Ray Mitcham

Looks to me as though two vertical notches, one box and one below,  of material have been cut into the original horizontal hole in the left photo. Probably for samples. The left photo looks as though it is the outside of the shirt, the centre one the inside.

4 hours ago, Pat Speer said:

 What's particularly striking is how the presumed entrance on the back of the shirt seems to line up at the same level as the slit by the collar.

The entrance on the back of the shirt only seems to line up at the same level as the slits by the collar because the top button is unfastened. If  it is fastened, and the button meets the button hole, the collar rises, and they don't line up, Pat.

Ron , this is a link in Mary Ferrell's site.

https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=4885#relPageId=33&tab=page

10 hours ago, François Carlier said:

His name was Oswald. I thought you knew.

Oswald, it is alleged, Francois. He was never found guilty. 

If you imagine  the button and the hole, lined up, as though they were buttoned, the shirt collar would be lifted between one and two inches (guesstimate). Thus the slits in the front of the shirt, would not line up with the hole shown in the back of the shirt. In the photo above, they only appear to line up as the button and hole are not fastened.

I wonder if in the first photo (the color one) the front of the shirt was pulled towards  the center to hide the hole in the back of the shirt. 

3 hours ago, Lance Payette said:

DVP has additional photos on his site.  No one would be paying $35,750 for a taxi that didn't have a pretty solid provenance and wasn't identical to the one in which Oswald rode.  A Dallas newspaper article stated that it had been sitting for more than 30 years and was in deplorable condition before being restored.  The salient point is that, contra Roy, sleazy Lone Nutter Lance is not attempting to slip an "airport limo Cadillac" into the discussion.

Just because somebody paid $35,750 for  taxi, doesn't mean it was kosha.

The (fake)Hitler Diaries were bought for $3.7m.  

This is the photo with the "heart"  shape filled with yellow. Makes it easier to se that it is a fraud.

Lance you seem to have missed an important word on the site you quote.

"The Checker is believed to be the car in which Mr. Oswald briefly rode while making his getaway following the shooting of President Kennedy in Dallas on Nov. 22, 1963."

On 12/9/2018 at 5:32 PM, Martin Blank said:

Freud said: "Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar."

Didn't Monica Lewinski say something similar?.

Don't think it was me, James. However makes sense for them to permanently close the camera, who can check the details?

Joe, It's the first photo I've seen, which shows the two men in tandem. I just drew the line from the alleged back wound, as the W.C. said in the neck,  through the tie knot. I haven't tried to show the angle from the TSBD. It doesn't look like the angle matches. Maybe some whiz kid can print  out the angle,  and show the line through the two men.

Frame from the video shows the absurdity of getting the magic bullet, which allegedly hit JFK in the neck and exited through his tie knot, to hit Connally in the shoulder.

Agree second name down appears to be Frazier.

Bottom name looks more like Elmer Todd.

23 hours ago, Micah Mileto said:

Any cursive readers? What are the named on the slip?

Fourth from bottom looks like "Jepson", and bottom name looks like "Elmer Todd'

That doesn't look like Danny Arce to me. His hair line is all wrong. Arce has a high forehead.

On 11/24/2018 at 5:36 AM, James DiEugenio said:

May I suggest we unite this with the Rodney Rivers thread?  I do not know why there are two of these.  Its the same topic.

Good idea, James. Perhaps the moderators will consider it.

Seems DVP and/or Francois have no comments to make about the interview.

Wow. Seems to confirm a lot of what David Lifton says happened. Especially the throat wound which he says was very unusual, and much bigger than would have normally been done. I wonder, what people like DVP and Francois will think.

12 hours ago, Tom Neal said:

Hello Again Ray,

A member PM'd me that he remembers the exchange and your comments. He sent me a link to two posts, but the link didn't work. I tried to make one also, but my link didn't work either.

The first post was in the "throat shot" thread and the second was in Prudhomme's "Back Wound Revisited (Again)" thread. The first thread comments are as I stated, and in the 2nd thread you state 'I still don't see how a bone fragment can make a round hole in the throat and a slit in the shirt.' James Gordon then posts several times in agreement with you... IIRC Gordon believes the throat wound is an entry wound, and I don't recall if you've taken a position as to exit/entry wound.

Tom

You are quite right. As I remember,  I was arguing against it being a bone fragment.I still fail to see how a bone fragment could form a round hole in the President's throat and slits in his shirt. I assume you want my opinion. I don't believe it was a bone fragment. Never have. I do indeed think as Dr Perry, and others originally thought, it was an entrance wound

On 11/17/2018 at 3:44 PM, Tom Neal said:

Possibly Ray Meachum will comment on this bone fragment as he did when this theory was originally posted.

 

Tom, if you mean me, I think you have  the wrong poster. I don't ever remember mentioning a bone fragment.

p.s. It's Ray Mitcham.

Interesting comment. Mathias The signal was used originally by the BBC in its war time broadcasts to German occupied Europe.

As here 

4 minutes ago, François Carlier said:

Hey, I think that's your most reasonable post so far !
(OK, just joking, no hard feelings)

None taken, Francois. I might even agree with you.

33 minutes ago, Lance Payette said:

 

Yes, we know - he was coached, he was lying, he'd been threatened, he'd been drugged, that wasn't really Dr. Perry, yada yada yada.  I don't know why people just keep saying the same things over and over, on thread after thread, for year after year, ad infinitum.  What a tedious and silly game.

removed.

I don't believe it was Ebersole who I am seeking, David.  I'm sure that there was another doctor who said it. Ebersole said it was a sutured wound, which it obviously wasn't.

For those who quote the photos, remember that Floyd Riebe, Autopsy photographer,  said he took photos of the hole in the occiput, photos  which have never been seen since.

19 minutes ago, François Carlier said:

Oh, I see, then please tell us why you think that Robert McClelland said that the wound was the same in Bethesda as it was in Parkland ?

I will if you can show me the photo he was shown when he said it.