Scott Kaiser

Good night I've said enough...

I also noticed you have Truman, president Truman's Secretary of Defense was Louis Johnson, Johnson's close friend and general was General Paul Griffith, Griffith owned a ranch in South Florida where my father would train these anti-Castro's. Griffith also advised President Eisenhower during the cold war and got involved in Cuban matters. Many of the Cubans trained under my father witnessed my father carrying a military type phone card and made calls to the pentagon. Griffith briefly worked out of the pentagon, his son I believed died in 2008 in Acres Florida, Lee County Florida.

Kinda ironic eh?

As for Hunt, that has already been established, there's no doubt about that, even Nino Diaz calls Hunt a pendajo for my father having his photo, Hunt was in Dallas, Phillips was talking to Oswald, so, he couldn't be in Mexico, established by Veciana. I have him on tape telling me this, and is the reason he believes he was shot when he first came out with this information.

I am kind of surprised that no one has mentioned what I consider to be really important information, some of it original, in the book that I specifically detailed in the review.

Let me name just a few:

1. The bombshell interview of DeGaulle after he returned form JFK's funeral and said that Kennedy's death was clearly a conspiracy between his security forces and the military; that Oswald was simply a cover story and was supposed to be disposed of, but Jack Ruby became the clean up guy. This is within days of the murder.

2. Kennedy telling the French ambassador that he does not have control over the CIA, but he will do what he can to back DeGaulle during the OAS revolt. He later revealed he did not believe Dulles' denials of non involvement, This was clearly one of the reasons JFK fired him.

3. Dulles actually lobbied his way onto the Warren Commission. This is striking, since as far as I can tell, no one else did that. Some of these guys had to have their faces slapped to agree to serve on this thing: like Russell and Warren. Why would Dulles do such a thing?

4. Well, maybe because his agenda from the beginning was to cover up absolutely everything about the case and turn it into (lying) biographies of Oswald and Ruby? Which he did, more than any other Commissioner.

5. That Bill Harvey was on a plane to Dallas in November from Italy. Which means that the following people were in Dallas either on the day of the assassination or in the weeks leading up to it: Allen Dulles

Allen Dulles

David Phillips

Howard Hunt

Bill Harvey.

Hmm. Maybe they were all Cowboys fans? I doubt it.

6. But this attraction might explain why Dulles was at the Farm from Friday to Sunday night though, eh? Perhaps coordinating the "plumbing" put in by his former subordinates who admired him like an idol. Some retirement eh? Should not Clover and he have been at their home in Georgetown, watching the TV spectacle. After all he was retired.

7. What other Warren Commissioner had an agent inside the Garrison camp?

8. What other Warren Commissioner flew to Missouri to get Truman to retract his editorial about the CIA being out of control and doing things he never dreamed they should do. An article Harry Truman started about 9-10 days after Kennedy's murder. (And by the way, Talbot did not include the best part of this exchange between Harry and Dulles--the part that was the most incriminating of his own guilt in my view.)

Anyway, it is a really good book. Everyone should read it.

I've not read the interview, it must be quite fascinating. I plan on it as my father was trained under DeGaulle, well, his Legion, it was DeGaulle who was in-charge during Algerian war 1957-58 in Africa. My father is seen receiving metals from DeGaulle. My father had something like 37 or 38 confirmed kills, he was a sniper for the Legion. I do have a photo of my father with the general, and because we sold our house in San Antonio, and I helped my mother move back to Florida she has all these photos packed away, I sure wished I had made a copy of that photo before giving it back to her when I first saw it sometime ago. Trying to get my mother to look for something again for me, is like pulling teeth.

What do you call reliable?

A source who has furnished verifiable info in the past. A source who has never furnished clap-trap. I ask because there's some wrong Banister info circulating out there.

I would say he's reliable, how he got it, I don't know, we were going over lots of documents. I was listening to his stories. Most folks wouldn't believe me if I told them who I've sat down with, broke bread, and talked too for hours. He personally knew McCcord, worked with him in Watergate. I never seen any document that I can remember on Banister, this is a first for me.

Scott - in your view is the source reliable?

I would say he is, he's ex-CIA, and I don't think he knows his document is missing, and if he does, I'm quite certain that he knows who took it. I've already said it a million times, perhaps, I need to say it a million more, there isn't a single person that sat on that WC panel that was behind the plot to assassinate the president. I strongly believe, that LBJ assembled this panel DCI of the CIA to manipulate the agency into the cover-up, Hoover was close to LBJ, and a Chief Justice Earl Warren may not have been presented with all the facts, Ford committed a Federal crime by tampering with evidence. Ford was LBJ's biggest brown nose.

