Michael Walton

I concur with Kathy. No missing tooth. Look at the morgue photo of LHO as well. You'd think he had no teeth at all so again the point is the school photo is an illusion. It's disingenious of Larsen to say that other researchers are flakes when he and others who believe in this fake story are the biggest flakes of all. In other words don't call someone a flake when you're a flake yourself.

Although Mary Ferrell has everything that's actually a great idea especially because of the tree branching.

I have a question about that doc that's mentioned in the article where when they're interviewing Helms and when they ask him about LHO's CIA connections and it cuts off. Is that a recently released doc or has it been around? If it's old, on which site is it hosted?

Karl, nice find about the guy standing with his back to the camera outside of the TSBD. The only issue I have is that film seems to have been taken later and if LHO had left to begin his journey to Oak Cliff to meet his contact at the theater, he may not have had enough time to linger like you see in the film. At the same time, it does look like him - he seems to have the general appearance. Here's a screen grab: ...and then here is LHO shortly after arriving at the police station: When you compare the two of the guys' backsides in the above it does appear to be him but we'll probably never know for sure. I also agree with you that the color red pops out more than colors. I vaguely remember reading about it years ago - something to do with the short wavelength of red in the spectrum, causing it to pop in film. You can see it in these films elsewhere too - there was a woman with a red coat on and her red too pops like the Lovelady shirt. There was no photoshopping done, just an FYI But more intriguing is people seem to have a problem believing that the "gorilla" out on the steps is Lovelady. To confirm, it is him. Here's why. Below is a screen grab of the red checkered guy out on the steps: ...and here is the known Lovelady sitting and watching Oswald being brought in. Notice the strand of hair across the bald spot on his head in both photos. This proves that the guy in the station and the guy out on the steps are the same people - Lovelady. But I agree, it is an interesting find in that film of a potential LHO sighting out in front of the building with the fire trucks and so on. And to answer your question about why would they photoshop in the red. My answer would be - why would they, indeed? There's simply no reason for it and what folks don't seem to understand that even if someone tried to do that with 50 year old film, it'd be very noticeable.

Thanks for posting this I'll give it a whirl over the weekend.

Thanks for the much needed comic relief here.

You've done plenty of attacking too, Dave. You're no innocent babe.

You're taking two photos that I took and merely overlaid. That's all. And now look how desperate you are - it's contrast! It's this! It's that! Talk about desperate!

Yes I've read plenty. Plenty where I've seen you support weirdness like the films were faked, this was faked, that was faked, and this story. In your mind everything is faked. Do you even believe what you see in the mirror or do you think it's a big boogey man staring back at you LOL You think that just because you've been published on Kennedys and King you're somehow an expert. The only thing I think you wrote well about is how LHO was not in MC. That's all. Then I saw you supporting the 67% solution, this goofy xxxxing story and many more and I thought - whew...this guy's a paranoid.

Ha funny Dave - funny how you made an LHO photo green...as in the little green monsters you see running around under your bed at night in your tinfoil covered walled bedroom. LOL

For crying out loud, Dave! It's the same person! Or have you found a few more little monsters running around under the bed in your tinfoil covered walled bedroom! LOL

Sigh...it's the same person Jim. For crying out loud!

Bad news. This was on today's WAPO home page... The records, held by the National Archives and Records Administration, could shed more light on Lee Harvey Oswald’s six-day trip to Mexico City, when he met with Cubans and Soviets two months before he shot John F. Kennedy in Dallas. Question....how would they know this without first seeing the docs? Nothing we want revealed is going to be released.

Once again as Tracy pointed out, a woman back then gets a little insurance money, buys and sells some homes, profiting on them - a perfectly reasonable and plausible event in one's life - but it's still not enough for the HL crazies to look at it for what it is. Their cult leader Armstrong even wrote these very numbers in HIS research - haha! OMG! And yet they keep whaling away with bits and pieces of testimony to show she was destitute. What a joke. You can go to any inflation calculator online and punch in $10k for 1947 and it comes to $92k in today's dollars. A week's worth of groceries back then cost $15 bucks. Do the math! But nope. The crazies keep at it - "Oh look! Someone in the WC testimony said this or that." Want to hear something funny? The HL crazies believe EVERYTHING has been faked in this case. Everything! And yet, here they are cherry-picking the very testimony that the government put up - and NONE of them believe in - to suit this absolutely ridiculous and funny (yet sad too) theory. Meanwhile, I also put up a head shot comparison. Keep in mind the young Oswald photo is supposed to be the HL crazies' clone and then the mug shot is the other. Birds tweet...crickets chirp. Not a single reply except Larsen saying "You do know that that's a line drawing." I was like - WTF?! Anyone with sense and decent eye sight can tell these photos are of the same person. Nope. Not for the crazies.

Tracy agreed. The numbers that Armstrong came up with for her income show she did quite well. It appears that when you're able to turn the tables on the evidence Team HL resort to school yard tactics. That's pretty much all they have left. And I'm still waiting for the big reveal of their funny theory on 60 Minutes. LOL

http://wtracyparnell.blogspot.com/2017/04/marguerites-finances.html?m=1 Amazingly Tracy debunks the HL story with Armstrong's own research. What none of the HL supporters realize is the money she made back then is huge in today's dollars. KUDOS to Tracy for bringing more truth out of the shadows.

Jeremy truly excellent research on this. Proving without a shadow of doubt.

Based on the animated GIF above it's hard to believe anyone would think those are two different people. But as is the case here, stranger things have happened.

I agree. The same LHO in the military and in Dallas. The same eye brows, nose, curled ears, narrow jaw leading to the pointed chin. It's all there. No clone. PS - this is a large animated GIF. Give it time to load.

Sandy, I'm just trying to prevent new people here from falling too far down the HL rabbit hole. If we didn't argue the merits here, then there could be a lot of suckers who could fall for the story without hearing the merits of both sides. As a matter of fact, these photos could actually be a great starting point for newbies to begin then work their way back. The reason is simple - unlike the many, many fallacies of the HL story, which is based on a misinterpretation of the written record, coaching witnesses (e.g., buttering them up by calling them sweetheart), cherry picking and sheer dishonesty (after all, the story needs to be kept up so Armstrong hopes to continue to sell his book and disks for $60), these three photos are documented proof that the exhume photo, the military photo, and the HS photo show that Lee Harvey Oswald had a full set of front teeth. Then, newbies can read both sides of the story and make their determination.

This is not adding to this HL narrative but a pretty interesting photo of LHO in the background when Marion Morrison visited a USMC base in Japan. The same skinny frame, the slightly pushed in shape of the head and that unmistakable mop of hair on his head.

Nothing "grew" Jim. It's the same tooth in the skull and traces back to the same person you see in the smiling soldier photo, and on back to the smiling HS photo, and probably all other photos that can be dug up in between showing his front teeth. The "look here" class photo that HL supporters use to show a missing tooth is simply too blurry and at too odd of an angle to make a determined analysis of.

Totally understand, Sandy, that you say (or think) that the pictures I'm talking about are HARVEY. What I and others are saying is that they show Lee Harvey Oswald.

Jim 1 + 1 + 1 = 3. As in the above HS photo, the smiling soldier photo, and the exhume photo. All showing the same LHO with teeth intact. There's no other way around it.

I am posting this here as an alternative to the Russia gate hysteria. https://consortiumnews.com/2017/09/29/russia-gates-shaky-foundation/