Nick Bartetzko

2 hours ago, Robert Morrow said:

Jimmy likes to say Marilyn Monroe never came to the White House to see JFK. That might very well be true. But there are many other places to carry on affairs: other cities and even airplanes.

Traphes Bryant, the former White House kennel keeper:

 QUOTE
 

President Kennedy certainly seemed to enjoy his women. I don't know for sure about Marilyn Monroe, but I did hear backstairs talk, after he was dead, that during his visits to California he had enjoyed a few discreet meetings with her at a private home.

I never saw her around the White House and I never heard talk of her being either an official or "O.R."-off the record-guest there in his administration, even though she once sang "Happy birthday, Mr. President, happy birthday to you" to him in New York's Madison Square Garden.

But this much I can tell you: he did enjoy having beautiful women around him at the White House and he did entertain them when Jackie was away. There was a conspiracy of silence to protect his secrets from Jacqueline and to keep her from finding out. The newspapers would tell how First Lady Jacqueline was off on another trip, but what they didn't report was how anxious the President sometimes was to see her go. And what consternation there sometimes was when she returned unexpectedly.

I remember one time it was a beautiful tall blond girl skinny dipping in the pool with him. JFK liked to swim nude and so did some of the girls who popped in to visit him. But this particular girl must have been just waiting for the First Lady to be on her way. She came in the South West Gate and straight to the South Portico, and a trusted aide met her there. He walked her through the Diplomatic Room and along the Colonnade, as if he were taking her to the President's office, but instead he took her to the gymnasium, where she shed her clothes and went to the pool.

Jack Kennedy was already there, lounging naked beside the pool and sipping a daiquiri. Sometimes one or two from a group of trusted staff aides and friends would join Kennedy in the pool, and often there would be just one other male and female to make up a foursome. This time there were several girls and several male friends.

 UNQUOTE

  [Traphes Bryant, Dog Days at the White House, p. 22, published 1/1/1975].

 

I heard about the Dog Days at the White House book decades ago. Tried to buy a used copy back then, but it was a bit too pricey. It was the first glimpse of marijuana, unclothed pool parties etc etc.  We have the Fiddle and Faddle girls, the book by Mimi Alford, the interviews with some of the Secret Service guys describing some of these events. It seems there’s quite a damning record of these liaisons. It seems a well documented part of JFKs life and could have contributed to what I believe is likely Secret Service involvement to a certain…or large…extent. 

4 hours ago, Pat Speer said:

I came across this on the website of Paul Seaton approximately 15 years ago. It shows the flight of the two largest bone fragments. Although I am quite convinced JFK was killed by a conspiracy, I have learned much from reading books and articles written by those with opposing viewpoints, such as Seaton. 

 

 

If Seaton is correct, this coincides with what Dino Brugnioni claims he saw. 

After all these year,  finally learned the identity of this witness. Thanks to all for posting 

On 1/29/2024 at 2:45 PM, Robert Morrow said:

The value of the letter from Billy Lord is that someone who spent a great deal of time in close quarters (as a cabin mate on a ship) with Lee Harvey Oswald in 1959 thought he was CIA handled fake defector to Russia and was not buying the "Oswald is a commie" narrative. And, furthermore, this witness came under surveillance and intimidation in the 1970s (presumably by the government) and had has home telephone tapped years after the JFK assassination.

I don’t disagree with you at all on that. It’s a piece of a large puzzle the points to Ozzy not being a real defector. I just wish there was much more than just one letter from Mr Lord. 

Thanks for posting, but this letter is of limited value. Unless there is another letter or interview that gives a physical description of Oswald, details why he believes/knows that Oswald was CIA and FBI, then it amounts only to allegations. 
I have no idea if there is a list of passengers available for that trip. But even if there is, it is still of little value imo. 

10 hours ago, Jim Hargrove said:

There are two more researchers I forgot to mention who have endorsed John’s Harvey and Lee.  One is Dick Russell (author of The Man Who Knew Too Much), who actually organized the meeting and drove John and me to Rob Reiner’s house.

The other researcher was Jack White, who worked with John in the 1990s and produced, based in part on John’s early research, the 1993 poster titled “The Evolution of Lee Harvey Oswald.”  (See below.)

