Joe Bauer

6 hours ago, Douglas Caddy said:

• 

HA HA HA!

Great one Doug !

DM, I see.

Thanks for the correct ID information.

No need to personally insult me for being uniformed.

8 minutes ago, Ty Carpenter said:

Amen, Joe. These lockdowns are the result of little tyrants flexing their power over the common man. I'll bet you Newsom is nice and cool somewhere today. Remember this during voting time, whether it be for local dog catcher, council member, governor or president.

Ty, I agree with much of the lockdown program.

However, here our fresh ocean air beaches were providing cooling physical relief and clearly calming "psychological" stress relief for tens of thousands of people, many driving over 100 miles from inner state cities like Stockton, Modesto, etc...to give their families this needed relief.

Our beaches are big enough to provide much distancing.

Shutting them down during this incredibly stressful time of heat waves and massive fires is wrong imo.

I have seen pictures of L.A. area beaches where it seemed hundreds of thousands were congregating. Different situation by far here with one tenth that amount.

There is a provocative claim cited more than a few times in some of these expert or high position military and scientific community witnesses UFO/Alien presence and technology testimonial expose documentaries that always catches my interest.

Here is a general paraphrasing...

The average person has no clue. That whatever you think is our most advanced technologies, we are 50 years ahead of that curve already.

Star Trek type stuff. 

I personally believe these claims more so than not.

Yet, I also believe that if we have developed these super advanced technologies, their ownership has created separated governmental power and control agencies that do not adhere to or abide by our democratic/constitutional constraints or oversight.

This super advanced stuff we have discovered, developed and probably use for secret agendas...is just too much for the little people ( 99% of us ) to deal with and too important to risk uninformed public demands for it's sharing. 

And we can't let other governments have this technology either. 

My guess is these new super advanced and secret technology breakthroughs create separate governments. They have to to maintain control of them.

121 degrees in Woodland Hills just North of Los Angeles yesterday. Highest temperature ever recorded there.

115 in Hollister, CA ( location of the early Marlon Brando film "The Wild Ones") yesterday. 111 in Morgan Hill. 112 in Big Sur Saturday. 111 in Sacramento Saturday.

Heat wave in Kansas right now as well.

Death Valley, CA will reach 125 today.

You could literally fry eggs on sidewalks and car hoods here in California this weekend. Grapes left out would be raisins in 3 days.

Road kill mummified.

Check out the newsreel footage of the 200 campers trapped in surrounding fire at Big Bear Lake California and rescued by huge helicopters. They had to leave their vehicles behind!

And here on the Monterey Peninsula, the cities closed all their beaches this weekend!

They feared too many people would flock there and ignore social distancing. They even blocked off all the parking above the beaches!

HEY, the beaches are not "owned" by the cities! They are "public" spaces, owned by every citizen.

With this suffocating heat wave, thousands ( especially families with children ) have only one place to find cool breeze relief...the beaches.

Up here, no out of the ordinary Covid outbreaks have been documented from beach visiting. We don't have the crowds of L.A.

This is the first time I have flat out disagreed with government over-reactions to the Covid situation.

At least let suffering thousands take advantage of the fresh, cool ( and clean virus free ) air the beaches provide.

It's been reported that David Phillips made a death bed confession to his surviving brother that he (David) was in Dallas on 11,22,1963.

Contradicting his long time claim that he wasn't.

His brother was very upset about this confession from what I remember reading about the death bed meet up.

4 hours ago, Richard Booth said:

I pretty much agree with all that Joe.

The only scenario I can think of where we have Oswald taking these pictures is this scenario where he is painting himself as a radical or a militant as part of some sort of "cover" -- it would be a scenario that corresponds to what he was doing in New Orleans with the FPCC flyers and subsequent radio debate.

He takes the pictures and he wants to use them as evidence he's a Castro-loving communist radical. So in the conspiratorial scenario here we can imagine that Oswald's "handler" -- whomever is directing the FPCC actions, most likely -- 

Wasn't David Phillips the highest person directing the FPCC front?