It was a carefully planned, well executed panel that did not receive all the pertinent facts, yet, they all signed their names on the report in order to prevent WWIII.

Scott

What do you call reliable?

Hi Thomas, yes, let me dig it up, and I'll shoot it over to you, no pun intended, and thank you for keeping it to yourself, I wholeheartedly believe if you start to share everything you have, it no longer is exclusive information. Sandra London told me that. I also have a lot of names kept in my contact list, can you please shoot me over an email so I can reply with the document, thanks.

Scott

That's a lot of homework done there Jim. I quickly spotted where you quote Talbot saying "James McCord, [part] of the CIA’s Office of Security, called the case a suicide. (p. 296)". I may be mistaken, but my understanding is McCord wasn't just [part] of Office of Security, but he was Director of Security. McCord was in charge of Security operations at Langley and JMWAVE.

​McCord was also responsible for heading up counterintelligence against FPCC and Lee H. Oswald. I have found a document which outlines Banister FBI reporting to McCord, McCord was also FBI at one time, this information is apart of my updated book.

Scott Kaiser

Scott, Not quite sure what you mean by "Banister FBI reporting to McCord" ??

Could you clarify that a bit?

Thanks

Bill

Bill, glad you were the only one who caught that, PM me your email and I'll dig up the CIA document and provide you the information so long as you keep this to yourself. This is new information going in my book. With more than one million five hundred thousand documents this was like finding a needle in a haystack. Guess I just got lucky. There are a few Watergate burglars still alive today that also confirmed the information. I mean exactly what I'm saying, Banister did do some reporting to McCord. McCord did head up the counterintelligence against FPCC not Banister.

Scott Kaiser

P.S. You may contact me at scott-kaiser@hotmail.com please title in the subject line "McCord" I'll send you the document under the condition you are not to share this document with anyone, no exceptions.

That's a lot of homework done there Jim. I quickly spotted where you quote Talbot saying "James McCord, [part] of the CIA’s Office of Security, called the case a suicide. (p. 296)". I may be mistaken, but my understanding is McCord wasn't just [part] of Office of Security, but he was Director of Security. McCord was in charge of Security operations at Langley and JMWAVE.

​McCord was also responsible for heading up counterintelligence against FPCC and Lee H. Oswald. I have found a document which outlines Banister FBI reporting to McCord, McCord was also FBI at one time, this information is apart of my updated book.

Scott Kaiser

I know I read this before, and I do believe this statement "Mr. Liebengood left his Senate position" is what confused me.

Yes, my apologies, I don't know where I got that from. I should have re-looked up Liebengood's resume to be correct about his information. I know that during Watergate, I believe he was acting as gathering intelligence or a consultant, or he could have been an acting attorney for the committee. I'm still trying to figure that one out. Do you know his exact position during Watergate? He did interview quite a few in Miami during those days.

Scott

It may sound like a theory of mime regarding my father's involvement in the murder of Duke, but after reading my father's letters over and over, his words begin to sink in, and I understand what my father is saying. Why he opened up to Liebengood about Duke may be his conscience of needing to do so.

Reading his letters that connect his thoughts and his conversations with Liebengood, researching Duke seemed like the right thing to do. I think it's safe to say that what my father was trying to express, is the fact that Duke's murder has been solved, however, it's a little too late to question my father.

In one of his letters he says;

"I met more and more Cubans and got involved in their problems more and more and as I did I understand that to help them in their fight in Cuba would help cut off the head of the snake who is biting us. Who is poisoning our sanity with drugs and drugs lead to pimps and prostitution. The streets in the United States today are a good example, our public parks our young generation. Thank God not all of it, but it is a start that has to be stopped in my mind."

[Who is poisoning our sanity with drugs and drugs lead to pimps and prostitution that has to be stopped in my mind]

Folks, great news! Mr. Roger Stone has agreed to write a foreword for my new, updated book. More than 70 pages has been added for rock solid, indisputable, corroborated, backed by documents for factual evidence to this book. For the first time, Mr. Stone will outline his private conversations he's had with senator majority leader Howard S. Liebengood, detailing the assassination plots conveyed to Mr. Stone regarding President Richard Nixon and those involved behind the plot. This is explosive information. The information he recalls is to the best of Mr. Stone's knowledge, and is now confirmed and backed by documentation. Secondly, Mr. Jesse Ventura may have a few words he would like to say as well.

I welcome these two men, both have been involved and worked with both parties in the corrosive rectum of politics. I look forward to sharing their information culled directly from their own personal experiences.

