Martin Hinrichs

I'am wondering why so many professional reseachers got it wrong. I'am not picking you in particular Josiah but Duncan was for enough time my target and will not blame him again. JFK's head is not a cube. What we see in the unaltered Zapruder film is a human rounded head which is captured slightely from behind at Z372-375. We see the right side and also portions of the backside of Kennedy head in this frames, Robin has posted. Not just the right side. I think it's very clear. No offense but it's very obvious. My very best to you Martin

What is the wheight of a rose petal in comparison to brain tissue /skulp on the fast flight to Parkland Hospital and what does the circulating wind with it? I think that answers many questions. Robin, i agree with you. best Martin

I believe the mindset of a poor LN'er is based upon a kind of "wirrwarr" in their heads. Most not evil intentions cause they are too much. Maybe fooled by too many outlandish theories like the moon landing or Big Foot or Nessie with the will to got back straight without super reflection. Means to be a part of strenght and the strong will to be a part of kind of scientist. Like this french man some months ago. Like fallen into victims trapped among into a great opposition without a chance to get never come back. Defend your team is the parole. Or maybe the sons or daughters whom are the WC apologists? Who knows. Who are they? You need no hyper IQ to come to the conclusion that this was a conspiracy. It's just a matter of time when this illusion collapse that LHO did acted alone. It's so easy. Martin

A pleasure Don. Thank you for posting it on your website. Thank you very much Bernice for your kind words. Much appreciated. Chris was the one who made the first stable GIF's on the forums. I learned from him. best to you Bernice. Martin

John. Do you have better frames with the ghost panels attached: at the moment Johns frames are the only ones i have access too I would appreciate it if anyone could send me a cd or dvd containing the clearest MPI Version. Robin. Hi Thomas. Thanks for the generous comments. Cheers. Robin. Robin, thank you. You did a famous job to desaturate this Costallallalo frames. Martin

Thank you Evan. Is it possible to fix it somehow? I like the style of the new forum engine but that limitation is really odd. The old Forum engine allowed much more then two images, the same for all the other forums i'am aware of. It's not an urgent task. I'am just asking.... Thank you forward. Martin

Dean, no chance whether you try to add more then two images. Whether inside or outsource like Photobucket or any other source like Imageshack. Impossible. Problem. Martin

Is it possible to change to the Forum rules to make more then two images in one posting available? This is not possible til today. I'am just getting an error message like this: I have to inform about something very important and therefore i need the ability to add more then two images. I'll go further, i need mayby 6-10 to make sure my postings won't be ripped out of context. Thank you forward. Martin

Here another frame from "3 Shots That Changed America" which shows possibly the Pilot car on Main Street in dark shadow and pretty fuzzy. best Martin

Hi Robin, it's sometimes not easy to guess distances only looking at the old footages in particular when it goes to unknown areas like Harwood and Main. Thanks to Gary Mack for providing the informations. I went into Google Earth and measured the distance from Main and Harwood corner to the point where Harwood made a west turn facing north. That should roughly capture the distance and what should be in sight. The distance is ~185 Yards! Thats more then i've expected. As you said correctly the Police Officer in front of the camera is hiding important parts but i think at least some motorcycles flanking the Queen Mary should have been in side at that distance. Clearly, this is not the case. I said earlier that Curry's car was further away from the motorcade in DP. I reviewed again the Hughes film on Houston and the distance between the SS-100-X and Lead car was just some 55 yards which makes my early claim pretty obsolete. I went as you too into "3 Shots That Changed America" and made a screenshot from the Pilot car and highlighted this image with Photoshop. Now a person is visible sitting directly behind Lumpkin in the backseat. Well done Robin. I believe now that this is indeed the Pilot Car. Your Discover. best to you Martin

From POTP: The Pilot car and the Lead Car were both white Ford Sedan. The Pilot car was driven by Lumpkin with four others on board. Todd meant propably the Advance Car which was driven Lawrence. Robin, nice catch. It is actually really the Pilot Car (both cars were the same) and Lumpkin behaved in the same fashion leaning his left arm out of the window as Curry did, or Curry drove temporarily faster and more away from the motorcade has he did in DP. best Martin

Will listen Greg. Thank you for the hint.

Forgot to say: I wish you all a happy new Year!

On my website i reach from time to time the Bandwith limit as long as the traffic is too hot. I think this Forum is too important an too frequented to become out of limits at all. Thank you Martin

How can anybody divide beetween my words and your blabber when you ink all in red, you Vollfosten? I found zero of value to respond to.