On 9/6/2020 at 3:29 AM, Benjamin Cole said:

"Here's a question: assuming the photographs are real, what do we think Oswald was doing in posing for these? Why would he do that? Holding some newspapers to say "look I'm a Communist" and holding guns to say "look I'm violent" ?  It really doesn't make any damn sense in the context of "they're real", does it? The only way it makes sense is that they're phony and designed to incriminate."

 

-----

The backyard photos may be "real," along with the documents and photos regarding the General Walker shooting, and parts of Oswald's Mexico City jaunt. Oswald was willfully writing and docuenting the biography of a left-ing nut. In truth, Oswald was a CIA asset.  

I suspect Oswald was part of CIA "Northwoods"-type project, a phony JFK assassination attempt. Someone piggybacked on the operation, and shot JFK for real.  This left Oswald as the patsy.

Why Oswald would take such photos ( which couldn't be more incriminating ) will always be one of my main suspicion questions regarding his role in the JFK event.

The more you try to understand why Oswald would create these and keep them so close and findable and even write "Hunter Of Fascists" on one the more you are compelled to rationally consider them as a calculated part of a set up.

Oswald exhibits enough intelligence in his background and verbal engagement with others to indicate he wasn't a typical dim witted, dumb crime planning idiot.

Even the dumbest of major caper planning criminals would know not to take pictures of themselves ahead of time holding the weapons they knew they would be using in these and then keep them close and findable.

Oswald's reported personal interests included Russian language study, Russian opera listening, regularly visiting libraries and bringing home and reading books, reading newspapers, planning and carrying out world travel itineraries, learning Radar operations in the Marines, photography, using what Buell Wesley Frazier described as a vocabulary over his head and those of his TXSBD lunch room co-workers and an ability to keep a decent conversation going for at least awhile with the erudite Michael Paine and George de Mohrenschildt.

Elitist Michael Paine did dismiss Oswald later in his testimony as an uneducated fool however. 

Yet, the taking of the BYPs and leaving them laying around belies the intelligence we have been told Oswald possessed and that he used and exhibited in his odd adventures including New Orleans Pro-Castro public activism, his radio and television debate appearance there, his trip to Mexico City, his covert Alex Hidell alias effort and even his public statements made ( often shouted ) in that crazy Dallas PD room to room to-and-fro hustling through wall-to -wall crammed crowds of question yelling reporters.

Through all of this reported and recorded Oswald behavior, comments and actions, which displayed more intelligence than a typical dumb criminal, I ask you ... do you think Oswald was just that stupid, inept and/or naive to create something as incriminating as the BYPs?

Oswald is in such a unique background, activity and mental make up place versus all other 20th century high figure assassins imo.   

One that is simply...too unique.

Most all those others were mentally ill stupid. Not world traveled.

Oswald just didn't come close to that kind of common bond craziness in his regular life and role of husband and father and social engagement that was admittedly very limited but still open and offered to those who he felt could carry on a decent political philosophy discussion.

So much of Oswald's reported behavior, actions and words contradicts the dumb criminal profile to such an improbable degree ( the laughably incriminating BYPs ) that in it's totality suggests a promoted false reality historical portrait of him imo. 

Good question.

Steve...the current statistics of ethnic make up of California's entire population are:

Hispanic 39%. White 37%. Other non-white 24%.

California's Population - Public Policy Institute of ...

1 hour ago, Mark Stevens said:

2018 Military Demographics

Then the 43% figure is way way off?

43 % of our military enlisted ranks are black?

Really?

It's that high versus white, Hispanic and Asian?

That's a remarkable number.

Especially considering blacks only make up 13.4 % of our population.

Hispanic 18% and white 60.1%.

I just accessed the link to the "Mirror" article on Nurse Hall.

According to this article Nurse Hall did indeed describe the bullet she claims she saw with the details you mentioned.

Can't help but consider her story with a little more doubt than before this information. However, I still don't think the bullet description discounts her bullet observation account entirely.

20 minutes ago, Bill Fite said:

Thanks.... surely the ever-vigilant Ruth Paine or Marina would have noticed Oswald's 3-5 hour absence from the house since he would have had to walk or take the bus.

Walking or taking a bus 6 and 1/2 miles ... with his rifle in hand?

Owned didn't own a typical rifle carrying case.