Upon receiving their information, the book will then go out for publication. Here is but a small sample of well documented information.

My father’s employment history remained a problem in Alaska. He was back in the country he loved so dearly, but was still not a citizen. A secret he kept from his young bride. He was hired doing various odd jobs, but nothing had the longevity or excitement he was seeking. My father secured employment at a nearby corner store, but soon left for lack of excitement. Fortunately, around the same time, he met a manufacturer of silk garments who needed help importing his textiles from Hong Kong. Johnny was his name. Johnny introduced my father to Charles Knuth aka "Duke" who was prexy of his Bail Bonds company.

His bail bond operation had offices in Anchorage, Fairbanks, Juneau and Kenai, with representatives reportedly as far away as Seattle and Tokyo. This may help explain how my father was able to handle imported silk garments that were specifically tailored for pimps and prostitutes. Duke was also favored for sporting his double breasted pin-striped suits, a white Stetson hat and spit shine cowboy boots. Judging by his appearance, the way Duke dressed, you'd think Duke was a bail bondsman by day, and a pimp by night. The one thing my father despised most, drugs, pimps and prostitutes. My father worked in Anchorage and Fairbanks area doing seismographic drilling and driving for an Alaskan bondsman with Chicago Mafia ties to Sam Giancana.

His name is Charles Knuth aka the "Duke". Sam had alleged connections to the CIA in plots to assassinate Fidel Castro. On the night of June 19, 1975. A gunman later entered Giancana's basement kitchen and shot him in the back of the head as he was frying sausage and peppers. After Giancana fell to the ground, the gunman turned him over and shot him six more times in the face and neck. Investigators suspected the murderer was a close friend. With friends like that, who needs enemies? A Chicagoan, Duke had been in Alaska since the mid-fifties, when he was released from prison after serving eleven years for armed robbery according to the newspapers accounts.

It's hard to imagine that Duke ran a company that would cater to bad guy's, hired bad guy's, and had his men chase these bad guy's down those who jumped bail. It's almost ironic to think that an owner of a Bail Bond Company was a hardened criminal himself. Duke claimed he did the time as a favor for friends in the Mafia who paid him for his trouble. Anyone doing eleven years for friends in the Mafia, must be pretty powerful figures. My father began working for this man Duke, and on many occasions, if he wasn't taking measurements of clients, he'd be chasing down criminals who jumped bail. My mom wanted my father to have a better job, she was quite shocked to learn that most of the garments were being outfitted for pimps and prostitutes.

According to my mother, my dad was not all to thrilled about his work either, but it was the only immediate work that he could find. It's almost unbelievable how my father was connected to the Mafia, the CIA, FBI, U.S Customs and the anti-Castro Cubans. If my father could be summed up in three words, I suppose they would be "one man bandstand." He did it all.

A fearless and relentless pursuer of bond jumpers once flew to Puerto Rico to grab a stray customer tracked him down and brought him back to Alaska. Duke was a frontier baron who ran his fiefdom on a very personal basis. If a client couldn't make his payments, he could always indenture himself to a stint wiping down cars at the Splash & Dash which is one way of putting it. I suppose if they weren't working as a booty call for Duke, it would be up to guys like my father to brake a few limbs. In December 1968, Duke was murdered, he was shot three times, once in the head at point blank range, the murder was never solved. It was after Duke's murder that we left for Florida, just two days after Christmas. FBI records show that we moved into Miami 1969, and according to my mother the drive from Alaska to Miami took one week with few stops along the way. I suppose our arrival into Miami would have been around the first of the new year 1969. My father says we left Alaska because I needed an ear operation, truth is, Duke was killed. My father wanted to go to Miami for the adventure he longed for, it wasn't about me, it was about him. Folks didn't live long when around my father.

It's hard to imagine when someone is able to walk on both sides of the street, lingering in the shadows, and playing both sides of the fence, someone who can so easily be this big bad guy, as Mike said, if you get in his way, he'll kick the xxxx out of you. Then, on the whim, be chasing these bad guy's down. I mean, here's my father robbing, killing while in the Legion, and beating up cops, to chasing down criminals of his own kind who jumps bail. I always wondered how my father met Duke, and a more plausible scenario would be while my father was facing some jail time for assaulting an Alaskan State Trooper, Duke could have been the bondsman who bailed my father out.

Someone, killed Duke the same month and year we left Alaska. My father never spoke about Duke's murder until he opened up to Howard Liebengood.

My mother didn't know anything about Duke.

