Martin Blank

couldn't morales have been secretly working for the cia when he was involved with walker and got him to do his bidding though the master manipulation and hypnosis tricks he learned from angleton and phillips. in other words walker was a dupe who was used by the cia. outsmarted by his betters. so no matter how you slice it the cia was in charge. walker was a patsy of the cia! yeah that's it the cia did it no matter what. they are not going to work for some pissant little general. the man's logic is like having a variable constant in math -- what ever works whether it' s true or not.

Um, Jon, do you actually KNOW the military history of Major General Edwin Walker -- a man who went to military school as a boy, and graduated from West Point in 1931 before entering what would now be called "Special Forces" as a youth? During WW2 Edwin Walker was in command of a sub-unit of the Canadian-American "First Special Reserve Force" -- the third regiment while in Italy. They started combat in December 1943 and were redeployed to the Anzio beachhead 1944 and joined the fight for Rome in June 1944. Walker's regiment landed on the French Riveria in October 1944 and took out one hell of a German garrison. Walker ended in command of all regiments of the "First Special Reserve Force" up through 1945. Sorry -- nobody can call this sort of a fighter an amateur in military action or planning. If anything, Edwin Walker was an expert in military-style ambush. Finally -- although the POLITICS of the JFK assassination were flawed, nobody can say that the Technical Planning and Execution of the ambush were flawed. On the contrary -- they were perfect. Regards, --Paul Trejo Do you have any proof that he did planning and logistics who in the army? do you have any proof that he planned ambushes in the military? you mean these german troops: Opposing the Allies was the German Army Group G (Heeresgruppe G). Although nominally an army group, Army Group G had at the time of the invasion only one army under its command: the 19th Army, led by Friedrich Wiese. As southern France had never been important to German planning, their forces there had been stripped of nearly all their valuable units and equipment over the course of the war. The remaining 11 divisions were understrength and only one intact panzer division was left, the 11th Panzer Division, which also had lost two of its tank battalions. The troops were positioned thinly along the French coast, with an average of 90 km (56 mi) per division.[14]:60 Generally the troops of the German divisions were only second and third grade. This meant that over the course of the years, Germans in those divisions were sent away and replaced with wounded old veterans as well as Volksdeutsche from Poland and Czechoslovakia. There were numerous Ostlegionen inserted, as well as several units made up from volunteered Soviet prisoners of war (Ostbataillone). The equipment of those troops was in poor shape, consisting of old weapons from various nations, with French, Polish, Soviet, Italian and Czech guns, artillery and mortars. Four of the German divisions were designated as "static", which meant that they were stripped of all of their mobile capabilities and unable to move from their position. The only potent unit inside Army Group G was the 11th Panzer Division, which was commanded by Wend von Wietersheim.

and as usual he vomits it up without any documentation, sources, or citations that would show it to be true facts (that he claims are so important.) I have to give this fairy tale an F

LNer: well if it was a conspiracy why was no one ever caught and tried Intelligent Person: maybe it was a very good conspiracy

oh it goes well beyond preserving state secrets

why didn't they just kill him then? why a patsy and all the shenanigans by those cia guys who supposedly had nothing to do with anything

i wonder why the national media swallowed the story lone nut fantasy

Roscoe White; you're still buying that?

sorry but i work alone except for those whom i respect and anyone who believes the confessions are noise should give substantiated reasons why. it sure seems strange to put out all that effort for someone else don't it

Bruce, since you're reflecting on US History, please also consider that JFK was murdered in the South, in the face of the New Reformation that was struggling in the movement of MLK Jr., and the Civil Rights Movement in general. According to Dr. Jeff Caufield in his new book, General Walker and the Murder of President Kennedy; The Extensive New Evidence of a Radical Right Conspiracy (2015), the murder of JFK was first and foremost due to the pushback of the Radical Right in the South against JFK's domestic politics as he voiced in his June 11, 1963 speech in favor of MLK. Only hours after that speech, after midnight (the earliest hours of 6/12/1963) Medgar Evers was shot dead in his driveway in Mississippi. Medgar Evers was the NAACP fighter who supervised James Meredith in his bid to be the first Black American to attend Ole Miss University in 1962, when General Walker started a massive race riot at that college, where hundreds were wounded and two were killed. Down to this day NARA will not release photo footage of that riot. The Civil War remains the Great National Trauma. The Reformation was painful as well. The Second Reformation, led by JFK, made JFK the latest casualty of the Civil War, IMHO. I think we can justify this view on the basis of Caufield's work. As for Vietnam, it is a coin-toss whether JFK would have entered Vietnam -- because his speeches spoke out on both sides of the issue. However, if JFK had entered that war, IMHO he would have ended it very quickly, since, being a Catholic, he would have recognized that the Catholic Church was the real problem in South Vietnam, i.e. when the government there banned Buddhism. That was the ship-wreck of the South right there. I think that JFK would have fixed Vietnam very quickly, healed the Catholic-Buddhist rift, and inspired the South Vietnamese to win their own Civil War, with minimal US losses. Regards, --Paul Trejo that would be Reconstruction or did martin luther and john wesley have a hand in it? also please cite source that buddhism was banned

and god knows there was none of that involved in the jfk killing and none of it from phillips sources and assets in the media. nope not a bit