He wrapped/stored his rifle in a blanket.

When he took his rifle to General Walker's residence and retrieved it later after burying it after the shooting that night, same question.

A man carrying a long rifle while daytime walking in public or sitting on a city bus was still a suspicious arousing thing back in 1963.

Armed showdown at Churchill Downs?

Have you seen the reports ( with images) of opposing black and white heavily armed militia looking political protest groups both converging on Kentucky's Churchill Downs race track during the Kentucky derby today?

It's almost surreal in it's ominous threat connotations!

Look at the full military combat dress and weaponry these groups have adorned themselves with!

High powered automatic rifles, bullet proof vests, fatigues, waiters, gloves...???

It looks like a movie set scene where a full military civil war type confrontation is about to take place.

How much closer to actual violence is this meet up encouraging? With all that deadly and powerful weaponry facing each other...one nut case firing could trigger a battle with hundreds dead and wounded?

The feds should stop this buildup immediately. They should be sending troops in to calm and disburse such a battle ready and risky situation like this?

Trump obviously doesn't think stopping these build ups before they explode is necessary. But he is wrong. It is not irrational to wonder if he wants this kind of confrontation to occur to scare tens of millions of citizens into such fear, they will blindly vote for the most law and order claiming party and candidates, which is always the Republicans.

What crazy, chaotic, dangerous times we are in...TRUMP times.

A best friend from my high school days ( 50 to 54 years ago!) was in town yesterday. He lives in Virginia but grew up here in this small town on the California Coast 125 miles South of San Francisco.

We talked about old times of course. And so many other things such as family, what other old friends are up to, our current lives, our similar health problems, etc.

I know that my friend is of the FOX NEWS / Trump is great persuasion and as many here know I am on the opposite side of the political spectrum. 

But throughout our yearly or semi-yearly meet ups, we have enough maturity and such a strong respectful and appreciative innocent high school bond friendship, that the subject of politics rarely comes up. We just don't go there.

However, we couldn't avoid discussing the pandemic.

And immediately my friend suggested that the actual death numbers are highly exaggerated. He repeated sound bites I have heard on FOX NEWS many times.

When I didn't respond to his claim that much of the Covid-19 story and death count is exaggerated ( except to stare down and away with obvious disagreement ) he then asked me..."be honest...have you actually known anyone who has gotten the virus?"

When I said "oh yes, my nephew and his wife" he looked surprised.

I told them they both suffered a lot but got through it apparently.

I told him my nephew was a strong believer of the Covid-19 hoax story himself "before" he was afflicted.

Now, this nephew no longer post this sentiment on his social network pages at all. This nephew is a vet like my friend, and even lives in a heavy military presence state next to my friend on the East Coast.

Right after telling my friend about my nephew, I couldn't restrain my political thoughts for a second more and half joked with him " Purvis, I kind of believe the reported death numbers from Covid."  Then to his offended silence stare...I said meekly and almost apologetically (for sake of our remarkable 54 year long friendship)   "y'all know I'm a flaming liberal...right?"

No similarly friendship appreciative answer back. Just a blank stare...or glare?

We kind of cut short our meet up at that point. The Trump subject situation has that effect.

GD.

I do not recall Nurse Hall describing the bullet, such as a ... pointed tip?

Is there another interview of her where she says this?

And my gosh, the shock of everyone responding to the arrival of the President of the Untied States in such a destroyed condition would make asking them to correctly and fully remember the actual names of all the doctors and nurses and others crowding into that dinky Trauma Room 1 ( or the entire Trauma Room area ) would be an impossible task.

The doctor's focus would have been hyper-fixed on the President who laid before them.

Dr. Jenkins mentioned clearly he couldn't remember who all was in that room during the chaos. Jenkins mentions that 3 nurses present might have been "student nurses?"

Student nurses?  Preposterous!   

That Trauma Room 1 scene would be the last place and time a supervising nurse would tell her students..."ladies, come on in and see the President."

Only the top experience nurses would even be called to assist in that tiny room.

Nurse Hall herself says most of her time in the room, she was pressed flat against the wall due to the crush of so many people in there.

Nurse Hall does get some details wrong. Easy to see this.