Craig adores Hany Farids phony work. That tells a lot. The BY photos are sheer phony. You should mention Lammy in one of your next talks on Black Op Radio, Jim. Farid escapes quickly after i've asked a few questions via email....... I'am also not allowed to publish our conversation. Enough? best Martin

You got that backwards...the correct statement is: To deal with CT's totally IGNORANT of the process called photography is like cleaning a toilet! Sometimes you just have to wash the poo stains away... I've ZERO interest in collaboration with CT's. Much better to just expose the poo and wash it away. As it is with Speers, and Hinrichs silly claims. You LOST Hinrichs, it's TIME for you to own up to that fact.... After all you confess you are a Ln'er finally? Yes or no? It's not that hard. C'mon, do it. It's not a problem to be a LN'er. I respect many. It's just a problem when someone as you, states he don't care after years online and just come forward when it goes to debunk CT'er theories.

I don't know him personally. He helped me one time great while measuring data in DP on the acoustic evidence, months later he insulted me out of sudden because i've estimated the height of BDM in Willis and he was plain wrong after reviewing. Strange. When i got critique from him, it's always when it goes against a conspiracy theory, he is not supporting. (This means acoustic evidence and Badgeman is supported by him).

You Lolly, your work is based upon of an uncropped Allen photo. Clear? It does stands and falls with it. Your theory is phony when the Allen photo is a crop. Understand? Have you ever seen a negative contact sheet from the Allen photos, Liarson? Rework your overhead disaster and come back. As i said before, do research before you type.

You are welcome as well John. I dislike it be that harsh. The best sentence i can imagine for my harsh reponse is in german. It can't be very good translated as far as i'am aware. Do you understand German a bit? Wie man in den Wald hineinruft, so schallt es heraus! Usually i'am a very modest person but sometimes you have to fire back. In particular when it goes to handle Craig Lamson. I said it today in a PM to a nice person. To deal with Craig is like to clean the toilet. It's ugly, but sometimes you have to do it. Yes, you say something good. To analyze Still photos accurate is pretty difficult and not that easy. When one do it, he/she should very careful. Dale Myers made a great job in his acoustic evidence work what this regards. Also his job on Badgeman is well although with minor mistakes. His SBT work exposed him as agenda driven biased person. Well, he received an Emmy Award for it. Ben Johnson got a gold medal for his famous 100 Meter run in 9.79 seconds at the Olympic games in 1988 in Seoul. Do i have to say more? best to you Martin

Thanks John. Once Craig started to behave collaborative, i'll do it as well. It would be a good step forward. best Martin

What can be witnessed here is a ludicrous disaster. First, Craig Lamson claimed in the first posting, the Paper bag to be 8.5 inches wide while shooting his images with a full frame 24x36mm camera and a lens parameter of 24mm. The vertical angle of his lense is 53° but is using now for his overhead view a different angle of 51°. He is comparing full frame uncropped (allegedly) 24mm lens photos and uses different angles! Now let's take a closer look at his Overhead view and his "51°" Field of View with his orange lines. In the uncropped Allen Photo just a fraction of the DalTex is in sight on the right. Now look at Lamson's field of view in orange lines: Compare my blue lines from the edge of the TSBD to middle of the two pillars given an angle of 8°. Add another 8° to Lamson's orange right FOV and you'll see how wide the Allen picture had to be! Rediculous. __________________________________________________________________________________________________ In his overhead View Lamson used small dots instead of real size human. Most likely on purpose. I've added human shapes for scale to show the truth. This is Lamson world. Sheer madness. Even here he can't stop to swindle.

I don't need to see anything else relating to the SBT to convince me that it's true. I've known for quite some time that the SBT is quite obviously the correct scenario. And (deep down) I'm pretty sure most conspiracy believers do, too. The CTers can't really believe that TWO (yes, two!) bullets just stopped dead in their tracks after entering JFK's upper back and throat. That type of crazy belief is much, much sillier than anything Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania ever purported. Fellow LNer "Bud" said it very well when he humorously said: "The assassins choose bullets that inflict non-lethal, 1-inch-deep wounds? Instead of feeding JFK to lions, they decided to nibble him to death by [using] ducks?" -- Bud; April 1, 2006 I snipped your images/links just because two images allowed to publish in one posting. David, here an accurate map of Dealey Plaza with a cutted SS-100-x but relevant occupants. The SBT is simply not working and Arlen Specter knows it. Btw, i'am not one of the crowd whom believe that Lee Harvey Oswald was not involved in the plot to kill Kennedy. To be frank, i dislike this fellow after reading tons of books and testimonies. I don't know what his order was, but after all he acted not alone. When i say acting, i don't mean shooting! Martin

Right Lee. He is posting still under a fantasy name and i've reported it already to Evan Burton (moderator). Evan may have missed my PM. For the Forum Rules: I think either the Member posting under his Pseudonym "Mark Henceroth" should reveal his real name or the forum Rules should be changend. Thank you forward. PS. I hope Kathy Beckett will read my words. best Martin

Robert, i confess we (Team Duncan) have frequent meetings in different locations to brainstorm your research to debunk it. Unfortunately we run out of our budget in the end of the year and couldn't have held our meeting in Australia cause Duncan reached his year budget of 15.000. As far as i'am concerned my only leader is my wife. Martin