As far as my mother is concerned, my father worked for someone who imported garments from Hong Kong. But, all that was about to change when according to my mother, my father hated his job. I discovered the Liebengood documents regarding my father's relationship with Duke. I began to research Duke's name only to find out that he was in a line of work my father despised most. It appears as though Duke was a Bondsman by day, and a drug pushing pimp by night. I've discovered Duke was murdered at the same time we left for Florida, and his murder was never solved which only raises my suspicion to the possibility that my father had something to do with it.

There are still a lot of inaccuracies. The original plot to infiltrate the White House started in Miami with Hunt. Hunt was able to seize a seat and desk in the White House. Hunt recruited Frank Sturgis, Barker and McCord. These three men never really got over the BOP invasion. In-fact, McCord who was head of Security in the CIA was in charge of Security at Langley and JMWAVE and who was responsible for heading up counterintelligence against FPCC.

Frank recruited Eugenio Martinez and Ed Kaiser who went to the first break-in only who by the way was among the 30 frogmen stationed in Cuba when Nixon shut it all down, Eugenio volunteered after losing his position with the CIA Eugenio brought in Virgilio Gonzalez as the locksmith who could unlock doors and help break-in.

McCord brought in Alfred Baldwin and Gordon Liddy, Baldwin's job was to record the conversation at the DNC. This information if any incriminating evidence could be found by Hunt, McCord or Barker would be used for entrapment by way of extortion for funding another run into Cuba.

These guys didn't know why they were recruited other then they were told the operation was sanctioned by the White House and because Baldwin was Mathia Mitchell's bodyguard, Baldwin could be the guy who is the go between from John Mitchell and having the law on your side as Mitchell was the United States Attorney General. This is why Sturgis was not worried about spending too much time in jail. Sturgis wasn't worried about because he believed that Jack Anderson would testify on his behalf and Frank believed he would only spend a few months in prison in exchanged for the freedom of Cuba. It would have been worth it for Frank.

Than there were the Chilean Embassy break-ins that Frank said he was not involved in, that too is false. Elias Chajet's brother "LEE" who worked with my father also worked at the Embassy, he was the inside man who assisted in those break-ins. Then there was the attempted break-in at Daniel Ellsburg's office which failed, so they tried to discredit him instead, there were also plans to break-in at other democratic senators offices including Ted Kennedy.

These guy's, Baldwin and Mitchell really had no idea what Watergate was about other than they were told it was an operation approved by the White House, after it was all said and done, and if they received the money they needed to recapture Cuba, Frank told Anderson to make sure he got a full page press release.

During Watergate, Frank and my father were both planning the "Sunward Plan", and because they didn't recruit enough men for the job, the plot was scrubbed.

I will be on a national radio talk show explaining why Watergate had to happen, and what Watergate was truly about. And, there was no "Deep Throat" that was a fictional character made up by Bernstein and Woodward to sell their books.

I have become good friends with Eugenio Martinez who told me that their other cover story to break-into Watergate was to find information that Fidel Castro was financing the DNC, but even Eugenio knew it wasn't true.

^Edited..

the day that Lennon was killed was a Cuban-American member of the CIA assassination team, Operation 40. St. John expressed shock upon hearing this and one got the impression that he immediately thought Lennon had been marked for death because of he was a famous outspoken opponent of the Vietnam War.

Everyone already knows that Sam Jenis was Frank Sturgis' handler in Op40. But, it had nothing to do with Vietnam War, and Watergate had absolutely nothing to do with Vietnam either. Douglas, you were acting attorney at Watergate, didn't Hunt ever tell you why Watergate [had to happen], didn't you ever get a chance to talk to Howard Liebengood? Didn't Liebengood ever play any of the tapes he was given by my father? There are so many contradictory statements as to why Watergate happened. Some say, the reason for Watergate is because they wanted to prove a call girl ring, and that these Democrats were hiring these call girls. Liddy couldn't have come up with such a stupid story all on his own, but then again, I wouldn't put it past him. What's even more stupid, are the folks who believed it.

Then there's, the reason for Watergate was to find the photos that connected us Kennedy's assassination, that's even more stupid than the first, because when Frank came out with that story in May 1977, my father was killed in February 1977. Just three months after Frank came out with that story, but what folks don't realize is that Frank, although was shoveling xxxx for folks to swallow, and he [Frank] knew no one would believe him, is because Frank knew those photos weren't at the Watergate building, they were in my father's possession. He had these photo's before he was killed.

But, my all time personal favorite is, the reason we broke into the Watergate Hotel was to prove Fidel Castro was providing funding to the Democratic party. More crap, I wonder if anyone here even knew that Jack Anderson knew all about Watergate before Watergate happened. Like Sturgis said, they just got greedy.