So, here is the list I’ve compiled so far of 15 researchers who have publicly endorsed a long-term two-Oswald analysis:

John Armstrong, Rob Reiner, James Norwood, Sandy Larsen, John Newman, Peter Dale Scott, Joseph McBride, Dick Russell, Jack White, Pat Shannan, George Schwimmer, David Mantik, David Josephs,  Robert Groden & me.

And here is the best photo I’ve been able to make of “The Evolution of Lee Harvey Oswald” poster.  If you enlarge the graphic sufficiently, you should be able to read the captions under each mug shot.

 

I’ve never been able to reconcile the picture(s) of Lee in Robert Oswald’s book…which I’ve not read and don’t have either. There are so many conflicts that have to be explained away to say it’s only one individual that I’m inclined to believe there were two Oswald’s, at least for a while. 

The concept of having two individuals sharing one identity being used by certain agencies back in those days in quite believable to me. Are you aware of actual proof of sets of individuals that have either come out and admitted being part of such programs or that researchers were able to uncover? I mean hard proof like birth certificates, mother and father details, photos from school days etc.? 

9 hours ago, Pat Speer said:

You might be onto something. Was it Greg Burnham who shot the footage after receiving the film from Della Rosa? For some reason that rings a bell. Does that make any sense? 

That was some years ago as Rich passed away in 2010.  My recollection is that Rich told me he didn’t…or no longer … needed it. Whether Greg then later received it to do filming, I have no idea. It would have been a waste not to use it as was in such good condition. 

I sent an excellent condition film of the exact type that Zapruder used to Rich Della Rosa that could have been used for that purpose. Rich passed away and I have no idea what happened to that film

20 hours ago, Ron Bulman said:

We can go back to Phelan, there is more. 

But regarding this last part I find it interesting, Laffite was working in New Orleans as a "Manager-(head) Chef" at the restaurant in the World Tade Mart developed by Clay Shaw/Bertrand at or near the time of his arrest and ultimately trial regarding the assassination of JFK.  Pierre (using the name Martin) had been there long enough to develop a reputation as an excellent chef, reputedly Shaw's favorite and receiving compliments from former first lady Ladybird Johnson. 

 

Skip to the latter 1960's, Clay Shaw's Pilimsol Club at his New Orleans Trade Mart with Pierre Martin as head (renowned) chef. 

Post Shaw trial, Martin arrested by FBI.  CIA TSS Director Sideny Gotlieb alerts CIA meeting, Director Helms says eliminate all references, photograph's.

"On December 22, 1969, alarm bells went off at the CIA.  TSS chief SIDNEY GOTTLIEB announced at a staff meeting the that the FBI Had arrested Laffite in New Orleans where he was working as manager-chef at the posh Plimsoll Club in the World Trade Mart.  Unbelievable came the response, how could that be.  Doesn't he sometimes work for the FBI?

Find out what's going on, ordered Richar Helms, now director of the CIA.  And make certain there are no photos of him in the newspapers or magazines, instructed Helms.

Apparently the bureau had little choice but to pick Laffite up.  Six years earlier he had swindled an unfortunate speculator named Ralph L. Loomis out of nearly $400,00.  Ironically the elaborate scheme, involving diamond mines in Africa, had originated out of an FBI sting operation, which the FBI had called Laffite in on to do undercover work. Laffite had mad investments under the Alias Anthony Shillitani while in the Belgian Congo in 1960 on another deep cover assignment for the CIA.  . . .

According to FBI documents, during its six-year "search" for Laffite the notorious agent had used dozens of aliases, including Jean Martin, Peter martin, John Martin, Jack Martin, Paul MARTINO, Pau MERTZ, Louis HIDELL . . . 

Within weeks of his arrest by the FBI in 1969, Pierre Laffite was quietly released, and quickly vanished for another five years."

Not the article I remembered or was looking for, but, for now,

Nation: The Gourmet Pirate - TIME

 

 

Laffite sure had some interesting aliases including John and Jack Martin, Martino, Mertz and Hidell… Great info once more

I don’t have the time to look this up, but it sure sounds like the Robert Morningstar theory of using JD Tippit’s body and that Tippit looked like JFK. I thought Morningstar was a member here as well….

5 hours ago, David Von Pein said:

All of those things have, indeed, been explained in non-conspiratorial ways over the last 60 years. Most of those items (if not all) were covered in a pretty decent amount of depth, of course, in Vincent Bugliosi's 2007 tome. And many other Lone Assassin advocates, including myself, have tackled most of those things as well.

