Shanet Clark

Braking, stopping, halting in the kill zone..........this is just more evidence of something sponsored "legally" DeGaulle's driver saved his life in a very similar attack through sheer speed and acceleration, this 1960 assassination attempt is recreated in the opening scenes of "Day of the Jackal" if only Kennedy's team had roared through the underpass at the first sound of gunshots.............

Robert Gates is a dirty bird. Ashton is correct, god knows what he was doing at Langley from 1966 to 1974. He infiltrates the Carter administration and manipulates CIA director Stansfield Turner. He leaks Carter's plans and strategies for dealing with Iran to the opposition party, who treacherously engage in high stakes negotiations with the Radical Iranian Students and apparently Gates was actually there in the Madrid/Paris meetings where the deal was THE HOSTAGES STAY IN CAPTIVITY LONGER UNTIL REAGAN WINS and this is the payoff, he can be Baker's man at the Pentagon now.................

Look at Kennedys upper right arm. At the same time as the vehicle decelerates rapidly, Kernnedy's upper right arm, his shoulder, moves back. It should move forward. It doesn't. The head striking the trapezoid muscle on the shoulder will do this. The headsnap itself is too fast. The result of it isn't. Good point John Dolva..........Kennedy is flapping back and to his right while the Connallys are obviously being thrown forward.......another anomaly...........

WHOA DUDES !!!! Andy, John, Jack and I have all been on good terms for years, so maybe I can help mediate and clarify this unfortunate passage.......... Like Larry, I got "blocked" and was not allowed to respond normally to a topic yesterday .........until I logged in (and my software remembered my passwords for me, I haven't had to log in in years. I suspect Jack White composed messages , attempted to send them and got the Pink "Rejection" slip like we get we post twice inside of one minute............. Jack, I assure you, andy and john are NEUTRAL ADMINISTRATORS of a fairly radical international education forum, and have no occult designs on censoring your views on NASA, WTC7, OSWALD or any thing else................. come on Jack, the first rule is "know who your friends are" best shanet

Myra I think you might be interested in my hypothesis, many members remember my seminar thread : "was the assassination of President Kennedy "legal" " ? It is posted on the JFK seminar thread here at the ED FORUM: http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=2387 (good Link? I hope...)

Hmmm...did my reply fail entirely? Usually it posts and then I run the risk of a double post. - lee Lee As we discussed, I am with you on the tactical magnitude and ambuscade specifics. However, my emphasis for strategic causation follows Stephen Turner and Jim Root's line of thinking. The motive was a mix of anti-Catholic, anti-movie star hatred of Kennedy's charisma, petty resentment in other words, vendettas against Joe Kennedy Sr., lingering reactionary hatred of Franklin Roosevelt and the New Dealers among the Naval brass and ultimately, the powers of the Angleton /Helms Hoover/Dulles Dillon beltway inside group, the reactionary counter intelligence honchos at JCS and CIA who were resentful of a POTUS who wouldn't play along with their neoconservative brinksmanship and adventurism..........the motive was power and the transition was a concerted effort. shanet

Who or whom?

who is this?

Jack Ruby wore a jockey strap for underwear ............

Salient ambuscade: Not consistent with Warren Commission conclusions, this thread...........

I always wondered why the CIA released the photos of the false "Oswald" character at the Mexico City Russian Embassy when they in fact were manifestly not Oswald.........................but only a pal of DeTorres................???

Great, Robin. I did not know my version was cropped from a wider view! Jack Good thread. Notice how well preserved the evidence is here, no chance of tampering with the GG-300 at all............

I conclude that JFK was shot in the neck at about the point he disappears behind the sign. COincidentally, the CIA had an umbrella that fired paralyzing darts. But that doesn't mean that UMBRELLA MAN shot the dart into his neck, since the aiming of the periscope sight would have been very difficult. This is three different stories converging: a) a man was conspicuous with an umbrella near the motorcade b- Kennedy appears to have been shot in the neck and possibly paralyzed; and c) it became public in the Senate Church Committee hearing that the CIA had umbrella guns........

What are you trying to post, the Cancellare photo?

Indeed, Wim. Speaking of Rogers, did you ever hear the rumors that he was alive and living in Western Australia up until at least the mid 1990's? I was never able to get any details though. James Wim and James \ John Liggett, the mystery mortician from Dallas in The Men Who Killed Kennedy, he also was alive, then dead, then alive once again.................

Charles Black is a renowned and respected authority, one of the thoughtful moderators of the member's educational international forum. Efforts to besmirch this founding members probity and fairness are bound to fail. I call upon the members to insist upon more propriety and less infantile slander. Mr. Simkins is doing an excellent job in the face of difficult obstructions and suspicious distractions............the threads he starts are excellent as are the SPARTACUS files shanet october o6

This member believes and will state that in fact JACK WHITE is a reliable and dependable source, and those who systematically disagree with him are in fact disingenuous and suspect reactionaries, interested only in the shrill crushing of independent thought and the brittle elimination of critical thinking from our international forum. Jack White is in fact a distinguished fellow and his opponents are truly suspect HACKS. <>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Bill O' Reilly is not a reputable source.

Another sad victim of inter ocular envy :

It talks!!!

I can think of two instances where US policy and CIA programs were hijacked by the party out of power, which amounts to treason --- first, when Nixon dealt with South VIetnam previous to the 1968 election, convincing them to hold off on peace talks until Humphrey lost and again in 1980 when bill casey flew to Paris to negotiate with the Iranian student radicals, convincing them to hold off on releasing the hostages until Carter was defeated --- I think the Cuba provocations followed this pattern ----------

Brendan Slattery There is a problem with your photo, it seems your eyes are way too close together, must be a problem with your software and you should have that fixed.

No, just someone with respect for a senior researcher who has worked hard and with courage to de-bunk the lone nut types.........