Jump to content
The Education Forum

Bernice Moore

JFK
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    3,556

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Posts posted by Bernice Moore

    JOHN DOLVA M/C/SCOPE

    in JFK Assassination Debate

    Posted

    That's great, thank you Bernice. You may have noted over time that I like to try reproduction attempts working blind. Personally, at the moment, and these photos and links will prove valuable, I think the three frames of the rifle being carried down the corridor when suddenly one frame is very much overexposed as the camera lines up inside the field of view of the scope so it actually sees at that moment through the scope. Either side of this are two frames kinda stereoscopicthat first shows looking down the right of the rifle, then light projected by the scope overexposes the next frame and then a view down the left of the rifle. I hypothesise that some useful data can be derived from good versions of these frames. Naturally any other good qual pre shimmy photos, and measurements, would help.

    JOHN I RECALL THE FRAMES YOU MENTION, I HAVE BEEN DIGGING BUT OF COURSE NOT SO FAR, BUT I DO NOT RECALL, THE LIGHT BEING VIEWED THROUGH THE SCOPE, BUT MAY NOT HAVE NOTICED...BY ANY CHANCE DO YOU RECALL THE PHOTOGRAPHERS NAME THAT MIGHT HELP IN THE SEARCH...I WILL CONTINUE LOOKING OFF AND ON, IF AND WHEN FOUND I SHALL POST THEM FOR YOU, IN THE MEANTIME HERE ARE A FEW MORE OF THE SCOPE..IF I DOUBLE I WILL DELETE WHICHEVER.....B

    JOHN DOLVA M/C/SCOPE

    in JFK Assassination Debate

    Posted · Edited by Bernice Moore

    JOHN YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN THIS SITE, LONG CONVERSATION ON SCOPES ETC RE RIFLE ALSO SOME PHOTOS, OF DUPLICATES OF THE RIFLE FROM COLLECTORS AS WELL AS A BRAND NEW SAME SCOPE BOUGHT IN 2009...AND THE RIFLE THAT WAS USED IN THE MAKING OF J.F.K THAT ONE OF THEM NOW OWNS....BELOW IS THE SAME SCOPE A PHOTO BOUGHT IN 2009 I BELIEVE...FWIW...B

    Questions About Oswald Reproduction Build - Rifle / Mount / Scope / Sling

    http://forums.gunboards.com/showthread.php...unt-Scope-Sling

    JOHN DOLVA M/C/SCOPE

    in JFK Assassination Debate

    Posted · Edited by Bernice Moore

    ''Mike, I'm not disputing that you are right. However. since hearing of the scope misalignment I've sought any data regarding this, and this strikes me as getting something. Having had this thought for some years but not the mterial to work with, I cannot say how accurate such a study in fact would be. I'd like to see it attempted though.''

    JOHN THESE ARE THE PHOTOS THAT I POSTED AND DELETED IN THE OTHER THREAD RE THE SCOPE YOU HAVE MENTIONED...B FWTAW

    B,

    You never cease to amaze me. You know me and my obsession with the rifle and shooting event, and yet you procure photos I have never seen!

    You are an asset to the community for sure, and I for one appreciate your abilities!

    Mike

    no i did not know you were obsessed :blink: but then i have noticed you do go on about it, we all have our favourite areas i imagine...pleased i had some you had not seen, these are not mine nor my work, they are the results of many in previous years who have posted and done their research within, i snaggle read borrow :tomatoes them and pack rat them away...for another day, I have always enjoyed the photos. and the research done within them...thanks b..

    JOHN DOLVA M/C/SCOPE

    in JFK Assassination Debate

    Posted · Edited by Bernice Moore

    THESE ARE THE TWO PREVIOUS PHOTO POSTS...SHOWING THE SUPPOSED RE-ENACTMENT....

    QUOTE (Jack White @ May 19 2010, 08:25 PM)

    QUOTE (Bernice Moore @ May 19 2010, 08:05 PM)

    QUOTE (Greg Burnham @ May 18 2010, 11:47 PM)

    QUOTE (John Dolva @ May 18 2010, 08:39 PM)

    Yes, thank you very much, Bernice. Note his left arm elbow to right of left knee, the leg of which appears twisted towards us, his shoulder behind the pipes, the rifle way in front. Basically he's contorting to avoid the pipes. Add the boxes, the box rest, lower the window to where it should be. Pretty snug. Is that the proper set up for a sniper to take that particular shot? (and for 8+ seconds not be on any photo, film)

    Great observations, John! And, as to your question, IMO, the answer is unequivocally: NO!!!