A very reasonable possibility for Tague's injury, as a matter of fact, is provided right there in the Warren Report itself (on my all-time favorite WCR page, which nearly every CTer continues to ignore on a daily basis --- Page 117). So the Warren Commission itself had, in effect, started debunking some of the pro-conspiracy nonsense before their final report ever went to press.

 

I very much respect all the work you’ve done on the JFKA over the years and your different conclusions. But in order to do so, you and fellow WC supporters have had to ignore/dismiss so very many credible witness statements, ignore very important missing evidence, claim that many individuals were mistaken etc etc. I truly wonder if part of your support of the WC and anything considered anti conspiratorial is based at least in part that your faith in the government and our system would be crushed if a conspiracy were ever proven to your satisfaction …. 

5 hours ago, Benjamin Cole said:

NB-

Oh, I entirely agree with you that more than three shots were fired on 11/22. 

In fact, I think it obvious Connally is struck about Z-295 and JFK at Z-313. At 18 frames a second, do the math.

I conclude that the JFKA was not perped by a lone gunman armed with a single-shot bolt-action rifle. 

Naming names after that...well, I suspect the Miami Station of the CIA and that milieu...but proof is hard to. come by. 

Interesting to ponder: The fact that many shots not only missed...but missed the entire limo, often widely off the mark...suggests one or two shooters were shooting intending to miss. 

That is, the JFKA was originally planned as a false flag op, a deliberately unsuccessful JFKA, to provoke an invasion or serious take down of Cuba.

But somewhere along the line, the false flag op was piggy-backed on by real assassins. 

That is my speculation. Note that I call it speculation, rather than a fact. 

BC

i absolutely agree with you that if indeed a false flag op existed and the perpetrators piggybacked onto it to kill JFK, then there had to be one or two locations where shots were intended to miss….and pin the attempt onto Castro/Cuba. I believe that would explain deliberate misses from the fence and 6th floor. I don’t believe the angle, injuries to JFK, debris, blood splatter can logically point to a shot(s) from the corner of the fence and very likely to the Depository as well….

3 hours ago, David Von Pein said:

So, according to Rob Reiner in the 10th and final installment of his "Who Killed JFK?" podcast series (which can be heard HERE), the "real assassins" shoot up Dealey Plaza using FIVE gunmen located to the front and rear of JFK; and they are doing this while also attempting to frame just ONE lone "patsy" in the Book Depository.

Does that sound like a plan that's likely to succeed....or doomed to fail?

Also....

Is it even remotely likely that such a FIVE-SHOOTER / ONE-PATSY plot would have even been considered by any group(s) who was planning to kill the President and wanted to get away with it and wanted to pin the blame on just one lone killer in the Depository Building on 11/22/63?

Were the architects of such a loony, over-the-top plot all insane....or did they merely enjoy the challenge of doing things the (very!) hard way?

In short, such a pre-planned "multi-gunmen with just one patsy" assassination scheme, very similar in nature to Oliver Stone's absurd 3-Gun, 1-Patsy plot, is just plain idiotic.*

* Not to mention the fact that there's not one shred of physical evidence to indicate that more than just one assassin (located on the sixth floor of the TSBD) fired any shots at President Kennedy, let alone five gunmen. But I guess the actual evidence in the JFK murder case doesn't mean very much to Mr. Reiner.

 

Huh? Not one shred of evidence? Ok, then cumulatively, I’ll list what I feel is “suspicious “…..

The Tague curb strike and his injury, the reports by a motorcyclist and 5-6 witnesses of a bullet striking the street, witnesses reporting a puff of smoke and movement behind the picket fence, Malcolm Summers encounter with trench coat man at the picket fence, a witness report of a bullet(s) striking the grass, the smell of gun powder at street level, the Harper fragment in the street and a bone fragment in the follow up secret service car, blood splatter on the motorcycle cops to the rear of the limo, Doug Horne’s work on NPIC and Hawkeyeworks and the two different briefing boards, no nitrate residue on Oswald’s cheek, the crimped bullet casing on the 6th floor, the huge discrepancies between the wounds as described at Parkland vs Bethesda, missing X-rays and photographs from the autopsy, the burnt original autopsy, a Bethesda eyewitness describing a right temple wound…. I think I’ll stop as I’m sure you have plausible explanations for everything that I’ve listed…

To paraphrase a famous line out of a well known 50s sitcom… “you got some    ‘splainin’ to do”…. 

