Jump to content
The Education Forum

Dawn Meredith

Members
  • Posts

    2,646
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Dawn Meredith

  1. pour yourself another glass of wine Craigster -- you're obsessive-compulsive when it comes to Jack White and his theories.... When Bill Miller farts, you yell it wasn't me.... Who the hell do you think your kidding..... when the GANG squeaks you're looking for something to oil..... Pass the foamcore.... What was that NASA control number again.....? roflmao! I see you are at a loss for words again davie...mind all blocked up with silly ct things. Come on davie deal with the Armstrong shadow. You have all of the information, including the answer. Be a man and not a mindless robot for White and crew. You do have a mind...right? Don't you know that shilling for them has destroyed what little of a reputation you had left? I hope dealing falsehoods was worth it for you. Craig, Bill, David Why are you guys so damn mean to each other? And what does all of this have to do with being hacked? Dawn Leave Jack the hell alone ok. You've offered your opinions about 7,000 times now. Enough already. We don't care. We like and respect Jack. I take no position on the Z film. If it was altered it still leaves in the headshot....the proof of conspiracy that got this case rolling early on. Attorney Vince Salandria was, I believe, the first to point out the backward motion, using stills from the Z film. I concur with RCD that this issue is secondary. Beyond secondary. The issues are why was JFK killed and how can we get the media to tell the truth. Now that Nellie is gone, taking many secrets with her to the grave, this seems a good time to try to get some media people with a quest for truth.
  2. Len: Thanx for the 6 reasons. Compelling. Bill and David, thanx also but you both go into tangents where I am unfamiliar. Someone whose name begins with Z (Not Zapruter)...who is to come out with something??? I trust Bob Groden completely. (FWIW) I have tried to read threads in the past on this but find them confusing because as I said they start with the premise that the reader already knows a lot on this particular subject and I do not. Other than that there is a controversary around the film. I am not in terested in reading Assassination Sciences because I do not feel it will further my understanding of this case. It's what Vince Salandria called micro analysing to me. A false debate. Dawn
  3. Hey Mark: I heard about the debate request but not the decline. I can only surmise that they are scared. W's not running would be his thinking, so why debate? Tho he held his own in the 04 debates. Kerry was a boob. (Howard Dean was my candidate in 04). W in 04 was very well prepared and rehersed. W's apparant lack of brain tissue truley frightens me. And he is so out of touch with the people in this country. Dawn
  4. How did we get from hacked again to this innane in fighting. ? Can you guys make a thread and fight there. Better yet, take if off the forum. I have asked repeatedly that someone give me 5 good reasons on either side for why, ( or why not), the Z film was faked. For those - like me- who don't read all this stuff (because of the never ending arguing) - but would like to know the basics- in a civil tone ... it's hard to follow all the arguments as they begin in the middle someplace. I have not read Assassination Sciences and don't plan to in the near future. So Bill, David: please 5 reasons. Thanx!! Dawn I have a jury trial today or I would start said thread myself. I guess I actually could have
  5. [quote name='James Richards' date='Aug 29 2006, 08:31 AM' post='73362'] There were two "Tippits" (phonetic) on DPD ... but the other was spelled Tippett. I don't recall the details offhand, but I recall that the latter was assigned downtown and frequented the Carousel. The pronunciation being the same, it is easy to understand how one could be confused with the other. (Duke Lane) There was an Accident Investigator named W.W. Tippett. This is him below. James James: You NEVER cease to amaze me. Your photo colection has to be the best I have ever seen. You must have some very "deep" sources. Not asking you to reveal any, just commenting, marvelling really, on on your production ability. Dawn
  6. I have never heard this before this post. Could you be confusing this with the phone lines in DC that day? (Either by design or mere overuse the phones were down several hours). Dawn
  7. I know that last summer John was tring to get a copy of Government by Gunplay (Harvey Yazijian and Sid Blumenthal). I would be interested in Paris Flammonde's book on the Garrison investigation. I borrowed a copy in 74 but would love to have my own. thanx, Dawn
  8. I think that demands an apology from you Jack. I don't take baseless and false accusations lightly. Am I the only one who sees this as a joke. Jack was not accusing Mr Burton os anythig except being both "an Aussie and avid defender of official stories". There is no accusation there. Grow some skin and aquire a sense of humor. Dawn
  9. Peter: Ashton's only slept 5 hours since joining this forum, so he's used to it now. Sleep is overrated. Ash your post (response to mine in this thread) cracked me up! Dawn
