Sandy Larsen

Just a sample of Juan Cole's anti-Israel anti-American propaganda. (He hates American support for Israel.)

Here's Robert's list:

You're all talking about a figment of the cover-up artists' imagination... a painted on gaping wound in the Z film. Which no one at Parkland hospital saw! You all might want to consider the possibility that the cover-up artists actually did some covering up. Otherwise you'll just continue being fooled by their coverup.

Expect to see Biden come out fighting beginning with his State of the Union address. That has been Biden's strategy all along. First to befriend Netanyahu and gain his ear. The to try and get Netanyahu to reduce collateral killings as much as possible. And finally to demand payback from Israel in the form of their support (or at least tolerance) of two states. Biden has been working behind the scenes for several weeks now trying to get a humanitarian ceasefire. Netanyahu has barely budged and that is why Biden has ordered humanitarian airdrops.

Robert, Ignore the infantile goofballs.

Good luck trying to convince Pat (or any anti-alterationist) of any of what you say, no matter how obvious it is to most of us. Nearly all of the 50 blowout wound witnesses said the wound was on the back of the head, and Pat thinks they are all wrong. It is statistically impossible for that many to be wrong, but Pat's irrational dogma keeps him from being swayed by that.

Click on David's second link. On the page that comes up, click the article named "Meek, Boylan and Bleau JFK Assassination Research Project." This will load a PDF file showing the poll results.

Thanks to all the people who made the poll happen! The results are very interesting.

What's the significance of Boston? I seemed to have missed that.

Shame on those of you who mocked Robert's work. By deleting his OP, Robert has decided not to "cast pearls before swine."

BTW, I'm not a believing Mormon. I believe only what is in the New Testament.

I don't know if you want me to hold off from answering your following question or not. I'm not really concerned with church attendance. It's a personal choice for everybody. But I do want to make a point that seems to favors religion and church attendance: I live in Utah County, which is in central Utah. Although Salt Lake County is technically the center of Mormon leadership, Utah County truly is the center of Mormonism itself. It is where Brigham Young University is located, and it has the highest rate of LDS membership in the country -- 88% I just found. There's an LDS church building every several blocks. I believe that a majority of residents attend church weekly. You get the point... Utah County is VERY religious. Utah County also has one of the lowest crime rates in the country. Utah State as a whole is ranked the fourth safest state, and Utah County is by far the safest heavily-populated county in the state. The point I am trying to make is that it appears that Mormonism has a positive effect on its followers, in terms of lowering their propensity to commit crimes. (Though it also helps that Utah County's poverty rate isn't through the roof... though it's not low either.) Having made my point, I'm not sure that the same can be said for all Christian denominations.

Well shame on that Biden for eating an ice cream cone! Jeez Doug, I can't believe how anti-Biden you have become.

I agree 100%, William.

Pure speculation... Maybe Oswald was removed from the custody of Emil Gardos during one of his legal battles. Maybe when he was deported. FBI didn't know what to do with him, but CIA said hmm, we have some ideas for a Russian speaking kid with no known relatives! P.S. Jim, great find in that newspaper article, about Gardos never having a job. Perfect match for Oswald's "father" described in the FBI report! The more I learn about and think about the FBI report, and related information, the more convinced I'm becoming that you guys have explained the FBI report accurately. The only thing that bugs me about all this is why the boy would have been called Lee Harvey Oswald while he was still being cared for by Gardos. Or, if that wasn't the case, how Elizabeth Bentley knew that the boy was the same person as the later Lee Harvey Oswald.

While it is true that I refer to the contemporary crosswalk lines in my presentation, I at no time considered them when I was doing my analysis. I did my analysis first. After I had concluded that Officer Baker veered to his right, then I wrote the presentation. I was while writing my presentation that I noticed that Baker and the two women crossing the street were following the lines of the contemporary crosswalk. BTW FWIW, of course there was a crosswalk there in 1963. It was unmarked, but people did routinely and legally cross there.

Oops! It turns out I made a mistake in my re-evaluation. Had Baker NOT veered to the right, he would have hit the outer TSBD wall to the east of the mailbox. I was right the first time. And Baker did veer to the right... Alan's evidence-shaping notwithstanding.

This is one of those cases where there is sufficient circumstantial evidence that one can "connect the dots" and arrive at precisely what happened. I love it! If researchers would only open their minds and shape their theories to fit the evidence rather than shaping the evidence to fit their theories, they would discover that it IS possible to discover the facts behind what some believe to be insurmountable mysteries in the case of the JFK assassination.

I did no such thing. I didn't use crosswalk lines to perform my analysis. I merely noticed and noted, after my analysis was completed, that Baker and the two woman followed pretty closely the lines of today's crosswalk. I never claimed that Baker suddenly moved laterally. He was in the process of veering to the right on his last step. So he was still approaching the steps, but not at the same rate as before. And he had turned enough that we don't have a clear view of his butt the way we do of the two women. I just spent some time studying more carefully all the clips I created for my analysis (many of which I didn't use in my presentation) and I will grant you this much: I now agree with you that Baker's initial path -- had he not veered right -- is very close to what is shown in the animated GIF you posted. He would have hit the outside wall of the TSBD right between the east side of the steps and the mailbox area. Again, had he not veered right.

If Oswald's getting a TSBD job really came about the way the official narrative says, then I think the question about the job being available or not is splitting hairs. Not really important. But the fact that the plotters needed the patsy to be working at a designated place for the shooting tells me that the plotters must have had control over the whole process of Oswald getting the job. Since the plotters were likely CIA, I believe that Oswald, Ruth, and Truly (or somebody with a great deal of influence over Truly) were all CIA assets. And that Ruth's handler instructed her to call Truly, Oswald's handler instructed him to do what Ruth told him to do, and that Truly was likewise told. And Oswald got the job that way. (BTW, I believe also that they were all compartmentalized, and didn't know that each other was CIA.) That way they could tell an "innocent" truth about how Oswald got the job, even though it was really the CIA plotters who got the job for him.

No. What I did was look at the Darnell clip carefully and noticed, among other things, that we were looking at Baker's profile, and not his butt side. Which told me that he had veered to his right. The difference between you and me, Alan, is that you shape the evidence to fit your theory whereas I shape my theory to fit the evidence.

What makes you think there wasn't? In any event, people generally know where a crosswalk is without one actually being painted in. They generally don't terminate at a business's front door, but at a sidewalk leading away from the crosswalk. The east edge of the brick road constituting Elm Street Extension served as the western boundary of the natural crosswalk.

Justice ILikeBeer Justice BackStabus Justice Corruptus

Here, I fill in your blanks with bold text: The Israelis are not as piously religious as I had thought, so they are grievously violating the Jewish principle of "an eye for an eye" (exacting punishment that is commensurate with the crime) by killing so many Gazans. (Not to mention violating their religious belief in "loving your neighbor," when it comes to the collateral killing and maiming of Gazans, and causing them to suffer.)

It's not bizarre. He could continue running straight until he's on the sidewalk, and then follow the sidewalk to the intersection. Or he could veer to the right a little early, thus taking a shortcut to the intersection. Which he did. Nothing bizarre in that.