.

Thanks again for your work and the work of those you feel are friends