  10. [quote name='Peter Lemkin' date='Aug 27 2006, 08:47 PM' post='73213'] Yeah, looks interesting!...but just as they tried to do a hatchet job on JFK they must have Pozner clones working overtime already......somehow I think the time may be 'ripe' for things to really start changing and I think it was 9/11 that was just one BIGLIE too far even for the TV-blinded masses......we will see....as the WC material alone was enough to prove a cover-up a the highest levels...can't wait to see public reaction to the Ruby statements...... I'd suggest people start planning information handouts on the assassination generally and where to get more information from books/internet/etc. to HAND OUT to persons going to the film [best on way out!] when it is in the theatres!!!!! I did that after film JFK and people were very receptive! Peter: What an excellent idea. Wish I'd had done that with JFK. I did talk to many of the poeple leaving and people were pretty shaken up. It opened here Dec 20, 1991 and we had a huge rainstorm. To the point where cars were being washed away. But people filled the theatre. Will have handouts for The Commission. Dawn
  11. What is this now pick on Jack White day? When any of you has contributed the amount of time, energy and dedicaton of Jack White, then chuck your wad but til then plese stay on topic. Dawn
  12. After I get the model of the magic bullet working. Right now it keeps going in circles Asthon Thanx Ash, My laugh of the day. Don't forget to have it hang mid air for 1.5 seconds Dawn
  13. Oh pleeeease. We're all grownups here. Dawn (a woman)
  14. Welcome Donald. I am a former Canadian as well. In this case we are all "backyard" researchers. It could be a fulltime job just to keep up. Dawn Meredith
  15. Mark: Thanx for the reminder. I have been waiting for this film to come out. It will be badly reviewed like other films critical to the WC and probably have limited runs. When "Executive Action" was released in 73 (or 74) it played only about two weeks in Boston. Dawn
  16. If we get really lucky maybe darlin Arlin will join us here. I missed the conference in Pittsburg in 03 put on by Dr Wecht and son Ben, but I understand Arlin did show up and made a total fool of himself. I think it's the first time he's ever appeared at a conference of LN critics and was in way over his head. Thanks for this article Doug. Dawn
  17. Great stuff Ashton, now can you add in all the shooters? Of course you will get many opinions here. Dawn
  18. Bravo John!! ( "You can run but you can't hide"....) who ever this ass**** is. Dawn
  19. No, his IP is 202.139.22.154 Is there anything about this particular timing that would have caused this attack? Or just a coincidence that you and Andy were on vacation? Lots of truth on this site so it will be under attack. By those opposed to truth. Sure hope they get this person and said criminal is prosecuted to the fullest. Some find free speech scary and offensive. We must endeavor to see to it that a site like this is never silenced. Dawn
  20. Wade, I'll label that anti-Bush propaganda before BS does, though it's unlikely he could stomich the cartoons, and the "pretty ugly" thesis. So as not to have wasted my time, I'll give you my thoughts on it. While Alex Jones labels those responsible for the assassination and coverup as "invisible forces" I think we pretty much know who they are now and can start putting names on the indictments. That Bush I inserted himself into the JFK assassination fray by dropping a dime on Parrott makes him suspect, yet it doesn't measure up to AJ's allegations that he was the vortex of the crime, nor does the idea that Bush II was responsible for JFKJR's death because he was in New Hampshire at the time and disapeared for three days. The music is cool though, and AJ should give some music credits, cause the songs make it. BK Hi Wade, BK I saw this video some time back and found it very interesting. But I have to concur, in part, with BK. I tend to be pretty partial to Alex' work; he's a home boy here in Austin TX and I have been watching him on tv for years and visit his website (infowars.com) pretty regularily. Some people are put off by his "New World Order" views, but I am not one of those people. I think in this international -all- interconnected day that one has to think in terms way beyond the US of A. The Bush family has Nazi ties that go way back. Whoever sent the clowns to Ross Perot's daughter's wedding scared him for life. (Perot did his own private investigation into the October Surprise but you will never hear him mention it these days.) I don't think Ray Gun engineered the October surprise, but the VP, Bush. I would love to know just why Jerry Ford picked Bush to be head of the CIA...and I would also like to know what happened to JFK JR. Someone blew up that plane. (inmo). On the internet the Clinton's get more blame than the Bushes.... (Interesting that Bill Clinton and Popa Bush are so found of each other these days). Lots of questions .... BK did W really disappear fore those 3 days? If this is true that does make it all the more suspect...but just that...suspect. Alex and a guy from England also