Vince Palamara

Yes! She left her handsome, same-age hubby (her high school sweetheart), to whom they had two kids, for an aging guy 33 years older (she's 48, he's 81) whose one son is 56! Gwen left Clint after 50+ years of marriage, two sons, and several grand kids. McCubbin had dated BLAINE'S SON and went to the prom with him---! Her father was a prominent person in the military.

McCubbin moved from Qatar in the Middle East to Virginia, started a company with Hill (McCubbin-Hill LLC), and they (SHE is) are going to write ANOTHER book! Weeeeeee---all the lemmings will buy it, too.

THAT is why Hill has changed his tune on certain matters.

<sup>"Hill, who lives in Virginia, is “happier than I have ever been” with Lisa McCubbin, the journalist he co-wrote the memoir with. “The calendar says I’m 81 and she’s 48, but I feel 52.” In his book he credits McCubbin “...for bringing me out of my dungeon, where I languished for years in my emotional prison ... you helped me find a reason to live, not just exist”. “I was there for her children, but I wasn’t there for the birth of either of my sons [Chris and Corey, now 56 and 51 respectively]. They grew up without a father. My wife Gwen raised them herself.” (They separated, “emotionally”, years ago, but have not divorced.)


http://www.irishexaminer.com/lifestyle/features/why-i-blame-myself-for-jfks-death-248893.html</sup>

David S. Lifton Address at Bismarck State College 11.7.13

permanent video

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3huHUs6yDw&feature=youtu.be

Beyond the issues of this book being a mere cash grab (mission accomplished, as the book is a best-seller), as there is zero new (no mention of the drinking incident and his participation in it), no hyped "clearing up of the conspiracy misconceptions along the way" (nothing is really addressed, one way or the other; must have had a change of heart as to even feel the need to take on the pro-conspiracy people) and the much ballyhooed hype about new photos did not ring true at all (I have seen most of these before), there are two items in the book that do NOT ring true and read as later-day reactions to the "conspiracy crowd" as he would call it. These items, IF they were truly accurate back on 11/22/63, are quite telling, to put it mildly. In other words, IF these two items ARE true, then I am wrong---there ARE two new items of interest in Hill's book after all:

1) Page 124- David Lifton premonition?!?!? And Johnson out front, Johnsen to the rear, huh?

Hill writes: "It strikes me that perhaps we should keep an agent with President Kennedy's body---out of respect for both President and Mrs. Kennedy, and in light of the questions that were raised at Parkland Hospital about taking the body back to Washington for the autopsy. This way, if there is ever any doubt about whether Dr. Burkley stayed with the body until the autopsy, or suspicions about tampering, there will be a Secret Service agent who also remained with the casket and can vouch for the integrity of the body. Agent Dick Johnsen is selected for the post because he is an agent who was with President Kennedy from the beginning and is familiar to Mrs. Kennedy, O'Donnell, and Powers [emphasis added]"

Beyond the absurdity of picking an AGENT as somehow relieving any person's suspicion that something could possibly be amiss ("oh, an agent was there? ok, no suspicion there"), the agent chosen was none other than the official keeper of CE399 aka the magic bullet. What's more, Lifton's best-selling book did not appear until the early 1980's and the issue of body tampering/ alteration was not on anyone's minds until the early-mid 1970's at the earliest...WHY would Hill write these comments? And, from the excerpt above as written, are we to somehow infer that it was HILL (not Kellerman, for example) who made the decision to have an agent stay with the body and decide that the specific person should be the magic bullet holder? Hmmm...

2) Pages 138-139- the autopsy doctors were sure the throat wound was an exit---who needs Doc Perry?-- and Hill is sure the first shot was this shot? Really??

Hill writes: "The doctor points to a wound in the throat and explains that this is where the emergency tracheotomy was done at Parkland Hospital, which covered up the area where a bullet had exited. He rolls the president slightly onto his left side and points to a small wound just below the neckline, slightly to the right of the spinal column in the upper back. This, he says, is where the bullet entered, and then came out the front of the neck. The bullet that caused these wounds hit nothing but soft tissue. Those wounds, I knew without a doubt, came from the first shot. It corroborates what I saw---the president suddenly grabbing his throat immediately after the first explosive noise. The doctor points to a wound on the right rear of the head. This, he says, was the fatal wound. He lifts up a piece of the scalp, with skin and hair still attached, which reveals a hole in the skull, and an area in which a good portion of the brain matter is gone{emphasis added]"

To his "credit", as he also recently demonstrated on television, Hill repeats what he has said since 11/22/63 (and in his other two Lisa McCubbin co-authored books) that the right rear of JFK's head was missing (page 107), but what gives with the above?

Vince

I trust the words of Sam Kinney himself:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LMdELC_UnpQ

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FRl-Un0o4ZU

The ONLY tv interview Sam ever gave (brief):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xCy3yqIOBI4

Already did Keep your fingers crossed

That was an Ed Chiarini DRAWING that appears in Groden's video (maybe his and/ or Livingstone's book, too). Oh, well- warts and all, still a great video

excellent:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iAtx5YT8To0

circa 1983

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vm2oDaQ2-NI

my pleasure, Blair! ) Groden's book DOES have a section re: LBJ ducking

Pat- the photo on page 177 is a black and white full side view of the body from the LEFT (minus the feet and pixilated [for taste reasons] genitals]). The large open trach wound can be seen, as well as a sink and wall dispensers in the background.

The book ALSO contains several photos of Oswald IN SURGERY (from a FILM previously unheard of [doctors are identified!!!]---NOT the autopsy photos; while he is under the knife! Also, new motorcade photos, as well

Yes--some never-before-seen or published (or both) photos; some great ones. The one JFK autopsy photo is amazing, as are the several of Oswald IN SURGERY (!). There are almost 1000 high-quality photos. A lot of good information- the medical evidence section is a real highlight

sounds good- thanks for the tip!