21 hours ago, Ron Bulman said:

Thanks for your comment Nick.  The Hemming part comes from A Terrible Mistake, pg. 436.  Hank went on to ask him, did you actually know or talk to Hughes?  No, I just saw him there, with Martino.

Thanks, Ron. I may read one or two of the Albarelli books after all….

1 hour ago, Ron Bulman said:

"Last and of significance, there was John Martino.  Martino's name is found in several of George Hunter White's address books and in Laffite's notes concerning his trips to Florida and Cuba.  . . . Laffite had known Martino for at least seven years prior to his arrest.  . . .  Laffite, operating under the alias Jean Pierre martin, visited Martino on at least one occasion in 1961.  This is known only because of a notation made by George Hunter White:  "Pierre to see Martino Cuba - call Rene" [Rene being Pierre's wife]."  From Coup in Dallas, pgs. 106-7. 

Not the source for this but from the end notes.  John Martino:  author Larry Hancock, citing HSCA travel receipts provided by John Martino's wife: He was in New Orleans on September 27, and spoke in various Texas cities on October 1-3, . . .  As Hancock made clear, Martino's sole claim to participation in the JFK assassination was that he acted as a courier, moving money.  Given Martino's travel schedule, it is striking that Pierre Laffite, a long-time acquaintance of Martino's , jotted down in his datebook on September 30, 1963, "Money from Dallas".

"Beginning about 1955, Martino partnered with former CIC and CIA-TSS employee Allan Hughes in his Cuban electronics ventures.  As readers may recall, Hughes was present at the fateful Deep Creek Lake meeting where Frank Olson was dosed with LSD."

To summarize, in 2000 Albarelli asked (J) Gerry Hemming, You met [Allan] Huges in Cuba?  Yeah, I sure did.  What do you remember about Hughes?  Not a whole lot.  He was there in Havana with Martino . . ."

Same reference as above about Pierre to see Martino, GHW notebook, call Rene.

Last three paragraphs/sentence from A Terrible Mistake.

Sources.  Pg. 802.  

Laffite and Cuba: Cirules Enrique, The Mafia in Havana, Ocean Press , New York, 2004, p. 111-118.

Martino/Laffite/White: George Hunter White Papers, Perham Electronics Foundation, Sunnyvale California.  The author, courtesy of foundation manager Ms. Rachel Wager, spent three days reviewing and studying White's papers in 1999.  The papers were subsequently reorganized and transferred to Stanford University (which JFK attended!).

I've read somewhere recently that George Hunter White's wife Albertine donated all of his papers first to a small college or maybe even local library 2-3 years after he passed.  They then went to Perham, then now Stanford.

I have no idea about digital access, but I guess anyone wanting to check Hank's sources on this can go to Stanford and do so.  Not sure where to find the Enrique book, haven't looked.

@Ron BulmanThanks for this very interesting thread and it makes me give much more credibility to to the possible involvement of Laffite. The reference to New Orleans and William Reilly are fascinating and so is Albarelli’s communication with Hemming. I’m unclear what book this interview with Hemming is in. Pls advise. It’s been years since I’ve read any JFKA books, but I may need to read one or two more…

Thanks, Gil. I’ve seen a still or brief video of the guy Summers described. It’s amazing to me how bold a few of these participants were…. 

I was out of town, so belated Christmas wishes and a great 2024 to all! I keep learning new and significant information here and appreciate the hard work and good research to get closer to the truth of what happened all those years ago…. 

I haven’t seen Thompson’s presentation on that in quite a while, but isolating the video on JFK and Connally individually at around Z 328 or so was very persuasive. 
I believe I’ve seen a version of Nix that depicts what could be headshot debris exiting rearward. Whether that’s an artifact of the film copy or not, I have no idea. But the timing would be very coincidental. 

On 12/5/2023 at 5:19 PM, Benjamin Cole said:

GD-

Sure, it may be. 

My view on the JFKA is since little is entirely beyond reasonable doubt (and even that is a matter of individual preference), one must look for the "preponderance of evidence." 

This 11/22 FBI memo does not say "fragments," it says "the bullet." 

Landis claims he found a whole bullet slug. 

Clint Hill told a neighbor a complete "bullet" was found in the limo. 

CE 399 is an entire, nearly pristine WCC 6.5 slug. Such a slug is extremely unlikely, if it had truly ripped out five inches of Gov. Connally's rib and then smashed his wrist. 