Here is something of interest: “There is an intriguing but unexplained reference to "Harvey" in Oswald’s CIA file. In 1978, former CIA Director Richard Helms was testifying before the House Assassinations Committee when he was asked about a CIA memo dated November 25, 1963. The document mentioned “the laying on of interviews with Lee Harvey Oswald” in 1960, which caused Committee Counsel [Michael] Goldsmith to ask If the CIA had every contacted Oswald Helms responded negatively (this testimony is excerpted from Committee hearings and appears in Appendix B of Spy Saga by Philip Melanson.) Goldsmith also asked about the “Harvey” reference. MG: I would like to draw your attention to the last line on this memorandum. It makes reference to the Harvey story. RH: Yes MG: Do you know what Harvey story that is referring to? RH: No, I do not.” So was it Harvey Lee and Lee Harvey Oswald or William Harvey. An invisible rabbit and Jimmy Stewart. Some other Harvey. We will never know most likely. Page 125

Well, Martin, I know that James DiEugenio and others would like to jump to conclusions to blame the CIA -- but in this case it is quite a LEAP. The only thing we have here is that David Atlee Phillips admitted to his brother to being in Dallas that day. Sorry, that's not good enough. For example, in a discussion with Larry Hancock last year, I argued that nobody less than Colonel Fletcher Prouty positively identified Major General Edward Lansdale in Dealey Plaza, Dallas, on 11/22/1963, seen with his back to the camera with the "Three Tramps", and in other photos. I told Larry that Prouty is a solid source, and so I was convinced that General Lansdale was a part of the plot to kill JFK. Larry Hancock then convinced me I was jumping to a conclusion. Yes -- there is evidence that Lansdale was there -- but there is just as much a chance that Lansdale was there to INVESTIGATE a rumor of a JFK murder, as that Lansdale was PARTICIPATING in the JFK murder. Larry Hancock himself doubts that General Lansdale was part of the JFK Kill Team. That carries a lot of weight with me. The same, then, must apply to David Atlee Phillips. See, with David Morales, he told his friend Ruben Carbajal, "We got that son of a bitch," when speaking of the JFK assassination." That's a direct confession (and no, there is no proof that "We" meant the CIA high-command. It could be ANYBODY). Also, with Howard Hunt, he just openly confessed to his son on his deathbed, in a tape recording, and that's convincing to me. But with David Atlee Phillips, we don't have a CONFESSION, we only have an Admission that Phillips was INSIDE DALLAS. Well, so was General Lansdale -- but that doesn't make him a JFK Killer. I give people the benefit of the doubt -- I have at least that much faith left in the US Government. Lansdale and Phillips could BOTH have been in Dallas to INVESTIGATE a rumor of a JFK murder plot. If so, then they got there too late. Besides -- the CIA is responsible for FOREIGN operations, while the FBI is responsible for DOMESTIC operations. It was mainly the FBI's fault (and the Secret Service) that the JFK Killers got past everybody. So, there was probably a MOLE inside the FBI (e.g. Hosty) and a MOLE inside the Secret Service (e.g. Forrest Sorrels) in their Dallas operations who worked with the JFK Kill Team. All I'm saying is this -- let's not jump to conclusions. Let's make a stronger case against the actual JFK Kill Team than the Warren Commission made against LHO. Regards, --Paul Trejo please put me on ignore as i requested months ago; I find your condescending attitude to be both unctuous and smarmy. thanks you mean a stronger case like this: Besides -- the CIA is responsible for FOREIGN operations, while the FBI is responsible for DOMESTIC operations. It was mainly the FBI's fault (and the Secret Service) that the JFK Killers got past everybody. So, there was probably a MOLE inside the FBI (e.g. Hosty) and a MOLE inside the Secret Service (e.g. Forrest Sorrels) in their Dallas operations who worked with the JFK Kill Team. the FBI operates in mexico as well. and the cia has operated in america

i gave you the citation that you asked for, i'm done

here Do you have this testimony? Is it made public? Surely, it would have to be if you're telling me they testified. Would you be so kind as to post it so that I may see it please? Thank you sir. herre's helms': Oct 29, 63 - Desmond FitzGerald, a senior CIA official, meets AM/LASH. Fitzgerald tells him that a coup against Castro would receive U.S. support. Fitzgerald is introduced to AM/LASH as a "personal representative of Attorney General Kennedy." The Church committee found no evidence that the AG RFK authorized, or was aware of this representation. Helms testified he did not seek the AG 's approval because he thought it was "unnecessary." (Book V Final Report of the [senate] Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with respect to Intelligence Activities, 4/23/76;Helms, 6/13/75, pp 117-118) give me a few on dizzy fitz