_{This information would be good for Larry Hancock for Nexus II:}

_{From Scott Kaiser:}

<sub>"It is known that Lee Harvey Oswald was in contact with Cuban diplomats in Havana 's embassy in Mexico City a few weeks before the assassination of President John F. Kennedy in Dallas in 1963.

Less well known is the report that Oswald met with Cuban diplomats in Los Angeles four years earlier, in 1959 , the year Fidel Castro came to power in the island.

If these contacts played a role in the murder is not known. But a former senior CIA officer specializing in Cuban affairs , said that the contacts suggest that Oswald may well have been in contact with Cuban intelligence before the events of November 22, 1963 .

The conclusions of Brian Latell , contained in a new paperback edition of his book in 2012, Castro 's Secrets , suggest that if Oswald had contact with Cuban intelligence , raises the possibility that Castro acted first , killing Kennedy before the government States could carry out its own plan to eliminate the Cuban leader.

" The possibility that the Cuban government has the responsibility for the death of Kennedy has never been adequately investigated ," Latell said in an interview with El Nuevo Herald. " Fidel Castro is now known , lied when one day after the assassination , Oswald said that ' we have never heard of him in our lives ' . In fact, Cuban intelligence , by then, had accumulated a detailed dossier on the murderer . "

Half a century after the assassination , multiply theories about who was responsible : Castro , exile, or mob enemies within the U.S. government itself .

Antonio Veciana , an anti-Castro activist who said he saw Oswald with his CIA contact in Dallas weeks before the murder , said in an interview that Kennedy was the victim of a plot by senior military and intelligence officials . Veciana said these officials were angered by the failure of the Bay of Pigs , the negotiations with the Soviet Union ended the missile crisis and the perception that Kennedy sought to improve relations with Cuba .

" The assassination of Kennedy ," Veciana told El Nuevo Herald, "was a coup ."

Two diametrically opposed theories have emerged about who was responsible for the murder : Castro or the Cuban exiles . If Castro was responsible , was to preempt the CIA plans to assassinate him. Exiles If they did, then it was in retaliation for the failure of the Bay of Pigs.

exiles

The new 1998 edition of Not in Your Lifetime, author Anthony Summers claims to have achieved the first " credible " identification of a gunman, previously known , he could have shot Kennedy in Dallas : the anti-Castro militant Herminio Diaz.

Summers noted that Diaz had worked for the mob boss Santo Trafficante , who had pre-Castro Cuba casinos and guarding resentment by the Kennedy administration actions against organized crime.

Diaz died during an attack on Cuba in 1966, but before his death revealed his role in the murder of his activist partner , Tony Cuesta, according Summers.</sub>

<sub>Just a reminder, and please make note of this and where you heard it from....

Richard Poyle who lived directly across the hall from Santo Trafficante, said in his own admission that "I have a lot of information", not much is found on Poyle at the MFF.

Poyle was also a working associate of my father who didn't like my father because my father wanted to do what was right, and Poyle worked for the CIA.

Poyle knew about the photo's my father stole, Poyle along with Frank Sturgis picked my father up for work on the day of my father's death.

Days after Kennedy's assassination. PBRUMEN was the CIA Cryptonym for Cuba. So that document refers to Cuban intel service and Fortson, and here we go Pawley enters the picture.

https://www.maryferrell.org/.../archive/viewer/showDoc.do...

Pawley, Martino and Fortson.

https://www.maryferrell.org/.../archive/viewer/showDoc.do...

Fortson involvement at Mexico Embassy ? Irving Richard Poyle was handled by Oliver E. Fortson, at least some of the time including just after the JFK Assassination. This fits with Fortsons other activities.

I wonder, do you suppose anyone is listening to me now?</sub>

Chris- no problem; understandable; Paul- not sure. He told me to post here (my facebook is open, so you can read what he wrote); Blair- we can only do what we can do. Keep in mind, hypothetically saying, whop is to say that the government wouldn't just whitewash this all away as a "conspiracy theory"?

http://www.opednews.com/articles/A-Death-Bed-Declaration-C-by-Jim-Lesar-Conspiracy_Federal-Agency-CIA_JFK-Assassination-131201-910.html

Here's what we have on our side: the opinion polls, book sales, and the internet. We just need to keep building a strong mosaic of all the important revelations.

It has always been an uphill battle with the government and people's attention spans. Luckily, again, the average person's belief, their pocket money toward a kindle, and their ability to check stuff out for free online is overwhelmingly in our favor...let's use what we got, so to speak.

Scott Kaiser SPOKE TO VECIANA. Scott has an impeccable reputation. He is the author of an upcoming book.

^{http://www.elnuevoherald.com/2013/11/17/1616177/la-conexion-cubana-en-el-asesinato.html}

^TRANSLATION

^{http://www.newcombat.net/news_and_links/JFK-Veciana11-17-13Translation.pdf}

will do!

thanks for the update/ information, Chris!

Frankie Vegas: "So, in case you missed the gossip from last night - and now..
Antonio Veciana - through his wife - confirmed that David Atlee Phillips is Maurice Bishop. Antonio then passed away last night."

On page 177 of Groden's book: from the black and white film reel exposed to the light and THOUGHT destroyed.

Pretty amazing.

Vince

Much better presentations than in 2003- that one was a snoozefest (when they aired that one on PCN and C-SPAN and panned the audience now and again, you saw either sleeping people or yawning people LOL).

PAT--that comment was yours: you made it at the beginning of DVP's long post about new books on the case