No, I cannot prove Landis found a whole slug, CE 399 in the limo. One might entertain reasonable doubts that he did. 

If I had to bet, it would be that a Secret Service agent indeed found a whole slug in the limo on 11/22. 

Police brotherhoods are very strong. No one ever "finks" on a fellow officer, rightly or wrongly. 

If a Secret Service agent made a mistake in the handling of CE 399, no one is going to squeal on him. 

 

That is an excellent find. You mention Clint Hill telling a neighbor, but might you be confusing that with SS Agent Sam Kinney who confided the same information to his neighbor? 

40 minutes ago, Ron Bulman said:

Have you read it?  It's not expensive.

I have not read it and haven’t bought a new JFKA book in years. Have spent many hundreds of dollars over decades and am frankly a bit burned out. I have been planning on selling or donating virtually all of them and didn’t want to add any more to the collection. The one exception would definitely have been Lifton ‘s Final Charade. But I’ll take a look now over at Amazon since you mentioned it. 

On 11/26/2023 at 9:20 PM, Leslie Sharp said:

@Nick Bartetzko to your point, I’ve known a number of authors who are not “withholding,” but instead are protecting information and sources until the material can be published in full and accurate context. It’s my understanding the circumstances of “Final Charade” fall into that category. Getting it right isn’t an easy task, getting it out there can be dangerous. And authors who accept those risks earn every dime of that 12-16% Royalty.

That said (underscored), I’ve lobbied privately for decades (beginning with Virginia M. who had custody of Mae Brussel’s files) that private archives belong in a non-governmental fully accessible public repository so that families and estates can pick up the phone, make a one-stop call and say “come get this stuff because that’s what our loved one would want ...he or she just didn’t get around to making the arrangements.”  We’ll do the rest. Santa Fe NM is under consideration for just such a venue with volunteer support staff. We shall see what unfolds in 2024. (If anyone is interested in discussing this project, I’ll launch a dedicated thread — providing our hosts approve.)

PS. If “the community” hadn’t devolved into a fractious, compartmentalized org. — created in the image of the very intel agencies it pursued — filled with green-eyed competitors and infiltrated by the likes of the Dirty Trickster himself, this case might have been solved — fully solved — by at least the mid-90s.  Study the trajectory, consider the current crisis in our democracy instigated by the 45th president, the recent exploitation of the JFK Records Act... the dots are there for the connecting. 
 

 

@Leslie Sharp I think your idea of a central public repository is a great idea and I would be interested in learning more. I do understand the complexities of protecting sources, having legal contracts in place, book deals, etc. Some of my post was a response in frustration because, imo,  we’ve lost valuable research and historical information because researchers didn’t properly care for the research they had accumulated.

You mentioned trajectories and I have yet to see a really good trajectory analysis that takes into account wound abrasion, clothing distortion, using Z186 and Z224 as key frames and body positioning at those frames, accessibility of the body from certain potential firing points, descriptions of X-ray findings and autopsy corpsman descriptions of the internal chest cavity, etc. I don’t have the skillset to do that, but I think reasonably specific firing points could be established using “reverse engineering “.

I must say that the description of Hank’s book is fascinating, but the concept of using Pierre Lafitte in such an important capacity is well, unbelievable. Until there is solid verification of the authenticity of his notebook, I will remain very skeptical. 
 

Thanks for taking the time to post and reveal his work. 

1 hour ago, Tony Krome said:

Receiver, barrel, as the guy above says, cops know nothing about guns. Remembers the stamp though ...

 

Thank you for posting. The idea that police misidentified a Mauser vs a Carcano and for such a long time isn’t believable. And that “mixup” is at least consistent with the pointed bullet found at Parkland by Tomlinson and Poole and the inconsistency with CE 399…..

3 hours ago, Benjamin Cole said:

RB--

Your concerns are valid.

However...Jim Robenalt, who helped Landis write the book, was not a CT'er.

In late 2013, for the City Club of Cleveland, Robenalt hosted Howard Willens and Burt Griffin, Warren Commission lawyers, for a 1:18 talk. Willens and Griffin are staunch defenders of the WC and the LN narrative. 

As you can see, the talk is entitled, "The True Story of the Warren Commission."  Robenalt is a gracious and accepting host. Griffin and Willens, WC'ers, are hardcore WC defenders. 