Do you have this citation? I missed the meeting. mary ferrell's site has this to say in an article about the via and the kennedy assassination: "On the same day, November 22 1963, a CIA officer was handing an assassination instrument to Rolando Cubela, code-named AMLASH, in the latest of CIA attempts to murder Fidel Castro. The case officer's superior, Special Affairs Staff Desmond Fitzgerald, had personally met with Cubela earlier, and presented himself as a personal representative of Robert Kennedy. Both Fitzgerald and his boss Richard Helms later testified that RFK had not been informed." ​will the defendants please rise; we the jury find Harvey Lee Oswald innocent; we find allen dulles, james angleton, lbj, j. edgar hoover, william harvey, e howard hunt, david morales, david phillips and other co-conspirators who are still at large guilty! finally a place where justice can still be found in america today.

david phillips all but confessed to his brother from jim dieugenio It was also an issue within the family of David Atlee Phillips as to whether he (D.A.P.) was involved in the JFK assassination. David and his brother Jim had a huge fight over this possibility. Shawn Phillips is the nephew of David Atlee Phillips and the son of James Atlee Phillips (deceaseed brother of D.A.P.). Email from Shawn Phillips: “The “Confession”, you refer to was not in so many words as such. I cannot remember the time frames involved, but this was what was told to me by my father, James Atlee Phillips, who is deceased. He said that David had called him with reference to his (Davids), invitation to a dinner, by a man who was purportedly writing a book on the CIA. At this dinner, was also present a man who was identified only as the “Driver”. David told Jim that he knew the man was there to identify him as Raul Salcedo, whose name you should be familiar with, if your research is accurate in this matter. David then told Jim that he had written a letter to the various media, as a “Preemptive Strike” , against any and all allegations about his involvement in the JFK assassination. Jim knew that David was the head of the “Retired Intelligence Officers of the CIA”, or some such organization, and that he was extremely critical of JFK, and his policies. Jim knew at that point, that David was in some way, seriously involved in this matter and he and David argued rather vehemently, resulting in a silent hiatus between them that lasted almost six years according to Jim. Finally, as David was dying of irreversible lung cancer, he called Jim and there was apparently no reconciliation between them, as Jim asked David pointedly, “Were you in Dallas on that day”? David said, “Yes”, and Jim hung the phone up.” .

What I'm saying is, had this assassins pride not gotten in the way, and would've killed Castro, Kennedy would've lived a long life. objection. calls for speculation. sustained

what do you mean by "matter?"

all you have to do is look around; it should make you sick and folks it ain't coming back anytime soon. the best you can do is to be citizens of the government in exile and be like the mole in the song made famous by bas com lunsford: "I wish I was a mole in the ground /If I’s a mole in the ground I’d root that mountain down /And I wish I was a mole in the ground. good luck

Well, Bill, I'm no True Believer -- I know my theory can be wrong. That's why I believe debate and dialogue is so important. As for the Modus Operandi, I agree with you that the JFK murder was a "military-style motorcade ambush." Yet why would anybody doubt that a US Major General from World War II and the Korean War would lack the skills to plan that -- especially if he had help with a top assassin like David Morales? Sounds plausible to me. Regards, --Paul Trejo why? because they have common sense and intelligence and know how to use them. that's why. Edwin Anderson Walker began his Army career as a lieutenant of artillery after graduating from the United States Military Academy in 1931. In World War II, he led a special force of Americans and Canadians in the Aleutians, Italy and France. The unit, the Special Service Force, was trained for airborne, amphibious, mountain and ski operations; it fought at the Anzio beachhead in Italy and in the invasion of southern France. He later commanded the 417th Infantry Regiment, attached to the Third Army, and at V-E Day he was commanding a special task unit in Oslo. In the Korean War, he commanded the Third Infantry Division's Seventh Regiment and was senior adviser to the First Korean Corps. He later served as military adviser to Chiang Kai-shek of Nationalist China. (How'd that work out, General?) ​Anyway this shows without a shadow of a doubt that he was one of Willoughby's boys boys and that Richard Nagell of FOI took the shot at Walker at the behest of Gen. Macarthur who had told JFK not to get involved in a land war in Asia. So someone had to pay and that was Larry Schmidt, Otto Skorzeny and Gerd von Runstedt's butler. And that's no theory; you can look it up

maybe general walker was an intelligence agent only posing as general walker

roosevelt "rosey" grier defensive lineman for giants and rams where he was a member of the fearsome foursome. also a needlepoint enthusiast. go figure. rafer johnson olympic decathlete

c'mon seriously everyone knows it was the cia running heroin. wink wink

this is the year! merry christmas