    YOUR WELCOME JOHN..THANKS FOR THE OBSERVATIONS, ESPECIALLY IN THE AREA OF THAT PIPE...I DELETED THE OTHER PHOTO, SO AS TO POST IT HERE UNDER YOUR COMMENTS SO OTHERS CAN RELATE...B PLEASE EXCUSE CAPS THXS

    This photo was purposely printed in such a way to make it look like the gunman HAD PLENTY OF ROOM

    in the corner. Attached is how it should really look, and where the corner is in the photo. I have simply

    darkened the east wall. A person could not do this behind the shield of cartons.

    Jack

    JOHN DOLVA M/C/SCOPE

    in JFK Assassination Debate

    Posted · Edited by Bernice Moore

    ''Mike, I'm not disputing that you are right. However. since hearing of the scope misalignment I've sought any data regarding this, and this strikes me as getting something. Having had this thought for some years but not the mterial to work with, I cannot say how accurate such a study in fact would be. I'd like to see it attempted though.''

    JOHN THESE ARE THE PHOTOS THAT I POSTED AND DELETED IN THE OTHER THREAD RE THE SCOPE YOU HAVE MENTIONED...B FWTAW

    Fetzer takes ballistics 101!

    in JFK Assassination Debate

    Posted · Edited by Bernice Moore

    Been there, done that.

    Jack

    Yes, thank you very much, Bernice. Note his left arm elbow to right of left knee, the leg of which appears twisted towards us, his shoulder behind the pipes, the rifle way in front. Basically he's contorting to avoid the pipes. Add the boxes, the box rest, lower the window to where it should be. Pretty snug. Is that the proper set up for a sniper to take that particular shot? (and for 8+ seconds not be on any photo, film)

    Great observations, John! And, as to your question, IMO, the answer is unequivocally: NO!!!

    YOUR WELCOME JOHN..THANKS FOR THE OBSERVATIONS, ESPECIALLY IN THE AREA OF THAT PIPE...I DELETED THE OTHER PHOTO, SO AS TO POST IT HERE UNDER YOUR COMMENTS SO OTHERS CAN RELATE...B PLEASE EXCUSE CAPS THXS

    This photo was purposely printed in such a way to make it look like the gunman HAD PLENTY OF ROOM

    in the corner. Attached is how it should really look, and where the corner is in the photo. I have simply

    darkened the east wall. A person could not do this behind the shield of cartons.

    Jack

    Jack in comparing......... the box that supposedly had LHO’s handprint on it is not there. and it appears this fellow’s right shin and foot are in that location.b

    Jack i believe this photo shows what i speak of, if not please let me know..and I will look further..best b...

    dorothy hunt

    in JFK Assassination Debate

    Posted

    There can't be anything suspicious about Dorothy Hunt's death. After all, there were scores of FBI agents allegedly on the scene as soon as the plane went down. If they found anything suspicious (besides their own presence), surely they would have told us. :D

    HI RON; YES THEY DO HAVE A HABIT OF TELLING AND BRAGGING UP ALL DON'T THEY.. :blink: .THIS SITE HAS A FIXED THREAD ON DOROTHY'S DEATH AND ALL, SO I FIGURE WHOMEVER IS BEST LEFT TO THAT RESEARCHED INFORMATION...I SUPPOSE ANYONE CAN JUST WRITE ANYTHING AND PUT IT ON THE WEB, AS BEING HOW IT WAS, AND HOPEFULLY IT BEING ACCEPTED, HE MAY BE A RETIRED HISTORY TEACHER BUT CERTAINLY IS NO RESEARCHER,THERE'S A BIG DIFFERENCE, THANKS FOR THE GRIN, MORE OF THAT RONNIE'S COMMON SENSE... :lol: BEST B TAKE CARE...

    Fetzer takes ballistics 101!

    in JFK Assassination Debate

    Posted · Edited by Bernice Moore

    Yes, thank you very much, Bernice. Note his left arm elbow to right of left knee, the leg of which appears twisted towards us, his shoulder behind the pipes, the rifle way in front. Basically he's contorting to avoid the pipes. Add the boxes, the box rest, lower the window to where it should be. Pretty snug. Is that the proper set up for a sniper to take that particular shot? (and for 8+ seconds not be on any photo, film)

    Great observations, John! And, as to your question, IMO, the answer is unequivocally: NO!!!

