Micah Mileto

The official story can be two or three shots, right? With the third shell casing being a chamber plug and the third loud report being the reverberation from the head shot?

DVP knows the sketchiness of specifying one or more specific exit points. Too parietal and the skull photos make zero anatomical sense. Too frontal and the pathologists kept it secret.

Nobody from the autopsy ever recognized the red spot as anything significant. Most suggested that it could be clotted blood. Boswell explained that it could indeed be A wound, but not THE wound. See here: http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/25200-i-was-a-teenage-jfk-conspiracy-freak/?do=findComment&comment=386609 And here for more info: https://www.reddit.com/r/AlternativeHistory/comments/9mrjri/multiple_shooters_in_the_jfk_assassination/ Hair could be covering the real wound.

deleted

"Anyway, since we can easily see (in the "red spot" autopsy photo) that JFK's head entry wound was, indeed, higher than Boswell's "dot" on the face sheet, then the "arrow" pointing upward is--actually--quite accurate. " -1984

I think the upwards-pointing arrow indicates a proposed upwards trajectory from the small head wound to the large head wound or beveled exit thereof. More information from the autopsy implies that the autopsy pathologists understood that a connection between the small "entrance" and large "exit" head wounds required an upwards bullet path. Sibert and O'Neill's 2:00 AM 11/23/1963 memo (https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=680) summarizes the preliminary autopsy findings as "TOTAL BODY XRAY AND AUTOPSY REVEALED ONE BULLET ENTERED BACK OF HEAD AND THEREAFTER EMERGED THROUGH TOP OF SKULL. PIECE OF SKULL MEASURING TEN BY SIX POINT FIVE CENTIMETERS LATER FLOWN IN FROM DALLAS HOSPITAL AND XRAYS BETHESDA DISCLOSED MINUTE METAL FRAGMENTS IN THIS PIECE WHERE BULLET EMERGED FROM SKULL". The autopsy report says "Upon reflecting the scalp multiple complete fracture lines are seen to radiate from both the large defect at the vertex and the smaller wound at the occiput. ". The supplemental autopsy report refers to a tissue sample of the scalp around the wound as "occipital". An upwards bullet path is exactly what the Rydberg drawings depict. During Humes' WC Testimony, Allen Dulles even questions the proposed upwards angle, to which Humes replies that the angle may be a little more even because the skull fragment with outward beveling could not be perfectly matched to it's former place within the skull. But any portion of skull in the right parietal bone would be higher than the EOP, and the autopsy pathologists said the wound was only slightly above the EOP. Boswell explained that this red spot may be a tear in the scalp related to the large defect. Humes and Boswell HSCA 3/11/1978: https://web.archive.org/web/20160407...nfo/hscv7f.htm Dr. PETTY. What is this opposite--oh, it must be, I can't read it--but up close to the tip of the ruler, there you are two centimeters down. Dr. BOSWELL. It's the posterior-inferior margin of the lacerated scalp. Dr. PETTY. That's the posterior-inferior margin of the lacerated scalp? Dr. BOSWELL. It tore right down to that point. And then we just folded that back and this back and an interior flap forward and that exposed almost the entire--I guess we did have to dissect a little bit to get Dr. HUMES. To get to this entrance, right? Dr. BOSWELL. But not much [...] Boswell ARRB 2/26/1996: http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/russ/testimony/boswella.htm Q. I'd like to draw your attention to in the color photograph the round, reddish marking just to the right of the ruler, very near the top of the ruler. A. Yes. Q. Could that round or ovular-shaped marking be the entrance wound? A. No. Q. What is that, if anything, that round or ovular-shaped marking? A. I think it's the--this is awfully near the front of the scalp fragment here, and here is a laceration up here with complete separation. And when-- Q. You're referring there to the very top of the scalp-- A. Just under the fingers that's holding the scalp up. And if you let--when you let this fall down, in one of the previous photographs-- Q. I'm sorry. Just for the record, you're letting the scalp fall down towards the back and cover where the ruler would be? A. Yes. If you let that fall down, then this would be right in the midline and that line that you asked me about where the tissue was separated but not completely separated. And I think this is probably the other side of that traumatic disfigurement of the scalp. Q. If I understood you correctly, were you saying that that marking that we've been pointing to that is near the top of the ruler and somewhat to the right might be the beginning or at least part of the laceration in the scalp? A. Yes. That's occurring from beneath with laceration up here with complete separation. And when-- Q. You're referring there to the very top of the scalp-- A. Just under the fingers that's holding the scalp up. And if you let--when you let this fall down, in one of the previous photographs-- Q. I'm sorry. Just for the record, you're letting the scalp fall down towards the back and cover where the ruler would be? A. Yes. If you let that fall down, then this would be right in the midline and that line that you asked me about where the tissue was separated but not completely separated. And I think this is probably the other side of that traumatic disfigurement of the scalp. Q. If I understood you correctly, were you saying that that marking that we've been pointing to that is near the top of the ruler and somewhat to the right might be the beginning or at least part of the laceration in the scalp? A. Yes. That's occurring from beneath with the explosion of the bullet.