In closing, I can tell you that Watergate had absolutely nothing to do with any of the above, even Elias Chajet who knew Bernard Barker for ten years prior to Watergate knew what Watergate was about, and why it had to happen. It was my father who introduced Chajet to Sturgis. They'd all meet at Barker's office in Miami. Hunt, Barker, Sturgis, Chajet and my father, hell, Anderson would even show up too, and pay Sturgis a great deal of money just to get the scoop on Watergate so it would help catapult his career.

Later, Frank and Anderson would have a falling out, and Frank thought he was doubled-crossed by Anderson, he even called Anderson a bastard, and didn't want to see him anymore, but it wasn't Anderson who double-crossed Frank, it was my father. When Frank was in prison he [Anderson] called Janet, Frank's wife, and told her if she wanted to move up to Washington he would help her out, and give her some money until Frank got out. Anderson didn't double cross Frank, when my father testified behind closed doors with Liebengood in 1973-74 that is when a lot of information my father knew started to surface, but he would only release everything he knew under the condition that he, my [father] would receive Federal and State pardons, and why do you suppose he was asking for pardons? Well, for one thing, my father impersonated a United States Army Officer, as well as CIA, FBI, U.S Customs and a Hialeah police office. He stole government classified document, photos, tapes, index cards from U.S. Customs which he admitted to taking, and he was the sixth burglar in Watergate no one had ever known.

My question to everyone here is, does anyone really know why Watergate [had] to happen?

The use for media, is to not exonerate Oswald, but to make him appear guilty of a crime he didn't commit. The CIA uses the media to disseminate false information, what intelligence calls, propaganda. Can we please established exactly how many stops along the way to Mexico would Oswald's bus have made?

The illusion is, we're to believe Oswald left New Orleans without his wife, and Mrs. Paine, as they both went to Irving TX. and Oswald would travel to Mexico, but there's just one small problem, Antonio Veciana says he sees Oswald, in Dallas, with [Maurice Bishop] aka David Phillips, CIA. If that's not enough to reconsider Oswald's trip to Mexico, then lets take into account what the CIA firmly said, "we have a tape of Oswald calling the Embassy, we have photos of Oswald in Mexico at the Embassy". Now, perhaps, not an exact quote, however, you get the logistics.

You'd think that the single most important piece of evidence, and the nail in the coffin would be Oswald's voice recorded conversation to the Russian Embassy. But, wait a minute, the CIA also has Oswald's photos, and they can prove, without a doubt Oswald was in Mexico. So, the two single most important pieces of evidence are lost, the photos of the mystery man, produced by the CIA, looks nothing like Oswald. And, the tape of Oswald's conversation, well, no one seems to know where it is.

There seems to be a lot of double talk going on in the CIA, I know I heard the tape, but I'm not sure, I seen the tape, but I gave it to the FBI. The FBI has the tape, but I'm not sure where it is. More propaganda.

https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=98919&relPageId=73&search=Ferre

I've read the work that Mr. Joseph has put out on Oswald, and undoubtedly, some of the greatest work I've read thus far regarding Oswald's "alleged" trip to Mexico.

http://www.ctka.net/2014-Josephs/Mexico%20trip_Part%202.html

What's that old saying? Close but no assassination? Mean cigar.

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/20673422/Scan0024%20(2).jpg

Now, I have to ask myself, since my father had these photos and all, did Ferre know anything about the photos my father had? And if so, would that be the reason my father was going to kill him? I think it's time to give Mr. Ferre another call.

When will people start to believe me about the assassination of Kennedy? Scroll all the way to the end, I've uploaded the doc to dropbox.

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/20673422/Lee.png

Okay, I'm no genius, but let's face it. I'm no idiot either, I understand there has got to be some wording to fill the page before getting to the real important part, what some folks like to call facts, but I have just one question. Where do these brainy acts get words like "Dane notes that,"Sean's like an expert plate-twirler". What the hell does plate twirling have to do with anything? Slaps my forehead!

photos and x-rays

What would they show that the Zfilm couldn't?

Here's what I imagine happened.

Too many cooks spoil the broth, if everyone "imagined" what could possibly happen, then everyone would write a book about the assassination, wait a minute, what am I saying? Everyone has.

Why hasn't the conspiracy unraveled?

Says who? You? And what makes you think it hasn't already?

It may be too late for justice, but it is never too late for The Truth

Best logical statement I've read.

This corroborates Junco and Nino Diaz' story who says my father also had Barker's photo.