    YOUR WELCOME JOHN..THANKS FOR THE OBSERVATIONS, ESPECIALLY IN THE AREA OF THAT PIPE...I DELETED THE OTHER PHOTO, SO AS TO POST IT HERE UNDER YOUR COMMENTS SO OTHERS CAN RELATE...B PLEASE EXCUSE CAPS THXS

    dorothy hunt

    in JFK Assassination Debate

    Posted · Edited by Bernice Moore

    deleted i have deleted this link as i found several mistakes within the research even though the set of articles are said to be written by a retired HISTORY TEACHER,,,, which i am not..i didn't want to lead anyone astray, such AS THAT STURGIS WAS MURDERED...FAR AS I KNOW AND REPORTS OBIT HE DIED OF CANCER...ALSO IT SAYS THAT HE WAS A TRAMP, SO THAT IS THE WHY IT IS GONE...OK... :D

    Fetzer takes ballistics 101!

    in JFK Assassination Debate

    Posted · Edited by Bernice Moore

    Pat,

    Let me say that I appreciate your contributions to this thread far more than those coming from other sources. Suppose we thought that your \"medical manual\" were good as gold. It omits any category for \"medium velocity\"! How dumb is that? Moreover, given what it does say about the dividing line, it is consistent with its definitions to take \"medium velocity\" as from 2,000 to 2,500 fps. By that standard, which is more reasonable that the high/low categorical distinction, the Mannlicher-Carcano is still not \"high velocity\". I don\'t understand your defense of Humes, by the way. Doug Horne, INSIDE THE ARRB, has proven that Humes was involved in body alteration (by performing a craniotomy, for example, which was observed by two witnesses) and was otherwise complicity in faking the autopsy report, including later shifting the location of the wound to the back of the head from the EOP to the cowlick. He had to be aware of the massive defect to the back of the head, which Tink\'s buddy, Gary Aguilar, documented in his contribution to MURDER IN DEAELY PLAZA, and which David W. Mantik exposed in his studies of the X-rays in ASSASSINATION SCIENCE. This defect, as Horne explains, was crudely obfuscated by painting it over in black, which he discusses in Volume IV, where, as I have observe in HOAX, you can view the defect for yourself in frames 374 of the Zapruder film. So I like your posts, but you are wrong. And of course the reason it is an inappropriate source is that it is not a study of rifles and ammo. If you read it as I suggest in relation to \"medium velocity\", however, it would be roughly right.

    Jim

    Jim, in the matter of the high-velocity vs. medium velocity argument, I have yet to come across anything in the literature prior to the assassination that would suggest Humes believed the M/C to be a medium-velocity weapon.

    While I defend Humes on a number of matters, including, in your opinion, this one, I can\'t rightly be considered a Humes defender. In part 2 of my video series I argue that he deliberately lied to the Warren Commission about the back wound. In part 3 I argue that he also lied to Dan Rather in a 1967 televised interview, albeit on behalf of the Justice Dept. These ARE smoking guns, IMO. You may want to check \'em out

    As far as the medical evidence for a wound on the far back of the head...it's just not as convincing when you take a good look at it. On the slide below, I show where Dr. Mantik presumes the Harper fragment exploded from Kennedy\'s head. I also show where Dr. Mantik believes a white patch was added to the X-rays. Look at them closely. THEY ARE NOT THE SAME SPOT.

    Drmantikandmrharper2.jpg

    On the following slide, furthermore, I show where two of the supposedly credible witnesses propped up by Horne and Aguilar, Crenshaw and Bell, just aren't reliable. They were asked to mark the wound location on rear view and lateral view drawings. When they did so, however, they marked them in different locations, not just from each other, but from themselves!

    credibilitygap.jpg

    Apologies to those hoping to find more on Judyth...

    but Pat, i know we agreed to disagree some long time ago, it seems each and every, but just wanted to post these comments for you, couldn't not as usual... :rolleyes: Of course, they marked the skull wound in different places! If they all put it in the same place with the passage of these years, all it would prove would be that perhaps they had recently consulted with each other and decided where to place the mark. The point is they put it at the right rear of the head, not on the top as shown in the photographs.

×
×
  • Create New...