I do think she has some "cross/reference" mis-recollections.

Mixing things she may have read or heard after the event with what she actually saw in person.

However, imo she gets enough right in her story to convince me she "was" in Trauma Room 1 when JFK was in there. Even if only briefly.

One detail which was corroborated word for word by Doctor Jenkins was his description of JFK's color while he was on the Trauma Room table - "cyanotic" ... a purplish cyanosis. Nurse Hall also uses the medical term "cyanotic" but says it was grey blue.

If Nurse Hall has made up her recollection of a bullet on JFK's stretcher, my guess is she has received some criticism for doing so.

I wonder what she has to say about such criticism, especially whether she has again recollected something mistakenly due to cross referencing memories of other observations from later reports?

I've gotten details wrong about recollections from 50 years ago many times. Yet, on the other hand I have gotten the main story perfectly correct many times as well.

Trump is getting HAMMERED over this reported slander of fallen American soldiers.

There are two men walking side by side in the photo.

I'll admit that the more visible man closest to the viewer wearing what looks like a suit or darker top doesn't strike me as a clearly strong Oswald look-a-like, but what about the shorter fellow behind him? Looks like he is wearing a light top, maybe even a T-shirt?

With all the photos being taken between the grassy knoll and the TXSBD building in the minutes after the shooting, you'd hope that one of these may have been snapped of the area and at the exact time that Roger Craig says he saw an Oswald look-a-like running down the grass and getting into a Rambler station wagon. But, alas, no such luck.

Wow. Getting this last picture up was worth the wait.

I couldn't make out a thing in the full picture, but this blow up is really intriguing.

There's the "trench coat/head scarf lady" again, walking over to the knoll side of Elm. She really gets around.

30 minutes ago, Larry Hancock said:

I worked in person with Anna Marie's collection for a good while in the 90's, and I actually have that photograph you refer to...it shows a man resembling Oswald going down the East side of the knoll, however he appears to be walking close to or with another man.  I had it blown up to the extent I could at that time but it certainly was not clear enough for me to say more than the individual did resemble Oswald.

 

 

 

So Larry, the photo you saw shows a man who you feel resembles Oswald "walking" close to another man going down the East Side of the knoll?

Heading to Elm street?

Not running?

It's at least somewhat intriguing that the figure in the photo does resemble Oswald. 

Since this particular photo has possibly great importance, I'm surprised no one has asked Ms. Walko to have a copy to post in venues like our research forum.

20 minutes ago, Jeff Royle said:

James,

It appears to me that we pretty much know the "why" JFK was assassinated and we know the "how" as well.  In your opinion, what is it everyone is still waiting for?  

The most important question of all ... the who.

1 hour ago, W. Niederhut said:

Was it, perchance, an orange-headed New Jersey sap sucker?

Typical Trump MO when he says something that is so inappropriate or demeaning and disrespecting that it creates national outrage.

The very next day he goes  ALL CAPS TWEET BANANAS either claiming the comments attributed to him are total lies ( like this WWI soldier blurb) or his huge wag-the-dog propaganda machine creates a massive all out alternate reality media damage control counter blitz.

Regards Trump's crazy vote twice proclamation, dozens of Trump mouthpieces ran out to the cameras and appeared on political TV shows pushing the same desperate damage control line ...

uh...uh... He ( Trump) didn't actually mean to suggest his supporters vote twice this November 3rd which is a crime! He really didn't. No sir... no sirree.

Although that is "exactly" what their fearless leader said. 

Uh... what he "meant" was that they should just check to see if their mail in votes for him were actually registered. ... oh...Uh Huh!

And if hundreds of thousands if not millions of Trump's voters actually did what Trump asked them to do, and went down to polling places and tied up poll workers time and energy and effort checking their mail in votes, this would be a deliberate act of impeding the legal voting process for citizens actually there to vote in person.

So, this Trump vote twice suggestion is really one of voter rights suppression via tying up voting centers with frivolous time consuming demands blocking legitimate voters ability to do so. Isn't that another crime as well?  Should be.

If the actual 6th floor found rifle and scope was never used in re-creation simulation tests, any results realized by using other rifles are totally invalid imo.

Pretty simple scientific logic.