Michael Walton

Bernie is correct. Josephs' semi-literate, incoherent comments show that he doesn't have the ability to think things through in a rational manner. When he's criticised, his first reaction is not to consider that he might be wrong, but to throw angry personal insults around, just like a three-year-old, as we see here. Show him an anomaly in the evidence and he'll automatically attach a conspiratorial explanation to it, no matter how far-fetched. To the angry, frustrated and inadequate tin-foil hat man, everything is a conspiracy, and everyone who says otherwise is seen as attacking him personally.

All of this may or may not meet the clinical definition of paranoia. It's certainly irrational, and it wouldn't surprise me if a mental breakdown is coming. As Bernie points out, Josephs really should get professional help before his mental state gets any worse.

The wider problem with Josephs and people like him is their effect on the public's impression of the JFK debate. Most people would not think it unreasonable in principle to suggest that President Kennedy was killed as the result of a conspiracy, because plenty of political figures have been killed as the result of conspiracies, and it doesn't require a huge and improbable conspiracy to kill a president. But if the claim is that the conspirators not only killed President Kennedy but also faked the Zapruder film for no good reason, faked the Altgens 6 photograph for no good reason, faked the wounds on JFK's body for no good reason, and duplicated Lee Harvey Oswald and his mother over several years for no good reason, the general public would conclude, not unreasonably, that anyone who questions the lone-nut theory is deranged. The tin-foil hat types, such as David Josephs, are exactly what the authorities want the general public to associate with the JFK assassination.

"for no good reason"  

Jeremy... thanks so much for your insightful reply...  

That Mr. W, finds it okay to take the work of others and ridicule it causes you no concern at all...
It's within his "rights" to call out Armstrong, to make fun of the title and mindlessly nod his head whenever any counterpoint is offered...  without reading it or taking any of the time needed to actually understand the results of 10+ years of work.

That the FBI and related agencies altered and destroyed or replaced a huge assortment of evidence is also of no concern to you since you see the conspiracy so clearly and can help others explain the nuances within each area of study.

Just because you don't THINK or BELIEVE something happened due to some limitation with your thought processes doesn't mean it didn't.   Having studied H&L I know for a fact that there are many conflicts with the evidence... many assumptions that are made... I also know there is concrete, irrefutable evidence of the existence of both men concurrently...

Your understanding and study of the Zfilm from 12:30pm until the 26th of Nov leads you to a conclusion does it?
Your understanding of the transportation of JFK from Parkland to Bethesda NEGATES all the work done in the past 50 years to prove the timeline was corrupt and the body terribly altered prior to the 8pm official autopsy start...
... this understanding of yours stand firm simply because you can't find a good reason?  That's pretty pathetic reasoning Jeremy...  maybe try looking at the actual evidence...

You still realize that even Chris Scally who wrote an extensive Zfilm timeline has no answer for what happens to the ROWLEY FILM which was in DC by 2am...  If you can't provide the ocation of the first copy which reaches DC that night... how can you claim anything concrete related to the film?

We saw you wade into the Math Rules thread only to exhibit your disdain for others doing work you don't understand...
and since that time you've only posted in H&L related threads and only to attack those offering the evidence.

Somehow Jeremy, only you and Mike and Bernie get all worked up over being called on your repeated BS within threads... you too are AMAZED that people take the time to study things, to discuss them with peers, to work things thru...

YOU on the other hand are so sure that we are wasting our time and cannot possibly be correct that it's obvious you don't even read or consider any rebuttals...  

We're all so very sorry that you and Mike and Bernie remain so angry with the work of those on these threads....
I call you out since no one else does...  it remains that your little group's lack of intellectual curiosity coupled with your noses so far up Parker's A$Spergers as to not know which end is up - is so painfully obvious to all the regular contributors that suffering the fools has become daily sport.

Us "tin-foil hat" types as you call us continue to find amusing your lack of comprehension of the world around you or the history of the US and world which brings us to this point.  You continue to remain dull and witless while the rest of us paranoid-crazies see the world for what it really is...

=====

Tell ya what Jeremy... point to ANYTHING in the JFK case and prove it's NOT conspiratorial...  that what we see is what it was...  then start a thread so others can see if you have any of the chops necessary to make a single coherent point...

And as if to prove my point...

David only seriously disturbed people take the time you have taken to write the above hysterical paranoia to those you are convinced are "dull and witless". Why would a sane person do that?

"...while the rest of us paranoid-crazies see the world for what it really is..."  Classic outlook of a paranoid schizophrenic with chronic delusions of grandeur.

Get some help before it is too late...