got a camera into Bohemian Grove a few years back and got W and others in some very compromising video, to put it mildly. So, all this "Christian" stuff W claims is also extremely suspect. Look at his deeds. Anyone can mouth the words. Of course the whole fundamentalism thing is very scary too, be it ours or theirs- the ones W calls "evil doers" . I am a Christian who attends church regularily but I stopped using that term to describe myself in the 8o's with the rise of the Moral Majority. I only recently decided that those of us who actually try to practice what Christ taught must reclaim this title from the monsters who are in power. There are "evil doers". All over the world, and those who killed JFK, MLK, RFK and so many since are definately evil. Evil must not ever be ignored, but confronted. Dawn
  21. You don't know jack about the case. You lemmings whine that the WC tried to pin it on LHO regardless of the facts, yet you're doing the same thing in reverse. Hmm. Funny how the dissenters are the only ones to get banned. A coincidence, I'm sure. Tim Gratz was banned because he THREATENED TO SUE JOHN. Not because he dissented. I know plenty about this case. You're the dimwit around here. What have you produced of any value? And I have not ever said a thing about Zionists. Must have me confused with someone else. And no I am not a personal injury attorney. I do many types of law: criminal defense, juvenile, child protective services, parole, TX Youth Commission. No slip and falls. And what is it again that Y0U do?? Now take your little toys and go haunt someplace else. I don't understand why people remain where they are not wanted. Inferiority complex? A deep desire to be hated? Seems irrational to me. Dawn
  22. You don't know jack about the case. You lemmings whine that the WC tried to pin it on LHO regardless of the facts, yet you're doing the same thing in reverse. Hmm. Funny how the dissenters are the only ones to get banned. A coincidence, I'm sure. He was banned because he
  23. Again Bill, thank you. I did see the frame numbers but my mind was wandering to the fact that I have a criminal jury trial on Monday and need to get my voir dire prepared NOW....so I looked at what you posted in a somewhat distracted way. I hope those who say there was alteration can be as cogent as you have been here. She pulled him down too late, perhaps an attempt to save her own life. BUT what about her crawling over the back? My memory is that she made contact with SS then.... so does this "down" occur after that or before? I own a copy of the Z fim and have never seen this "down" pic before. (My copy is one that Groden worked on). NOT to say I believe Bob G did anything to this film. Except to enhance it. Dawn
  24. Slightly off the beat, but relevant: Do you know anything about the company that made "Suddenly" - who financed it, that sort of thing? Paul I believe we've discussed this before. I think I brought it up. Priscilla McMillan wrote of Oswald staying up late and watching Suddenly back to back with some film on Cuba. *Gary Mack, however, looked through all the Dallas TV Guides and found that these films had not been shown on Dallas TV anytime around the assassination. *(Gary Mack has reminded me that she got her info from an obscure SS report.) As far as Suddenly, it's one of my pet pieces of evidence. Sinatra yanked it. Why? Out of respect? Or because it implicated his friends? The character played by Sinatra, a swarthy WWII vet/assassin, is named Johnny Baron. Although they lack the Italian surnames, Mr. Baron and his friends are obviously Itallian Goombahs. Well, what Italian vet/assassin would Sinatra know? Precisely. Johnny Rosselli. But what about the screenwriter, Richard Sale? Did he know Rosselli? Almost certainly, at least by reputation. I found that Sale's wife/partner was the niece of the legendary screenwriter Anita Loos, and that Anita Loos was, in turn, close friends with Joe Schenck, the movie mogul whose testimony sent Rosselli to prison in the 40's. When I looked at Rosselli's bio, All-American Mafioso, moreover, I found that John Barron was the name of Rossell's nemesis, an FBI agent who'd hounded him for years. That seemed way too much a coincidence. *Gary Mack e-mailed me to fill in the story. He said "The person who looked it up and told you about it was me, and I already sent a note about it to JWK saying that there's no historical record of Suddenly being broadcast at any time after Oswald returned from Mexico City. McMillan didn't make up the story, however; she got it from an obscure SS report that is listed in her footnotes." Gary Mack Speaking os Sinatra. I remember when the son was "kidnapped" shortly after the assassination. Tho I was only 14 at the time I did not believe this and thought it was a ploy to get the assassination less press coverage by diverting people's attention to a missing Sinatra kid. Many years l ater I saw that the kidnapper had confessed, or something that made this "event" seem more real. Indeed, why would Sinatra pull this film? Didn't he do somethig similar with either MC or Seven Days in May? ( Sorry my movie history leaves much to be desired. ) Dawn
×
×
  • Create New...