Aren't you "skeptical" of the autopsy diagram that shows a literal arrow pointing upwards next to the dot representing the entry wound in the back of the head? https://i.imgur.com/nba1W2V.png If all the evidence points directly at Oswald, then where the heck was Oswald? NO TAKEBACKSIES

Your post on Bowers is missing the information from Beyond The Fence Line. And IMO the best evidence for multiple shooters begins with evidence for shots from behind, a la Connally's statements, EOP wound, etc.

Is it true that the uncropped original color back wound photos show the cranium empty with a gloved hand reaching down into the head? In that case, the BOH photos only show intact scalp, not skull. And it would probably imply the scalp was peeled back before the taking of the photographs.

What a peculiar mock-up.

This whole website is full of JFK images I am not sure the origin of. Like this image: https://the-eye.eu/public/concen.org/JFK John F Kennedy Assassination Research Archive (2016)/pics/JFK pics/020 JFK.jpg

That's what I thought at first.

Havean't seen much discussion on his image. Where does this image place the 7 spokes/8 spokes umbrella debate?

Perry said Humes called Friday night. John Stringer and John Ebersole clearly described contact with Dallas on the night of the autopsy. Which was also indicated in Manchester's 1967 book TDOAP.

It couldn't have been very obvious to Kennedy's autopsy pathologists if they chose to examine the chest with a y-incision to find the bullet that entered the back rather than examine the neck above it. And then there's all the evidence that the autopsy pathologists were aware bullet damage in the throat on the night of the body examination, but lied and claimed they weren't aware until the neck day. Why would they choose to lie about that?

Robert Croft, Hugh Betzner, and Phillip Willis all orient the first loud report as coming at about this time of z190-224, using the photographs they snapped as reference points.

CE 399 and CE 567 reportedly matched the markings of two FBI test-fired bullets from the rifle in evidence. Microscopic photos of the markings were shown in the WC Volumes. CE 567 was examined in the 90's and found to contain blood, skin and muscle tissue. How could that be a plant?

That interpretation would be nullified if the small circular indention/spot of matter is proven to be the left parietal foramen.

BTW, this area in the several versions of this image available appears to be some kind of indention rather than a circular spot of matter laying on top.

IMO the diagram marked on the night of the autopsy fits better with a "slightly above the EOP".

If you don't think the statements of the autopsy participants pertain to physical evidence, isn't at least the face sheet diagram physical evidence? That one is stained in blood. It shows the small head wound too low to fit a scenario with all damage to the head being caused by a 6.5 round from the Sixth Floor. It even has a little arrow pointing up next to the dot, indicating that the upwards bullet path required was understood on the night of the autopsy.

The post I linked is nothing but that.

I know the times he did, and I know the times he went back to saying it was "slightly above". Finck was not at Humes and Boswell's interview with the HSCA. You may want to see this reddit post for a compilation of EOP wound information: https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/8qbocn/there_were_multiple_shooters_in_the_jfk/