But in a recent interview with Larry Schnapf and Jeff Morley, Robenalt said he has confidence in Landis. He describes Landis as lucid and active. 

The short story, as I understand it, is this: Landis was in a daze post-JFKA (that's believable). So, he did what he did, thinking he had left evidence where it would be found. 

Landis somewhat realized what he did was wrong, and he more or less detached from 11/22 thereafter. He left the Secret Service shortly after the JFKA and had a varied career, and says he did not involve himself in the JFKA thereafter, even passively. 

Landis testified to the HSCA, and left out his finding of the spent slug, although he did say he thought the shots had come from the front. 

But late in life Landis looked at the JFKA topic again, and realized the official record needed cleaning up, and he himself came clean. 

I will say this: The Landis version explains the shallow wound in JFK's back. An undercharged slug struck JFK in his back, entered perhaps an inch or two, and was pushed out by the shock wave of subsequent impacts. 

Pat Speer says the use of undercharged slugs is mentioned in CIA literature and I have confirmed that. 

https://nsarchive2.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB4/ciaguat2.html

In the JFKA, I suspect someone hand-loaded a previously used WCC 6.5 cartridge, leaving behind the "dent" or crimp seen on one of the three recovered shells. Whether the shell was amateurishly hand-loaded due to a lack or ammo, or was done under CIA plotter's supervision...well, who knows? LHO, or other party, evidently had only four rounds. 

JFK's throat wound is a mystery, but perhaps Pat Speer/Tink Thompson are right, it was a bone fragment exiting the throat, or perhaps it was small glass shard from the windshield, also pushed out by subsequent impacts. 

If you can find the Robenalt interview both Schnapf and Morley, I recommend it. 

 

 

The understanding of what happened is clearer now than ever. The back wound was indeed shallow and it was confirmed by an autopsy tech that the back probe simply pushed against intact chest tissue, but did not go through. Two SS agents claimed to have placed a bullet in Parkland. It is to me irrelevant which agent was covering for the other’s mishandling of evidence. The Pat Speer/Tink Thompson bone fragment exit theory is interesting and coincides with no metal residue being found on the front of the shirt and tie, but does not explain Dr Perry’s very specific comment to Weisberg in 1966 at Parkland that the wound had a ring of bruising that is consistent with a wound of entry. Dr Perry wiped blood from that wound and saw the ring of bruising. Unless a small, exiting fragment of bone can cause a ring of bruising, it is now a moot point. It doesn’t also explain why someone would cut such a large opening in the neck. The only conclusion is an attempt to retrieve something. 

One has to be quite a unique/special individual to really pursue the JFKA. Many have done very intriguing and sometimes very good investigative work,  yet hold onto their findings like a hungry dog that is guarding it’s very last bone. I understand that countless hours and lots and lots of money have been spent and there is a rightful desire to try and recoup as many of those expenses as possible by selling a book or rights to a movie or whatever…. But there is, I believe, also an obligation to the serious JFKA body of researchers to share at least some of this alleged new information to try and vet it. 

We have David Lifton, for example, who claimed to have incredible new revelations backed by documents and interviews. And then Mr Lifton has suddenly passed on and we’re all left to wonder whether any of these materials will ever see the light of day now so that they can be properly examined and evaluated. So that’s the problem with gatekeepers…they hold all the keys and parcel out breadcrumbs as they see fit. One moment they’re here, the next, they’re not. 

Over the years, I also recall Richard Case Nagel and his trunk of secret recordings and documents. The materials were very secure as only he had the key to the safe deposit box. And then he passed away and the mysterious trunk and materials had vanished. 

Then there are those who’d seen the real Z film that was in a secure vault somewhere in France. It was safely stored, but still too dangerous to be released after all these years, but apparently safe enough to sit in a location where it could likely quite easily be stolen. 

Then there’s the story of the sharpshooter who served in Vietnam, who confided to a poster here that he’d been asked to participate in Dallas, but who’s now dead. But his secrets are being held in confidence because, well, that’s much more important than trying to gather evidence to try and solve the Crime of the Century. 

There are other examples, but these so readily came to mind. I can only wonder what’s next………… 

I’m presuming they didn’t show the Getty shirt that shows the neck shirt damage higher than the back wound shirt damage. Actually, the damage on the shirt front is likely from that of a scalpel and fibers removed for testing by the FBI….